- Poster presentation
- Open Access
P119: Hand hygiene compliance among nurses in a Japanese tertiary hospital emergency department
© Ikeda et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2013
- Published: 20 June 2013
- Emergency Department
- Hand Hygiene
- Compliance Rate
- Tertiary Hospital
- Hygiene Practice
In June 2012, the number of patients in whom MRSA was detected increased in our hospital emergency department. As hospital-acquired infection was suspected in some of the patients, we conducted observation-based evaluation of hand hygiene practices.
To evaluate the status of hand hygiene compliance in nurses working at the emergency department.
We conducted a total of 11 surveys between June and August 2012 on the status of hand hygiene compliance in 60 nurses at the emergency department. Two infection control practitioners investigated the five moments requiring hand hygiene. The survey form developed by WHO was used. For statistical analysis, chi-square test was conducted using Epi Info™ 3.5.4.
A total of 435 moments requiring hand hygiene were observed, including 64 moments before touching a patient (Moment 1), 112 moments before a clean/asceptic procedure (Moment 2), 40 moments after body fluid exposure (Moment 3), 99 moments after touching a patient (Moment 4), and 120 moments after touching patient surroundings (Moment 5). The median of overall compliance rates was 38% (range, 21-69%). The compliance rate was the highest for Moment 3 at 52.5%, followed by Moment 4 at 47.5%, Moment 5 at 35.0%, Moment 2 at 33.9%, and Moment 1 at 33.9%. With regard to Moments 2 to 4, the compliance rates in nurses wearing gloves were significantly lower than those not wearing gloves.
Our data showed that the overall compliance rate in the emergency department was low as previously reported in other countries. However, we found that there were differences in compliance rates by moment, and the compliance rates were particularly low before touching a patient and before a clean/asceptic procedure. Therefore, education targeting moments with low compliance rates will be required. As the compliance rate was unexpectedly low when gloves were worn, re-education concerning appropriate use of gloves is considered to be necessary.
This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.