Skip to main content

Table 2 General characteristics of the interventional studies on antibiotic prescription

From: Antibiotic prescribing in inpatient and outpatient settings in Iran: a systematic review and meta-analysis study

References

Region

Setting

Sample size/unit of analysis

Study type/duration

Intervention type

Percentage of the prescribed antibiotics

Effects of the intervention

The most commonly prescribed antibiotic classes (from most to least)

The most commonly prescribed antibiotics (from most to least)

Mohagheghi, et al. (1995–2001) [45]

Tehran

Outpatient

1,096,861 prescriptions

RCT/6 months

Short educational course for GPs

Before: in IG, 66.8% and in CG, 71.4% After: in IG, 66.1% and in CG, 74.8%

Antibiotic prescribing was less in IG than in CG (p < 0.05)

Penicillin, Sulfonamides, Cephalosporin, Macrolides, Metronidazole, Aminoglycosides

NM

Najaf Zare et al. [46]

Shiraz

Outpatient

119 GPs

Quasi experimental (before and after)/one year

Rational prescribing workshop (one day)

Before: 47.3% After: 46.4%

Relative improvement (p > 0.05)

NM

NM

Garjani et al. [47]

Tabriz

Outpatient

1135 prescriptions

RCT/One month

Educational intervention reviewing examples of prescriptions, principles of prescription writing, necessity of rational prescribing and use of drugs, impact of irrational use of drugs, common errors in prescribing, and rational use of injections, antibiotics, and glucocorticoids (why, where, how, and how long)

Before in both groups: 40.8% After: in IG, 38.9% and in CG, 37.2%

Relative improvement in prescribing (p > 0.05)

Penicillin, Cephalosporin, Aminoglycosides

NM

Ataei et al. [48]

Kermanshah

Outpatient

2040 prescriptions

Quasi experimental (Before and After)/6 months

Rational prescribing workshop

Before: 52.2% After: 47.6%

Less prescribing antibiotics (p > 0.05)

NM

NM

Esmaily [49]

East Azarbayjan

Outpatient

159 GPs

CRCT/3 day

Educational programs: (1) principles of prescription writing, (2) adverse reactions to drugs, (3) drug interactions, (4) injections, (5) antibiotic therapy, and (6) therapy with anti-inflammatory agents

Pretest (IG: 61%, CG: 59%)

No significant improvement (p-value: IG: .41 and CG: .39)

NM

NM

Posttest (IG: 63%, CG: 60%)

Sadeghi et al. [50]

Cheharmahal Bakhtiyari

Outpatient

50 physicians

Quasi experimental with an external control group

Feedback for patients with mean of the country, a book about rational prescribing medications, content of Iran’s drugs

Before: in IG1, 59.4% and in IG2, 58.5%

Relative improvement (p > 0.05)

NM

NM

After: in IG1, 50.3% and in IG2, 59.38%

Soleymani et al. [51]

Tehran

Outpatient

800 physicians

RCT/3 months

Four-armed randomized controlled trial: routinely conducting audit and feedback (RA&F), newly-designed audit and feedback (NA&F), printed educational materials (PEM) as well as a control arm

RA&F: 50.14%

None of the interventions were effective in reducing overall antibiotic use

NM

NM

NA&F: 47.79%

PEM: 48.19%

Control: 47.05%

  1. CG control group, CRCT cluster randomized control trial, GP general practitioner, IG intervention group, NM not mentioned, RCT randomized control trial