From: Antimicrobial stewardship in long term care facilities: what is effective?
References, infection | Design | Interventions | Outcomes |
---|---|---|---|
Pneumonia | |||
Naughton, 2001 [10] US | Randomized, controlled; 10 LTF | 1. Small group consensus process for guideline development with physician/nurse practitioners. | 1. No differences in antimicrobial use consistent with guidelines between two randomized groups. |
Facilities randomized to physician/nurse practitioner intervention only, or multidisciplinary (registered nurses/LPN’s). | |||
2. In a pre/post analysis: | |||
a) Pre/post parenteral antibiotics meeting guidelines 50% vs 81.8% (p = 0.06) for multi-disciplinary group and 65% vs 69% (p = 0.73) for physician/practitioners. | |||
2. Nurses: 1 hour training session on guidelines. | |||
3. Laminated pocket cards summarizing guidelines. | |||
b) No change in 30 day mortality or hospitalization. | |||
4. Laminated posters with guidelines by telephone. | |||
Linnebur, 2011 [11] US | Non-randomized: 8 intervention homes, 8 control homes. | 1. Optimized immunization, diagnostic testing at facility level. | 1. Optimal antibiotic use pre/post: intervention 60% vs 66%; control 32% vs 39% (NS). |
2. Interactive educational sessions for NH staff to improve vaccination rates and nursing assessment skills. | |||
2. Duration of antibiotics, no difference. | |||
3. Antibiotics within 4 hours: 57% → 75% vs 38% → 31% (p < 0.001) | |||
3. Study liaison nurse to facilitate change. | |||
4. Academic detailing to physicians | |||
Urinary tract infection | |||
Loeb, 2005 [12] Canada | Cluster randomized: 24 NH | 1. Diagnostic & treatment algorithm for urinary infection. | 1. Antimicrobial courses for suspected urinary infection: 1.17 vs 1.59/1,000 resident days– difference - 0.49 (−0.93, -0.06) |
2. Small group interactive sessions for nurses using case scenarios - video-tapes of sessions, written material, continuing outreach visits. | |||
2. Total antimicrobial use: 3.52 vs 3.93/1,000 days difference −0.37 (−1.17, 0.44) | |||
3. One on one interviews with physicians. | |||
4. Pocket cards and posters with algorithms. | |||
Zabarsky, 2008 [13] US | Pre/post: single LTCF | 1. Education of nursing staff to discourage urine cultures in absence of symptoms. Pocket cards with criteria for cultures. | In 6 months after intervention: |
1. Inappropriate urine cultures: 2.6 → 0.9/1000 (p < 0.04) | |||
2. Treatment of ASB: 167.1 → 117.4/1000 pt-days (p = 0.0017) | |||
3. Total antimicrobial days: 167.7 → 117.4/1,000 pt days (p < 0.001) Reductions maintained for 7 to 30 months while intervention continued. | |||
2. Education of physicians/nurse practitioners re current guidelines not to treat ASB and adverse effects of antibiotics. Pocket cards for diagnosis and treatment of symptomatic urinary infection. | |||
3. Posters at computer stations used by nurses/primary care physicians. | |||
4. Follow-up educational sessions semi-annually by infection control nurse with case based feedback of inappropriate practices. | |||
Rummukainen, 2012 [14] Finland | Pre/post; 25 primary care hospitals, 39 NH | 1. Visit of team to facility with education: structured interview of individual patients, review of systemic antimicrobials, diagnostic practices for UTI. | Proportion of patients receiving antibiotic prophylaxis for UTI: 13% in 2005 → 6% in 2008 (p < 0.001) |
2. Regional guidelines developed and published. | |||
3. Annual questionnaire to reinforce guideline consistent use of antibiotics. |