Author Date Country | Design | Setting | Participants | Comparators | Outcome measure(s) | Data collection method | Standardisation | Results |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Tan et al (2020) [26] Switzerland | Within-subject RCT | Laboratory | 19 HCWs | 1) Poured ABHR + rubbing; 2) Sprayed ABHR + rubbing; 3) Sprayed ABHR without rubbing | Bacterial load on hands | Fingertips | Product ABHR isopropanol 60% (v/v) Application time 30 s ABHR volume 3 ml Application technique 6-step (for intervention 1 & 2); sprayed ABHR without hand rubbing (for intervention 3) Artificial contamination (E. coli) | Mean log10 reduction (95% CI) Poured ABHR + rubbing: 3.46 (1.27–5.65); sprayed ABHR + rubbing: 3.66 (1.68–5.64); sprayed ABHR without rubbing: 2.76 (1.65–3.87) Sprayed ABHR without hand rubbing resulted in significantly lower bacterial load reduction than poured or sprayed ABHR with hand rubbing (− 0.70; 95% CI: − 1.13 to − 0.28) |