Skip to main content
  • Poster presentation
  • Open access
  • Published:

A multi-site clinical field study to evaluate the effectiveness of manual cleaning for flexible gastrointestinal endoscopes

Introduction

An ATP bioluminesce assay (ATP Water Test), measuring organic bioburden including microbes, was used to monitor the cleanliness of flexible GI endoscopes after the manual cleaning step of the decontamination and disinfection process, in seven US hospitals.

Objectives

To characterize the effectiveness of the manual cleaning step during reprocessing of flexible endoscopes, from site to site as well as by type of endoscope.

Methods

Duodenoscopes, gastroscopes, and colonoscopes were tested using an ATP Water Test. The method entailed collecting and testing a sterile water sample flushed through the suction/biopsy lumen of the endoscope after completion of manual cleaning. The amount of ATP, in relative light units (RLUs), was measured with a hand-held luminometer. Cleaning failure rates based on a comparison to a published cleanliness pass-fail criterion [1, 2], were determined. A total of 398 endoscopes were tested.

Results

The level of ATP contamination post manual cleaning was found to be statistically different by scope type (p<0.0005), as well as from site to site for each scope type (all p-values < 0.05). Duodenoscopes were found to have the highest mean value of ATP contamination (142 RLUs), followed by gastroscopes (83 RLUs), and finally colonoscopes (29 RLUs). The standard deviation of the mean was also largest for duodenoscopes and gastroscopes. Using the 200 RLUs value proposed in the literature1,2 as a pass-fail cleanliness criterion after manual cleaning, the observed failure rates were found to be highest for duodenoscopes (31%, 15/48) and gastroscopes (22%, 38/168) and lowest for colonoscopes (3%, 6/182).

Conclusion

398 endoscopes, for seven different US hospitals were measured for ATP contamination after manual cleaning. Considerably higher levels of ATP contamination were found in duodenoscopes and gastroscopes as compared to colonoscopes, leading to a significant number of cleaning failures. Given the importance of the manual cleaning step to ultimately achieve proper high level disinfection, these results suggest that protocols and methods used to manually clean upper GI endoscopes may not be adequate.

Disclosure of interest

M. Bommarito Employee of: 3M, G. Thornhill Employee of: 3M, D. Morse Employee of: 3M, H. Reuter Employee of: 3M.

References

  1. Alfa MJ, Fatima I, Olson N: The adenosine triphosphate test is a rapid and reliable audit tool to assess manual cleaning adequacy of flexible endoscope channels. Am J Infect Control. 2013, 41 (3): 249-253. 10.1016/j.ajic.2012.03.015.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Alfa MJ, Fatima I, Olson N: Validation of adenosine triphosphate to audit manual cleaning of flexible endoscope channels. Am J Infect Control. 2013, 41 (3): 245-248. 10.1016/j.ajic.2012.03.018.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Bommarito, M., Thornhill, G., Morse, D. et al. A multi-site clinical field study to evaluate the effectiveness of manual cleaning for flexible gastrointestinal endoscopes. Antimicrob Resist Infect Control 4 (Suppl 1), P54 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1186/2047-2994-4-S1-P54

Download citation

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/2047-2994-4-S1-P54

Keywords