Skip to main content

Table 2 Results of the Delphi survey on antimicrobial agents to be included and on methods for data extraction for antibiotic quality assessment

From: Developing a framework for regular and sustainable qualitative assessment of antibiotic use in Korean medical institutions: a Delphi study

Items

Agree (%)

Disagree (%)

Neutral (%)

CVR

The range of antimicrobial agents that can be included (currently)

Antibacterial agents

19 (100.0)

0

0

1.000

Antifungal agents

6 (33.3)

1 (5.6)

11 (61.1)

− 0.333

Antiviral agents

2 (11.1)

5 (27.8)

11 (61.1)

− 0.778

Anti-TB, protozoal, malarial agents

0

12 (66.7)

6 (33.3)

− 1.000

Systemic antibiotics (IV, oral)

19 (100.0)

0

0

1.000

Local antibiotics (nebuliser, ointment, etc.)

1 (5.3)

12 (63.2)

6 (31.6)

− 0.895

The range of antimicrobial agents that can be included (in the future)

Antibacterial agents

19 (100.0)

0

0

1.000

Antifungal agents

16 (88.9)

0

2 (11.1)

0.778

Antiviral agents

12 (66.7)

2 (11.1)

4 (22.2)

0.333

Anti-TB, protozoal, malarial agents

2 (11.1)

4 (22.2)

12 (66.7)

− 0.778

Systemic antibiotics (IV, oral)

19 (100.0)

0

0

1.000

Local antibiotics (nebuliser, ointment, etc.)

3 15.8

9 47.4

7 36.8

− 0.684

Types of antibiotics based on the purpose of the antibiotic prescription (currently)

Therapeutic

19 (100.0)

0

0

1.000

Surgical prophylaxis

19 (100.0)

0

0

1.000

Medical prophylaxis

17 (89.5)

0

2 (10.5)

0.789

Antibiotics for community acquired infection

19 (100.0)

0

0

1.000

Antibiotics for healthcare-associated infection

19 (100.0)

0

0

1.000

Types of antibiotics based on the purpose of the antibiotic prescription (in the future)

Therapeutic

19 (100.0)

0

0

1.000

Surgical prophylaxis

19 (100.0)

0

0

1.000

Medical prophylaxis

19 (100.0)

0

0

1.000

Antibiotics for community acquired infection

19 (100.0)

0

0

1.000

Antibiotics for healthcare-associated infection

19 (100.0)

0

0

1.000

Methods for quality assessment of antibiotics (based on expert opinion, specific criteria [quality indicators])

Evaluation based on expert judgement (not based on specific criteria)

10 (52.6)

2 (10.5)

7 (36.8)

0.053

Evaluation using systematised criteria (quality indicators)

19 (100.0)

0

0

1.000

The need for regular revision of quality indicators developed through consensus of domestic expert groups

19 (100.0)

0

0

1.000

How to extract targeted antibiotics for inclusion in a qualitative antibiotic assessment (currently)

Evaluation of a random sample of antibiotics prescribed on a given day (without considering the duration of antibiotic use)

15 (78.9)

2 (10.5)

2 (10.5)

0.579

Evaluation of all antibiotics prescribed on a given day (without considering the duration of antibiotic use)

4 (21.1)

5 (26.3)

10 (52.6)

− 0.579

Randomised evaluation of antibiotics prescribed in a specific period (considering the duration of antibiotic use)

19 (100.0)

0

0

1.000

Evaluation of all antibiotics prescribed in a specific period (considering the duration of antibiotic use)

6 (31.6)

3 (15.8)

10 (52.6)

− 0.368

Evaluation of antibiotics prescribed at a specific point in time for a specific disease or for a specific antibiotic (census or randomised)

14 (77.8)

2 (11.1)

3 (16.7)

0.556

Combining an assessment of antibiotics prescribed in a specific period with an assessment of specific antibiotics or conditions as needed (all or randomised)

16 (84.2)

2 (10.5)

1 (5.3)

0.684

How to extract targeted antibiotics for inclusion in a qualitative antibiotic assessment (in the future)

Evaluation of a random sample of antibiotics prescribed on a given day (without considering the duration of antibiotic use)

8 (42.1)

3 (15.8)

8 (42.1)

− 0.158

Evaluation of all antibiotics prescribed on a given day (without considering the duration of antibiotic use)

9 (47.4)

4 (21.1)

6 (31.6)

− 0.053

Randomised evaluation of antibiotics prescribed in a specific period (considering the duration of antibiotic use)

18 (94.7)

0

1 (5.3)

0.895

Evaluation of all antibiotics prescribed in a specific period (considering the duration of antibiotic use)

17 (89.5)

1 (5.3)

1 (5.3)

0.789

Evaluation of antibiotics prescribed at a specific point in time for a specific disease or for a specific antibiotic (census or randomised)

8 (42.1)

1 (5.3)

10 (52.6)

− 0.158

Combining an assessment of antibiotics prescribed in a specific period with an assessment of specific antibiotics or conditions as needed (all or randomised)

18 (94.7)

1 (5.3)

0

0.895

  1. CVR content validity ratio, IV intravenous, TB tuberculosis