Skip to main content

Table 3 Baseline characteristics of studies in resistant P. aeruginosa

From: Risk factors for hospitalized patients with resistant or multidrug-resistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa infections: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Author

Year

Design

Country

Case/Exposure

Control/Comparator

Total N

Age cases (Yr)

Age control (Yr)

Male cases (%)

Male controls (%)

Akhabue [41]

2011

CC, unmatched

USA

Cefepime-resistant P.aeruginosa

Cefepime-susceptible P.aeruginosa

2529

Median:61 (total)

Median:61 (total)

62

56.4

Fortaleza (b) [45]

2006

CC, matched

Brazil

Ceftazidime-resistant P.aeruginosa

Control

165

median 38

median 44.5

72.7

62.7

Gasink [48]

2006

CC, unmatched

USA

Fluoroquinolone-resistant P.aeruginosa

Fluoroquinolone-susceptible P.aeruginosa

847

56

62

NR

NR

Harris [49]

2002

CC, unmatched

USA

Piperacillin-tazobactam-resistant P. aeruginosa

Patients without Piperacillin-tazobactam-resistant P. aeruginosa

1315

53.4

49.7

42.5

39.4

Hsu [52]

2005

CC, unmatched

USA

Fluoroquinolone-resistant P.aeruginosa

Fluoroquinolone-susceptible P.aeruginosa

177

73.8

68

43

49

Khayr [53]

2000

CC, unmatched

USA

Ciprofloxacin-resistant P.aeruginosa

Ciprofloxacin-susceptible P.aeruginosa

94

Age > 65: 79%

Age > 65: 79%

100

100

Trouillet [63]

2002

CC, unmatched

France

Piperacillin-resistant P. aeruginosa

Piperacillin-susceptible P. aeruginosa

135

64.6

65.5

67.6

64.4

  1. CC case-control, NR not reported, YR year