Skip to main content

Table 5 Attitudes towards the implementation of a measurement system of infections in ICUs

From: Prevention of ventilator-associated pneumonia in intensive care units: an international online survey

 

Weighted estimates for Europe (respondents from 16 countries with >=10 replies)

Other respondants (66 countries)

N=1281

N=449

Agree strongly/ agree

Disagree/ disagree strongly

Agree strongly/ agree

Disagree/ disagree strongly

%

95% CI

%

95% CI

%

95% CI

%

95% CI

    

To what extent do you agree with the following comments

If you cannot measure it, you cannot improve it

83

80

85

11

9

13

84

80

87

11

8

14

Monitoring of VAP related measures stimulates quality improvement

93

91

94

2

1

3

97

94

98

1

0

3

VAP-related measures in my ICU (if any) are reliable

54

51

58

12

10

15

66

61

70

8

6

11

I am willing to implement, or support, a VAP data collection system

84

81

86

4

3

6

92

89

94

1

0

3

Clinical diagnosis of VAP is difficult: this makes measurement systems unreliable

46

43

50

32

29

36

43

38

47

36

32

41

There is a difference between a definition of VAP for reporting, and a diagnosis of VAP for treatment

45

42

49

32

28

35

46

41

50

30

26

35

Please indicate what actions would facilitate the implementation of a measurement system of infections in ICUs

Timely feed-back of data at ICU level

92

90

94

1

1

2

96

93

97

0

0

2

Administrative support

88

86

90

2

1

3

95

92

97

1

0

2

Dedicated software / IT resources

91

89

93

2

1

3

92

89

94

0

0

2

Reliable data

95

93

96

1

0

2

96

94

98

0

0

1