Skip to main content

Table 3 Change in skin tolerability as a mean of the difference between intervention and baseline; differences in tolerability between intervention and control alcohol-based handrub formulations as assessed by healthcare worker self-evaluation* and observer evaluation; paired-student test;** randomized-crossover study; N = 37 participants

From: Acceptability of an alcohol-based handrub gel with superfatting agents among healthcare workers: a randomized crossover controlled study

 

H1

Hopirub/gel

H1–Hopirub/gel

Mean (SD)

Mean (SD)

Estimate

(IC95%)

P value

Self-evaluation

Redness

− 0.15 (0.66)

0.24 (0.91)

− 0.351

(− 0.818; 0.115)

0.1353

Skin rash

− 0.03 (0.42)

0.05 (0.46)

− 0.081

(− 0.295; 0.132)

0.4461

Oedema

0.00 (0)

0.08 (0.36)

− 0.081

(− 0.202; 0.040)

0.1833

Fissures

− 0.18 (0.64)

0.21 (0.87)

− 0.405

(− 0.886; 0.076)

0.0960

Desquamation

− 0.13 (0.79)

0.26 (1.06)

− 0.405

(− 0.964; 0.153)

0.1495

Dryness

− 0.33 (1.12)

0.08 (1.40)

− 0.351

(− 1.085; 0.383)

0.3381

Itching

− 0.10 (0.67)

0.13 (1.07)

− 0.243

(− 0.755; 0.269)

0.3415

Burning

− 0.08 (0.66)

0.24 (0.82)

− 0.270

(− 0.712; 0.172)

0.2231

Pain

− 0.28 (0.85)

0.29 (0.87)

− 0.595

(− 1.175; − 0.015)

0.0448

Observer evaluation

Redness

− 0.05 (0.45)

0.08 (0.27)

− 0.135

(− 0.360; 0.089)

0.2301

Scaliness

− 0.23 (1.07)

− 0.39 (1.00)

0.270

(− 0.272; 0.813)

0.3190

Fissures

0.00 (0)

0.03 (0.16)

0

(NA)

NA

  1. *Participants were asked to evaluate their skin’s appearance, integrity, level of hydration and physical sensations on a scale of 1–7, and the total was calculated; lower values indicated better self-evaluation.
  2. **A negative difference indicates that H1 scored better than the control (Hopirub/gel)