Skip to main content

Table 2 Summary of the multivariate log–log models obtained in this study

From: Estimating the effect of practicing nursing professionals density on cumulative carbapenem-resistance prevalence in gram-negative invasive Isolates: a 30 European country observational modeling study

Model

adj.-R2 (%)

Method

Dependent variable

ß0

 

Nurses

DDD

CPI

log_Acpr

intEAPD

intEAlos

intEAlos_H

M1.M

93.5

Step-wise forward selection

log_CRGN (n = 30)

0.238Ø

b

− 0.085*

0.030*

− 0.007**

0.549***

   

ß

− 0.221

0.133

− 0.321

0.462

   

M2.M

93.8

Step-wise forward selection

log_CRGN (n = 30)

− 0.150**

b

 

0.034**

− 0.008***

0.432***

− 0.114**

  

ß

 

0.148

− 0.350

0.364

− 0.270

  

M3.M

92.7

Forced entry

log_CRGN (n = 30)

0.100Ø

b

 

0.032*

− 0.009***

0.494***

 

− 0.519*

 

ß

 

0.141

− 0.382

0.416

 

− 0.202

M4.M

93.3

Forced entry

log_CRGN (n = 27)

0.567Ø

b

 

0.033*

− 0.011***

0.443***

  

− 0.730*

ß

0.145

− 0.477

0.372

− 0.156

  1. adj.-R2: adjusted coefficient of determination, ß0: intercept, b: regression coefficient, ß: standardized regression coefficient. Only variables with significant regression coefficients were retained by the respective model through step-wise forward selection (inclusion cut-off p < 0.05; exclusion cut-off p ≥ 0.10) unless otherwise indicated. Ø denotes p > 0.05, * denotes p < 0.05, ** denotes p < 0.01, *** denotes p < 0.001. Information on log-linear models M1.S, M2.S and M3.S are provided in the Supplementary Material, section ‘Model equations’