Skip to main content

Table 3 Post-course satisfaction survey of Train-the-Trainers in hand hygiene

From: Train-the-Trainers in hand hygiene facilitate the implementation of the WHO hand hygiene multimodal improvement strategy in Japan: evidence for the role of local trainers, adaptation, and sustainability

Questions

1st TTT

(N = 74)

2nd TTT

(N = 31)

3rd TTT

(N = 47)

Total

(N = 152)

P value

Did the course meet your expectation?

68 (91.9%)

31 (100%)

47 (100%)

146 (96.1%)

0.037

Do you think what you learned in this course will be useful for your practice?

71 (95.9%)

30 (96.8%)

46 (97.9%)

147 (96.7%)

0.845

Do you think what you learned in this course will improve your patients’ outcome?

63 (85.1%)

31 (100%)

45 (95.7%)

139 (91.4%)

0.095

Do you recommend this course to your colleagues?

64 (85.6%)

30 (96.8%)

46 (97.8%)

140 (92.1%)

0.043

Were the topic covered in the course satisfactory?

66 (89.2%)

31 (100%)

47 (100%)

144 (94.7%)

0.012

Was the balance between lectures and hands-on sessions appropriate?

45 (60.8%)

28 (90.3%)

40 (85.1%)

113 (74.3%)

 < 0.001

Was the length of the entire course appropriate?

29 (39.2%)

23 (74.2%)

38 (80.9%)

90 (59.2%)

 < 0.001

Were hands-on sessions easy to participate in?

32 (43.2%)

24 (77.4%)

38 (80.9%)

94 (61.8%)

 < 0.001

Was the support for hands-on sessions satisfactory?

49 (66.2%)

29 (93.5%)

43 (91.5%)

121 (79.6%)

0.002

Were the course materials satisfactory?

60 (81.1%)

31 (100%)

47 (100%)

138 (90.8%)

0.003

  1. *Wilcoxon sign rank test