Skip to content

Advertisement

  • Poster presentation
  • Open Access

Comparison of hand hygiene opportunities (HHOS) between a us study and in acute care facilities in three other countries

  • 1,
  • 2,
  • 3,
  • 3,
  • 4,
  • 5 and
  • 2
Antimicrobial Resistance and Infection Control20154(Suppl 1):P299

https://doi.org/10.1186/2047-2994-4-S1-P299

Published: 16 June 2015

Keywords

  • Valuable Insight
  • Hand Hygiene
  • Case Patient
  • Compliance Rate
  • Similar Patient

Introduction

There is a lack of published data on HHOs/patient/day across countries. While HH compliance rates are often published based on observations by auditors, some recognised disadvantages are training required, valuable hours taken to collect representative samples and the Hawthorne effect. Emerging technologies have potential to improve data reliability, timeliness and density. A key challenge is to establish an accepted “denominator” (HHOs) in the compliance equation.

Objectives

Our aim was to establish the average HHOs/patient/day in a variety of acute care facilities in Australia, Netherlands and United Kingdom based on the WHO 5 Moments for HH recommendations.

Methods

Australia: 24-hr expert observations of HHOs were made in 2 wards for 7 days. HHOs/patient/day were averaged for both wards, tested for difference and aggregated. Aggregated average HHOs/patient/day were adjusted for care level using patient:nurse ratio and weighted for auditor bias.

Netherlands: Case patients were followed for 7 days to directly observe HHOs/patient/day. Data were tested for difference and averaged.

UK: Commonly performed care scenarios, “virtual patient/HCW observations”, were gathered from a range of wards in 3 hospitals and aggregated into typical care-days representative of patient type by care level to generate HHOs/patient/day. Selected expert observations were completed to validate results.

Average HHOs established from a USA study were then compared against the results from the 3 countries.

Results

In all 3 countries average HHOs/patient/day were in the range 50-85. Patient:nurse ratios in all 3 countries fell in the range 3-5. All results compared closely with the USA study findings.

Conclusion

Our work indicates that in acute care facilities in the 3 countries studied and USA, HHOs/patient/day is similar and driven by the prevailing similar patient:nurse ratio as a universal indicator of patient care level. This novel information provides valuable insight and allows emerging technologies that use HHOs as a denominator in a compliance equation to be considered for use in different developed countries where facilities and practices are similar.

Disclosure of interest

None declared.

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
School of Public Health and Community Medicine, UNSW Medicine, Sydney, Australia
(2)
Research & Development, Deb Group Ltd, Denby, UK
(3)
S3 Global, Glasgow, UK
(4)
Department of Medical Micriobiology and Infectious Diseases, Canisius-Wilhelmina Hospital, and Radboud University Medical Centre, Nijmegen, Netherlands
(5)
Deb Australia, Moorebank, Australia

Copyright

© McLaws et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2015

This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.

Advertisement