- Short report
- Open Access
Difficult-to-detect carbapenem-resistant IMP13-producing P. aeruginosa: experience feedback concerning a cluster of urinary tract infections at a surgical clinic in France
© Milan et al. licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2013
Received: 3 September 2012
Accepted: 29 March 2013
Published: 4 April 2013
We report a carbapenem-resistant P. aeruginosa clone responsible for a cluster of urinary tract infections in elderly surgery patients, diagnosed during a three-month period in a 59-bed surgical clinic.
The clonal nature of the cluster was established by molecular study of the P. aeruginosa isolates (PFGE and MLST). Despite an MIC of imipenem in the susceptibility range for two isolates, all were metallo-β-lactamase-producers (IMP13-type, clone ST621). We conducted a review of the medical and surgical procedures. We tested water delivered into the clinic and urological devices for the presence of the epidemic strain. The hygiene nurse observed hygiene practices. A week after the implementation of barrier precautions around the fourth infected patient, we studied the extent to which the patients hospitalised were colonised to assess whether the spread of the epidemic strain had been controlled.
1/ Our findings indicate the difficulties in the detection of the metallo-β-lactamase in this clone, that resulted in the alert being delayed. 2/ Unlike most investigations of UTI outbreaks described in urology wards, we did not detect any contaminated urological devices or water colonisation. 3/ Consistent with outbreaks involving the IMP-13 clone in critical care units, the observation of inadequate application of standard precautions argued for patient-to-patient transmission during urinary management of the urology patients. 4/ The implementation of barrier precautions around infected patients resulted in control of the spread of the epidemic clone. This report serves as an alert concerning a difficult-to-detect multidrug-resistant P. aeruginosa clone in elderly urology patients.
IMP-type enzymes, the first acquired metallo-β-lactamases (MBLs) to be detected in Gram-negative pathogens in the early 1990s, remain among the most prevalent and widely distributed MBLs. The P. aeruginosa clone ST621, producing IMP-13, has been responsible for outbreaks in Italian critical care settings, and has recently been identified in other European countries and in South America[1–3].
Patient-to-patient transmission of Pseudomonas aeruginosa is frequent in high-risk patients. Numerous outbreaks of multi-drug resistant P. aeruginosa have been described in neonatal and adult intensive care units, burns units, oncohaematology units and transplantation units. Outside critical care settings, nosocomial outbreaks of P. aeruginosa are mostly associated with contaminated water supplies or inadequately disinfected medical or surgical devices. In urology wards, P. aeruginosa has been found to be associated with urinary tract infection (UTI) outbreaks linked to contaminated urodynamic systems, cystoscopes or urometers, or tap water colonisation.
We report a cluster of UTIs associated with a carbapenem-resistant IMP13-producing P. aeruginosa strain in a French small surgical clinic. This report serves as an alert concerning a difficult-to-detect and multidrug-resistant P. aeruginosa clone in elderly urology patients.
The P. aeruginosa isolates from the UTI cases were identified with Vitek 2 Gram-Negative Identification Cards (bioMerieux, France). Antibiotic susceptibility was tested by an agar disk diffusion method. The combined meropenem +/− dipicolinic acid disk test (Rosco, France) was used for the phenotypic detection of MBL in isolates displaying decreased susceptibility to imipenem according to CLSI and EUCAST breakpoints (MIC > 4 mg/L). The metallo-β-lactamase gene, bla IMP-13, was identified in the epidemic strain as previously described. The isolates were also characterised by O-serotyping, pulsed-field gel electrophoresis (PFGE) and MLST as previously described. We also studied three unrelated IMP-13-producing P. aeruginosa recently isolated in distant French regions (named R1 of ST 621, R2 of ST 308 and R3 of ST111).
During the outbreak investigation, we tested water delivered into the clinic and urological devices for the presence of the epidemic strain. Environmental samples (n=26) were taken from water fittings in each medical and surgical unit. Samples of 200 mL of cold water taken directly from the tap immediately after activating were filtered and the filters cultured on plates containing cetrimide medium. Environmental samples were also taken from the four cystoscopes of the clinic. Plates were incubated at 37°C for 48 hours, and all bacterial colonies likely to be P. aeruginosa were identified and studied as described above.
The hygiene nurse observed hygiene practices (materials and techniques used) in the clinic, to assess if the standard precautions (for all patients) and the barrier precautions (around IMP-13-producing P. aeruginosa-infected patients) were being followed by healthcare workers.
A week after the implementation of barrier precautions around the fourth infected patient, we studied the extent to which the patients hospitalised in the clinic were colonised with the epidemic strain to assess if its spread had been controlled. Rectal swabs were taken from each patient for screening. Swabs were immediately suspended in 0.5 mL of sterile water and 0.1 mL of the suspension was streaked on a plate containing cetrimide medium.
This study was run in accordance with the French Healthcare recommendations for the prevention of infection. Ethical approval was obtained at the national level from the Réseau Alerte Investigation Surveillance des Infections Nosocomiales (RAISIN). The study was managed jointly with the director of the clinic, the hygiene nurse, surgeons and physicians responsible for caring for the patients, and the regional infection-control practitioner. Patients and their relatives were enrolled after an individual interview for consent to allow access to medical records and to culture a faecal sample.
The four clinical cases of UTI
The first case involved a 74-y-old man diagnosed on the 28th of October with a multidrug-resistant imipenem-intermediate P. aeruginosa UTI, 45 days after prostatectomy, and following imipenem treatment administered for multidrug-resistant imipenem-susceptible P. aeruginosa UTI identified one week earlier. The second case was a 90-y-old man diagnosed on the 19th of December with a multidrug-resistant imipenem-susceptible P. aeruginosa UTI, 15 days after nephrostomy. Patient 3 (80 y) was diagnosed on the 6th of January with a multidrug-resistant imipenem-susceptible P. aeruginosa UTI, one day after cystography and during a period when he was undergoing numerous urological surgical interventions. The fourth patient was a woman (89 y) diagnosed on the 16th of January with a multidrug-resistant imipenem-intermediate P. aeruginosa UTI, one month after nephrostomy. In all cases, UTIs were defined on the basis of clinical signs of infection and biological criteria (significant leukocyturia and bacteriuria).
Detection of the IMP-13-producing P. aeruginosa
Review of procedures and techniques, and analysis of environmental samples and hygiene practices
A review of the medical and surgical procedures, and other techniques performed by the medical staff, did not reveal any factor common to the infected patients. P. aeruginosa isolates were recovered from four water samples collected from water fittings in the urological surgical unit, but none of these isolates exhibited high levels of resistance to any of the antibiotics tested. In addition, PFGE and MLST demonstrated that these environmental isolates were genetically distant from the epidemic IMP-13 strain (Figure 1). None of the environmental samples from the cystoscopes was positive for P. aeruginosa. Observations by the hygiene nurse revealed that the barrier precautions around IMP-13-producing P. aeruginosa-infected patient 4 were being followed by healthcare workers. By contrast, the application of standard precautions was not optimal, as hand hygiene practices were inadequate, especially for urinary management and/or the manipulation of urinary catheters, and before cystography. Overall, these observations suggest that transmission between patients was not likely to have been associated with surgery, invasive acts or contaminated water supplies, but with urinary managment.
Nosocomial acquisition of the IMP-13 P. aeruginosa after implementation of barrier precautions
On the 23th of January, all patients hospitalised in the clinic, were screened for the epidemic strain. Nine of the 55 patients (16%), all urology patients, were positive for P. aeruginosa carriage. PFGE and MLST showed genetically diverse colonising isolates and that none presented the IMP13-type (Figure 1). Note that the colonising isolate (R1) of ST 621 and presenting the PFGE IMP13 pattern, was recovered from patient 4, who was still hospitalised at the time of the colonisation study. In addition, no epidemic strain was recovered from any patient at the clinic during the following six months, suggesting that the spread of the epidemic isolate in the clinic had been controlled.
Our results document the spread of the IMP13-producing clone in a small private surgical clinic, rather than in an intensive care unit of a university hospital as previously described for this clone.
For two of the four isolates, the MIC of carbapenem drugs was in the susceptibility range. Consequently, the detection of the cluster of UTIs was delayed for several weeks. Our findings confirm the previously described heterogeneous carbapenem-resistance phenotype of the IMP13-producing clone and suggest that the spread of the clone may be, at least partially, facilitated by difficulties in its detection.
Despite extensive investigations prompted by this cluster of UTIs associated with the IMP-13 P. aeruginosa, no evidence was found for the involvement of the water supplies or contaminated medical or surgical devices. It is possible that the delay between the time of contamination of the patients and our investigations hindered the identification of a contaminated source. However, in all but one case, the time separating surgery and invasive acts from the onset of clinical signs of UTI was long. These observations do not argue for contamination of the patients during surgery or invasive acts.
By contrast, the temporal superposition of hospitalisation for the infected patients, and the observation of insufficiently strict application of hygiene practices in the urology unit and before cystography suggest that the UTI cases may have resulted from cross-transmission during post-surgery hospitalisation. The rate of faecal carriage of P. aeruginosa among elderly urology patients is frequently high, confirming the ability of this bacterium to colonise the urinary tract of such patients. In view of the frequent and invasive nature of urinary care acts following surgery, and the well-described epidemic potential of the IMP-13 clone[1, 3, 11], we suggest that elderly urology patients should be considered to be at high risk of patient-to-patient cross-transmission of IMP-13-producing P. aeruginosa.
Concordant with MLST results, the recent sequence analysis of the bla IMP13 gene in numerous IMP-13-P. aeruginosa isolates from distant French regions showed that our epidemic isolates and the Italian clone have very similar characteristics. Nevertheless, no link with countries experiencing IMP-13-P. aeruginosa outbreaks was identified in the index case history, and the origin of the IMP-13 clone involved in this outbreak remains unclear. Further studies are needed to improve our knowledge of the epidemiology of this highly resistant clone.
Because of the association between the use of broad-spectrum antibiotics and multidrug resistance, a campaign has been run to promote systematic microbiological documentation of UTI: this should favour the use of specific rather than broad-spectrum antibiotics. The early implementation of barrier precautions around infected patients successfully prevented the further spread of the carbapenem-resistant clone in the clinic. We suggest that, when facing a limited cluster of infections, such precautions may be sufficient for infection control, without the need for more extreme measures, such as cohorting, for example.
This work was supported by the Centre de Coordination de la Lutte contre les Infections Nosocomiales de l’Ouest de la France (CCLIN Ouest), the Agence Régionale de Santé du Centre, and the Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Tours, France. None of the authors has a competing interest.
- Naas T, Bogaerts P, Kostyanev T, Cuzon G, Huang TD, Ozsu S, Nordmann P, Glupczynski Y: Silent spread of IMP-13-producing P. aeruginosa belonging to sequence type 621 in Belgium. J Antimicrob Chemother. 2011, 66: 2178-9. 10.1093/jac/dkr252.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Toleman MA, Biedenbach D, Bennett D, Jones RN, Walsh TR: Genetic characterization of a novel metallo-B-lactamase gene, blaIMP-13, harboured by a novel Tn5051-type transposon disseminating carbapenemases genes in Europe: report from the SENTRY worldwide antimicrobial surveillance programme. J Antimicrobial Chemoth. 2003, 52: 583-590. 10.1093/jac/dkg410.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Santella G, Pollini S, Docquier JD, Mereuta AI, Gutkind G, Rossolini GM, Radice M: Intercontinental dissemination of IMP-13-producing P. aeruginosa belonging in sequence type 621. J Clin Microbiol. 2010, 48: 4342-4343. 10.1128/JCM.00614-10.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Kohlenberg A, Weitzel-Kage D, van der Linden P, Sohr D, Vögeler S, Kola A, Halle E, Rüden H, Weist K: Outbreak of carbapenem-resistant P. aeruginosa infection in a surgical intensive care unit. J Hosp Infect. 2010, 74: 350-357. 10.1016/j.jhin.2009.10.024.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Tosh PK, Disbot M, Duffy JM, Boom ML, Heseltine G, Srinivasan A, Gould CV, Berríos-Torres SI:Outbreak ofP. aeruginosasurgical site infections after arthroscopic procedures. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol. 2011, 32: 1179-86. 10.1086/662712.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Wendelboe AM, Baumbach J, Blossom DB, Frank P, Srinivasan A, Sewell CM:Outbreak of cystoscopy related infections withP. aeruginosa: New mexico, 2007. J Urol. 2008, 180: 588-592. 10.1016/j.juro.2008.04.003.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Ferroni A, Nguyen L, Pron B, Quesne G, Brusset MC, Berche P: Outbreak of nosocomial urinary tract infections due to P. aeruginosa in a paediatric surgical unit associated with tap-water contamination. J Hosp Infect. 1998, 39: 301-307. 10.1016/S0195-6701(98)90295-X.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Kidd TJ, Grimwood K, Ramsay KA, Rainey PB, Bell SC: Comparison of three molecular techniques for typing P. aeruginosa isolates in sputum samples from patients with cystic fibrosis. J Clin Microbiol. 2011, 49: 263-268. 10.1128/JCM.01421-10.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Pollini S, Fiscarelli E, Mugnaioli C, Di Pilato V, Ricciotti G, Neri AS, Rossolini GM: P. aeruginosa infection in cystic fibrosis caused by an epidemic metallo-B-lactamase-producing clone with a hetergoeneous carbapenem reistance phenotype. Clin Microbiol Infect. 2011, 17: 1272-1275. 10.1111/j.1469-0691.2011.03466.x.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Djeribi R, Bouchloukh W, Jouenne T, Menaa B: Characterization of bacterial biofilms formed on urinary catheters. Am J Infect Control. 2012, 40: 854-859. 10.1016/j.ajic.2011.10.009.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Cejas D, Almuzara M, Santella G, Tuduri A, Palombarani S, Figueroa S, Gutkind G, Radice M: Phenotypic and genotypic characterization of imipenem-resistant P. aeruginosa isolated in a Buenos Aires hospital. Rev Argent Microbiol. 2008, 40: 238-245.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Fournier D, Jeannot K, Robert-Nicoud M, Muller E, Cholley P, van der Mee-Marquet N, Plésiat P: Spread of the bla(IMP-13) gene in French Pseudomonas aeruginosa through sequence types ST621, ST308 and ST111. Int J Antimicrob Agents. 2012, 40: 571-3. 10.1016/j.ijantimicag.2012.08.006.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.