Open Access

Evaluation of a Stenotrophomonas maltophilia bacteremia cluster in hematopoietic stem cell transplantation recipients using whole genome sequencing

Antimicrobial Resistance & Infection Control20176:115

https://doi.org/10.1186/s13756-017-0276-y

Received: 29 September 2017

Accepted: 8 November 2017

Published: 13 November 2017

Abstract

Background

Stenotrophomonas maltophilia ubiquitously occurs in the hospital environment. This opportunistic pathogen can cause severe infections in immunocompromised hosts such as hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) recipients. Between February and July 2016, a cluster of four patients on the HSCT unit suffered from S. maltophilia bloodstream infections (BSI).

Methods

For epidemiological investigation we retrospectively identified the colonization status of patients admitted to the ward during this time period and performed environmental monitoring of shower heads, shower outlets, washbasins and toilets in patient rooms. We tested antibiotic susceptibility of detected S. maltophilia isolates. Environmental and blood culture samples were subjected to whole genome sequence (WGS)-based typing.

Results

Of four patients with S. maltophlilia BSI, three were found to be colonized previously. In addition, retrospective investigations revealed two patients being colonized in anal swab samples but not infected. Environmental monitoring revealed one shower outlet contaminated with S. maltophilia. Antibiotic susceptibility testing of seven S. maltophlia strains resulted in two trimethoprim/sulfamethoxazole resistant and five susceptible isolates, however, not excluding an outbreak scenario. WGS-based typing did not result in any close genotypic relationship among the patients’ isolates. In contrast, one environmental isolate from a shower outlet was closely related to a single patient’s isolate.

Conclusion

WGS-based typing successfully refuted an outbreak of S. maltophilia on a HSCT ward but uncoverd that sanitary installations can be an actual source of S. maltophilia transmissions.

Keywords

Stenotrophomonas maltophilia Outbreak investigationWhole genome sequence-based typingImmunocompromised hosts

Background

Stenotrophomonas maltophilia, an intrinsically multidrug resistant gram negative pathogen, is widely distributed in aqueous habitats such as, sink drains, endoscopes and hemodialysis water within clinical settings [1, 2]. Usually, this pathogen is not highly virulent in immunocompetent individuals but can cause severe infections including bacteremia, peritonitis and meningitis in immunocompromised hosts resulting in complications, e.g. septic shock, respiratory failure, tissue necrosis and septic thrombophlebitis [3]. Recipients of hematopoietic stem cell transplantations (HSCT) are especially at risk and suffer from pulmonary hemorrhage resulting in higher mortality rates compared to non-HSCT patients [4].

In recent years, an increasing incidence of S. maltophilia is reported on oncologic wards [5]. Moreover, several outbreaks and pseudo-outbreaks caused by this pathogen have been reported [6, 7]. In addition to epidemiological investigations, different typing methods, e.g. pulse field gel electrophoresis (PFGE) and multi locus sequence typing (MLST) are used to identify the genetical relationship among different S. maltophilia isolates [811]. These techniques are useful in excluding outbreak scenarios, if MLST sequence types (ST) or PFGE patterns of isolated pathogens differ. In case of identical STs or highly similar PFGE patterns both methods reach their discriminatory limits. In these cases an outbreak is assumed, although more precise methods uncover and accidental cluster. Additionally, inter-laboratory comparability is limited using PFGE. Therefore, whole genome sequence-based typing (WGS) approaches are increasingly seen as gold standard method for highly discriminatory typing [12] and the superiority of WGS in comparison to other typing methods was already demonstrated for several bacterial pathogens [1317]. Moreover, we could recently demonstrate the high reproducibility of WGS, which is another prerequisite for the applicability in clinical routine [18].

Here we evaluated a cluster of S. maltophilia bacteremia in recipients of allogeneic stem cell grafts using WGS-based typing.

Methods

Cluster detection, epidemiological investigations and infection control measures

The 1500-bed University Hospital Münster includes two HSCT-units each comprising 10 patient rooms, which are all HEPA-filtered and equipped with separated bathrooms for each patient (Fig. 1). In total, 193 patients were admitted to the HSCT-units during 2016. Patients usually receive an allogenic HSCT.
Fig. 1

Distribution and isolation dates of S. maltophilia on the HSCT-unit. Distribution of blood culture (yellow), anal swab (blue) and environmental (green) isolates detected during February and July 2016 on both HSCT wards. Patient rooms on wards are highlighted by black edges. Dates of S. maltophilia detection are assigned to the according patient room

S. maltophilia bloodstream infections (BSI) were defined as one or more blood cultures positive for S. maltophilia obtained from patients with clinical signs of infection (fever >38 °C, chills, hypotension) according to the critieria given by the European Centre for Disease Prevention and Control [19]. Four S. maltophilia BSI were detected in patients (P1, P3, P4, P6) in the HSCT ward between February and July 2016. As this number exceeds the average baseline of 0.5 S. maltophilia BSI per year detected during 2011–2015, an epidemiological investigation was initiated. Routine environmental screening of aqueous habitats (shower heads, shower outlets, washbasins and toilets) within patients’ rooms in the HSCT unit, normally focusing on multidrug resistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa, was expanded to S. maltophilia. Patients colonized with S. maltophilia, coincidentally detected in anal/rectal swabs or stool samples (as screening of HSCT-patients concentrates on multidrug resistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa), were retrospectively identified. Moreover, hand hygiene and surface disinfection measures were intensified.

Identification and susceptibility testing

Positive blood culture samples were detected using an automated blood culture system (BACTEC™ 9240, Becton Dickinson GmbH, Heidelberg, Germany). Environmental samples were plated on Columbia sheep blood agar (Oxoid, Wesel, Germany) and MacConkey agar (Becton Dickinson, Heidelberg, Germany) after enrichment in Tryptic Soy Broth (Becton Dickinson) for 24 h at 36 °C. Subsequent species identification was performed by Matrix-Assisted Laser Desorption/Ionization-Time of Flight-Mass Spectrometry (MALDI-TOF MS; Bruker, Bremen, Germany). Susceptibility testing for trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole (TMP-SMX) was performed using disk diffusion method in accordance with the European Committee on Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing (EUCAST) standards and interpreted using EUCAST clinical breakpoints (version 6).

Whole genome sequencing (WGS) based typing

To determine the clonal relationship of S. maltophilia strains isolated from blood cultures, the isolates were subjected to WGS using the Illumina MiSeq platform (Illumina Inc., San Diego, USA) as described previously [13]. Retrospectively identified colonization isolates were not subjected to WGS as they were no longer available in contrast to BSI isolates, that are stored for a longer time period. Using SeqSphere+ software version 2.0 beta (Ridom GmbH, Münster, Germany), all coding regions were extracted and compared in a gene-by-gene approach (core genome multilocus sequence typing, cgMLST) using S. maltophilia K279a strain (GenBank accession number AM743169.1) as a reference sequence. Instead of a published cgMLST scheme, which is not yet available, this ad hoc scheme was used to differentiate the cluster. SeqSphere+ software was used to display the clonal relationship in a minimum-spanning tree (MST). For backwards compatibility with classical molecular typing, i. e. MLST, the MLST sequence types (ST) were extracted from the WGS data in silico.

Results

Epidemiological investigation and susceptibility testing

Chronological order and spacial distribution of isolated S. maltophilia is displayed in Fig. 1. Isolates were obtained from blood culture samples of patients on both wards. Two of the four isolates (isolated from P4 and P6) were detected within short intervals in two patients both admitted to room 1 on ward 2. Of the four patients suffering from S. maltophilia bacteremia, three (P1, P4 and P6) were previously tested positive for S. maltophilia in stool samples or anal swabs. Additionally, two colonized patients (anal swabs; P2, P5) admitted to ward 2 were uncovered by the retrospective analysis (Table 1). One environmental isolate (E1) could be detected in a shower outlet of a patient room that was a patient with S. maltophilia infection. Susceptibility testing revealed all patient isolates to be susceptible to TMP-SMX, except isolate P3. The environmental isolate was resistant to TMP-SMX (Table 1).
Table 1

Patients with S. maltophilia colonizations and blood stream infections during February and July 2016

Patient no.

Anal colonization

Blood stream infection

Strain susceptibility to TMP-SMX

WGS performed

P1

+

+

S

+

P2

+

S

P3

+

R

+

P4

+

+

S

+

P5

+

S

P6

+

+

S

+

TMP-SMX – trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole, WGS – whole genome sequencing

Clinical characteristics and outcome of patients with S. maltophilia bacteremia

All patients with S. maltophilia BSI suffered from acute myeloid leukemia as the underlying disease. P2 and P5, who were only colonized by S. maltophilia, suffered from chronic lymphatic leukemia and myeloproliferative neoplasm. Except P1, all patients had already received allogenic SCT at the time of S. maltophilia detection. P1 and P6 developed an acute respiratory distress syndrome. P1, P3, and P6 died due to S. maltophilia bacteremia.

WGS-based typing

We analyzed four bloodstream isolates and the environmental isolate by WGS. Comparison via cgMLST, based on 1876 genes present in all isolates, revealed no genetical relationship among isolates originating from patients (Fig. 2). In contrast, S. maltophilia strains isolated from P3 and E1 showed a similar genotype with only four alleles difference, suggesting a relationship between these two isolates. P3 and E1 harbored the MLST ST 94. All other isolates harbored new MLST STs.
Fig. 2

Minimum spanning tree of S. maltophilia isolates. Minimum spanning tree of four blood culture isolates (P, yellow), one environmental isolate (E, green) from the HSCT unit and one outgroup isolate (Ref, non-HSCT unit, isolated in May 2016, grey) based on up to 1876 target genes, pairwise ignoring missing values. Genotypes are consecutively numbered, starting with P1 (isolated in February 2016). Each dot represents one genotype and is colored according to its origin. Different connecting lines and numbers on these lines show the number of alleles differing between two genotypes

Discussion

S. maltophilia has emerged as an important nosocomial pathogen associated with increased mortality rates in patients suffering from hematological malignancies and receiving hematopoietic stem cell transplantations [20, 21]. In this study, WGS was used to evaluate a cluster of four S. maltophilia BSI in patients partially suffering from pulmonary dysfunction associated with the infection due to this pathogen [4]. Susceptibility testing, normally used as a first indication of nosocomial transmission of bacterial strains, could not exclude a spread of one single clone. WGS and subsequent cgMLST analysis, methods that have shown to provide detailed information in evaluating the epidemiology in nosocomial clusters of other pathogens [22], excluded a genetical relation and therefore an outbreak scenario.

A number of different sources are possibly responsible for the increasing number of S. maltophilia BSI. Due to its multidrug resistant nature, selection of this pathogen can easily occur in patients after receiving broad-spectrum antibiotics [23]. Moreover, S. maltophilia infections occur frequently in combination with the distinct immunocompromised status of HSCT recipients [24]. On the other hand, several environmental sites such as sink drains could be detected as sources of S. maltophilia within hospital settings [25].

To what extent these habitats are origins for hospital-acquired colonizations or infections of S. maltophilia could not yet be shown in detail. In this study we documented a genetical relation between an environmental and a patient blood stream infection isolate by analyzing WGS data. Although there was no local proximity, S. maltophilia could be transmitted from the environment to a patient or vice versa, at least giving the possibility of further spread via aqueous habitats in the HSCT unit.

Conclusion

WGS- analysis can be used to precisely refute an outbreak of S. maltophilia. Additionally, WGS- based typing documented sanitary installations in HSCT units to be an actual source or result of transmission between environmental and human habitats. Hence, in addition to classical infection control strategies, monitoring of aqueous habitats has to be established within the rooms of HSCT recipients in order to prevent transmission of these multidrug resistant organisms, as recently also shown for P. aeruginosa [26].

Abbreviations

BSI: 

Blood stream infection

cgMLST: 

Core genome multilocus sequence typing

HSCT: 

Hematopoietic stem cell transplantation

MST: 

Minimum spanning tree

PFGE: 

Pulsed field gel electrophoresis

ST: 

Sequence type

WGS: 

Whole genome sequencing

Declarations

Acknowledgements

Not applicable.

Funding

None.

Availability of data and materials

Not applicable.

Authors’ contributions

SK, AP, EAI were responsible for all data collection. SK, MHP, AK and AM were involved in data analysis and interpretation. All authors contributed to and approved the final draft of manuscript.

Ethics approval and consent to participate

All strategies and investigations were performed in accordance with the recommendations of the legally assigned institute for infection control and prevention (Robert Koch Institute). For the present retrospective analysis formal consent is not required.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
Institute of Hygiene, University Hospital Münster
(2)
Institute of Medical Microbiology, University Hospital Münster
(3)
Science for Life Laboratory, Division of Translational Medicine and Chemical Biology, Department of Medical Biochemistry and Biophysics, Karolinska Institute

References

  1. Abbott IJ, Peleg AY. Stenotrophomonas, Achromobacter, and nonmelioid Burkholderia species: antimicrobial resistance and therapeutic strategies. Semin Respir Crit Care Med. 2015;36:99–110.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. Brooke JS. Stenotrophomonas maltophilia: an emerging global opportunistic pathogen. Clin Microbiol Rev. 2012;25:2–41.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  3. Al-Anazi KA, Al-Jasser AM. Infections caused by Stenotrophomonas maltophilia in recipients of hematopoietic stem cell transplantation. Front Oncol. 2014;4:232.PubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  4. Tada K, Kurosawa S, Hiramoto N, et al. Stenotrophomonas maltophilia infection in hematopoietic SCT recipients: high mortality due to pulmonary hemorrhage. Bone Marrow Transplant. 2013;48:74–9.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. Safdar A, Rolston KV. Stenotrophomonas maltophilia: changing spectrum of a serious bacterial pathogen in patients with cancer. Clin Infect Dis. 2007;45:1602–9.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. Guyot A, Turton JF, Garner D. Outbreak of Stenotrophomonas maltophilia on an intensive care unit. J Hosp Infect. 2013;85:303–7.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. Waite TD, Georgiou A, Abrishami M, et al. Pseudo-outbreaks of Stenotrophomonas maltophilia on an intensive care unit in England. J Hosp Infect. 2016;92:392–6.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. Corlouer C, Lamy B, Desroches M, et al. Stenotrophomonas maltophilia healthcare-associated infections: identification of two main pathogenic genetic backgrounds. J Hosp Infect. 2017;96:183–8.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. Crispino M, Boccia MC, Bagattini M, et al. Molecular epidemiology of Stenotrophomonas maltophilia in a university hospital. J Hosp Infect. 2002;52:88–92.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. Gherardi G, Creti R, Pompilio A, et al. An overview of various typing methods for clinical epidemiology of the emerging pathogen Stenotrophomonas maltophilia. Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis. 2015;81:219–26.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. Tanimoto K. Stenotrophomonas maltophilia strains isolated from a university hospital in Japan: genomic variability and antibiotic resistance. J Med Microbiol. 2013;62:565–70.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. Salipante SJ, SenGupta DJ, Cummings LA, et al. Application of whole-genome sequencing for bacterial strain typing in molecular epidemiology. J Clin Microbiol. 2015;53:1072–9.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  13. Mellmann A, Bletz S, Boking T, et al. Real-time genome sequencing of resistant bacteria provides precision infection control in an institutional setting. J Clin Microbiol. 2016;54:2874–81.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  14. Joensen KG, Scheutz F, Lund O, et al. Real-time whole-genome sequencing for routine typing, surveillance, and outbreak detection of verotoxigenic Escherichia coli. J Clin Microbiol. 2014;52:1501–10.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  15. Davis RJ, Jensen SO, Van Hal S, et al. Whole genome sequencing in real-time investigation and Management of a Pseudomonas aeruginosa outbreak on a neonatal intensive care unit. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol. 2015;36:1058–64.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. Kwong JC, Mercoulia K, Tomita T, et al. Prospective whole-genome sequencing enhances National Surveillance of Listeria monocytogenes. J Clin Microbiol. 2016;54:333–42.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  17. Fitzpatrick MA, Ozer EA, Hauser AR. Utility of whole-genome sequencing in characterizing Acinetobacter epidemiology and analyzing hospital outbreaks. J Clin Microbiol. 2016;54:593–612.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  18. Mellmann A, Andersen PS, Bletz S, et al. High Interlaboratory reproducibility and accuracy of next-generation-sequencing-based bacterial genotyping in a ring trial. J Clin Microbiol. 2017;55:908–13.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  19. European Centre for Disease Prevention and Control. Annual Epidemiological Report - Healthcare-associated infections acquired in intensive care units. 2016. https://ecdc.europa.eu/en/publications-data/healthcare-associated-infections-acquired-intensive-care-units-annual. Accessed 05 Nov 2017.
  20. Micozzi A, Venditti M, Monaco M, et al. Bacteremia due to Stenotrophomonas maltophilia in patients with hematologic malignancies. Clin Infect Dis. 2000;31:705–11.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. Labarca JA, Leber AL, Kern VL, et al. Outbreak of Stenotrophomonas maltophilia bacteremia in allogenic bone marrow transplant patients: role of severe neutropenia and mucositis. Clin Infect Dis. 2000;30:195–7.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. Willems S, Kampmeier S, Bletz S, et al. Whole-genome sequencing elucidates epidemiology of nosocomial clusters of Acinetobacter baumannii. J Clin Microbiol. 2016;54:2391–4.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  23. Chang YT, Lin CY, Chen YH, et al. Update on infections caused by Stenotrophomonas maltophilia with particular attention to resistance mechanisms and therapeutic options. Front Microbiol. 2015;6:893.PubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  24. Paez JI, Costa SF. Risk factors associated with mortality of infections caused by Stenotrophomonas maltophilia: a systematic review. J Hosp Infect. 2008;70:101–8.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. Brooke JS. Pathogenic bacteria in sink exit drains. J Hosp Infect. 2008;70:198–9.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. Kossow A, Kampmeier S, Willems S, et al. Control of multidrug-resistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa in allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplant recipients by a novel bundle including remodeling of sanitary and water supply systems. Clin Infect Dis. 2017;65:935–42.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright

© The Author(s). 2017

Advertisement