Skip to main content

Table 2 Patient characteristics of travelling and non-travelling patients

From: Pre-COVID-19 international travel and admission to hospital when back home: travel behavior, carriage of highly resistant microorganisms, and risk perception of patients admitted to a large tertiary care hospital

Patient characteristic

Travelling patient; n = 117

Non-travelling patient; n = 130

p-value

Male gender (%)

70 (59.8)

71 (54.6)

0.408

Age, median (IQR)

63 (21)

65 (15)

0.006

HRMO carrier at admission (%)

7 (6.0)

8 (6.2)

0.955

Antibiotic use < 1y (%)

57 (51.8)a

65 (52.8)a

0.875

Antacid use < 1y (%)

49 (43.0)b

57 (44.9)b

0.767

Travelling household members < 1y (%)

34 (29.3)c

19 (14.6)

0.005

Animal contact (%)d,e

46 (39.3)

42 (32.3)

0.251

Domestic animal contact

39 (33.9)f

35 (27.1)g,h

0.272

Dogs

26 (22.6)

24 (18.8)

0.463

Cats

21 (18.3)

21 (16.4)

0.708

Birds

2 (1.7)

3 (2.3)

NA

Rabbits

1 (0.9)

1 (0.8)

NA

Farm animal contact

2 (1.7)g

3 (2.3)h

NA

Horses

2 (1.7)

2 (1.6)

NA

Goats

1 (0.9)

1 (0.8)

NA

Poultry

1 (0.9)

1 (0.8)

NA

Sheep

0 (0)

2 (1.6)

NA

Pigs

0 (0)

1 (0.8)

NA

  1. Significant differences are indicated in bold text
  2. NA, not applicable; HRMO, highly resistant microorganism; y, year
  3. aSeven patients with missing information
  4. bThree patients with missing information
  5. cOne patient with missing information
  6. fContact with farm or domestic animals more than 3 times a week, more than 1 h each day
  7. eNumbers do not add up because 20 patients had contact with multiple animals
  8. fTwo patients with missing information about which animal
  9. gOne patient with missing information about which animal
  10. hOne patient reported domestic animal contact but missing information about which animal