Skip to main content

Table 1 Characteristics of included studies

From: Predictive performance of automated surveillance algorithms for intravascular catheter bloodstream infections: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Study

Setting

Type of ward

Location

Study period

Study population sample size

Catheter types included

Outcome

Trick et al. [22]

2 hospitals

All wards excluding neonatal and pediatric wards

US, Chicago

Sep 1st, 2001 to Feb 28th, 2002

99 patients (104 positive blood culture) in one hospital, and 28 patients (31 positive blood culture) in the other hospital

CVC

CLABSI

Bellini et al. [23]

1 hospital

All types

Switzerland, Lausanne

3-years period

669 positive blood culture

Unspecified intravascular catheter

CRBSI

Woeltje et al. [24]

1 hospital

6 ICU

US, Missouri

July 1st, 2005 to Dec 31, 2006

540 patients (694 positive blood culture)

CVC

CLABSI

Woeltje et al. [25]

1 hospital

4 non-ICU

US, Missouri

Jul 1st, 2005 to Dec 31, 2006

331 patients (391 positive blood culture)

CVC

CLABSI

Snyders et al. [26]

11 hospitals

17 ICU

US, Missouri

Jan1st to Jun 30, 2011

518 patients (643 positive blood culture)

CVC

CLABSI

  1. CVC: central venous catheter; CLABSI: central line-associated bloodstream infection; CRBSI: catheter-related bloodstream infection ICU: intensive care unit