Theme | Sub-themes | N* |
---|---|---|
Core Component 1: IPC programme | ||
Need an approach to maintain “continuous” advocacy (n = 15) | Set up regular meetings with senior leadership/managers | 10 |
IPC should be a part of routine meetings, presentations, or rounds | 5 | |
May first need external technical assistance (n = 13) | National level should first support selected professionals to receive external IPC training and these professionals can then act as trainers in-country | 9 |
External IPC experts should first review initial materials to ensure they meet IPC standards | 4 | |
Use a stepwise approach to build required resources (n = 10) | Start with a small group of committed staff in addition to link nurses and regional staff | 6 |
Need at least a small budget in the beginning for recognition | 4 | |
Use specific activities or opportunities as “catalysts” for advocacy (n = 6) | Use of data (process or outcome measures) can help convince leadership of IPC’s importance, i.e. avoid "no data, no problem" | 3 |
Publicize starting examples, e.g. hand hygiene, surgical site infections | 3 | |
Promote linkages with health system (n = 6) | Link IPC personnel and team with the quality management team | 3 |
Link IPC personnel and team with AMR team | 3 | |
National IPC association can drive IPC improvement (n = 6) | National IPC association can be active in providing expert input and assisting with local adaption of materials | 6 |
May need normative actions to convince stakeholders (n = 4) | Need legislation for recognition | 4 |
Core Component 2: IPC guidelines | ||
Consider specific approaches to operationalize guidelines (n = 16) | Link guidelines directly to training and workshops | 6 |
Link guidelines directly to monitoring indicators | 4 | |
Set guideline dissemination plan early during planning | 3 | |
Designate dedicated multidisciplinary guideline implementation leads | 3 | |
Use specific strategies for adaption of guidelines (n = 15) | Schedule ongoing meetings to review guidelines and regularly update them based on current evidence and practice | 5 |
National IPC association can drive guidance development and adaption | 4 | |
Meet with other public health programmes (e.g. maternal and child health, HIV, tuberculosis) and identify joint guideline themes and actions | 3 | |
Develop a plan to collect local evidence to inform guidelines | 3 | |
May first need external technical assistance (n = 12) | Hire external IPC expert for initial development and then locally adapt | 8 |
Adapt international standard guidelines, e.g. WHO, ECDC, US CDC | 4 | |
Core Component 3: IPC education and training | ||
Consider specific training methods (n = 19) | Select 1–2 master trainers to first receive IPC expert training outside of the country | 5 |
Consider multidisciplinary training, i.e. different staff together, to remove hierarchy | 4 | |
Use a train-the-trainers structure | 4 | |
May need initial IPC expert technical consultant and then can locally adapt training | 3 | |
Ensure regular in-service workshops | 3 | |
Promote linkages with health system and sustainability (n = 9) | Create an IPC career path, e.g. accreditation | 5 |
Harmonize trainings across programmes, e.g. maternal and child health, HIV, tuberculosis | 4 | |
Foster local IPC leadership during trainings (n = 7) | Require mandatory trained IPC hospital leads who can play an integral role in trainings | 4 |
Identify local champion trainers and trainees at the facility level | 3 | |
Core Component 4: HAI surveillance | ||
Prioritise feasible but high-impact starting points or pilots (n = 30) | Start with surgical site infection (e.g. post caesarean-section, 30-day follow-up) pilot | 8 |
Start with device-associated infection, e.g. urinary or bloodstream, pilot | 5 | |
Start with severe acute respiratory infection pilot | 5 | |
Use a stepwise fashion to slowly scale-up surveillance in a careful way | 5 | |
Can start with paper-based system but develop transition plan for electronic surveillance | 4 | |
Start with pilot in intensive care units | 3 | |
Ensure multidisciplinary collaboration, mentorship (n = 26) | Conduct regular surveillance training and feedback, e.g. yearly seminars | 6 |
Conduct site support visits, e.g. assessment of case finding, forms, denominator data | 5 | |
Advocate for integration of HAI surveillance with AMR and stewardship efforts | 4 | |
Create a technical working group on surveillance in National IPC or AMR committees | 4 | |
Ensure that one hospital is effectively trained in surveillance and can provide leadership to other hospitals | 4 | |
Promote frequent informal mentorship | 3 | |
Carefully consider definitions and data quality processes (n = 22) | Conduct a careful structured discussion on adaption of case definitions, maintaining standards, consistency and predictive value | 7 |
Reference US National Healthcare Safety Network (NHSN) definitions | 7 | |
First identify who can collect, clean, and analyse data, i.e. invest in statisticians | 4 | |
Decide early on how to regularly evaluate data quality | 4 | |
Promote “data for action” (n = 7) | Leverage quality improvement programme/activities | 7 |
Core Component 5: Multidmodal strategies for implementation of IPC interventions | ||
Promote activities to clearly communicate and advocate for multimodal strategies (n = 16) | Need leadership buy-in to obtain resources, e.g. awareness workshop, regular meetings | 7 |
Many cannot explain what multimodal strategies so communicate a clear definition | 6 | |
Identify multidisciplinary champions for multimodal strategies | 3 | |
Put focus on certain elements of multimodal strategies (n = 16) | Monitoring, audit, feedback, scoring and accountability mechanisms are key elements | 8 |
Guidelines and training are key elements | 4 | |
Promotion of safety culture is a key element, e.g. organizational culture questionnaire, team communication mechanisms, mentorship activities | 4 | |
Prioritise feasible but high-impact starting points or pilots (n = 14) | Start with hand hygiene pilot | 8 |
Start with device-associated infections, e.g. urinary or bloodstream, pilot | 3 | |
Start with surgical site infection pilot | 3 | |
Core Component 6: Monitoring/audit of IPC practices and feedback | ||
Promote “data for action” (n = 17) | Present at IPC committee meetings, during hospital workshops, and in staff emails to build political will for change | 6 |
Recognize performance with incentives, e.g. centre of excellence, ward/personnel awards | 6 | |
Publish scores for staff, e.g. device-associated infection-free days, hand hygiene practices | 5 | |
Prioritise feasible but high-impact starting points or pilots (n = 12) | Monitoring/audit and feedback should be part of IPC implementation from the beginning | 5 |
Start with hand hygiene pilot | 4 | |
Start small to show “the problem” | 3 | |
Put focus on certain methods (n = 6) | Communicate positive audit and feedback culture, i.e. not punitive | 3 |
Integrate with national health monitoring and information systems (HMIS) | 3 | |
Core Component 7: Workload, staffing and bed occupancy | ||
Need the participation of national level actors (n = 11) | National level actors should set standards, e.g. for nurse-patient ratio | 6 |
Long-term advocacy with national level actors is essential | 5 | |
Put focus on certain methods (n = 3) | Need to show data and local research to set staffing and bed occupancy standards | 3 |
Core Component 8: Built environment, materials and equipment for IPC | ||
IPC professionals should be actively involved in facility construction (n = 8) | Conduct regular meetings between construction and IPC teams to ensure that facility design, construction, modifications and renovations meet IPC standards | 8 |
Put focus on certain elements of a multimodal strategy (n = 5) | Start with procuring equipment for hand hygiene | 5 |
Promote long-term advocacy and integration with health system (n = 3) | Long-term WASH advocacy is needed for leadership buy-in and need phased in approach | 3 |