Skip to main content

Table 4 Nursing staff results for logistic regression model

From: The acceptability of screening for Carbapenemase Producing Enterobacteriaceae (CPE): cross-sectional survey of nursing staff and the general publics’ perceptions

TDF Domain

Significant predictors

Questionnaire Itema

Wald

OR

95% CI

1. Intentions

I intend/ would intend to conduct CPE screening, on patients on admission, according to my hospital policy.

(79% nursing staff agree)

26.17***

14.2

5.1–39.2

2. Beliefs about the severity of consequences

The consequences of CPE infection for the patients I care for is/will be so severe that screening will always be a priority.

(47% nursing staff agree)

24.15***

7.1

3.26–15.6

3. Knowledge, and Environmental context and resources

I have been informed about my hospital’s policy and processes for screening patients for CPE.

(55% nursing staff agree)

8.70**

3.04

1.45–6.3

4. Social influences

If a rectal swab is/was required as part of CPE screening for the patient I care for they should be asked to do this themselves, if they are able.

(74% nursing staff agree)

8.12**

2.89

1.39–6.0

5. Knowledge

I am aware that CPE is an emerging multi-drug resistant bacterium of growing concern.

(68% nursing staff agree)

6.36*

2.44

1.22–4.9

  1. Adjusted odds ratios, controlling for Health Board and reported CPE screening undertaken in the clinical area
  2. * = p < 0.05, ** = p < 0.01; *** = p < 0.001; Wald reported to 2 significant places [27]; OR and 95% CI reported in line with rule of four [28]
  3. aIn all cases ‘Not agreeing’ with the statement is the reference category