- Research
- Open access
- Published:
Trends in the antimicrobial susceptibility among Chinese neonates from 2012 to 2021: a multicenter study
Antimicrobial Resistance & Infection Control volume 13, Article number: 83 (2024)
Abstract
Background
Antibiotic resistance is a serious global public health issue. However, there are few reports on trends in antimicrobial susceptibility in Chinese neonates, and most of the existing evidence has been derived from adult studies. We aimed to assess the trends in antimicrobial susceptibility of common pathogens in full-term neonates with invasive bacterial infections (IBIs) in China.
Methods
This cross-sectional survey study analyzed the antimicrobial susceptibility in Chinese neonates with IBIs from 17 hospitals, spanning from January 2012 to December 2021. Joinpoint regression model was applied to illustrate the trends and calculate the average annual percentage change (AAPC). Using Mantel-Haenszel linear-by-linear association chi-square test, we further compared the antibiotic minimum inhibitory concentrations (MICs) by pathogens between 2019 and 2021 to provide precise estimates of changes.
Results
The proportion of Escherichia coli with extended-spectrum-beta-lactamase-negative strains increased from 0.0 to 88.5% (AAPC = 62.4%, 95% confidence interval (CI): 44.3%, 82.9%), with two breakpoints in 2014 and 2018 (p-trend < 0.001). The susceptibility of group B Streptococcus (GBS) to erythromycin and clindamycin increased by 66.7% and 42.8%, respectively (AAPC = 55.2%, 95% CI: 23.2%, 95.5%, p-trend = 0.002; AAPC = 54.8%, 95% CI: 9.6%, 118.6%, p-trend < 0.001), as did Staphylococcus aureus to penicillin (AAPC = 56.2%; 95% CI: 34.8%, 81.0%, p-trend < 0.001). However, the susceptibility of Enterococcus spp. to ampicillin declined from 100.0 to 25.0% (AAPC = − 11.7%, 95% CI: − 15.2%, − 8.1%, p-trend < 0.001), and no significant improvement was observed in the antibiotic susceptibility of Escherichia coli to ampicillin, gentamicin, and cephalosporin. Additionally, the proportion of GBS/Staphylococcus aureus with relatively low MIC values for relevant antibiotics also increased in 2021 compared to 2019.
Conclusions
Antimicrobial susceptibility of the most prevalent pathogens in full-term neonates seemed to have improved or remained stable over the last decade in China, implying the effectiveness of policies and practice of antibiotic stewardship had gradually emerged.
Background
Antimicrobial resistance poses a pressing threat to human health, affecting all regions at all income levels [1, 2]. Low- and middle-income regions are most impacted [1]. From 1998 to 2016, the proportion of the most prevalent gram-negative pathogens with extended-spectrum beta-lactamase (ESBL) or fluoroquinolone resistance had expanded rapidly, and methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) had emerged within Sub-Saharan Africa [3]. According to a study by China’s National Center for Antimicrobial Resistance, some pathogenic strains, such as Escherichia coli, had a high proportion (60–80%) of resistance to ciprofloxacin over a 7-year period starting in 1994, which is still increasing at an average annual growth rate of approximately 15% [4]. The UN General Assembly’s High-Level Meeting gradually moved the focus onto antimicrobial resistance, and in 2016 provided guidance to political leaders on how to promote sustainable action on antimicrobial resistance. This guidance included the appropriate use of antibiotics in human and animal health, eradication of untreated effluent, prevention and control of infections, and supply of quality-assured and affordable antimicrobials [5]. In response, the Chinese government instituted a series of critical policies to mitigate the escalating trend of antibiotic resistance, including strengthening the supervision of antibiotic marketing paradigm, vigorously promoting pediatric vaccination, as well as supporting the development of new antimicrobial agents [6].
Existing reports of antibiotic resistance include single pathogen species or single-center designs and the information released by the China Antimicrobial Surveillance Network (https://www.carss.cn/Report) are annual cross-sectional surveys [7, 8]. These reports do provide some support regarding trends in antimicrobial resistance; however, they lacked long-term tracking and comprehensive assessments of this issue. Moreover, the majority of these studies focused on adults or adolescents, with limited specific research regarding antibiotic resistance in neonatal cohorts. Compared to adults, neonatal bacterial infections exhibit unique characteristics in terms of bacterial spectrum and antibiotic selection [9, 10]. As the immune function of newborns is still developing, they are more susceptible to a broad range of pathogens, rendering them more vulnerable to invasive bacterial infections (IBIs) and necessitating more frequent administration of antibiotics [11]. Furthermore, IBIs during the neonatal period are confirmed to be associated with high rates of mortality and sequelae, which accounted for 12.8% of global newborn deaths in 2010, thus necessitating heightened attention from clinicians [12, 13]. Having a clear understanding of the antibiotic resistance profile will have direct implications for antibiotic selection, supervision, and disease burden reduction. Considering the existing evidence of increasing antimicrobial resistance, we urgently attempted to explore the temporal trajectory of antibiotic susceptibility in Chinese newborns between 2012 − 2021, intending to optimize empirical anti-infection strategies, assess the effectiveness of policies, and facilitate subsequent revisions.
Methods
Study design
This was a cross-sectional multicenter survey that included full-term neonates with IBIs in 17 tertiary hospitals located in eight municipalities/provinces across China (see Additional File 1), spanning from January 2012 to December 2021. Neonatal IBIs, including bacteremia and/or bacterial meningitis, are defined as the isolation of pathogens in blood and/or cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) cultures respectively [14]. Each participating hospital was equipped with a level III neonatal intensive care unit (NICU), comprising a minimum of 30 beds [15]. They had advanced laboratory facilities and expertise for treating critically ill newborns. The inclusion criteria of patients were: (1) with manifestations of infections, including fever, grunting, cyanosis, apnea, poor perfusion, slow/no response, lethargy, seizure, and irritability; (2) with positive cultures of blood and/or CSF; (3) samples of blood or CSF cultures were collected within 28 days after birth; (4) gestational age ≧ 37 weeks. The exclusion criteria were: (1) lack of the results for antibiotic susceptibility tests; (2) only contaminating bacteria in blood and/or CSF cultures.
The study was conducted following the principles of the Declaration of Helsinki (1964). The study was approved by the Medical Ethical Committees of each hospital, and subsequent data were shared with other coordinating centers (approval number: XHEC − C−2017 − 084).
Data collection
Information on pathogens of neonatal IBI cases was extracted from the electronic medical records of each hospital, as well as the corresponding antimicrobial susceptibility data. Minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) data were collected since 2019, as it was available to most participating hospitals during that time. Other characteristics, including demographic information, age at onset, clinical signs and symptoms, and laboratory data were also recorded in detail.
Bacterial culture
A uniform method of bacterial culture was used in the participating hospitals. Blood and CSF samples were aseptically inoculated into single aerobic bottles using an automated BacT/ALERT system (BioMérieux, France). As outlined in our previous research, we focused on the four most prevalent pathogens that cause IBIs in full-term neonates, namely Escherichia coli, Group B Streptococcus (GBS), Enterococcus spp., and Staphylococcus aureus [14]. In contrast, organisms such as coagulase-negative staphylococci, Bacillus non-cereus/non-anthracis, diphtheroids, Lactobacillus, Micrococcus, and viridans group streptococci were considered contaminants [16].
Antibiotic susceptibility test
Antibiotics recommended for infectious conditions of neonates were selected for susceptibility analysis. The laboratories of all participating hospitals used the same method for qualitative determination of antimicrobial susceptibility, which is called the Kirby-Bauer disk diffusion method. MIC (µg/mL), the lowest concentration of antibiotic that inhibited the growth of bacteria, was determined using the agar dilution method recommended by the Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI) [17]. The resistant and intermediate resistant categories were merged, and the ESBL-producing isolates were detected using the double disk synergy test (DDST), as described in the CLSI [17, 18]. The susceptibility of gentamicin for Enterococcus spp. was detected using high-level aminoglycoside resistance testing. The Staphylococcus aureus strains were classified as MRSA according to their oxacillin resistance levels (MIC ≥ 4 µg/mL) [19].
Statistical analysis
To demonstrate the temporal trend in percentage of susceptibility to relevant antibiotics by strains, we introduced the Joinpoint regression technique, a statistical modeling approach used to identify temporal changes in event rates. Joinpoint program is fitted with a multi-segmented line to achieve a superior fitting than a less segmented line or a single line. Each joinpoint represents a change in the trend with statistical significance. The natural logarithm of incidence rate is fitted into a straight line as the function of calendar year in each segment, thus the estimated annual percentage change (APC) along with its 95% confidence intervals (CIs) are obtained. The slope of each line segment is indicated by APC, showing both gradient and direction. The average annual percentage change (AAPC) is calculated by assuming that there is only one line throughout the study period [20 − 22]. In the process of our Joinpoint regression analysis, the Monte Carlo simulation technique was used to model fitting. A default permutation test was applied to predict the number of joinpoints, and the number of permutations was 4499 after trading off the computer time and the consistency of p-values. Frequencies of categorical variables and medians and interquartile ranges of continuous variables were presented in the results. Mantel-Haenszel linear-by-linear association chi-square test was employed to analyze the trends in the levels of MIC over time by isolates against corresponding antibiotics. Support information can be accessed on the official IBM website (https://www.ibm.com/support/pages/mantel-haenszel-test-trend-available-crosstabs). All tests, including Mantel-Haenszel linear-by-linear association chi-square test and permutation test in the Joinpoint regression, are two-sided. The statistical significance was set at P < 0.05. Statistical analyses were performed using SPSS software (Version 26.0, IBM Corp, Armonk, NY, USA) and Joinpoint Regression Program (Version 4.9.1.0, Calverton, Maryland).
Results
Participants and pathogen distribution
A total of 1397 full-term neonates met the inclusion criteria between January 1, 2012 and December 31, 2021. After excluding patients without antibiotic susceptibility reports (n = 257, 18.4%) and those with only contaminated strains in the blood or CSF cultures (n = 445, 31.9%), 695 episodes of neonatal IBIs were ultimately enrolled in this study, including 197 early-onset cases with age of onset 3 days or less after birth and 498 late-onset cases with age of onset more than 3 days after birth (Fig. 1). Among these 695 cases, 547 (78.7%) had bacteremia without bacterial meningitis, 55 (7.9%) had bacterial meningitis without bacteremia, and 93 (13.4%) had both bacteremia and bacterial meningitis. The yearly demographic characteristics of the patients are described in Table 1, which remained relatively stable over the decade. Male patients constituted 66.3% of the total cases, and vaginal deliveries accounted for 75.5%. Moreover, 68 neonates (9.8%) had invasive procedures like operations, invasive ventilation or central venous catheters. The overall mortality rate of IBIs was 3.7%.
With regard to the pathogens, the top four pathogens accounted for 90.9%, including Escherichia coli (219, 31.5%), GBS (173, 24.9%), Enterococcus spp. (123, 17.7%), and Staphylococcus aureus (117, 16.8%). Other isolates are listed in Fig. 1.
Trends in antimicrobial susceptibility in neonatal IBIs
Figure 2 exhibits the B-spline fitting curves describing the temporal trends in the prevalence of antimicrobial susceptibility by the four most prevalent pathogens during the past 10 years and highlighting the inflection points with statistical significance. The annual proportions of susceptible strains and their corresponding 95% CIs are shown in Additional File 2. Figure 3 illustrates the AAPC in antibiotic susceptibility of four common pathogens in neonatal IBIs from 2012 to 2021, which is calculated by assuming that there are no flection points throughout the study period. The findings revealed that there was no significant change observed in the antibiotic susceptibility of gram-negative bacilli. However, the proportion of ESBL-negative Escherichia coli strains increased significantly (AAPC = 62.4%; 95%CI, 44.3–82.9%; P for trend < 0.001). Among gram-positive cocci, GBS and Staphylococcus aureus appeared to have pronounced improvement in some antimicrobial susceptibilities over the past decade, such as GBS to erythromycin (AAPC = 55.2%; 95%CI, 23.2–95.5%; P for trend = 0.002), GBS to clindamycin (AAPC = 54.8%; 95%CI, 9.6–118.6%; P for trend < 0.001), and Staphylococcus aureus to penicillin (AAPC = 56.2%; 95%CI, 34.8–81.0%; P for trend < 0.001). However, Enterococcus spp. showed a declining trend to ampicillin (AAPC = − 11.7%; 95%CI, − 15.2% to − 8.1%; P for trend < 0.001) (Fig. 3).
Changes in the prevalence of susceptibility to antibiotics, however, are not constant over time. Individually, for Escherichia coli, except meropenem which maintained almost 100% sensitivity, the susceptibility to third- or fourth-generation cephalosporins and gentamicin remained relatively stable, whereas ampicillin displayed a slight decrease (Fig. 2a). Nevertheless, the rate of ESBL-negative strains increased significantly and persistently, especially during the periods of 2012–2014 (APC = 281.3%; 95% CI, 34.6–980.2%; P for trend = 0.03) and 2014–2018 (APC = 53.7%; 95% CI, 18.4–99.5%; P for trend = 0.02). After 2018, the prevalence stabilized within the range of 76.5–88.5% (APC = − 1.0%; 95% CI, − 9.2–8.0%; P for trend = 0.68) (Fig. 2b). For gram-positive cocci, the improvement in susceptibility of GBS to clindamycin exhibited a subsequent decrease after 2016, with fluctuations ranging from 20.0 to 42.8% between 2016 and 2021 (APC = 1.9%; 95% CI, − 28.5–45.4%; P for trend = 0.90) (Fig. 2c). The sensitivity of Enterococcus spp. to penicillin and high-concentration gentamicin did not change significantly; however, its susceptibility to ampicillin gradually declined over time, from 100.0 to 25.0% (APC = − 11.7%; 95% CI, − 15.2% to − 8.1%; P for trend < 0.001) (Fig. 2d). Regarding Staphylococcus aureus, a substantial susceptibility improvement was only observed in penicillin with an inflection point in 2018. Before 2018, the strain exhibited a complete resistance with the prevalence of susceptibility close to 0.0%; while after that, there was a notable advancement, reaching 50% by 2021 (APC = 260.3%; 95% CI, 114.5–505.2%; P for trend = 0.001). Meanwhile, Staphylococcus aureus also displayed a high sensitivity to gentamicin throughout this decade, except for the sporadic emergence of resistant strains in 2017 and 2021. The prevalence of MRSA was comparatively low, as the majority of subjects in our study were community-acquired infections. The annual susceptibility of Staphylococcus aureus to oxacillin primarily fluctuated from 85.7 to 92.9% (Fig. 2e). In addition, it was reassuring that all gram-positive cocci, GBS, Enterococcus spp., and Staphylococcus aureus were shown sustained susceptibility to linezolid and vancomycin throughout the past decade. Over the ten years of this study, we observed that the transition period was around 2014 to 2018. Detailed model outputs of Joinpoint regression are shown in Additional File 3.
Changes in antibiotic MICs in neonatal IBIs
To obtain a more precise profile of subtle changes in susceptibility of pathogens to antibiotics in neonates, we further observed the changes in antibiotic MICs between 2019 and 2021 (Fig. 4). The arrows pointing to the right exhibit increases in proportion over time, while arrows pointing to the left represent decreases. Compared with 2019, the proportion of strains with relatively low MIC levels in some pathogens increased to varying degrees in 2021. Specifically, in sensitive strains of GBS, the percentages of the strains with low MIC values for erythromycin, clindamycin, linezolid, and vancomycin increased in 2021, but only GBS to clindamycin with a significant linear trend (P = 0.016), consistent with the observed trend analysis (Fig. 4b and Additional File 4). Regarding Enterococcus spp., although the trend analysis above showed a decline in ampicillin sensitivity, there was no significant change in the MIC from 2019 to 2021 (Fig. 4c). In terms of MIC values for antimicrobials to Staphylococcus aureus strains, the proportion of MIC ≤ 0.12 µg/ml for penicillin tripled in 2021 compared with 2019 (50.0% vs. 16.7%), with statistical significance (P = 0.033). Although Staphylococcus aureus showed sustained susceptibility to vancomycin in these years, its proportion of relatively low MIC levels still increased in a linear trend (P = 0.035) (Fig. 4d and Additional File 4). Finally, in gram-negative bacteria, Escherichia coli strain did not show any obvious improvement in the composition ratio of MIC values for the antibiotics such as ampicillin, cefepime, cefotaxime, ceftriaxone, and gentamicin over the study period.
Discussion
Our study explored the dynamics of pathogen susceptibility to antibiotics among full-term neonates with IBIs in 17 facilities across China from 2012 to 2021. During the decade, there was a rapid increase in the percentage of ESBL-negative Escherichia coli, reaching approximately 80%, which approached the level observed in the United States (93 − 95%) [23]. The susceptibility of pathogens to most antibiotics generally tended to be stable or improved over various periods, except for Enterococcus spp. to ampicillin. Specifically, the susceptibility of GBS to erythromycin and clindamycin improved after 2012; however, it still fell behind the levels in North American countries (0.0 − 66.7% vs. 50 − 84%; 0.0 − 42.8% vs. 58 − 95%, respectively) [24]. Following the release of a refined management of antimicrobials for children in 2018, a breakthrough improvement was observed in the susceptibility of Staphylococcus aureus to penicillin. The proportion of lower MICs for certain antibiotics appeared to have improved from 2019 to 2021, in which GBS demonstrated prominent improvement in its susceptibility to clindamycin, as did Staphylococcus aureus to penicillin and vancomycin.
The increased antimicrobial susceptibility can be attributed to several factors, one of which was the implementation of significant reforms in antibiotic manufacturing, circulation, and utilization by the Chinese government in early years. It was exemplified by the Administrative Measures for Clinical Application of Antibiotics issued by the Ministry of Health in China in 2012. This policy primarily aimed to prohibit the over-the-counter sales of antibiotics and mitigate antimicrobial abuse rates [25]. By 2016, the 5-year National Action Plan was enacted, including enhancing drug-resistant strain monitoring systems, prohibiting routine administration of antibiotics to healthy livestock, and intensifying prevention measures against environmental pollution caused by antibiotics [26]. Subsequently, in 2018, the National Health Commission further issued a notice on strengthening the clinical management of antibiotics in vulnerable populations such as children [27]. In response, all clinicians in our participating hospitals followed the antibiotic prescription patterns among Chinese children [28] and executed various strategies, including implementing broad-spectrum antibiotic prescription authorization, limitations on the number of prescribed medicines, regular evaluation of antibiotics use density, and real-time monitoring of antimicrobial resistance data by pharmacists. Subsequently, we observed a decline in the prevalence of gram-negative bacilli-producing ESBL enzymes, whereas the susceptibility of certain gram-positive cocci to antibiotics improved gradually. Nevertheless, the emergence of each breakpoint in the trend may be attributed to the combined effect of multiple policies, which required a certain period of effort to show up. Therefore, it cannot be explained by any specific policy.
Besides that, another possible contributing factor was the standard therapeutic scheme for certain infectious diseases. Recently, domestic experts have developed several clinical guidelines for antimicrobial use and continuously updated them in real time [29 − 31]. These guidelines were developed with reference to relevant foreign guidelines or protocols [32, 33], and updated based on evidence-based recommendations that align with Chinese population characteristics. One significant initiative was to gradually implement prenatal screening for GBS and utilize penicillin or ampicillin as first-line intrapartum antimicrobial prophylaxis in many Chinese hospitals, aiming to standardize prenatal antibiotic use [34, 35]. The administration of this standardized treatment regimen did contribute to reducing the irrational use of antibiotics and enhancing the susceptibility of GBS to erythromycin and clindamycin, as evidenced by our research findings.
Additionally, the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID − 19) pandemic may also have an impact on public health and the management of diverse healthcare matters [36]. During this epidemic, implementing non-pharmaceutical public health interventions (NPIs), such as strict adherence to isolation protocols, the reinforcement of personal protective measures, the promotion of hand hygiene, and the enhancement of environmental disinfection procedures, were pivotal in curbing nosocomial infections and reducing antibiotic utilization rates. It had been reported that NPIs likely contributed to the decline in invasive bacterial disease incidence in the United States in 2020 [37], and caused reductions in antibiotic prescribing among children [38]. As shown in our study, the increase in the proportion of GBS strains with relatively low MIC value of clindamycin in 2021 was obvious compared with 2019, as well as Staphylococcus aureus to penicillin. Furthermore, although the antibiotic susceptibility test indicated that some gram-positive cocci consistently remained sensitive to vancomycin and linezolid, there was still a discernible increase in the proportion of strains with lower MIC levels. All these improvements in antimicrobial susceptibility may be partially attributed to the modifications above in medical models and health concepts during the epidemic period.
Our study had several limitations. First, although this was a multicenter survey, our study was not designed as a national census. Due to the unbalanced regional distribution of participating hospitals, it may not reflect the specific situation of neonatal antimicrobial resistance in different regions of China. Second, the contamination rate in this study was relatively high. This suggested that there was still some space for improvement in the prior sample collection process. On the other hand, it also probably reflected the inherent challenges in obtaining high-quality data for neonatal IBIs. Third, given that the ESBL testing was not routinely conducted for all Escherichia coli strains, it resulted in a disconnect between ESBL production and third-generation cephalosporin resistance in the early years. Fourth, since the MIC of antibiotics was not determined before 2019, we could only explore its changes over the following three years. Lastly, preterm infants were excluded from the study. Preterm newborns may have a distinct spectrum of pathogens compared with full-term neonates and are more vulnerable to drug-resistant bacterial infections due to prolonged hospitalization in NICUs and exposure to more invasive procedures. This could potentially obscure the true trend of antimicrobial susceptibility if they are included in the study.
Conclusions
In this study, antimicrobial susceptibility in full-term neonates with IBIs in China appeared to be improved and stabilized for most pathogens between 2012 and 2021, implying that the effectiveness of principles and practice of antibiotic stewardship had gradually emerged. The current domestic situation, however, still remains severe compared with that in developed countries [39]. Therefore, in addition to the further improvements in hospital capacity of infection control, individualized management should be accelerated to promote targeted care for vulnerable infants. Our multicenter study may help decision-makers to institute sustainable antimicrobial strategies.
Data availability
All data generated or analyzed in the study are included within this article and its supplementary information files.
Abbreviations
- AAPC:
-
Average annual percentage change
- APC:
-
Annual percentage change
- CI:
-
Confidence interval
- CLSI:
-
Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute
- COVID − 19:
-
Coronavirus disease 2019
- CSF:
-
Cerebrospinal fluid
- DDST:
-
Double disk synergy test
- ESBL:
-
Extended-spectrum beta-lactamase
- E. coli:
-
Escherichia coli
- E. spp.:
-
Enterococcus spp
- GBS:
-
Group B Streptococcus
- IBIs:
-
Invasive bacterial infections
- IQR:
-
Interquartile range
- MICs:
-
Minimum inhibitory concentrations
- MRSA:
-
Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus
- NPIs:
-
Non-pharmaceutical public health interventions
- S. aureus:
-
Staphylococcus aureus
References
Laxminarayan R, Van Boeckel T, Frost I, Kariuki S, Khan EA, Limmathurotsakul D, et al. The Lancet Infectious Diseases Commission on antimicrobial resistance: 6 years later. Lancet Infect Dis. 2020;20(4):e51–60.
WHO. Antimicrobial resistance. 2023. https://www.who.int/en/news-room/fact-sheets/detail/antimicrobial-resistance. Accessed 21 Nov 2023.
Musicha P, Cornick JE, Bar-Zeev N, French N, Masesa C, Denis B, et al. Trends in antimicrobial resistance in bloodstream infection isolates at a large urban hospital in Malawi (1998–2016): a surveillance study. Lancet Infect Dis. 2017;17(10):1042–52.
Zhang R, Eggleston K, Rotimi V, Zeckhauser RJ. Antibiotic resistance as a global threat: evidence from China, Kuwait and the United States. Global Health. 2006;2:6.
Rochford C, Sridhar D, Woods N, Saleh Z, Hartenstein L, Ahlawat H, et al. Global governance of antimicrobial resistance. Lancet. 2018;391(10134):1976–8.
Qu J, Huang Y, Lv X. Crisis of Antimicrobial Resistance in China: now and the future. Front Microbiol. 2019;10:2240.
Liang Y, Qiu L, Zheng X, Liu J. Trend in Antimicrobial Resistance of Staphylococcus aureus: results from the China Antimicrobial Surveillance Network (CHINET) in the last 15-Year-period reports (2005–2019). Infect Drug Resist. 2021;14:2179–81.
Hu F, Guo Y, Yang Y, Zheng Y, Wu S, Jiang X, et al. Resistance reported from China antimicrobial surveillance network (CHINET) in 2018. Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis. 2019;38(12):2275–81.
Baltogianni M, Giapros V, Kosmeri C. Antibiotic Resistance and Biofilm infections in the NICUs and methods to combat it. Antibiot (Basel). 2023;12(2):352.
Sands K, Carvalho MJ, Portal E, Thomson K, Dyer C, Akpulu C, et al. Characterization of antimicrobial-resistant Gram-negative bacteria that cause neonatal sepsis in seven low- and middle-income countries. Nat Microbiol. 2021;6(4):512–23.
Li G, Bielicki JA, Ahmed ASMNU, Islam MS, Berezin EN, Gallacci CB, et al. Towards understanding global patterns of antimicrobial use and resistance in neonatal sepsis: insights from the NeoAMR network. Arch Dis Child. 2020;105(1):26–31.
Holmes CL, Anderson MT, Mobley HL, Bachman MA. Pathogenesis of Gram-negative bacteremia. Clin Microbiol Rev. 2021;34(2):e00234–20.
Liu L, Johnson HL, Cousens S, Perin J, Scott S, Lawn JE, et al. Global, regional, and national causes of child mortality: an updated systematic analysis for 2010 with time trends since 2000. Lancet. 2012;379(9832):2151–61.
Tan J, Wang Y, Gong X, Li J, Zhong W, Shan L, et al. Antibiotic resistance in neonates in China 2012–2019: a multicenter study. J Microbiol Immunol Infect. 2022;55(3):454–62.
Neonatal Professional Committee of Chinese Medical Doctor Association. Guidelines for the classification construction and management of neonatal wards in China [Article in Chinese]. Chin J Appl Clin Pediatr. 2013;28(3):231–7.
Cruz AT, Mahajan P, Bonsu BK, Bennett JE, Levine DA, Alpern ER, et al. Accuracy of complete blood cell counts to identify Febrile infants 60 days or younger with invasive bacterial infections. JAMA Pediatr. 2017;171(11):e172927.
Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute. Performance standards for antimicrobial susceptibility testing, M100. 31st ed. Wayne, PA: Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute; 2021.
Jean SS, Coombs G, Ling T, Balaji V, Rodrigues C, Mikamo H, et al. Epidemiology and antimicrobial susceptibility profiles of pathogens causing urinary tract infections in the Asia-Pacific region: results from the study for Monitoring Antimicrobial Resistance trends (SMART), 2010–2013. Int J Antimicrob Agents. 2016;47(4):328–34.
Zhu L, Lai Y, Li X, Ma H, Gong F, Sun X, et al. Molecular and epidemiological characterization of Staphylococcus aureus causing bovine mastitis in China. Microb Pathog. 2024;191:106640.
Kim HJ, Fay MP, Feuer EJ, Midthune DN. Permutation tests for joinpoint regression with applications to cancer rates. Stat Med. 2000;19(3):335–51.
Muntner P, Hardy ST, Fine LJ, Jaeger BC, Wozniak G, Levitan EB, et al. Trends in blood pressure control among US adults with hypertension, 1999–2000 to 2017–2018. JAMA. 2020;324(12):1190–200.
Kim HJ, Chen HS, Byrne J, Wheeler B, Feuer EJ. Twenty years since Joinpoint 1.0: two major enhancements, their justification, and impact. Stat Med. 2022;41(16):3102–30.
Strysko JP, Mony V, Cleveland J, Siddiqui H, Homel P, Gagliardo C. International travel is a risk factor for extended-spectrum β-lactamase-producing Enterobacteriaceae acquisition in children: a case-case-control study in an urban U.S. hospital. Travel Med Infect Dis. 2016;14(6):568–71.
Sabroske EM, Iglesias MAS, Rench M, Moore T, Harvey H, Edwards M, et al. Evolving antibiotic resistance in Group B Streptococci causing invasive infant disease: 1970–2021. Pediatr Res. 2023;93(7):2067–71.
Ministry of Health. People’s Republic of China. Administrative measures for clinical application of antibiotics. in Chinese. 2012. https://www.gov.cn/flfg/2012-05/08/content_2132174.htm. Accessed 8 May 2012.
National Health and Family Plan Commission of China, National Development and Reform Commission of China, Ministry of Education of China, et al. National action plan for the containment of antibacterial resistance (2016 – 2020). in Chinese et al. 2016. https://www.gov.cn/xinwen/2016-08/25/content_5102348.htm. Accessed 25 Aug 2016.
National Health Commission of the People’s Republic of China. Guidelines for optimizing the management of antimicrobial clinical applications. in Chinese. 2018. http://www.nhc.gov.cn/yzygj/s7659/201805/c79c998bdf8f4744858051cdfd1e6818.shtml. Accessed 10 May 2018.
Zhang J, Zheng Y, Yang Y. Antibiotic prescription patterns in children and neonates in China. Lancet Glob Health. 2019;7(11):e1496.
National Health Commission of the People’s Republic of China. Special rectification of antibacterial drug clinical application. in Chinese. 2012. https://www.gov.cn/gzdt/2012-03/06/content_2084862.htm. Accessed 6 Mar 2012.
National Health and Family Planning Commission of the People’s Republic of China. Guiding principles of clinical use of antibiotics. in Chinese. 2015. https://www.gov.cn/xinwen/2015-08/27/content_2920799.htm. Accessed 27 Aug 2015.
Subspecialty Group of Neonatology, the Society of Pediatric, Chinese Medical Association. Professional Committee of Infectious Diseases, Neonatology Society, Chinese Medical Doctor Association. Expert consensus on the diagnosis and management of neonatal sepsis (version 2019). In Chinese. Zhonghua Er Ke Za Zhi. 2019;57(4):252–7.
National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE). Neonatal infection: antibiotics for prevention and treatment. 2021. https://www.nice.org.uk/guidance/ng195. Accessed 20 Apr 2021.
Verani JR, McGee L, Schrag SJ, Division of Bacterial Diseases, National Center for Immunization and Respiratory Diseases, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC). Prevention of perinatal group B streptococcal disease–revised guidelines from CDC, 2010. MMWR Recomm Rep. 2010;59(RR–10):1–36.
Li X, Gao W, Jia Z, Yao K, Yang J, Tong J, et al. Characterization of Group B Streptococcus recovered from pregnant women and newborns attending in a hospital in Beijing, China. Infect Drug Resist. 2023;16:2549–59.
Puopolo KM, Lynfield R, Cummings JJ, COMMITTEE ON FETUS AND NEWBORN; COMMITTEE ON INFECTIOUS DISEASES. Management of infants at risk for Group B Streptococcal Disease. Pediatrics. 2019;144(2):e20191881.
Tseng YW, Huang CW, Chen CC, Er TK. Assessment of antibiotic resistance patterns in Central Taiwan during the COVID-19 pandemic: a retrospective study. J Infect Public Health. 2024;17(2):229–35.
Prasad N, Rhodes J, Deng L, McCarthy NL, Moline HL, Baggs J, et al. Changes in the incidence of Invasive Bacterial Disease during the COVID-19 pandemic in the United States, 2014–2020. J Infect Dis. 2023;227(7):907–16.
Hamilton A, Poleon S, Cherian J, Cosgrove S, Laxminarayan R, Klein E. COVID-19 and Outpatient Antibiotic prescriptions in the United States: A County-Level analysis. Open Forum Infect Dis. 2023;10(3):ofad096.
Antimicrobial Resistance Collaborators. Global burden of bacterial antimicrobial resistance in 2019: a systematic analysis. Lancet. 2022;399(10325):629–55.
Acknowledgements
The authors thank all the pharmacists and microbiologists who served as scientific advisers, as well as other participants involved in the data collection in this study.
Funding
This work was supported by the National Key R&D Program of China (Grant No.2022YFC2705300) and the Collaborative Innovation Program of the Shanghai Municipal Health Commission (2020CXJQ01).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
ZHY, JTT, and HFH have contributed equally to this work and are co-first authors. YJZ, YC and RC conceived and designed the study. HFH conducted the data analysis. ZHY and JTT constructed the tables and figures, and ZHY drafted the manuscript. JYZ, XHG, JL, CC, FL, XYH, HYW, HYL, MFW, RQY, XPL, QZ, FDX, NL, HJ and JHF investigated and collected data. YJZ, YC and RC revised the manuscript critically. YJZ supervised the study. All the authors are responsible for interpreting the data, checking the data, and providing the final approval of the manuscript.
Corresponding authors
Ethics declarations
Ethics approval and consent to participate
This study was approved by the Medical Ethical Committees of Xinhua Hospital, School of Medicine, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai, China (Approval number: XHEC − C−2017 − 084). All the authors have signed written informed consent, approved the submission of this manuscript in its current form, and assumed full accountability for its content. The legal guardian of all participants provided informed consent for the use of their data in this clinical study.
Consent for publication
Not applicable.
Competing interests
The authors declare no competing interests.
Additional information
Publisher’s Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Electronic supplementary material
Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.
13756_2024_1440_MOESM2_ESM.pdf
Additional File 2. Table of trends in the antimicrobial susceptibility of common pathogens among Chinese full-term neonates with IBIs
13756_2024_1440_MOESM4_ESM.pdf
Additional File 4. Table of Mantel-Haenszel linear-by-linear chi-square test for MIC of antibiotics against pathogens in Chinese full-term neonates with IBIs, 2019–2021
Rights and permissions
Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
About this article
Cite this article
Yin, Z., Tan, J., Huang, H. et al. Trends in the antimicrobial susceptibility among Chinese neonates from 2012 to 2021: a multicenter study. Antimicrob Resist Infect Control 13, 83 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1186/s13756-024-01440-2
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s13756-024-01440-2