From: A narrative review on current duodenoscope reprocessing techniques and novel developments
Method | Phase of development | Advantages | Disadvantages | References |
---|---|---|---|---|
Single-use duodenoscope | Implemented | No need for reprocessing, non-toxic | High costs, quality of duodenoscope | |
Bioburden assays | Implemented | Quick and easy to use | Lack of correlation with microbial culture | |
Electrolyzed acidic water | Endoscope tested | No biofilm fixation, non-toxic | Preparation on site needed | |
Vaporized hydrogen peroxide plasma | Endoscope tested | No aeration needed, non-toxic | Material incompatibility | |
Cavitation | Not tested | Potentially effective against biofilm, non-toxic | No disinfecting properties | [116] |
Methylene blue photodynamic therapy | Model tested | Effective against biofilm, limited toxicity | Practical application lacking | [117] |
Plasma-activated gas | Model tested | Non-toxic | Short-lived effect | [118] |