Skip to content

Advertisement

  • Research
  • Open Access

Extended spectrum and metalo beta-lactamase producing airborne Pseudomonas aeruginosa and Acinetobacter baumanii in restricted settings of a referral hospital: a neglected condition

  • 1Email author,
  • 2,
  • 3 and
  • 4
Antimicrobial Resistance & Infection Control20176:106

https://doi.org/10.1186/s13756-017-0266-0

©  The Author(s). 2017

  • Received: 22 March 2017
  • Accepted: 17 October 2017
  • Published:

Abstract

Background

Frequently encountered multidrug-resistant bacterial isolates of P. aeruginosa and A. baumannii are common and prevalent in a hospital environment. The aim of this study was to determine the prevalence and pattern of antibiotic resistance, extended spectrum and metallo beta-lactamase producing P. aeruginosa and A. baumannii isolates from restricted settings of indoor air hospital environment.

Methods

A hospital-based cross-sectional study was conducted in Wolaita Sodo University Teaching and referral Hospital, Ethiopia from December 1/2015 to April 30/2015. The Air samples were collected from delivery room, intensive care unit and operation theatre of the hospital by active, Anderson six slate sampler technique during the first week of the months, twice a week during Monday’s and Friday’s. Standard microbiological procedures were followed to isolate P. aeruginosa and A. baumannii. Susceptibility testing was performed on isolates using the Kirby-Bauer disk diffusion technique. Extended spectrum beta lactamase production was detected by double disc synergy test and Imipenem-resistant isolates were screened for producing Metallo-beta lactamase.

Results

A total number of 216 indoor air samples were collected from the delivery room, intensive care unit, and operation room. Correspondingly, 43 A. baumannii isolates were identified (13 from delivery room, 21 from intensive care unit and 9 from operation room). Likewise 24 P. aeruginosa isolates were obtained (4 from delivery room, 13 from intensive care unit and 7 from operation room). Extended spectrum beta lactamase and metalo-beta lactamase production were observed in 24 (55.8%) and 13 (30.2%) isolates of A. baumannii respectively, whereas P. aeruginosa showed 15 (62.5%) extended spectrum beta lactamase and 9 (37.5%) metallo-beta lactamase production.

Conclusions

Extended spectrum beta lactamase and metallo-beta lactamase producing bacteria in hospital air is a new dimension for specific setting of the study area where antimicrobial resistance is increasing and surgical site infection is prevalent. So, identification of these microorganisms has a great role in reducing the burden of antibiotic resistance and could also provide a significant input for framing hospital infection control policies.

Keywords

  • Antibiotic resistance
  • ESBL
  • MBL
  • P. aeruginosa
  • A. Baumannii
  • MDR
  • Airborne

Background

Airborne microorganisms could cause respiratory disorders, severe infections, hypersensitivity pneumonitis and toxic reactions [1]. Frequently encountered multidrug-resistant (MDR) bacterial isolates like Ceftazidime-resistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa and Imipenem-resistant Acinetobacter baumannii are common and prevalent in a hospital environment [2–5].

Multidrug-resistant P. aeruginosa is inherently resistant to many drug classes and is able to acquire resistance to all effective antimicrobial drugs [6]. MDR P. aeruginosa elaborates inactivating enzymes that make beta-lactams and carbapenems ineffective, such as extended spectrum beta lactamases (ESBLs) and metallo-β-lactamases (MBLs) [7].

A. baumannii also remain problematic because of its high intrinsic resistance to a wide variety of antimicrobial agents. Moreover, the ability of resistant strains of A. baumannii to survive for prolonged periods in the hospital environment contributes significantly to antimicrobial resistance, thereby posing a difficult challenge for infection control [8, 9]. Carbapenems used to be the drugs of choice for treating burn infections caused by A. baumannii strains. Consequently, due to selective pressure on carbapenems and the increased use of this antibiotic, carbapenem-resistant A. baumannii has emerged. This problem worsens in cases of MBL production when the drug of last choice, carbapenems, is inactive [10].

The uncontrolled movement of air in and out of the hospital environment makes the bacterial persistence worse since these infectious microorganisms may spread easily into the environment through sneezing, coughing, talking and contact with hospital materials. It can affect patients admitted to rooms in which the prior occupants tested positive for a pathogen and also other patients in the facility [11, 12].

Therefore, the main objective of this study was to determine the prevalence and pattern of ESBL and MBL producing P. aeruginosa and A. baumannii from hospital indoor air of Wolaita Sodo University Teaching and Referral Hospital (WSUTRH).

Methods

Study area

The study was conducted at Wolaita Sodo University Teaching and Referral Hospital (WSUTRH), Sodo, located South Central Ethiopia. It is serving people in catchment’s area of 2 million people. The hospital has 320 beds for inpatient service which are on medical, pediatrics, surgical, intensive care unit, gynecology and obstetrics wards.

Study design and period

A hospital based cross sectional study was conducted to determine the prevalence and pattern of antibiotic resistance, extended spectrum and metallo beta-lactamase producing P. aeruginosa and A. baumannii isolates from restricted settings of indoor air hospital environment. The study was undertaken from December 1, 2015 to April 30, 2016 in WSUTRH.

Sampling techniques

The Air samples were collected during the first week of the months, twice a week during Monday’s and Friday’s. All microbiological procedures were conducted in Wolaita Sodo University microbiology laboratory which is an accredited laboratory with bio-safety cabinet two and vitek 2 microbiology apparatus. The laboratory built independently 5 km far from the clinical departments where air samples were conducted.

Active air sampling

Active air sampler, Anderson six state cascade impactor, which sucks 28.3 l of air per minute, was used and the Petridish was placed in the impactor for 5 minutes [13]. After that the Petridish was shipped to Wolaita Sodo university microbiology laboratory. Petri dishes were labeled with sample number, hospital ward, date and time (hour, minute and second) of sample collection.

Three agar plates were placed at various distances in each of the selected wards with five meter apart. Self-contamination was prevented by wearing sterile surgical gloves, mouth masks, and protective gown.

Processing of specimens and preliminary identification

Following collection, colonies on tryptic soya agar were inoculated into MacConkey agar, and blood agar plates. The inoculated plates were incubated at 35 °C for 24–48 h. Then the growth was inspected to identify the bacteria.

P. aeruginosa isolates were presumptively identified by gram staining, colony morphology, pigment formation, mucoid, haemolysis on blood agar, positive oxidase test, grape-like odour, growth at 42 °C on nutrient agar, and positive motility [14].

Genus Acinetobacter was identified by Gram staining, cell and colony morphology, positive catalase test, negative oxidase test and absence of motility. Suspected A. baumanii isolates were confirmed by API-20 NE kit (biomerieux, France) system.

Antibiotic susceptibility testing

The drug susceptibility testing of the isolates was done by Kirby-Bauer disc diffusion method [15] following Clinical Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI) guide lines. The grades of susceptibility pattern were recognized as sensitive, intermediate and resistant by comparison of the zone of inhibition as indicated by CLSI, 2014 [16]. Intermediate isolates were taken as sensitive for the purpose of this study. The antibiotic discs were obtained from Oxoid, England, with the following concentrations: amikacin (30 μg), cefotaxime (30 μg), cefepime (30 μg), azetronam (30 μg) amoxicillin-clavulanic acid (30 μg), ceftazidime (30 μg), ceftriaxone (30 μg), ciprofloxacin (10 μg), meropenem (10 μg), gentamicin (10 μg), imipenem (10 μg), trimethoprim-sulphamethoxazole (25/1.25 μg). Antibiotics were selected based on local availability, their effectiveness, guideline provided by CLSI and from literatures.

Phenotypic detection of extended spectrum beta-lactamase producing bacteria

Extended spectrum beta-lactamase (ESBL) production was detected by double disc synergy test (DDST) [17]. Accordingly, 3–5 selected colonies were taken from a pure culture and transferred to a tube containing 5 ml sterile nutrient broth and mixed gently until a homogenous suspension was formed. The suspension was incubated for 4–6 h at 37 °C until the turbidity was matched with the 0.5 McFarland standards. A sterile cotton swab was then used to distribute the bacteria evenly over the entire surface of Mueller Hinton agar (Oxoid, England).

Amoxicillin-clavulanic acid disc was placed in the center of the plate whereas ceftriaxone, ceftazidime and cefotaxime (30 μg each) discs were placed at a distance of 20 mm (center to center) from the amoxicillin-clavulanic acid disk. The plates were then incubated at 37 °C for 24 h and results were read. Enhancement of zone of inhibition of the cephalosporin disc towards clavulanic acid containing disc was inferred as synergy and the strain considered as ESBL producer.

Phenotypic detection of metalo-beta lactamase producing bacteria

Imipenem-resistant isolates were screened for producing MBL. The double disk method was used to detect this enzyme. Colonies from overnight cultures on blood agar plates were suspended in Mueller-Hinton broth and the turbidity standardized to equal that of a bacterial concentration of 1:100 suspensions of the 0.5 McFarland standards. Then the suspension was streaked onto Mueller-Hinton agar plates (Hi Media, Mumbai, India). A disc of Imipenem alone (10 μg) and Imipenem (10 μg) in combination with EDTA (750 μg/disc) was placed at the distance of 20 mm (centre to centre). After overnight incubation at 35 °C, a ≥ 7 mm increase in the inhibition zone of diameter around Imipenem-EDTA discs, as compared to imipenem discs alone, interpreted as indicative of MBL production [18].

Operational definitions

MDR was defined as acquired non-susceptibility to at least one agent in three or more antimicrobial categories.

Pan resistance-resistance for all antibiotics tested.

High MDR: resistance rate of the isolates for more than 60% of the antibiotics.

Quality controls

Standard operating procedures were prepared and followed from sample collection to reporting. Culture medias were prepared based on the manufacturers’ instruction then the sterility was checked by incubating 5% of the batch at 35-37 °C for overnight and observing bacterial growth. Those Media which showed growth were discarded. Anderson air sampler was handled by environmental microbiologist and as per the manufacturer’s instruction.

Escherichia coli ATCC 25922 and Pseudomonas aeruginosa ATCC 27853 were used as control strains.

Data analysis

Statistical analysis was performed by using SPSS version 20 software program and descriptive statistics were used.

Results

Microbial load of hospital wards

A total of 216 indoor samples were collected from intensive care unit (ICU), delivery room (DR) and operation room (OR). Correspondingly, 67 isolates (43 A. baumannii and 24 P. aeruginosa) were obtained with an overall isolation rate of 31% (67/216). Of those isolates, the highest rate (50.7%) was identified from ICU, whereas the lowest rate (23.9%) was from OR (Table 1).
Table 1

Distribution of airway A. baumannii and P. aeruginosa isolates in wards of WSUTRH

Wards

A. baumannii n = 43

P. aeruginosa n = 24

Total isolates n = 67

Delivery room

13

4

17

Intensive care unit

21

13

34

Operation room

9

7

16

Antibiotic resistance profile of air-borne bacterial pathogens

A. baumannii showed a high level of resistance, i.e. >80%, for each of trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole, cefepime, ciprofloxacin and ceftriaxone antibiotics whereas P.aeruginosa showed a high resistance percentage for trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole, ciprofloxacin and ceftriaxone antibiotics with the rate of 88.2%, 83.3, and 79.1% respectively (Table 2).
Table 2

Antibiotic resistance profile of air-borne A. baumannii and P. aeruginosa

Antibiotics

A. baumannii (n = 43) No (%)

P.aeruginosa (n = 24) No (%)

Amikacin

30 (69.8)

6 (25)

Cefotaxime

32 (74.4%)

17 (70.8)

Cefepime

38 (88.4%)

14 (58.3)

Ceftazidime

28 (65.1)

7 (29.1)

Ciprofloxacin

38 (88.4%)

20 (83.3)

Gentamicine

33 (76.7)

19 (79.1)

Ceftriaxone

36 (83.7)

19 (79.1)

Aztreonam

19 (44.2)

14 (58.3)

Meropenem

13 (30.2)

10 (41.7)

Imipenem

16 (37.2)

10 (41.7)

Trimethoprim-Sulfamethoxazole

40 (93.0)

21(87.5)

ESBL and MBL production by A. baumannii

From the total isolates of A. baumannii, 38 (88.4%) of them showed resistance to at least one of the third generation cephalosporins (3GC). ESBL and MBL production were observed in 24(55.8%) and 13 (30.2%) of the isolates respectively. Coexistence of both ESBL and MBL producers was seen in 5(11.6%) isolates of A. baumannii (Table 3).
Table 3

ESBL and MBL producing airway A.baumannii isolates in restricted settings of the Hospital

Number of resistance isolates (%)

Antibiotics

Total isolates n = 43

ESBL producer n = 24

MBL producer n = 13

Ceftazidime

28 (65.1)

19 (79.2)

8 (61.5)

Ceftriaxone

36 (83.7)

22 (91.7)

10 (76.9)

Cefepime

38 (88.4)

23 (95.8)

11 (84.6)

Cefotaxime

32 (74.4)

20 (83.3)

9 (69.2)

Aztreonam

19 (44.2)

21 (87.5)

12 (92.3)

Impeniem

16 (37.2)

5 (20.8)

13 (100)

Meropenem

13 (30.2)

3 (12.5)

13 (100)

ESBL and MBL production by P. aeruginosa

Out of 24 isolates of P. aeruginosa, 15 (62.5%) were found to become ESBL producers. Metalo-beta-lactamase production was observed in 9 (37.5%) of P. aeruginosa isolates. Co-occurrence of both ESBL and MBL producers were seen in 5 (20.8%) isolates (Table 4).
Table 4

ESBL and MBL producing airway P. aeruginosa isolates in intensive care unit of the hospital

Number of resistance isolates (%)

Antibiotics

Total isolates n = 24

ESBL producer n = 15

MBL producer n = 9

Ceftazidime

7 (29.1)

11 (73.3)

7 (77.8)

Ceftriaxone

19 (79.1)

13 (86.7)

8 (88.9)

Cefipime

14 (58.3)

10 (66.7)

5 (55.6)

Cefotaxime

17 (70.8)

11 (73.3)

8 (77.8)

Aztreonam

14 (58.3)

10 (66.7)

9 (100)

Impenem

10 (41.7)

5 (50.0)

9 (100)

Meropenem

10 (41.7)

3 (20.0)

9 (100)

MDR patterns of aerosol A. baumannii and P.aeruginosa

A total of 35 (81.4%) A. baumannii isolates were found out to be multi-drug resistant. Moreover, 7 (16.3%) of the isolates were pan-drug resistant. Likewise about 20 (83.3%) P. aeruginosa isolates were multi-drug resistant with 5 (20.8%) of them pan-drug resistant isolates (Table 5).
Table 5

Antibiogram of air-borne A. baumannii and P. aeruginosa isolates

Bacteria

Quantity

Resistance pattern

Frequency

Class

P.aeruginosa n = 24

Max

TMP-SXT, CIP, GEN, CRO, CTX, ATM, FEP, IMP, MEM, CAZ, AMK

5

6

 

TMP-SXT, CIP, GEN, CRO, CTX, ATM, FEP, IMP, MEM, CAZ

2

6

 

TMP-SXT, CIP, GEN, CRO, CTX, ATM, FEP, IMP, MEM

2

6

 

TMP-SXT,CIP, GEN, CRO, CTX, FEP, IMP, MEM,AMK

1

5

 

TMP-SXT, CIP, GEN, CRO, CTX, ATM, FEP

4

5

 

TMP-SXT, CIP, GEN, CRO, CTX

3

4

 

TMP-SXT, CIP, GEN, CRO, ATM

1

4

 

TMP-SXT, CIP, GEN

1

3

Min

TMP-SXT, CIP, CRO

1

3

A. baumannii n = 43

Max

TMP-SXT, CIP, FEP, CRO, GEN, CTX, AMK, CAZ, ATM, IMP, MEM

7

6

 

TMP-SXT, CIP, FEP, CRO, GEN, CTX, AMK, CAZ, ATM, IMP

3

6

 

TMP-SXT, CIP, FEP, CRO, GEN, CTX, AMK, CAZ, IMP, MEM

3

5

 

TMP-SXT, CIP, FEP, CRO, GEN, CTX, AMK, CAZ, ATM

6

5

 

TMP-SXT, CIP, FEP, CRO, GEN, CTX, AMK, CAZ

6

4

 

TMP-SXT, CIP, FEP, CRO, GEN, CTX, AMK

2

4

 

TMP-SXT, CIP, FEP, CRO, GEN, CTX

2

4

 

TMP-SXT, CIP, FEP, CRO

4

3

Min

TMP-SXT, CIP, FEP

2

3

Key: AMK-Amikacin, CTX-Cefotaxime, FEP-cefepime CAZ-Ceftazidime, CIP-Ciprofloxacin GEN-Gentamicine CRO-Ceftriaxone, ATM-Aztreonam, MEM-Meropenem, IMP-Imipenem, TMP-SXT-Trimethoprime-Sulphamethoxazole

Discussion

Several studies have documented extensive contamination by Acinetobacter spp. of the environment, including respirators and air samples, in the vicinity of infected or colonized patients [19]. In an outbreak of infection with Multi-resistant Acinetobacter spp. extensive contamination of the environment, including air was found [19].

The presence of A.baumannii as bioaerosols in this study could be supported by its higher survival ability (3 days to 11 months) in the environment and its disinfectant resistance. As the best of the investigators knowledge, this is the first finding of A.baumannii in Hospital air in Ethiopian setup. But our finding was corroborated with previous reports in Taiwan [20], Iran [21] and Nepal [22].

High percentage of antibiotic resistance, more than 80%, A. baumannii isolates were detected for trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole, ciprofloxacin, cefepime and ceftriaxone in this study which is corroborated with findings of previous reports in Iran [23, 24], Turkey [25] and Italy hospital intensive care units [26]. A study in Romania reported highly resistant A. baumannii isolates with 75% resistance for ceftriaxone, ceftazidime, gentamicin and kanamycin antibiotics each [27] and a study conducted in Ethiopia also revealed 100% and 88% resistant Ciprofloxacin and Gentamicin A.baumannii from environmental isolates respectively [28]. Ciprofloxacin resistant, 86.5% A.baumannii isolates were also detected in clinical and environmental isolates in Brazil [29] and 92.2% TMP-SXT resistant isolates were also identified in hospital waste effluent in Denmark [30]. Similarly, high antibiotic resistance percentage were also found in Bangladesh from isolates collected from endotracheal tube with 100% resistance for ceftriaxone and gentamicin, and 66.7% for amikacin and impenem 66.7% [31].

Meropenem and imipenem depicted 30.2% and 37.2% resistance A. baumannii in the current study which is in harmony with previous findings of 30.2% Meropenem resistance in India [32], 33.3% and 28.1% imipenem resistance in Egypt [33] and Brazil [29] respectively but much lower than 87.7% and 95% resistance reported for both antibiotics in Turkey [34] respectively which could be due to difference in availability and prescribing pattern of antibiotics where these antibiotics were introduced in our country recently.

ESBLs were reported in the species belonging to the genera of Enterobacter and Klebsiella isolated from the air of hospital associated environment. 55.8% of A. baumannii isolates were ESBL producing. This finding is higher than 21% ESBL production rate reported in Tehran [35] and 28% in India [36].

MBL producer A. baumannii rate identified in this study (30.2%) was lower than 48% reported in India [37] and 81.48% reported in environmental isolates in Egypt [38], which could be explained by difference in samples, and reduced selective pressure of Acinetobacter for imipenem and meropenem antibiotics in our country setups.

Generally A.baumannii showed the highest percentage of resistance for most antibiotics tested, this could possibly be due to the bacterial ability to resist many antibiotics and disinfectant or could possibly be due to selective pressure or abusing of the drugs in the hospital.

P. aeruginosa associated infection is a recognized public health threat often acquired from the hospital environment. It is not only an important cause of morbidity but also increases the stay of the patient in the hospital and increases the cost of treatment [39]. The isolation of epidemic P. aeruginosa from room air in the presence of patients increases the possibility that there may be airborne spread of epidemic P. aeruginosa strains between patients [40].

The antibiotic susceptibility pattern of environmental isolates of P. aeruginosa is mostly overlooked and rarely reported. A few reports available on susceptibility pattern of P. aeruginosa suggest significant resistance to a variety of antibacterial agents. In this study, high rate (> 60%) of antibiotic resistant P.aeruginosa isolates were observed for amikacin, cefotaxime, cefepime, ceftazidime, ciprofloxacin, gentamicin and trimethoprim-sulphamethoxazole. This finding is corroborated with previous study from environmental isolates in Egypt where isolates from the hospital environment have showed more antibiotic resistance than the clinical isolates with rate of resistance 100% for cefotaxime, 92% for ceftriaxone, 85% for gentamicin, 85%, and 62% for ciprofloxacin [41].

A previous study conducted in Ethiopia revealed high antibiotic resistant P.aeruginosa isolates in hospital environment. Indoor air pseudomonas species were also showed significant percentage of resistance for Gentamicin (73.7%) and Ciprofloxacin (78.9%) [42]. Higher levels of P.aeruginosa resistance to trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole, gentamicin and ceftriaxone in the present study is comparable with the study conducted in Ethiopia where 95.1% to trimethoprim-sulphametoxazole, 62% to gentamicin, and 58% to ceftriaxone resistance revealed [43].

The rate (41.7%) of resistance of the P.aeruginosa isolates to imipenem seen in this study is higher than 18and 18.9% reported in India [44, 45]. Ceftazidime resistance (29.1%), P.aeruginosa isolates in this study is different from the previous reported findings in Nigeria 34.6% [46] and India 36% [44]. Variation of resistance across different studies could be due to availability of antibiotics at the hospital as well as community level, type of patients, number of samples, and genotypic resistance mechanisms.

ESBL producing P.aeruginosa isolates were mostly detected in clinical isolates in hospital setup according to the university hospital microbiology report. ESBL producing P.aeruginosa isolates detected in this study corroborated with a study in Egypt where 95% of P.aeruginosa isolates were beta-lactamase producers [6] and all isolates from surface water were ESBL producer in study conducted by Nasereen et al. [47].

In our finding, 37.5% MBL production by P. aeruginosa was observed. A study conducted in India, Brazil and Iran revealed 32.9%, 30%, 48.3% MBL production respectively [48–50]; however those studies used clinical specimen. These P. aeruginosa isolates could be causes for several nosocomial infections, illustrating the need for proper infection control practices [51].

Conclusions

Higher rate of MDR, ESBL and, MBL producing antibiotic resistant P.aeruginosa and A.baumannii isolates were found in indoor air. Though the current isolates were not identified from patients in this study, the role of contaminated indoor air for the production of ESBL and MBL isolates could play a major role if contact is established. So it is pertinent that their presence should be controlled and antimicrobial stewardship programs should be designed to prevent the further spread of these isolates. ESBL and MBL strains as airborne microbiota are the first finding in Ethiopian that could provide a new insight for antimicrobial stewardship programs and future studies.

Strength

These bacteria especially A.baumannii is the first finding as airborne organism in Ethiopia. Many antibiotics as per the guidelines were tested for these findings and post intervention phase is started after fumigation.

Weakness

The study didn’t have a plan of post intervention phase by the investigators due to budget limitation even though now the budget was approved for it. The cross sectional nature of this study may increase and decrease the prevalence of the bacteria since patient trafficking, type of patients and other environmental factors like humidity and others may differ in a given day.

Abbreviations

ATCC: 

American Type Culture Collection

BAP: 

Blood agar plates

DR: 

Delivery room

ESBLs: 

Extended spectrum beta lactamases

HAI: 

Health care associated infections

ICU: 

Intensive care unit

MBLs: 

Metallo-β-lactamases

MDR: 

Multidrug-resistant

OR: 

Operation room

TSA: 

Tryptic soya agar

WSUTRH: 

Wolaita Sodo University Teaching and Referral Hospital

Declarations

Acknowledgements

We acknowledge all the nurses and midwives, Laboratory technologists of WSUTRH, Wolaita Sodo University ethical review committee for the ethical clearance, and WSU for Financial support.

Funding

The research budget is funded by Wolaita Sodo University. Grant number 239/2015WSU.

Availability of data and materials

Anyone interested in the full data in excel format can have a data by writing to fith2007@yahoo.com.

Author’s contributions

FS: Conceived the study, FS, FW: Participated in the design of the study and performed the statistical analysis, FS, FW: Interpreted the data: FS, EG: Obtained ethical clearance and permission for study: FW: Supervised data collectors: FS, FW, MM: Drafting the article or revisiting it critically for important intellectual content. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Ethics approval and consent to participate

The proposal was approved by the ethical review committee of Wolaita Sodo University. An Official letter was written from the university to Wolaita Sodo University teaching referral hospital administrator and the hospital granted permission for sample collection. The result of the study was communicated to the responsible bodies for any beneficiary or corrective measures.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interest

All authors declare that they have no competing interest.

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
School of Medicine, Wolaita Sodo University, PO box 138, Sodo, Ethiopia
(2)
Wolaita Sodo University, School of Medicine, Sodo, Ethiopia
(3)
Department of medical laboratory, Wolaita Sodo University, Sodo, Ethiopia
(4)
College of health science and medicine, school of medicine, MaddaWalabu University, Bale Goba, Ethiopia

References

  1. Gorny R. Filamentous microorganisms and their fragments in indoor air: a review. Ann Agric EnvironMed. 2004;11:185–97.Google Scholar
  2. Asghar AH, Faidah HS. Frequency and antimicrobial susceptibility of gram- negative bacteria isolated from 2 hospitals in Makkah. Saudi Arabia Saudi Med J. 2009;30:1017–23.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. WHO. The evolving threats of antimicrobial resistance, option for action ISSN 9789241503181. 2012.Google Scholar
  4. CDC. Antibiotic resistance threats in the United States. 2013.Google Scholar
  5. Lee TB, Baker OG, Lee JT, Scheckler WE. Recommended practices for surveillance. Am J Infect Contr. 1998;26:277–88.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  6. Gad G, Eldomany E, Zaki S, Ashour H. Characterization of Pseudomonas Aeruginosa isolated from clinical and environmental samples in Minia, Egypt: prevalence, Antibiogram and resistance mechanisms. J Antimicrob Chemother. 2007;60:1010–7.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. Vahdani M, Azimi L, Asghari B, Bazmi F, Rastegar LA. Phenotypic screening of extended-spectrum ß-lactamase and metallo-ß-lactamase in multidrug-resistant Pseudomonas Aeruginosa from infected burns. Ann Burns Fire Disasters. 2012;25(2):78–81.PubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  8. Manchanda V, Sanchaita S, Singh NP. Multidrug Resistant Acinetobacter. J Glob Infect Dis. 2010;2(3):291–304.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  9. Vila J, Pachón J. Therapeutic options for Acinetobacterbaumannii infections. Expert OpinPharmacother. 2008;9:587–99.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  10. Owlia P, Azimi L, Gholami A, Asghari B, Lari AR. ESBL and MBL mediated resistance in Acinetobacterbaumannii: a global threat to burnt patients. Infez Med. 2012;20(3):182–7.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. Roy FC, Sarah S, Charles D. The role of the healthcare environment in the spread of multidrug-resistant organisms: update on current best practices for containment. TherAdv Infect Dis. 2014;2:79–90.Google Scholar
  12. Pasquarella C, Pitzurra O, Savino A. The index of microbial air contamination (review). J Hosp Infect. 2000;46:241–56.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. Anderson AA. New sampler for the collection, sizing and enumeration of viable airborne particles. J Bacteriol. 1958;76(5):471–84.Google Scholar
  14. Govan JR. Pseudomonas aeruginosa. In: Collee G, Barrie PM, Andrew PF, Anthony S, editors. Mackie and McCartney practical medical microbiology. 14th ed. New York: Churchill Livingstone; 2006. p. 413–24.Google Scholar
  15. Bauer A, Kirby W, Sherris J, Turck M. Antibiotic susceptibility testing by a standardized single disk method. Am J ClinPathol. 1966;45:493–6.Google Scholar
  16. Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute. Performance Standards for Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing; Twenty-Fourth Informational Supplement, M100-S24, 2014.Google Scholar
  17. Clinical Laboratory Standards Institute. Performance standards for antimicrobial susceptibility testing. Sixteenth informational supplement. Approved standards, M100 -S16, Wayne, PA. 2007.Google Scholar
  18. Yong D, Lee K, Yum J, Shin H, Rossolini G, Chong Y. Imipenem-EDTA disk method for differentiation of metallo-betalactamase- producing clinical isolates of pseudomonas spp. and Acinetobacter spp. J ClinMicrobiol. 2002;40:3798–801.Google Scholar
  19. Bergogne E and Towner K. Acinetobacter spp. as Nosocomial Pathogens: Microbiological, Clinical, and Epidemiological Features. Clinical microbiology reviews. 1996;9(2):148–65.Google Scholar
  20. Huang PY, Shi ZY, Chen CH, Den W. Airborne and surface-bound microbial contamination in two intensive care units of a medical Center in Central Taiwan. Aerosol Air Qual Res. 2013;13:1060–9.Google Scholar
  21. Alireza A, Sanam M. Microbial profile of air contamination in hospital Ward. Iranian J Pathol. 2012;7:168–74.Google Scholar
  22. Kritu P, Prakash G, Shiba K, Reena K, Mukhiya RN, Ganesh R. Screening of Antibiotype among environmental isolates of Acinetobacter spp.in hospital setting. Nepal J Sci Technol. 2012;13(2):203–8.Google Scholar
  23. HakemiVala M, Hallajzadeh M, Fallah F, Hashemi A, Goudarzi H. Characterization of theextended-spectrum beta-lactamase producers among non-fermenting gram-negative bacteria isolated from burnt patients. Arch Hyg Sci. 2013;2(1):1–6.Google Scholar
  24. Mirnejad R, Vafaei S. Antibiotic resistance patterns and the prevalence of ESBLs amongstrains of A. baumannii isolated from clinical specimens. JGMI. 2013;2:1–8.Google Scholar
  25. Aktas O, Ozbek A. Prevalence and In-vitro antimicrobial susceptibility patterns of Acinetobacter strains isolated from patients in intensive care units. J Int Med Res. 2003;31:272–80.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. Parviz O, Leila A, Abbas G, Abdolaziz R. L. ESBL- and MBL-mediated resistance in Acinetobacter baumannii: a global threat to burn patients. Infez Med. 2012;3:182–7.Google Scholar
  27. Sofia C, Angela R, Luminiţa S, Raluca F, Iuliana T. Cultural and biochemical characteristics of acinetobacter spp. strains isolated from hospital units. J Prev Med. 2004;12(3–4):35–42.Google Scholar
  28. Agersew A, Degisew M, Yitayih W. Bacterial profile and their antimicrobial susceptibility patterns of computer keyboards and mice at Gondar University hospital, Northwest Ethiopia. Biomedicine Biotechnology. 2015;3(1):1–7.Google Scholar
  29. Medeiros M, Lincopan N. Oxacillinase (OXA)-producing Acinetobacter baumanniiin Brazil: clinical and environmental impact and therapeutic options. J Bras Patol Med Lab. 2013;49(6):391–405.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  30. Luca G, Andreas P, John E, Anders D. Antibiotic resistance in Acinetobacter spp. isolated from sewers receiving waste effluent from a hospital and a pharmaceutical plant. Appl Environ Microbiol. 1998;64(9):3499–502.Google Scholar
  31. Azizun N, Shasheda A, Ruhulu AM AAS. Isolation of and their antimicrobial resistance pattern in an intensive care unit (ICU) of a tertiary care hospital in Dhaka, Bangladesh. Bangladesh J Med Microbiol. 2012;06(01):03–6.Google Scholar
  32. Mahua S, Srinivasa H, Macaden R. Antibiotic resistance profile & extended spectrum beta-lactamase (ESBL) production in Acinetobacterspecies. Indian J Med Res. 2007:63–7.Google Scholar
  33. Enas A, Ismael S, Ahmad S, Sherein G, Entsar H, Ibrahim M. Relationship between clinical and environmental isolates of Acinetobacter baumanniiin Assiut university hospitals. J Am Sci. 2013;9(11):67–73.Google Scholar
  34. Aktas O, Ozbek A. Prevalence and in-vitro antimicrobial susceptibility patterns of Acinetobacter strains isolated from patients in intensive care units. J Int Med Res. 2003;31:272–80.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  35. Ava B, Mohammad R, Jalil V. Frequency of extended spectrum beta-lactamase (ESBLs) producing Escherichia coli and klebseilla pneumonia isolated from urine in an Iranian 1000-bed tertiary care hospital. Afr J Microbiol Res. 2010;4(9):881–4.Google Scholar
  36. Sinha M, Srinivasa H, Macaden R. Antibiotic resistance profile & extended spectrum beta-lactamase (ESBL) production in Acinetobacter species. Indian J Med Res. 2007;126(1):63–7.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  37. Goel V, Hogade SA, Karadesai SG. Prevalence of extended spectrum beta lactamases, AmpC beta lactamase, and metallo beta lactamase producing Pseudomonas Aeruginosa and Acinetobacterbaumannii in an intensive care unit in a tertiary care hospital. J Sci Soc. 2013;40(1):28–31.Google Scholar
  38. Enas A, Ismael S, Ahmad S, et al. Relationship between Clinical and Environmental Isolates of Acinetobacter baumannii in Assiut University Hospitals Journal of American Science 2013;9(11):67-73.Google Scholar
  39. Elizabeth B, Vincent HT. Impact of multidrug-resistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa infection on patient outcomes. Expert Rev Pharmacoecon Outcomes Res. 2010;10(4):441–51.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  40. Jones AM, Govan JR, Doherty CJ, et al. Identification of airborne dissemination of epidemic multiresistant strains of Pseudomonas Aeruginosa at a CF Centre during a cross infection outbreak. Thorax. 2003;58:525–7.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  41. Gamal F, Ramadan A, Sahar Z, Hossam M. Characterization of Pseudomonas aeruginosa isolated from clinical and environmental samples in Minia, Egypt: prevalence, antibiogram and resistance mechanisms. J Antimicrob Chemother. 2007 Nov;60(5):1010–7.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  42. Teklu S, Lakew G, Girma M, Adinew Z, Feleke B, Daba M, Endalew Z. Bacterial indoor-air load and its implications for healthcare-acquired infections in a teaching hospital in Ethiopia. Int J Infect Control. 2016;12:1–9.Google Scholar
  43. Meseret M, Solomon A, Gebre K. Antimicrobial drug resistance and disinfectants susceptibility of Pseudomonas aeruginosa isolates from clinical and environmental samples in Jimma University specialized hospital, Southwest Ethiopia. Am J Biomedical Life Sci. 2014; 2 (2). 40-45. doi:10.11648/j.ajbls.20140202.12.
  44. Sivaraj S, Murugesan S. Muthuvelu S, et al. Comparative study of Pseudomonas aeruginosaisolate recovered from clinical and environmental samples against antibiotics. Int J Pharm PharmSci. 2012;4:103–107.Google Scholar
  45. Indu B, BalvInder S, Imple K. Incidence of multidrug resistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa isolated from burn patients and environment of teaching institution. J Clin Diagnostic Research. 2014;8(5):26–9.Google Scholar
  46. Eyo AA, Ibeneme BD, Thumamo AE. Antibiotic resistance profiles of clinical and environmentalisolates of Pseudomonas aeruginosain Calabar, Nigeria. J Pharm Biol Sci. 2015;10(4):09–15.Google Scholar
  47. Nasreen M, Sarker A, Malek MA, Ansaruzzaman Md, Rahman M. Prevalence and resistance pattern of Pseudomonas aeruginosaIsolated from surface water. Adv Microbiol. 2015;5:74-81. doi:10.4236/aim.2015.51008.
  48. Gaikwad V., Bharadwaj R., Dohe V. Study the Prevalence and Risk Factors of Metallo- Betalactamase Producing Pseudomonas aeruginosa from Teriary Care Centre. 2015;4(5):3126–32.Google Scholar
  49. Inacio H, Bomfim M, França R, Farias LM, Carvalho M, Serufo J, Santos S. Phenotypic and Genotypic Diversity of Multidrug-Resistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa Isolates from Bloodstream Infections Recovered in the Hospitals of Belo Horizonte, Brazil. Chemotherapy. 2014:60;54-62.Google Scholar
  50. Alisha A, Afsaneh S, Bizhan N, Kamal A. Prevalence and Clonal dissemination of Metallo-Beta-Lactamase-producing Pseudomonas Aeruginosa in Kermanshah. Jundishapur J Microbiol. 2015 Jul;8(7):e20980.Google Scholar
  51. Arunava K, Sreenivasan S, Shailesh K, Hema A, Akhila K, Sivaraman U. Incidence of metallo beta lactamase producing Pseudomonas aeruginosa in ICU patients. Indian J Med Res. 2008 Apr;127(4):398–402.Google Scholar

Copyright

© The Author(s). 2017

Advertisement

Antimicrobial Resistance & Infection Control

ISSN: 2047-2994

Contact us