Skip to main content

Table 2 Environmental surveillance results of outbreaks with confirmed E. anophelis

From: Review on infection control strategies to minimize outbreaks of the emerging pathogen Elizabethkingia anophelis

Outbreak

number*

Environmental surveillance

Surveillance culture method

Positive environmental cultures

Environmental isolate related to outbreak cluster

Source

Possible transmission route

1

Hospital water from central tank and wards, dialysis water, dialysis fluid, seven bottles of disinfectant, oxygen masks, distributed oxygen gases, community tap water and a rainwater cistern

Columbia agar

none

-

Unknown

Unknown

2

50 cultures from 25 potential surfaces and equipment including incubators, monitors, sinks, faucets, aerators and water from faucets.

n/a

Faucet aerator in material washing waste basin (n = 1)

Yes

Faucet aerator

Water

5

27 cultures from 9 water points: sinks, aerator swabs and water samples.

n/a

2 water samples, 4 aerators, 3 sinks (n = 9)

Typing not performed

Water taps

Health care worker’s hands

6

281 swab cultures of equipment and surfaces within patient rooms, restrooms, nursing stations, electronics, furniture, patient care devices, patient transport carts, sinks, and water taps.

BA and MAC, 24 h

4 water taps in ICU, 2 washbasins in ICU, 1 suction regulator in hospital ward (n = 7)

Yes, all 7 environmental isolates in Cluster 1

Cluster 1: water taps

Other clusters: unknown

Water

8

41 cultures of healthcare and personal care products, 29 samples of tap water 61 water-associated biofilm samples (n = 131)

n/a

1 sample of standing water with contaminated patient material

Typing not performed

Unknown

Unknown

9

34 tap water samples and 117 surface swabs (beds, monitors, remote controllers, light switches feedings tubes/bags swabs and sputum suction regulator swabs)

Tryptic soy broth, 48 h followed by BA and MAC 18-24 h CO2

18 tap water samples and 4 surface swabs (2 feedings tubes/bags and 2 sputum suction regulators) (n = 22)

Yes, 4/4 surface swabs and 5/14 water samples were related (PFGE).

Typing not performed on remaining 4 water samples.

Water taps

Feeding tube/bag and sputum suction devices

10

n/a

5% horse agar

3 sinks, 2 sink drains and one handrail (n = 6)

Yes, 2 sink swab related to outbreak isolates. Other 4 isolates not related.

Sink

Unknown

11

15 swabs of equipment or re-usable items, 79 aerator swabs, swabs of internal surfaces of 5 water taps, 10 samples of dialysis water in patient rooms, 8 samples from dialysis taps in dialysis centres, 6 aerators in OR scrub rooms, unknown number of water samples of central water supply.

BA, 48 h

35 aerator swabs, 5 swabs of internal surface of water taps.†

14/14 aerator swabs were > 99% similar to clinical isolates (Rep-PCR)

2/4 aerator swabs < 180 SNP difference (WGS)

Water taps

Water

  1. * Outbreak numbers correspond with outbreak numbers in Table 1. †All clinical and environmental isolates were (mis)identified as E. meningoseptica, but correctly identified as E. anophelis through WGS on available clinical isolates (n = 3) and environmental isolates (n = 4)
  2. n/a = not available, BA = blood agar (tryptic soy agar + 5% sheep blood), MAC = MacConkey agar