Table 5 Study details and E. coli bloodstream infection incidence rates from previously published population-based studies
Study location | Study dates | Number of E. coli BSI | Incidence rate (cases/100,000 person-years) | Type of incidence rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Olmsted County, USA (21) | 1998–2007 | 461 | 41.4 | Standardizeda |
Canberra, Australia (4) | 2000–2004 | 515 | 28 | Crude |
Funen County, Denmark (2) | 2000–2002 | 811 | 70.2 | Crude |
2003–2005 | 718 | 61.8 | Crude | |
2006–2008 | 671 | 56.7 | Crude | |
mid-Norway (9) | 2002–2013 | 686 | 80 | Crude |
2002–2013 | 686 | 74 | Standardizedb | |
Calgary, Canada (5) | 2000–2006 | 2,368 | 30.3 | Crude |
Finland (national) (1) | 2004–2007 | 9,190 | 44 | Crude |
Auckland, New Zealand (6) | 2006–2011 | 1,507 | 52 | Crude |
Skaraborg County, Sweden (7) | 2011–2012 | 104c | 67.0 | Crude |
Two rural Thai provinces (10) | 2008 | 373 | 32.9 | Crude |
2014 | 593 | 51.6 | Crude | |
England (national) (8) | 04/2012–03/2013 | 32,309 | 60.4 | Crude |
04/2013–03/2014 | 34,203 | 63.5 | Crude |