The impact of staffing on central venous catheter-associated bloodstream infections in preterm neonates – results of nation-wide cohort study in Germany

  • Rasmus Leistner1Email author,

    Affiliated with

    • Sarah Thürnagel1,

      Affiliated with

      • Frank Schwab1,

        Affiliated with

        • Brar Piening1,

          Affiliated with

          • Petra Gastmeier1 and

            Affiliated with

            • Christine Geffers1

              Affiliated with

              Antimicrobial Resistance and Infection Control20132:11

              DOI: 10.1186/2047-2994-2-11

              Received: 7 December 2012

              Accepted: 29 March 2013

              Published: 4 April 2013

              Abstract

              Background

              Very low birthweight (VLBW) newborns on neonatal intensive care units (NICU) are at increased risk for developing central venous catheter-associated bloodstream infections (CVC BSI). In addition to the established intrinsic risk factors of VLBW newborns, it is still not clear which process and structure parameters within NICUs influence the prevalence of CVC BSI.

              Methods

              The study population consisted of VLBW newborns from NICUs that participated in the German nosocomial infection surveillance system for preterm infants (NEO-KISS) from January 2008 to June 2009. Structure and process parameters of NICUs were obtained by a questionnaire-based enquiry. Patient based date and the occurrence of BSI derived from the NEO-KISS database. The association between the requested parameters and the occurrance of CVC BSI and laboratory-confirmed BSI was analyzed by generalized estimating equations.

              Results

              We analyzed data on 5,586 VLBW infants from 108 NICUs and found 954 BSI cases in 847 infants. Of all BSI cases, 414 (43%) were CVC-associated. The pooled incidence density of CVC BSI was 8.3 per 1,000 CVC days. The pooled CVC utilization ratio was 24.3 CVC-days per 100 patient days. A low realized staffing rate lead to an increased risk of CVC BSI (OR 1.47; p=0.008) and also of laboratory-confirmed CVC BSI (OR 1.78; p=0.028).

              Conclusions

              Our findings show that low levels of realized staffing are associated with increased rates of CVC BSI on NICUs. Further studies are necessary to determine a threshold that should not be undercut.

              Keywords

              Staffing CVC BSI NICU VLBW

              Background

              Newborns with very low birthweight (VLBW) are at increased risk for developing healthcare-associated blood stream infections (BSI) [13]. The BSIs mostly occur on neonatal intensive care units (NICU) and are associated with the use of central venous catheters (CVC). To prevent these potentially lethal infections, consistent high quality of care is critical. Process and structure parameter on NICUs are suspected to influence the quality of care and therefore indirectly the incidence of CVC BSI. Until now it is not clear which parameters have the highest impact. Concerning this topic there have been only few studies on structure and process parameters on NICU that also include NICU staffing [46]. Analyzing data from the German nation-wide nosocomial infection surveillance system for preterm infants on neonatology departments and ICUs (NEO-KISS), we are able to estimate the situation for a large part of Germany’s NICUs.

              Methods

              Setting and patient population

              In January 2000, NEO-KISS was started as a prospective national surveillance system for the most relevant nosocomial infections in VLBW infants (birthweight < 1500 g) in Germany [7]. By January 2008, 213 neonatology departments participated in KISS surveillance. In NEO-KISS, all VLBW infants admitted to the participating NICUs are kept under surveillance from admission to discharge, transfer or death, and all healthcare-associated infections are recorded.

              Data collection

              We collected data on the structure characteristics of the neonatological departments and on the working processes of their NICUs with two separate point questionnaires. The first enquiry took place in August 2008, the second in April 2009. Information requested about NICU structure included data on number of wards and beds of the concerning departments, VLBW patient days in 2007, the existence of handover and/or infectious diseases rounds, and existence of microbiological screening, among other items. The NICU processes assessed included e.g. infusion preparation, CVC and incubator hygiene management, unit-level hand hygiene performance and infusion system use. The “realized staffing” for each unit was defined as realized number of nurses at the time of the questionnaire enquiry divided by the (individual hospital based) planned number of nurses. This ratio was multiplied by 100 and is displayed in the results section as “percentage of realized staffing”. Patient data was obtained from the NEO-KISS database for the departments that took part in our enquiry. The data from January 1st 2008 to June 31st 2009 were analyzed. In the NEO-KISS surveillance database, basic demographic data on patients (e.g. birthweight, sex, way of childbirth, device-days) is collected. Length of stay is defined as the number of days between birth or admission and until a weight of 1,800 g has been reached, the patient’s discharge or death. The pooled CVC utilization ratio was obtained as number of device-days per 100 patient-days. The pooled incidence density was defined as number of BSI cases per 1,000 patient days.

              Definitions of healthcare-associated infections

              NEO-KISS focuses on bloodstream infections, pneumonia and necrotizing enterocolitis. Infection is classified as healthcare associated if arised in hospital after the first 72 h of life or 72 h after admission. NEO-KISS uses modified definitions from the Center for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) for healthcare-associated infections. They are already thoroughly described in former publications [1, 8]. A healthcare-associated BSI was considered central venous catheter-associated if the catheter was present within 48 hours before the infection occurred or if the catheter was still present at infection onset. According to the modified definitions of the CDC for primary sepsis, we stratified the cases in clinically-diagnosed BSI and laboratory-confirmed diagnosis (LCD) of BSI [1, 8]. The LCD BSI cases were further classified by proven pathogens in the two groups coagulase negative staphylococci only (CoNS) or other than CoNS.

              Statistical analysis

              In the descriptive analysis, we calculated numbers and percentages and/or median and inter-quartile range (IQR; 25% percentile - 75% percentile). In the multivariable analysis, we used logistic regression models to investigate the association between occurrence of CVC BSI and various patient, structure and process parameters. We investigated two different endpoints: CVC BSI and CVC BSI cases with laboratory confirmed (LCD) diagnosis other than CoNS. Since observations within one neonatology department are not statistically independent due to department-dependent policies, adjusted incidence rate ratios with 95% confidence intervals (CI) were estimated based on generalized estimating equation (GEE) models which account for this clustering effect by using an exchangeable correlation structure [9, 10]. The log number of patient days was treated as an offset in the model. For the occurrence of bloodstream infection, the multivariable model building strategy was performed in 3 steps. First step: All patient-based parameters were considered in a logistic regression model by stepwise forward variable selection with the significance level p=0.09 for including a parameter in the model and p=0.10 for excluding a parameter. Second step: All process and structure parameters were considered in the resulting model from step 1 by stepwise forward variable selection using the same significance levels for including and excluding. Third step: With all parameters included by step 1 and 2, a GEE model was calculated that took cluster effects within a department into account. By stepwise backward selection only significant parameters remained in the final model. Excluding criteria were the smallest Chi-square value and p≥0.05 in the Type III score statistic. The quasi-likelihood information criterion (QIC) as a modification of the Akaike information criterion was used as goodness-of-fit measure in the GEE model. P-values less than 0.05 were considered significant. All analyses were performed using SAS (SAS Institute, Cary, NC, USA) [13]. In Germany, anonymised secondary data research does not require human research committee review.

              Results

              Basic characteristics of patients and departments

              By January 2008, 213 neonatology departments were registered in NEO-KISS. Thereof 108 (51%) departments took part in our 2008 and 2009 inquiries and provided data on their VLBW-patients to the NEO-KISS database between January 2008 and June 2009 leading to a total of 5,586 patients with 206,459 patient days, and 50,113 CVC days. We found 954 BSIs that occurred in 847 (15.2%) infants. Table 1 shows the parameters of the participating NEO-KISS departments collected by the two questionnaires. Table 2 shows basic demographic data of the patients included. The distribution of realized staffing among the analyzed departments showed the 25% lowest achiever below a maximum level of 95% realized/planned staffing. This breakpoint was chosen as distinction between low level of staffing and not low level of staffing.
              Table 1

              Parameters of the analyzed NEO-KISS departments (N=108)

              Parameter

              Category

              N (%) / †median (IQR)

              Departments total

               

              108 (100)

              Size of department

              Beds

              †20 (16–29)

              ICU beds

              †8 (6–12)

              Patients in 2007

              Total

              †384 (298–529)

              < 1 500 g birthweight

              †35 (20–55)

              Patients January 2008- June 2009

              < 1 500 g birthweight

              †44 (28–65)

              Level

              Level III* (Neonatal critical care) departments

              89 (82)

              Level II* (Step down neonatal nursery) departments

              14 (13)

              Level I* (healthy baby nursery) departments

              2 (2)

              other Level

              3 (3)

              Realized staffing percentage

              Staffing

              †99.6% (94.0% - 100.0%)

              Staffing (min-max)

              87.0% - 117.0%

              Staffing ≥ 95%

              72 (67)

              Staffing < 95%

              27 (25)

              Missing

              9 (8)

              Daily handover rounds and/or regular infectious diseases rounds

              No

              2 (2)

              Yes

              106 (98)

              Standards for indication of hand hygiene

              No

              2 (2)

              Yes

              104 (96)

              Missing

              2 (2)

              Daily disinfection of the buttons of the ventilation systems

              No

              6 (6)

              Yes

              102 (94)

              Routine microbiological screening

              No

              26 (24)

              Yes

              82 (76)

              Cleaning inside the incubator

              No

              25 (23)

              Yes

              83 (77)

              Infusion preparation

              In the pharmacy OR on wards with laminar-flow bench

              93 (86)

              On wards without laminar-flow bench

              15 (14)

              *Care level classification is based on the definitions by the National Healthcare Safety Network (NHSN).

              IQR, inter-quartile range. Realized staffing percentage, ratio of realized staffing / planned staffing * 100.

              Table 2

              Basic patient characteristics of 5,586 analyzed VLBW neonates recorded in NEO-KISS between January 2008 and June 2009

              Parameter

              N (%) overall

              Median (IQR)

              VLBW neonates

              5,586 (100)

               

              Sex male

              2,836 (51)

               

              Birthweight in g

               

              1,150 (869–1370)

              Gestational age in days

               

              205 (190–217)

              Patient-days

              206,459

              33 (23–48)

              Cesarean section

              4,584 (82)

               

              Multiple birth

              1,735 (31)

               

              VLBW neonates with ≥ 1 BSI

              847 (15)

               

              CVC-days

              50,113

              5 (0–14)

                1 CVC-associated BSI

              349 (6)

               

                2 CVC-associated BSI

              28 (1)

               

                3 CVC-associated BSI

              3 (0)

               

              VLBW with ≥ 1 CVC-associated LCD BSI

              94 (1.68)

               

                1 CVC-associated LCD BSI

              89 (1.59)

               

                2 CVC-associated LCD BSI

              4 (0.07)

               

                3 CVC-associated LCD BSI

              1 (0.02)

               

              VLBW died before 1,800 g weight or discharge

              358 (6)

               

              Realized staffing percentage

                

                Missing

              551 (10)

               

                Staffing < 95%

              1,403 (25)

               

                Staffing ≥ 95%

              3,632 (65)

               

              IQR, inter-quartile range. VLBW, very low birthweight. CVC, central venous catheter. PVC, peripheral venous catheter. CPAP, continuous positive airway pressure. BSI, bloodstream infection. LCD, laboratory confirmed diagnosis. Realized staffing percentage, ratio of realized staffing/planned staffing * 100.

              Frequency of different BSI diagnoses

              The pooled incidence of BSI was 15.2 per 100 patients, in median 11.7 (IQR 6.3-19.2). The pooled incidence density of BSI was 4.6 per 1000 patient days (median 3.5; IQR 2.1-5.7). Of the 954 (100%) cases of healthcare-associated BSI, 482 (49%) were laboratory confirmed. Two hundred fifty-eight cases (27%) were due to coagulase negative staphylococci only, 214 (22%) were due to pathogens other than CoNS. Four-hundred fourteen BSIs (43%) were CVC associated. The pooled incidence density was 8.3 per 1,000 CVC days (median 6.8, IQR 1.8-12.2). The pooled CVC utilization ratio was 24.3 per 100 patient days.

              Risk factors for CVC BSI

              To assess the risk factors for a CVC BSI in VLBW newborns, we analyzed demographic, structure and process characteristics of their NICUs individually for each VLBW newborn. The results of the multivariable analyses are shown in Table 3. A realized staffing below 95% of planned staffing proved to be a significant risk factor for the development of CVC BSI compared to the reference category: realized staffing ≥ 95%.
              Table 3

              Risk factors associated with CVC-associated BSI on NEO-KISS NICUs

              Parameter

              Category

              OR

              CI 95%

              p-value

              Realized staffing percentage

              Missing

              1.25

              (0.83-1.88)

              0.289

              <95%

              1.47

              (1.11-1.95)

              0.008

              ≥95%

              1=reference

                

              Birth weight

              <500 g

              4.23

              (2.46-7.3)

              <0.001

              500-749 g

              3.17

              (1.85-5.45)

              <0.001

              750-999 g

              2.28

              (1.47-3.53)

              <0.001

              1000-1249 g

              1.36

              (0.86-2.14)

              0.187

              1250-1499 g

              1=reference

                

              Gestational age (completed weeks)

              <27 weeks

              3.97

              (2.23-7.09)

              <0.001

              27-28 weeks

              3.04

              (1.79-5.16)

              <0.001

              29-30 weeks

              1.99

              (1.05-3.77)

              0.035

              >30 weeks

              1=reference

                

              Length of stay

              21-34 days

              0.44

              (0.29-0.69)

              0.001

              35-48 days

              0.32

              (0.21-0.49)

              <0.001

              >48 days

              0.29

              (0.2-0.42)

              <0.001

              <21 days

              1=reference

                

              Standards for indication of hand hygiene

              Yes

              0.61

              (0.44-0.84)

              0.002

              No

              1=reference

                

              Daily disinfection of the buttons of the ventilation systems

              Yes

              0.68

              (0.5-0.93)

              0.014

              No

              1=reference

                

              Disinfection of the application port before medication infusion/connection of an infusion system

              Often

              0.48

              (0.31-0.77)

              0.002

              Rarely/no

              1=reference

                

              Infusion preparation

              On ward without laminar-flow bench

              1.53

              (1.02-2.28)

              0.039

              In the pharmacy OR on ward with laminar-flow bench

              1=reference

                

              IQR, inter-quartile range. CI 95%, 95% confidence interval. CVC, central venous catheter. BSI, bloodstream infection. Realized staffing percentage, ratio of realized staffing / planned staffing * 100.

              Results of the multivariable regression analysis by GEE models.

              Risk factors for LCD BSI other than CoNS

              The multivariable analysis showed that low realized staffing is a risk factor for the development of laboratory confirmed CVC BSI due to organisms other than CoNS. The results are shown in Table 4.
              Table 4

              Risk factors associated with CVC-associated LCD BSI other than CoNS on NEO-KISS NICUs

              Parameter

              Category

              OR

              CI 95%

              P-value

              Realized staffing percentage

              Missing

              0.71

              (0.26-1.94)

              0.507

               

              <95%

              1.78

              (1.06-2.99)

              0.028

               

              ≥95%

              1=reference

                

              Gestational age (completed weeks)

              <27 weeks

              10.73

              (4.25-27.08)

              <0.001

               

              27-28 weeks

              2.72

              (1.08-6.85)

              0.033

               

              29-30 weeks

              1.81

              (0.67-4.88)

              0.241

               

              >30 weeks

              1=reference

                

              Mode of delivery

              Vaginal

              2.10

              (1.29-3.43)

              0.003

               

              Emergency cesarean section

              1.05

              (0.55-2.00)

              0.888

               

              Cesarean section

              1=reference

                

              CI 95%, 95% confidence interval. CVC, central venous catheter. BSI, bloodstream infection. LCD, laboratory confirmed diagnosis. CoNS, coagulase negative staphylococci. Realized staffing percentage, ratio of realized staffing / planned staffing * 100.

              Results of the multivariable regression analysis by GEE models.

              Discussion

              Multiple risk factors have an impact on the prevalence of CVC BSI in preterm neonates. We performed a prospective nation-wide study on the impact of process and structure parameters in the majority of German NICUs.

              Our results demonstrate that high staffing levels are associated with a lower incidence of CVC BSI and laboratory-confirmed BSI (with organisms other than coagulase negative staphylococci). The results are congruent with several other studies on staffing [4, 11]. A study by Pittet et al. demonstrated that an increased workload is associated with diminished hand hygiene compliance [12]. Cho et al. showed that even a small increase in the nurse-per-patient ratio is associated significantly decreased odds for adverse events [13]. Other studies showed that understaffing as well as overcrowding is associated with a higher risk of outbreaks on NICUs [14, 15]. Two other studies did not observe an influence of nurse staffing [16, 17]. However, both studies assessed the situation on ICUs rather than NICUs. We did not assess the nurse per patient ratio, but we showed that compliance with the in-house recommendations on staffing levels has the potential to prevent healthcare-associated BSI and is a relevant quality assurance tool. So far, there is no general reference for staffing ratios on NICUs. However, the German Commission on Hospital Hygiene and Infection Prevention suggests at least high levels of appropriately trained nurses [18].

              Birthweight and gestational age have been shown in the literature to be the predominant patient related risk factors for healthcare-associated infections [2, 1921]. We could fully confirm these findings our study.

              The preparation of infusions at laminar airflow benches has been recommended to minimize the risk of contamination [22, 23]. Thomas et al. demonstrated that the training background of the preparing person can be critical, rather than the preparation site [24]. We did not assess the training background of personnel. Nevertheless, our data confirms the importance of laminar-flow benches in the preparation of intravenous fluids.

              There are only few studies on the mode of delivery in VLBW newborns. It was found that cesarean section is associated with BSI in VLBW infants, while other studies reported improved morbidity and mortality [2527]. Even though our results confirm the potential protection by cesarean section, this might also be an indirect effect of emergency vaginal delivery. Cesarean sections are usually handled in a well-prepared professional environment and more common in preterm infants [28].

              This study has following limitations. It is based on the NEO-KISS database. Even though we thoroughly proofed their reliability, the accuracy of data is dependent on the quality of these data. We furthermore depend on the information we obtained by the inquiries that could be subject of relevant recall bias. We did not assess the nurse patient ratio and therefore cannot provide an exact threshold as benchmark for quality assurance. Nevertheless our results show that the planned numbers of staffing can have an impact on their rate of nosocomial infections. Planned staffing should therefore strictly be realized.

              Conclusions

              We analyzed the impact of various process and structure parameters on the outcome of healthcare-associated BSI in VLBW neonates. A low level of staffing (realized/planned) on a NICU was associated with an increased risk for CVC-associated BSI. Rather high staffing levels should therefore be implemented and continuously be realized on NICUs. Our results furthermore emphasize the importance of standardization and consistency of medical procedures and hygiene measures on NICUs. We furthermore advocate a high level of communication and cooperation between the staff of the NICU and related fields like infectious diseases and clinical microbiology.

              Declarations

              Authors’ Affiliations

              (1)
              Institute of Hygiene and Environmental Medicine, German National Reference Center for the Surveillance of Healthcare-Associated Infections, Charité University Medicine Berlin

              References

              1. Geffers C, Gastmeier A, Schwab F, Groneberg K, Ruden H, Gastmeier P: Use of central venous catheter and peripheral venous catheter as risk factors for nosocomial bloodstream infection in very-low-birth-weight infants. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 2010, 31:395–401.PubMedView Article
              2. Sandora TJ: Prevention of healthcare-associated infections in children: new strategies and success stories. Curr Opin Infect Dis 2010, 23:300–305.PubMedView Article
              3. Wicker L, Saslow J, Shah S, Bhat V, Sannoh S, Brandon E, Kemble N, Pyon K, Stahl G, Aghai ZH: The effect of comprehensive infection control measures on the rate of late-onset bloodstream infections in very low-birth-weight infants. Am J Perinatol 2011, 28:227–232.PubMedView Article
              4. Cimiotti JP, Haas J, Saiman L, Larson EL: Impact of staffing on bloodstream infections in the neonatal intensive care unit. Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med 2006, 160:832–836.PubMedView Article
              5. Parry GJ, Tucker JS, Tarnow-Mordi WO: Relationship between probable nosocomial bacteraemia and organisational and structural factors in UK neonatal intensive care units. Qual Saf Health Care 2005, 14:264–269.PubMedView Article
              6. Stevens B, Lee SK, Law MP, Yamada J: A qualitative examination of changing practice in Canadian neonatal intensive care units. J Eval Clin Pract 2007, 13:287–294.PubMedView Article
              7. Gastmeier P, Geffers C, Schwab F, Fitzner J, Obladen M, Ruden H: Development of a surveillance system for nosocomial infections: the component for neonatal intensive care units in Germany. J Hosp Infect 2004, 57:126–131.PubMedView Article
              8. Bartels DB, Schwab F, Geffers C, Poets CF, Gastmeier P: Nosocomial infection in small for gestational age newborns with birth weight <1500 g: a multicentre analysis. Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed 2007, 92:F449–453.PubMedView Article
              9. Zeger SL, Liang KY, Albert PS: Models for longitudinal data: a generalized estimating equation approach. Biometrics 1988, 44:1049–1060.PubMedView Article
              10. Graves N, Weinhold D, Tong E, Birrell F, Doidge S, Ramritu P, Halton K, Lairson D, Whitby M: Effect of healthcare-acquired infection on length of hospital stay and cost. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 2007, 28:280–292.PubMedView Article
              11. Fridkin SK, Pear SM, Williamson TH, Galgiani JN, Jarvis WR: The role of understaffing in central venous catheter-associated bloodstream infections. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 1996, 17:150–158.PubMedView Article
              12. Pittet D, Mourouga P, Perneger TV: Compliance with handwashing in a teaching hospital. Infection Control Program. Ann Intern Med 1999, 130:126–130.PubMedView Article
              13. Cho SH, Ketefian S, Barkauskas VH, Smith DG: The effects of nurse staffing on adverse events, morbidity, mortality, and medical costs. Nurs Res 2003, 52:71–79.PubMedView Article
              14. Haley RW, Bregman DA: The role of understaffing and overcrowding in recurrent outbreaks of staphylococcal infection in a neonatal special-care unit. J Infect Dis 1982, 145:875–885.PubMedView Article
              15. Smith PJ, Brookfield DS, Shaw DA, Gray J: An outbreak of Serratia marcescens infections in a neonatal unit. Lancet 1984, 1:151–153.PubMedView Article
              16. Graf J, Reinhold A, Brunkhorst FM, Ragaller M, Reinhart K, Loeffler M, Engel C: Variability of structures in German intensive care units–a representative, nationwide analysis. Wien Klin Wochenschr 2010, 122:572–578.PubMedView Article
              17. Peelen L, de Keizer NF, Peek N, Scheffer GJ, van der Voort PH, de Jonge E: The influence of volume and intensive care unit organization on hospital mortality in patients admitted with severe sepsis: a retrospective multicentre cohort study. Crit Care 2007, 11:R40.PubMedView Article
              18. KRINKO: German commission on hospital hygiene and infection prevention [empfehlung zur prävention nosokomialer infektionen bei neonatologischen intensivpflegepatienten mit einem geburtsgewicht unter 1500 g]. Bundesgesundheitsblatt Gesundheitsforschung Gesundheitsschutz 2007, 50:1265–1303.View Article
              19. Fanaroff AA, Korones SB, Wright LL, Verter J, Poland RL, Bauer CR, Tyson JE, Philips JB 3rd, Edwards W, Lucey JF: Incidence, presenting features, risk factors and significance of late onset septicemia in very low birth weight infants. The national institute of child health and human development neonatal research network. Pediatr Infect Dis J 1998, 17:593–598.PubMedView Article
              20. Phillips P, Cortina-Borja M, Millar M, Gilbert R: Risk-adjusted surveillance of hospital-acquired infections in neonatal intensive care units: a systematic review. J Hosp Infect 2008, 70:203–211.PubMedView Article
              21. Plano LR: The changing spectrum of neonatal infectious disease. J Perinatol 2010,30(Suppl):S16–20.PubMedView Article
              22. Perez-Gonzalez LF, Ruiz-Gonzalez JM, Noyola DE: Nosocomial bacteremia in children: a 15-year experience at a general hospital in Mexico. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 2007, 28:418–422.PubMedView Article
              23. Vidt DG: Use and abuse of intravenous solutions. JAMA 1975, 232:533–536.PubMedView Article
              24. Thomas M, Sanborn MD, Couldry R: I.V. admixture contamination rates: traditional practice site versus a class 1000 cleanroom. Am J Health Syst Pharm 2005, 62:2386–2392.PubMedView Article
              25. Gorbe E, Chasen S, Harmath A, Patkos P, Papp Z: Very-low-birthweight breech infants: short-term outcome by method of delivery. J Matern Fetal Med 1997, 6:155–158.PubMedView Article
              26. Stohl HE, Szymanski LM, Althaus J: Vaginal breech delivery in very low birth weight (VLBW) neonates: experience of a single center. J Perinat Med 2011, 39:379–383.PubMedView Article
              27. Makhoul IR, Sujov P, Smolkin T, Lusky A, Reichman B: Epidemiological, clinical, and microbiological characteristics of late-onset sepsis among very low birth weight infants in Israel: a national survey. Pediatrics 2002, 109:34–39.PubMedView Article
              28. Isayama T, Lee SK, Mori R, Kusuda S, Fujimura M, Ye XY, Shah PS: Comparison of mortality and morbidity of very low birth weight infants between Canada and Japan. Pediatrics 2012, 130:e957–965.PubMedView Article

              Copyright

              © Leistner et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2013

              This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://​creativecommons.​org/​licenses/​by/​2.​0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

              Advertisement