Skip to main content

Table 2 Hospital AMS structures and activities, overall and by region

From: Assessing the impact of the Global Point Prevalence Survey of Antimicrobial Consumption and Resistance (Global-PPS) on hospital antimicrobial stewardship programmes: results of a worldwide survey

 

n (%)

n/n (%)

Africa (n = 38)

Asia (n = 91)

Europe (n = 61)

Latin America (n = 31)

Northern America (n = 24)

Total (n = 248)

Initiated as a result of PPS findings*

Local, evidence-based guidelines

12 (31.6)

69 (75.8)

44 (72.1)

24 (77.4)

23 (95.8)

175 (70.6)

67/143 (46.9)

Antimicrobial formulary

9 (23.7)

68 (74.7)

41 (67.2)

14 (45.2)

21 (87.5)

156 (62.9)

42/126 (33.3)

Education and communication

15 (39.5)

38 (41.8)

40 (65.6)

19 (61.3)

16 (66.7)

129 (52.0)

50/98 (51.0)

AMS committee**

12 (31.6)

46 (50.5)

27 (44.3)

16 (51.6)

23 (95.8)

127 (51.2)

34/102 (33.3)

AMS team†

8 (21.1)

42 (46.2)

31( 50.8)

16 (51.6)

19 (79.2)

119 (48.0)

27/95 (28.4)

Specific AMS interventions††

7 (18.4)

31 (34.1)

24 (39.3)

11 (35.5)

23 (95.8)

99 (39.9)

32/81 (39.5)

Information technology support

1 (2.6)

43 (47.3)

14 (23.0)

7 (22.6)

9 (37.5)

76 (30.6)

25/62 (40.3)

Other AMS activities

1 (2.6)

3 (3.3)

2 (3.3)

2 (6.5)

2 (8.3)

10 (4.0)

 

No AMS activities

11 (28.9)

6 (6.6)

1 (1.6)

2 (6.5)

0 (0.0)

20 (8.1)

 
  1. Results for Oceania (n = 3) are not reported separately
  2. *For the group of hospitals participating in the Global-PPS and with the respective AMS component implemented in the hospital
  3. **The organizational structure responsible for defining the antimicrobial stewardship strategy [12]
  4. †The core operational team, responsible for the implementation of the antimicrobial stewardship activities in daily practice [12]
  5. ††E.g. audit and feedback, automatic stop orders, intravenous-to-oral switch policies etc.…