Skip to main content

Table 5 Empiric antibiotic use

From: Empiric antimicrobial therapy in the intensive care unit based on the risk of multidrug-resistant bacterial infection: a single-centre case‒control study of blood culture results in Japan

 

All patients (n = 173)

R group (n = 129)

Control group (n = 44)

P value

Antifungal

15 (9)

14 (11)

1 (2)

0.066

Anti-MRSA

42 (24)

30 (23)

12 (27)

0.592

Anti-Pseudomonas

77 (45)

61 (47)

16 (36)

0.208

 Carbapenem

30 (17)

22 (17)

8 (18)

0.865

 Anti-Pseudomonas penicillin

37 (21)

30 (23)

7 (16)

0.305

 Anti-Pseudomonas cephem

8 (5)

7 (5)

1 (2)

0.351

 Quinolone

2 (1)

2 (2)

0 (0)

0.555

Penicillin (excluding anti-Pseudomonas)

29 (17)

20 (16)

9 (20)

0.448

Cephem (excluding anti-Pseudomonas)

31 (18)

23 (18)

8 (18)

0.958

Macrolide

3 (2)

1 (1)

2 (5)

0.160

Sulfamethoxazole Trimethoprim

3 (2)

3 (2)

0 (0)

0.412

Metronidazole

4 (2)

4 (3)

0 (0)

0.305

Clindamycin

2 (1)

0 (0)

2 (5)

0.064

Antiviral

2 (1)

0 (0)

2 (5)

0.064

None

32 (18)

21 (16)

11 (25)

0.198

Bacteraemia

65 (38)

45 (35)

20 (45)

 

 Appropriate spectrum coverage

48 (74)

29 (64)

19 (95)

0.010

 28-day mortality

15(23)

11 (24)

4 (20)

0.480

  1. Values are presented as the medians (IQRs), n, or n (%)