- Oral presentation
- Open Access
O002: Patient and healthcare worker perception about patient participation in improving hand hygiene practices: impact of a patient participation intervention
https://doi.org/10.1186/2047-2994-2-S1-O2
© Stewardson et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2013
Published: 20 June 2013
Keywords
- Healthcare Worker
- Hand Hygiene
- Patient Participation
- Nursing Profession
- Hand Hygiene Compliance
Introduction
We implemented a cluster-randomized study at a 2200-bed academic medical centre to assess the impact of novel strategies to promote hand hygiene (HH). Wards in one of the three study arms were exposed to a patient participation (PP) program.
Objectives
To investigate the impact of a formal PP program on healthcare worker (HCW) and patient perception of PP for improving HH compliance.
Methods
We performed two cross-sectional studies with written, self-administered, anonymous questionnaires: one each for patients and HCWs. Adult patients were eligible if hospitalized for more than 24 hours in one or more of 66 study wards and discharged between May 16 and May 31, 2012 to their usual place of residence. Patients were defined as “exposed” (to PP) if they stayed ≥ 24 hours in ≥ one ward in the PP study arm during their admission. Completed surveys were returned via postal mail. HCWs working in all study wards were eligible. HCWs were defined as “exposed” if they currently worked in a PP ward. Surveys were brought to each study ward by a member of the study team and completed surveys were returned via internal mail. For each survey, non-respondents received reminders 2 and 4 weeks after initial distribution.
Results
The response rate was similar among exposed and non-exposed patients: 167/316 (53%) and 378/686 (55%), respectively. Compared with non-exposed patients, exposed patients were no more likely to agree that “patients should remind healthcare workers to perform hand hygiene” (31% vs 26%, p=.25) or to report having reminded a nurse (5% vs 3%, p=.16) or a doctor (2% vs 5%, p=.29) during their last admission. The response rate was also similar among exposed and non-exposed HCWs: 230/531 (43%) and 436/999 (44%), respectively. The concept of patients reminding HCWs to perform HH was accepted by 67% of HCWs. HCW acceptance was independently associated with PP exposure (OR 1.51, CI95% 1.00-2.29, p=.048) and nursing profession (OR 1.69, CI95% 1.03-2.79, p=.039).
Conclusion
Compared with control wards, HCWs (but not patients) present in intervention wards had a more favourable perception of PP in HH promotion.
Disclosure of interest
None declared.
Authors’ Affiliations
Copyright
This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
