Skip to main content

Table 2 Proportion estimates of ESBLs in different regions of Pakistan

From: Prevalence of extended-spectrum-β-lactamase-producing Enterobacteriaceae: first systematic meta-analysis report from Pakistan

Study

ES [95% Conf. Interval]

% Weight

Punjab, Lahore

 Anwar et al., 2007 [12]

0.44

0.38

0.49

1.83

 Hafeez et al., 2009 [6]

0.35

0.34

0.37

1.85

 Amin et al., 2009 [15]

0.15

0.11

0.20

1.82

 Riaz et al., 2011 [8]

0.29

0.27

0.32

1.84

 Ejaz et al., 2011 [11]

0.05

0.05

0.06

1.85

 Riaz et al., 2012 [22]

0.29

0.27

0.32

1.84

 Mehmod et al., 2012 [58]

0.10

0.09

0.11

1.85

 Ejaz et al., 2013 [9]

0.30

0.27

0.34

1.84

 Qureshi et al., 2013 [13]

0.15

0.13

0.18

1.84

 Hanan et al., 2013 [44]

0.69

0.59

0.78

1.79

 Sabir et al., 2014 [84]

0.54

0.50

0.59

1.84

 Sohail et al., 2015 [86]

0.27

0.24

0.29

1.84

 Riaz et al., 2015 [7]

0.80

0.77

0.82

1.84

 Anwar et al., 2016 [89]

0.38

0.29

0.47

1.8

 Sub-total Random pooled ES

0.33

0.21

0.46

25.66

Punjab, Islamabad

 Shah et al., 2002 [76]

0.15

0.12

0.19

1.83

 Shah et al., 2003 [77]

0.22

0.18

0.26

1.83

 Ali et al., 2004 [47]

0.45

0.42

0.49

1.84

 Mirza et al., 2006 [101]

0.07

0.02

0.16

1.74

 Mumtaz et al., 2007 [78]

0.33

0.20

0.48

1.71

 Ullah et al., 2009 [20]

0.27

0.23

0.32

1.83

 Khan et al., 2010 [79]

0.20

0.15

0.26

1.82

 Hussain et al., 2011 [45]

0.64

0.55

0.73

1.80

 Roshan et al., 2011 [80]

1.00

0.99

1.00

1.83

 Habeeb et al., 2013 [82]

0.47

0.40

0.55

1.81

 Hassan et al., 2011 [81]

0.64

0.54

0.73

1.78

 Begum et al., 2013 [48]

1.00

0.96

1.00

1.78

 Day et al., 2013 [69]

0.26

0.24

0.29

1.84

 Shafiq et al., 201 [18]

0.38

0.36

0.41

1.84

 Amin et al., 2013 [10]

0.88

0.82

0.92

1.82

 Khalid et al., 2013 [83]

0.44

0.41

0.48

1.84

 Habeeb et al., 2013 [82]

1.00

0.86

1.00

1.62

 Saboor et al., 2014 [84]

0.70

0.69

0.72

1.85

 Akram et al., 2014 [5]

0.54

0.47

0.60

1.82

 Khan et al., 2015 [14]

0.16

0.14

0.17

1.85

 Ahmed et al., 2016 [59]

0.36

0.33

0.38

1.84

 Ali et al., 2016 [47]

0.59

0.53

0.65

1.82

 Jamil et al., 2016 [88]

0.37

0.23

0.52

1.71

 Sub-total Random pooled ES

0.50

0.39

0.62

41.46

Khyber Pakhtunkhawa

 Ullah et al., 2009 [49]

0.19

0.15

0.24

1.83

 Mumtaz et al., 2010 [90]

0.09

0.08

0.10

1.85

 Ullah et al., 2010 [100]

0.59

0.48

0.69

1.78

 Bari et al., 2013 [21]

0.48

0.45

0.51

1.84

 Ilyas et al., 2014 [19]

0.26

0.20

0.32

1.82

 Iqbal et al., 2014 [91]

0.09

0.09

0.10

1.85

 Bari et al., 2014 [21]

0.43

0.40

0.46

1.84

 Rahman et al., 2016 [50]

0.44

0.39

0.50

1.83

 Ahmed et al., 2016 [59]

0.04

0.03

0.05

1.85

 Sub-totaRandom pooled ES

0.26

0.15

0.39

16.48

Sindh

 Jabeen et l., 2003 [92]

0.30

0.26

0.34

1.83

 Jabeen et l., 2005 [93]

0.40

0.38

0.42

1.85

 Ahmed et al., 2009 [94]

0.08

0.06

0.11

1.84

 Khan et al., 2010 [96]

1.00

0.94

1.00

1.75

 Jabeen et l., 2010 [95]

0.06

0.05

0.07

1.85

 Khan et al., 2010 [96]

0.32

0.31

0.32

1.85

 Afridi et al., 2011 [97]

0.04

0.04

0.05

1.85

 Hassan et al., 2011 [98]

0.54

0.44

0.64

1.78

 Afridi et al., 2012 [99]

1.00

0.98

1.00

1.81

 Sub-total Random pooled ES

0.43

0.27

0.60

16.4

Overall Random pooled ES

0.40

0.34

0.47

100.00