Skip to main content
Download PDF

Comparison of subsequent infection in methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus nasal carriers between ST72 community-genotype and hospital genotypes: a retrospective cohort study

Antimicrobial Resistance & Infection Control volume 6, Article number: 60 (2017) Cite this article

Abstract

Background

Carriage of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) is an important risk factor of subsequent infection. The purpose of our study was to compare the rates of subsequent infection among newly-admitted patients carrying MRSA between community-genotype and hospital-genotypes

Methods

In this retrospective cohort study, we compared the rates of subsequent MRSA infection, time to subsequent infection and mortality in the following 6 months between the community-genotype ST72 MRSA cohort and the hospital-genotypes ST5 / ST239 MRSA cohort.

Results

We identified 198 patients carrying ST72 and 156 patients carrying ST5 or ST239. There was no difference in the rates of subsequent infection between ST72 cohort and ST5 / ST239 cohort (13.1% vs. 12.8%; P = 0.931). The median time to development of subsequent infection was not significantly different (27 days vs. 88 days; P = 0.0877). The Kaplan-Meier method showed no difference in the cumulative rate of being free of subsequent infection between the cohorts (P = 0.9209). Overall mortality rates at 6 months did not differ (1.5% vs. 1.9%; P = 1.000)

Conclusions

We found no evidence that rates of subsequent MRSA infection were different between newly-admitted patients carrying community-genotype ST72 MRSA and those whom carrying hospital-genotypes ST5 or ST239 MRSA.

Background

Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) infections have imposed a high burden on healthcare resources as well as significant morbidity and mortality, and a recent emergence of community-associated MRSA (CA-MRSA) worldwide has added another concern. MRSA carriage has been identified as a strong risk factor for subsequent infection [1, 2]. Approximately 11% - 25% of patients who newly acquired MRSA were reported to develop subsequent infection during hospitalization [3, 4]. Although several CA-MRSA clones have emerged as important pathogens both in the community and the hospitals worldwide [5,6,7] and have shown different characteristics in the pattern of colonization and infection from the hospital-genotype MRSA clones [7, 8], there has been no study comparing the rates of subsequent MRSA infection in hospitalized patients carrying MRSA between the community-genotype and hospital-genotype strains.

In Korea, dominant MRSA clones endemic in the hospitals have been sequence type 5 (ST5) and ST239 clones, while ST72 clone has emerged in the community and has spread into the hospitals [9,10,11]. A recent single center study from Korea showed that the most frequent genotype in newly-admitted patients carrying MRSA was ST72, followed by ST5 and ST239 [12]. In this study, we compared the rates of subsequent MRSA infection among newly-detected hospitalized patients carrying MRSA between the community-genotype and the hospital-genotype cohort.

Methods

Study design and study participants

A retrospective cohort study was performed at Samsung Medical Center (Seoul, Republic of Korea), a university-affiliated tertiary care hospital with 1983 patient beds. We identified patients who were newly-detected MRSA nasal carriers between January 1, 2007 and March 31, 2010 from the previous study [12]. MRSA nasal screening was performed in selected newly-admitted patients according to the active surveillance policy for infection prevention purpose of the hospital. The indications for screening included the referral patients from the other hospitals or the chronic care facilities, the patients scheduled for operations in the departments of orthopedic surgery, neurosurgery, thoracic surgery and general surgery, the patients receiving hemodialysis or peritoneal dialysis, MRSA isolation from clinical specimens and carriage of vancomycin-resistant Enterococcus (VRE). Conventional culture methods were used for screening and confirmation of nasal carrier status of MRSA. The MRSA isolates were collected and stocked in the Asian Bacterial Bank (Seoul, Republic of Korea). Patients were excluded from the study if nasal MRSA carriage had been already known prior to the study period.

The patients carrying MRSA belonging to the sequence types other than ST72, ST5 and ST239 were excluded. We also excluded the patients who could not be followed up at least 6 months and had not developed subsequent MRSA infection until that time point (Fig. 1). Cohort 1 included the patients carrying MRSA with community-genotype, ST72, and cohort 2 included those who carried MRSA with hospital-genotypes, ST5 or ST239. If the patients developed MRSA infection multiple times, the first episode was only included in the analysis. This study was approved by the Institute Review Board of Samsung Medical Center.

Fig. 1
figure 1

Flow chart summarizing identification of study cohorts

Full size image

Data collection

Demographic and clinical characteristics, laboratory data, and outcome data were collected from the electronic medical records. The McCabe classification was used to categorize the severity of the underlying medical condition as non-fatal, ultimately fatal, or rapidly fatal [13]. Outcome variables included the rates of subsequent MRSA infection within six months after new detection of MRSA nasal colonization, overall mortality rates at six months, and time to development of subsequent MRSA infection. The type of infections was also described.

Microbiological and molecular characterization

The Vitek 2 automated system (bioMerieux, Marcy l’Etoile, France) was used for microbiological identification and antimicrobial susceptibility testing. The MICs were determined according to the standards established by the Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI) [14]. Multilocus sequence typing (MLST) was carried out using PCR amplification and sequencing of seven housekeeping genes (arcC, aroE, glpF, gmk, pta, tpi, and yqiL), as previously described [15]. The allelic profiles and sequence types (STs) were assigned according to the MLST web site (http//saureus.mlst.net/).

Statistical analysis

All tests of significance were two-tailed. P-values <0.05 were considered statistically significant. Categorical variables were compared between the groups using Chi-square test or Fisher’s exact test. Continuous variables were compared using the Mann–Whitney U test. Multivariate logistic regression analysis was used to determine the risk factors of subsequent MRSA infection. Stepwise model comparison was used to determine the best model using the PASW version 18.0 (SPSS Inc., Chicago, IL, USA). Times to development of subsequent MRSA infection during the follow-up period were calculated by the Kaplan-Meier method and compared between the cohorts using the log-rank test. Stata version 11.2 (StataCorp, College Station, TX, USA) was used for this analysis.

Results

Study population

We identified 1118 patients with nasal MRSA colonization during the study period. Among those patients, 592 known MRSA carriers revisiting the hospital were excluded. The patients carrying MRSA strains belonging to ST72, ST5 or ST239 who were followed up for at least 6 months were included in this study. A total of 354 patients carrying MRSA were included (Fig. 1). Among those MRSA isolates, the most frequent sequence type was ST72 (55.9%). ST5 and ST239 accounted for 23.8% and 5.4%, respectively. The most frequent reasons for nasal MRSA screening were transfer from other hospital (36.2%) and pre-operative screening (33.6%). Other reasons included MRSA isolation from clinical specimens (9.0%), carriage of VRE (6.5%), and undergoing hemodialysis or continuous ambulatory peritoneal dialysis (CAPD) (4.2%). Among the MRSA isolates from nasal carriers who were screened for pre-operative screening, ST72 (67.2%) was more frequent than ST5 or ST239 (Table 1).

Table 1 Comparison of demographic and clinical characteristics of the patients colonized with methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus between ST72 and ST5 / ST239 cohorts
Full size table

Comparison of characteristics of MRSA carriers between ST72 cohort and ST5 / ST239 cohort

The demographic and clinical characteristics of MRSA nasal carriers were compared between ST72 cohort and ST5 / ST239 cohort (Table 1). The most frequent comorbidity in ST72 cohort was solid tumor (24.2%), followed by cardiovascular disease, diabetes mellitus, liver disease, neurologic disease, and chronic kidney disease. Solid tumor was more frequent in ST72 cohort than in ST5 / ST239 cohort, whereas hematologic malignancy was more frequent in ST5 / ST239 cohort.

Subsequent MRSA infection

The median duration of follow-up after detection of nasal MRSA carriage was 1058 days (range 11–2441 days) in ST72 cohort and 774.5 days (range 13–2515 days) in ST5 / ST239 cohort (P = 0.555). Among MRSA carriers of ST72 cohort, 13.1% developed subsequent MRSA infection similar to the rate in ST5 / ST239 cohort (12.8%) (P = 0.931). The median time to development of subsequent MRSA infection following new detection of nasal carriage was 27 days in ST72 cohort, which was not a statistically significant difference compared to ST5 / ST239 cohort (88 days). The Kaplan-Meier method was used to calculate the cumulative rate of being free of subsequent MRSA infection, and no significant difference was observed between two cohorts (P = 0.9209) (Fig. 2). Overall mortality rates did not differ between two cohorts (1.5% vs. 1.9%) (P = 1.000).

Fig. 2
figure 2

Kaplan-Meier curves for the cumulative risk of subsequent MRSA infection

Full size image

The most frequent type of subsequent MRSA infections was pneumonia (50%), followed by urinary tract infection (13.0%), primary bacteremia (10.9%), surgical site infection (8.7%), intra-abdominal infection (8.7%), and skin and soft tissue infection (6.5%). There was no difference in distribution of infection types between two cohorts. Among 26 cases of subsequent MRSA infections in ST72 cohort, 19 (73.1%) were hospital-onset.

Risk factors for subsequent MRSA infection in MRSA nasal carrier cohorts

Multivariate analysis showed that the nasal carriers who also had MRSA isolated from culture of clinical specimens had 33-fold increased risk of subsequent MRSA infection (Table 2). Chronic lung disease and transfer from another hospital were also the risk factors for subsequent MRSA infection (O.R. 4.870 and O.R. 2.375, respectively).

Table 2 Risk factors for subsequent MRSA infection in MRSA nasal carrier cohorts
Full size table

Predictive factors for ST72 MRSA nasal carriage

Multivariate analysis showed that predictive factors for ST72 MRSA among MRSA nasal carriage were pre-operative screening for MRSA nasal carriage (odds ratio 1.828; 95% CI 1.127–2.967; P = 0.015) and solid tumor (odds ratio 1.747; 95% CI 1.004–3.040; P = 0.048).

Discussion

We found no evidence that rates of subsequent MRSA infection were different between community-genotype ST72 MRSA nasal carrier cohort and hospital-genotype ST5 / ST239 cohort. Comparison of the cumulative rates of being free of subsequent MRSA infection using the Kaplan-Meier method also revealed no significant difference between two cohorts. In most previous reports studying subsequent MRSA infection rates among MRSA carriers, the difference of infection rates according to the genotype was not studied. Our study is unique in this regard because we compared the subsequent MRSA infection rates between hospital-endemic MRSA clones and CA-MRSA clone highly prevalent in Korea.

A retrospective cohort study in the US tertiary care medical center showed that 33% of MRSA carriers developed MRSA infections in the following year [16]. Another retrospective cohort study in the US hospitals showed that persistent MRSA colonizers had an increased risk of death (HR 2.58) and MRSA infection (HR 10.89) [17]. A retrospective cohort study conducted in Alaska aiming to determine if carriage of CA-MRSA increased the risk for subsequent soft tissue infection revealed nasal MRSA carriage to be a significant risk factor for skin infections in the first year when compared with MSSA and non–S. aureus carriers [18]. In contrast, the study from the Asian countries is sparse. The report from the single center in Singapore showed that 14.4% of the MRSA carriers developed MRSA infection with median time to infection of 22 days [19].

It is interesting that ST72 MRSA cohort tended to have a shorter duration until developing subsequent MRSA infection compared to ST5 / ST239 cohort. A study from Singapore showed that risk of infection was much higher shortly after the initial acquisition; however the genotypes of MRSA were not determined [19]. In the retrospective cohort study from the US tertiary care medical center which also provided no information on genotypes showed that infection occurred a median of 56 days post-detection [16]. Higher virulence potential of CA-MRSA has been suggested in various community-genotype MRSA clones. USA300 clone is well known to be highly virulent [20]. Enhanced virulence of ST59 CA-MRSA over hospital-associated lineages was also demonstrated [21]. However, the virulence of ST72 MRSA needs to be more elucidated. Two studies comparing the virulence of ST72 MRSA with that of ST5 revealed lower virulence of ST72 MRSA strains [22, 23]. Several genes associated with adhesion and virulence were absent or rarely found in ST72 isolates.

Our study has demonstrated that isolation of MRSA from culture of clinical specimens was the most significant risk factor for subsequent MRSA infection in nasal carrier cohorts using the multivariate analysis. Although anterior nares are the most frequent carriage sites for S. aureus, multiple body sites can be colonized and CA-MRSA appears to be different in the distribution of colonization sites [7, 24]. As for USA300 strains, perirectal and inguinal area were common sites of colonization following the nares [25]. The frequencies of colonization in those areas were higher compared to non-USA300 strains.

There are some limitations in our study. First, this study focused on screening the nasal MRSA carriers according to the infection prevention and control policy of the hospital, and screening for the MRSA carriage at other body sites was not routinely performed. The MRSA surveillance study from the hospitals in Taiwan, in which majority of the isolates were clonotypes belonging to ST239, showed that nares cultures alone detected only 72.5% - 81.5% of all colonized patients [26]. As CA-MRSA strains are known to colonize various body sites rather than the nares frequently, the carriers who have a higher potential to develop subsequent MRSA infection could be excluded, affecting the results. Second, this was a retrospective design, and so many patients whose follow-up period less than 6 months were excluded from the analysis. It could affect the results. Third, the genotypes of MRSA isolates from subsequent infection were unknown, and so the relationship of MRSA isolates between the colonizing strains and the strains causing subsequent infection were not determined. Lastly, this is a single center study and caution should be exercised in generalizing our results.

Conclusions

In conclusion, we found no evidence that rates of subsequent MRSA infection were different between newly-admitted patients carrying community-genotype ST72 MRSA and those whom carrying hospital-genotypes ST5 or ST239 MRSA in the following 6 months. This study also suggests the importance of post-discharge surveillance in determining the incidence of healthcare-associated infections due to MRSA, considering that infections occur after a considerable period of time after becoming a carrier.

References

  1. von Eiff C, Becker K, Machka K, Stammer H, Peters G. Nasal carriage as a source of Staphylococcus aureus bacteremia. Study group. N Engl J Med. 2001;344:11–6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Wertheim HFL, Vos MC, Ott A, van Belkum A, Voss A, Kluytmans JAJW, et al. Risk and outcome of nosocomial Staphylococcus aureus bacteraemia in nasal carriers versus non-carriers. Lancet. 2004;364:703–5.

  3. Coello R, Glynn JR, Gaspar C, Picazo JJ, Fereres J. Risk factors for developing clinical infection with methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) amongst hospital patients initially only colonized with MRSA. J Hosp Infect. 1997;37:39–46.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Davis KA, Stewart JJ, Crouch HK, Florez CE, Hospenthal DR. Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) nares colonization at hospital admission and its effect on subsequent MRSA infection. Clin Infect Dis. 2004;39:776–82.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Moran GJ, Krishnadasan A, Gorwitz RJ, Fosheim GE, McDougal LK, Carey RB, Talan DA, Group EMINS. Methicillin-resistant S. aureus infections among patients in the emergency department. N Engl J Med. 2006;355:666-674.

  6. Maree CL, Daum RS, Boyle-Vavra S, Matayoshi K, Miller LG. Community-associated methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus isolates causing healthcare-associated infections. Emerg Infect Dis. 2007;13:236–42.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  7. DeLeo FR, Otto M, Kreiswirth BN, Chambers HF. Community-associated meticillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus. Lancet. 2010;375:1557–68.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  8. Naimi TS, LeDell KH, Como-Sabetti K, Borchardt SM, Boxrud DJ, Etienne J, et al. Comparison of community- and health care-associated methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus infection. JAMA. 2003;290:2976–84.

  9. Kim ES, Song JS, Lee HJ, Choe PG, Park KH, Cho JH, et al. A survey of community-associated methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus in Korea. J Antimicrob Chemother. 2007;60:1108–14.

  10. Song JH, Hsueh PR, Chung DR, Ko KS, Kang CI, Peck KR, et al. Spread of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus between the community and the hospitals in Asian countries: an ANSORP study. J Antimicrob Chemother. 2011;66:1061–9.

  11. Joo EJ, Chung DR, Ha YE, Park SY, Kang SJ, Kim SH, et al. Community-associated Panton-valentine leukocidin-negative meticillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus clone (ST72-MRSA-IV) causing healthcare-associated pneumonia and surgical site infection in Korea. J Hosp Infect. 2012;81:149–55.

  12. Park SY, Chung DR, Yoo JR, Baek JY, Kim SH, Ha YE, et al. Sequence type 72 community-associated meticillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus emerged as a predominant clone of nasal colonization in newly admitted patients. J Hosp Infect. 2016;93:386–9.

  13. McCabe W, Jackson G. Gram-negative bacteremia: I. Etiology and ecology. Arch Intern Med. 1962;110:847–55.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute. Performance standards for antimicrobial susceptibility testing; Twenty-First Informational Supplement M100-S21. Wayne, PA; 2009.

  15. Enright MC, Day NP, Davies CE, Peacock SJ, Spratt BG. Multilocus sequence typing for characterization of methicillin-resistant and methicillin-susceptible clones of Staphylococcus aureus. J Clin Microbiol. 2000;38:1008–15.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  16. Huang SS, Hinrichsen VL, Datta R, Spurchise L, Miroshnik I, Nelson K, et al. Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus infection and hospitalization in high-risk patients in the year following detection. PLoS One. 2011;6:e24340.

  17. Gupta K, Martinello RA, Young M, Strymish J, Cho K, Lawler E. MRSA nasal carriage patterns and the subsequent risk of conversion between patterns, infection, and death. PLoS One. 2013;8:e53674.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  18. Stevens AM, Hennessy T, Baggett HC, Bruden D, Parks D, Klejka J. Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus carriage and risk factors for skin infections, southwestern Alaska. USA Emerg Infect Dis. 2010;16:797–803.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Balm MN, Lover AA, Salmon S, Tambyah PA, Fisher DA. Progression from new methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus colonisation to infection: an observational study in a hospital cohort. BMC Infect Dis. 2013;13:491.

  20. Li M, Diep BA, Villaruz AE, Braughton KR, Jiang X, DeLeo FR, et al. Evolution of virulence in epidemic community-associated methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2009;106:5883–8.

  21. Li M, Dai Y, Zhu Y, Fu CL, Tan VY, Wang Y, et al. Virulence determinants associated with the Asian community-associated methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus lineage ST59. Sci Rep. 2016;6:27899.

  22. Joo EJ, Choi JY, Chung DR, Song JH, Ko KS. Characteristics of the community-genotype sequence type 72 methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus isolates that underlie their persistence in hospitals. J Microbiol. 2016;54:445–50.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Park KH, Chong YP, Kim SH, Lee SO, Choi SH, Lee MS, et al. Community-associated MRSA strain ST72-SCCmecIV causing bloodstream infections: clinical outcomes and bacterial virulence factors. J Antimicrob Chemother. 2015;70:1185–92.

  24. Wertheim HF, Melles DC, Vos MC, van Leeuwen W, van Belkum A, Verbrugh HA, et al. The role of nasal carriage in Staphylococcus aureus infections. Lancet Infect Dis. 2005;5:751–62.

  25. Popovich KJ, Aroutcheva A, Hota B, Beavis KG, Hayden MK, Weinstein RA. Anatomic sites of colonization with community-associated methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol. 2014l35:1192-1194.

  26. Lauderdale TL, Wang JT, Lee WS, Huang JH, McDonald LC, Huang IW, et al. Carriage rates of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) depend on anatomic location, the number of sites cultured, culture methods, and the distribution of clonotypes. Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis. 2010;29:1553–9.

Download references

Acknowledgements

Not applicable.

Funding

This work was supported by the Basic Science Research Program through the National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF) funded by the Ministry of Education, Science and Technology (NRF-2016M3A9B6918694) and by a grant from the Korean Health Technology R&D Project, Ministry of Health & Welfare, Republic of Korea (HI12C0756).

Availability of data and materials

The datasets generated and/or analysed during the current study are not publicly available but are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.

Authors’ contributions

SYP performed the data collection. YRK and SHK performed the laboratory experiments. SYP, YRK, SYC, and DRC performed the analysis. SYP, YEH, CIK, KRP, JHS and DRC conceived the study, participated in its design and drafted the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Ethics approval and consent to participate

The Institute Review Board of Samsung Medical Center approved this study and a waiver of the informed consent (2013–09-123).

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Division of Infectious Diseases, Department of Internal Medicine, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, 81 Irwon-ro, Gangnam-gu, Seoul, 06351, Republic of Korea

    So Yeon Park, Doo Ryeon Chung, Yu Ri Kang, So Hyun Kim, Sun Young Cho, Young Eun Ha, Cheol-In Kang, Kyong Ran Peck & Jae-Hoon Song

  2. Center for Infection Prevention and Control, Samsung Medical Center, Seoul, South Korea

    Doo Ryeon Chung & Sun Young Cho

  3. Asia Pacific Foundation for Infectious Diseases, Seoul, South Korea

    Doo Ryeon Chung, Yu Ri Kang, So Hyun Kim & Jae-Hoon Song

  4. Present address: Division of Infectious Diseases, Kangdong Sacred Heart Hospital, Hallym University College of Medicine, Seoul, South Korea

    So Yeon Park

Authors
  1. So Yeon Park
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Doo Ryeon Chung
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Yu Ri Kang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. So Hyun Kim
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Sun Young Cho
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Young Eun Ha
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  7. Cheol-In Kang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  8. Kyong Ran Peck
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  9. Jae-Hoon Song
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Doo Ryeon Chung.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Park, S.Y., Chung, D.R., Kang, Y.R. et al. Comparison of subsequent infection in methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus nasal carriers between ST72 community-genotype and hospital genotypes: a retrospective cohort study. Antimicrob Resist Infect Control 6, 60 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1186/s13756-017-0220-1

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s13756-017-0220-1

Keywords

Antimicrobial Resistance & Infection Control

ISSN: 2047-2994

Contact us