Skip to main content

Table 1 Analytical performance of the five methods utilized for P. aeruginosa detection from ETA samples compared to the extended gold standard

From: Evaluation of GeneXpert PA assay compared to genomic and (semi-)quantitative culture methods for direct detection of Pseudomonas aeruginosa in endotracheal aspirates

Methods

Extended gold standarda

Sensitivity (95% confidence interval)

Specificity (95% confidence interval)

Positive (n = 41)

Negative (n = 39)

Quantitative culture

 Positive

40

1

97.6% (87.1–99.9)

97.4% (86.5–99.9)

 Negative

1

38

Enrichment culture (4 samples could not be tested)

 Positive

34

0

89.5% (75.2–97.1)

100% (90.8–100)

 Negative

4

38

In-house qPCR (1 sample could not be tested)

 Positive

38

11

92.7% (80.1–98.5)

71.1% (54.1–84.6)

 Negative

3

27

GeneXpert PA assay

 Positive

40

0

97.6% (87.1–99.9)

100% (91.0–100)

 Negative

1

39

Semi-quantitative culture

 Positive

40

0

97.6% (87.1–99.9)

100% (91.0–100)

 Negative

1

39

  1. aP. aeruginosa detected by semi-quantitative culture plus one sample that showed P. aeruginosa presence by the other four methods but not by semi-quantitative culture