Skip to main content
Download PDF

Colonization of a hand washing sink in a veterinary hospital by an Enterobacter hormaechei strain carrying multiple resistances to high importance antimicrobials

Antimicrobial Resistance & Infection Control volume 9, Article number: 163 (2020) Cite this article

Abstract

Background

Hospital intensive care units (ICUs) are known reservoirs of multidrug resistant nosocomial bacteria. Targeted environmental monitoring of these organisms in health care facilities can strengthen infection control procedures. A routine surveillance of extended spectrum beta-lactamase (ESBL) producers in a large Australian veterinary teaching hospital detected the opportunistic pathogen Enterobacter hormaechei in a hand washing sink of the ICU. The organism persisted for several weeks, despite two disinfection attempts. Four isolates were characterized in this study.

Methods

Brilliance-ESBL selective plates were inoculated from environmental swabs collected throughout the hospital. Presumptive identification was done by conventional biochemistry. Genomes of multidrug resistant Enterobacter were entirely sequenced with Illumina and Nanopore platforms. Phylogenetic markers, mobile genetic elements and antimicrobial resistance genes were identified in silico. Antibiograms of isolates and transconjugants were established with Sensititre microdilution plates.

Results

The isolates possessed a chromosomal Tn7-associated silver/copper resistance locus and a large IncH12 conjugative plasmid encoding resistance against tellurium, arsenic, mercury and nine classes of antimicrobials. Clusters of antimicrobial resistance genes were associated with class 1 integrons and IS26, IS903 and ISCR transposable elements. The blaSHV-12, qnrB2 and mcr-9.1 genes, respectively conferring resistance to cephalosporins, quinolones and colistin, were present in a locus flanked by two IS903 copies. ESBL production and enrofloxacin resistance were confirmed phenotypically. The isolates appeared susceptible to colistin, possibly reflecting the inducible nature of mcr-9.1.

Conclusions

The persistence of this strain in the veterinary hospital represented a risk of further accumulation and dissemination of antimicrobial resistance, prompting a thorough disinfection of the ICU. The organism was not recovered from subsequent environmental swabs, and nosocomial Enterobacter infections were not observed in the hospital during that period. This study shows that targeted routine environmental surveillance programs to track organisms with major resistance phenotypes, coupled with disinfection procedures and follow-up microbiological cultures are useful to control these risks in sensitive areas of large veterinary hospitals.

Background

Hospital acquired infections are a significant threat to human and animal health. Hospital environments are critical reservoirs for drug-resistant bacteria [1,2,3]. Investigations into nosocomial infections outbreaks caused by Enterobacterales, Pseudomonas and Acinetobacter, have revealed that contaminated hand washing sinks in intensive care units were an important source of these microorganisms [4,5,6,7,8]. Dissemination of bacteria from the hand washing sinks is droplet-mediated [9]. Mobile genetic elements such as plasmids, integrons, and transposons play a key role in maintaining and propagating antibiotic resistance genes (ARGs). Common plasmid sequences have been detected in different species of carbapenemase-producing bacteria that colonised both the patients and the plumbing of an intensive care unit (ICU) in a human hospital [10]. Good biosecurity practices and routine, targeted environmental surveillance are two important tools to prevent outbreaks of nosocomial infections caused by multidrug resistant opportunistic or obligate pathogens in hospital premises. The genomic analysis of the bacteria isolated through these surveillance programs provides useful information on the origin and potential spread of antibiotic resistance genes. This knowledge can be used to improve infection control procedures. The aim of this study was to exploit the findings of a surveillance program for multi-drug resistant organisms in the environment of a teaching veterinary hospital. The genus Enterobacter represents a group of phylogenetically diverse opportunistic pathogens, often harboring multiple drug resistance genes and are involved in hospital-acquired infections [11]. Here, we report the repeated isolation of an extended spectrum beta lactamase (ESBL) producing, multidrug resistant Enterobacter sp. from the hand washing sink of a large veterinary hospital ICU, and its genotypic and phenotypic characterization. Antimicrobial resistance genes, integrons and transposons were identified in the isolates and their potential for mobility and horizontal transfer was investigated through comparative sequence analysis and conjugation experiments. A successful decontamination protocol was implemented in the hospital to eliminate the organism from the sink in response to these findings.

Methods

Bacterial isolates

Swabs from ICU sink and drain were submitted to the clinical microbiology laboratory of the Melbourne Veterinary School U-Vet hospital in Werribee, Victoria, Australia, as part of the routine environmental surveillance program. The swabs were placed in 100 ml of buffered peptone water (BPW) and incubated at 37 ºC for 24 h. ESBL screening plates (Oxoid) were inoculated with one loop of broth culture and incubated at 37 ºC for 24 h. Presumptively ESBL positive green or blue colonies were sub-cultured onto sheep blood agar and MacConkey agar (MicroMedia, Australia) plates, which were incubated at 37 ºC for 24 h. Phenotypic identifications were performed based on colony morphology, Gram staining characteristics, oxidase test and biochemical properties using the API rapidID 32E test (bioMerieux, Marcy-l'Étoile, France) and the Entero-Pluri test (Liofilchem) kits. ESBL production was confirmed with double disk diffusion synergy assays using cefotaxime, ceftazidime and amoxicillin-clavulanate [12]. Antimicrobial susceptibility testing was performed with the Calibrated Dichotomous Susceptibility method [13] and the broth microdilution method using Sensititre plates COMPGN1F and GNX2F (Thermo-Fischer) on a Aris2X machine according to the manufacturer’s instructions.

DNA extraction

Single colonies from pure overnight cultures on sheep blood agar were inoculated into 10 ml of tryptic soy broth (TSB), which was incubated at 37 °C overnight. Cells from 1 ml of each TSB cultures were collected by centrifugation at 15,000×g for 2 min and genomic DNA was extracted using the Wizard Genomic DNA Purification Kit (Promega) according to the manufacturer’s protocol for Gram negative bacteria. The DNA concentration was measured using a Quantus fluorometer (Promega) and the quality was determined by microspectrophotometry (NanoDrop ND-1000, NanoDrop Technologies). The DNA extracts were cleaned using SPRI beads (AMPureX, Beckman Coulter).

Nanopore sequencing

The sequencing libraries were prepared according to the 1D native barcoding genomic DNA sequencing protocol with EXP-NBD103 and SQK-LSK108 kits (Oxford Nanopore Technologies, Oxford, UK). At least 1 µg of DNA was processed by treatment with the Formalin-Fixed Paraffin-Embedded (FFPE) enzyme mix (New England Bio Labs, Ipswich, USA) and then end-repaired. Barcode-adaptor ligation was performed after dA-tailing. The sequencing was performed out in a MinION device with flow cell version FLO-MIN107 (Oxford Nanopore Technologies). The raw reads were basecalled into fastq files with Albacore version 2.2.7 (Oxford Nanopore Technologies). De-multiplexing and adaptor trimming was performed using Porechop version 0.2.3 (https://github.com/rrwick/Porechop), before filtering out 20% of the reads with the lowest quality, using the program Filtlong version 0.2.0 (https://github.com/rrwick/Filtlong).

Illumina sequencing

Illumina sequencing was performed at the Australian Genome Research Facility (AGRF, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia) using the Illumina HiSeq2500 platform, generating 125 bp long paired-end reads. The sequencing adaptors were removed and the reads with a Phred quality score of < 20 were filtered out using Trim Galore version 0.4.4 [14].

Genome assembly and analysis

Hybrid (short Illumina and long Nanopore reads) or long read-only de novo genomic assemblies were performed using Unicycler version 0.4.7 [15]. The identity of the genomes and their sequence type was determined using mlst (https://github.com/tseemann/mlst) within the PubMLST database [16]. The genomes and plasmids resulting from hybrid assemblies were annotated using the program Prokka version 1.14 [17] and the RAST annotation server [18]. Sequence visualization and plotting were performed with the Artemis program suite [19]. The annotations were manually curated using BLASTP to search the non-redundant protein database (NCBI). The antibiotic resistance genes were identified by searching the Prokka predicted open reading frames (ORFs) against the CARD protein database [20] with BLASTP. Transposons and integrons were predicted using ISfinder [21] and Integron Finder [22], respectively. The program IslandViewer [23] was used to visualise genomic islands. The origins of transfer regions on plasmids were identified using oriTfinder [24]. Multilocus Sequence Type (MLST) and Ribosomal Multilocus Sequence Typing (rMLST) analysis were performed on the pubMLST server [25, 26]. The program ABRicate [27] version 0.9.8 was used to detect antimicrobial genes with the databases ncbi and card, and incompatibility groups with the database plasmidfinder.

Comparative sequence analysis

Full genome and plasmid alignments were performed using Mauve aligner version 2.4.0 [28]. Detailed single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) and gap analysis of genome and plasmid alignments were performed using Geneious version 11.1.2. The plasmid sequences were searched against the NCBI nucleotide database and the PLSDB plasmid database [29] using BLASTN. Comparative plasmid visualizations were performed using the genoPlotR [30] package in R version 3.4.0. and the CGView Comparison Tool [31]. Phylogenetic trees were built with MegaX software [32] from concatenated multiple alignments of housekeeping gene sequences produced with the program Muscle [33].

Mating

Broth mating experiments were performed as described before [34, 35]. Briefly, the recipient E. coli DH5ɑ and the donor CM18-216 were inoculated into 1 mL of LB and grown respectively at 37 °C (recipient) and either 27 °C or 37 °C (donor) for 18–20 h without shaking. One volume of donor cultivated at either 27 °C or 37 °C was mixed with four volumes of recipient and incubated at the same temperature for 2 h. Subsequently, 100 μl of the conjugation mixtures were plated onto LB agar plates containing 16 μg/ml tetracycline and 16 μg/ml nalidixic acid, and incubated at 27 °C and 37 °C for 48 h and 24 h, respectively. Colonies were randomly picked and sub-cultured on Sheep Blood Agar and MacConkey Agar plates for phenotypic testing.

Results

Persistence of a multidrug resistant strain of Enterobacter hormaechei in a sink

Four ESBL producing Enterobacter sp. were isolated on selective media from environmental swabs collected in a veterinary teaching hospital ICU over a period of approximately one month. The first isolate, CM18-216, was obtained from a hand-washing sink as part of the hospital routine surveillance program. A second isolate, CM18-242-2, was obtained from a follow-up assessment of the tap handles and sink edges after a first disinfection attempt. Two more isolates, namely CM18-269-1 and CM18-269-2, were later recovered from the drain and the edge of the same sink, after a second disinfection attempt. All isolates had identical antimicrobial resistance profiles.

The biochemical characterisation of isolates CM18-216 and CM18-242-2 established with the rapid ID 32E strip (Bio-Merieux) resulted in the profile 46772514741, which the ApiWeb database reports as an excellent identification of an Enterobacter cloacae (%ID 99.9, T 0.97). This identification was confirmed by an Entero-pluri test, giving the biocode 32261. However, an atypical result, Lactose negative, was indicated by the test. Moreover, the sink isolates did not ferment lactose on MacConkey plates.

The genomes of isolates CM18-216 and CM18-242-2 were completely sequenced, using Illumina and Oxford Nanopore platforms. A summary of sequence read statistics for both methods is provided in Additional file 1: Table S1. Isolate CM18-216 contained a 4,689,992 bp chromosome and a 288,096 bp plasmid; isolate CM18-242-2 contained a 4,689,986 bp chromosome and a 288,061 bp plasmid. The two isolates had nearly identical chromosome sequences, with only 44 single nucleotide differences and 6 small insertion/deletions which accounted for the 6 bp length difference (Table 1). These nucleotide differences were all in hypothetical proteins or in non-coding regions, except for one position within a 16S rRNA region. Several prophages and genomic islands were also identified on the chromosome (Additional file 2: Fig. S1). The sequence alignments of the large plasmids, hereafter named pCM18-216 and pCM18-242-2, revealed 16 nucleotide differences between the two sequences, as well as 6 gaps in pCM18-216 and 41 gaps in pCM18-242-2 (Table 2). These nucleotide differences were all clustered in a region of approximately 380 bp encoding an IS5 family transposase. The plasmids belonged to the incompatibility group IncHI2 and contained all the genes required for transfer and an oriT region, indicating that it was capable of conjugation.

Table 1 Nucleotide differences identified between the chromosomes of isolates CM18-216 and CM18-242-2
Full size table
Table 2 Nucleotide differences identified between the plasmids pCM18-216 and pCM18-242-2
Full size table

The genomes of the two other isolates subsequently recovered from the ICU sink, CM18-269-1 and CM18-269-2, were sequenced with Nanopore reads only, and were assembled into 2 circular contigs corresponding to a chromosome and a plasmid. Multiple sequence alignments showed high levels of colinearity between all chromosomal contigs, suggesting that all four Enterobacter isolates recovered from the ICU sink over one month were related. However, while all four genomes carried a complete prophage of approximately 32 kb located 1160 kb from the chromosomal origin, the isolate CM18-269-2 possessed a second prophage, which was absent from the 3 other genomes, 1800 kb apart (Additional file 3: Fig. S2).

The Sequence Type of CM18-216 was determined by the online pubMLST server as ST110, using the Enterobacter cloacae database. Ribosomal Multilocus Sequence Typing (rMLST) genome analysis identified CM18-216 and CM18-242-2 as E. hormaechei. Average Nucleotide Identity (ANI) analysis confirmed this result, indicating a higher proximity with E. hormaechei than with E. cloacae type strains (Table 3). Phylogenetic analysis of concatenated alignments of the house keeping genes groL, gyrA, gyrB, rpoB and dnaA from 142 Enterobacter sp. complete genomes from RefSeq (Additional file 1: Table S2) placed the two sink isolates on the same branch, amongst a cluster of E. hormaechei strains (Fig. 1). Of note, some entries identified as “E. cloacae” in the Ref_Seq database which were used to build the tree also fell into E. hormaechei clades. These genomes were individually analysed by rMLST, which re-classified them as E. hormaechei. The isolate CM18-216 was selected as representative of the E. hormaechei strain repeatedly found in the hospital ICU sink.

Table 3 ANI analysis of CM18-216, E. cloacae and E. hormaechei type strains
Full size table
Fig. 1
figure 1

Phylogenetic analysis of 136 Enterobacter sp. genomes from RefSeq and the two sink isolates CM18-216 and CM18-242-2. A maximum likelihood tree was built from concatenated alignments of groL, gyrA, gyrB, rpoB and dnaA genes, representing 12174 positions, using the General Time Reversible model with discrete gamma distribution G (5 categories, 0.5920) and invariable sites I (58.19%). The E. coli K12 MG1655 strain is used as an out-group (orange). The E. hormaechei, E. cloacae, other Enterobacter sp., and sink isolates are respectively indicated in blue, green, black and red. The sub-tree containing the sing isolates is presented on the right. The asterisks indicate E. cloacae genomes re-classified as E. hormaechei by rMLST analysis. Scale bars represent the number of substitutions per site

Full size image

Resistance genes to clinically important antimicrobials and to heavy metals are clustered on the large IncH12 plasmid

Thirty-five ARGs were detected on E. hormaechei CM18-216 genome by the program ABRicate, with 18 on the chromosome and 16 on the IncH12 plasmid (Table 4). The clinically important ARGs were clustered within two loci on the plasmid (Fig. 2). These ARGs were identified as blaSHV-12, qnrB2, mcr-9.1, bla-TEM, catII, tetD, sul1, dfrA19, ereA, arr, aac(3)-II, aac(6′)-IIc, aph(6)-Id, aph(3″)-Ib and ant(3″)-Ia.

Table 4 Antimicrobial resistance genes in Enterobacter CM18-216
Full size table
Fig. 2
figure 2

Genetic map of the plasmid pCM18-216. From outer to inner circles: 1-nucleotide positions; 2,3-grey bars: CDSs; 4-teal: conjugation, dark red: ARG loci, green–brown metal/other resistance loci; 5-light blue: transposases CDSs; 6-dark blue: IS26 elements, purple: integron recombinase CDSs; 7-orange: ARGs, green–brown: other resistance genes; 8-GC% plot; 9-GC skew plot

Full size image

Phenotypic testing of the isolates broadly confirmed the resistance patterns predicted by genetic analysis. The isolates CM18-216 and CM18-242-2 possessed high Minimal Inhibitory Concentrations (MICs) values for penicillins, cephalosporins, monobactams, aminoglycosides, phenicols, trimethoprim-sulfonamides and tetracyclines (Table 5). Analysis of MICs for third generation cephalosporins and double-disk diffusion synergy assays confirmed the ESBL phenotype seen on selective plates during the primary isolation of the organism from environmental swabs. The MIC for enrofloxacin of both isolates was 1 ug/mL. The organism displayed a susceptible phenotype to colistin and polymyxin B in broth and agar diffusion tests.

Table 5 MIC of Enterobacter sink isolates, DH5 alpha transconjugant (TG) and parental recipient strain used in mating experiments
Full size table

Gene operons or clusters for tellurium, mercury and arsenic metal resistance were also detected on the plasmid (Fig. 2). The tellurium resistance gene cluster was located between nucleotide positions 76066 and 82286, and consisted of terZ, terA, terB, terC, terD, terE and terF. The components of the mercury resistance operon, merE, merD, merA, merC, merP, merT and merR, were located between nucleotide positions 101821 and 105561. The arsenic resistance operon contained arsH, arsR, arsB and arsC and was located between nucleotide positions 199610 and 201790. The operon was co-located with an ISNCY family transposase, to the left of arsH. In addition to these plasmid operons, two complete copper and silver resistance loci, pcoABCDRSE and silESRCFBAP were present on the chromosome, next to Tn7-like transposases, in a predicted genomic island located between nucleotide positions 4356976 and 4393429 (Additional file 2: Fig. S1).

The multidrug resistance plasmid pCM18-216 is conjugative

Mating between E. hormaechei CM18-216 and a laboratory strain of E. coli DH5ɑ (lactose negative, nalidixic acid resistant) in broth at 27 °C for 2 h resulted in the appearance of tetracycline-resistant transconjugants, which were confirmed as the E. coli recipient by conventional biochemistry. Mating performed at the higher temperature of 37 °C did not result in transconjugants.

The MICs of four randomly picked transconjugants were compared to the E. hormaechei and E. coli DH5ɑ parents (Table 5). All transconjugants had MICs identical to the donor and higher than the recipient for ampicillin, chloramphenicol, gentamicin, tetracycline, and trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole. Moreover, the transconjugants had MICs higher than DH5ɑ, albeit slightly lower compared to the donor, for amoxicillin/clavulanic acid, first and third generation cephalosporins (cefalexin, cefazolin, cefovecin, cefpodoxime, ceftazidime), and doxycycline. However, the tranconjugants MICs for fluoroquinolones were similar to the unconjugated DH5ɑ recipient, and lower than the E. hormaechei donor.

Antimicrobial resistance genes are associated with transposable elements

The two antibiotic resistance gene loci carried by plasmid pCM18-216 contained transposons and/or class 1 integrons putatively forming complex transposable elements.

Locus 1 was identified as an 18 kbp fragment consisting of two composite transposons and a class 1 integron fused together. The locus contained four IS26 copies, with the chloramphenicol resistance gene catII between the first two, the tetracycline resistance gene tetD and its regulator tetR between the second and third, and a complete class 1 integron between third and fourth IS26 elements. The integron contained the aminoglycoside resistance gene aac(6′)-IIc upstream of the integrase gene, an IS1380 family transposase gene, and the aminoglycoside, rifampicin and erythromycin resistance genes aac(3)-II, arr and ereA, between the transposase and the 3′-CS of the integron. This structure appears to be the result of genetic re-arrangements involving IS26 family composite transposons conferring chloramphenicol and tetracycline resistance, together with a class 1 integron carrying the other resistance genes. This brought together 7 complete and 2 truncated ARGs that potentially could be mobilised in a single horizontal gene transfer event. Moreover, a beta-lactamase gene bla-TEM associated with a Tn3 transposon was located at the end of locus 1. These various components were also detected in plasmids with high levels of sequence similarity with pCM18-216, exemplified by pEC-IMPQ (NC_012556.1) carried by an Enterobacter isolated from a hospital environment in Taiwan, and pIMP4-SEM1 (KX810825.1) carried by a Salmonella isolated from a cat in Australia. However, the different genetic elements forming the pCM18-216 ARG locus 1 were located in separate regions in those replicons (Fig. 3a).

Fig. 3
figure 3

Schematic representation of the genetic context of the IS26 transposable elements in pCM18-216 and comparison with related plasmids pEC-IMPQ (NC_012556.1) and pIMP4-SEM1 (KX810825.1). Resistance genes and mobile elements are represented by color-coded arrows. a ARG locus 1; b ARG locus 2

Full size image

Locus 2 was a 26 kbp structure, also containing IS26 elements. The region is bordered by two IS903 copies and carries composite transposons and a complex class 1 integron containing two integrase genes, surrounding two “insertion sequence common region 1” elements (ISCR1, or IS91 family transposases). Eight ARGs were found in locus 2, including the ESBL blaSHV-12, fluoroquinolone resistance qnrB2 and colistin resistance mcr9.1, which were respectively associated with copies of IS26, ISCR1 and IS903. As for locus 1, these structures were also found in pEC-IMPQ and pIMP4-SEM1 but were organized differently and carried a slightly larger repertoire of ARGs (Fig. 3b).

pCM18-216 shows similarities with a subset of large multidrug resistance plasmids from Enterobacteriaceae

Since the ARG loci-1 and -2 shared several genetic components with other multidrug resistance plasmids, the pCM18-216 sequence was compared to a set of 269 large plasmids of various incompatibility groups from Enterobacteriaceae (Additional file 1: Table S2). BLASTN DNA-DNA alignments showed that over 100 of these plasmids shared most of their sequence with pCM18-216 (Fig. 4a). However, BLASTP analysis of pCM18-216 CDS products indicated that some sequences were shared with only a smaller subset of replicons (Fig. 4b); for the most part these genes corresponded to ARG-carrying and mercury resistance loci of the plasmid (Fig. 4c, d). All 98 IncHI2 plasmids present in the dataset displayed overall sequence similarity with pCM18-216, but only 22 and 8 plasmids possessed a blaSHV-12 and qnrB2 gene, respectively.

Fig. 4
figure 4

Comparative analysis of pCM18-216 against 269 complete plasmid sequences from Enterobacteriaceae. Outer rim represents the pCM18-216 map; ARGs are indicated in pink, metal resistance genes in green, transposable elements and integrases in teal. Each inner rim represents an individual plasmid sequence. a DNA-DNA alignments; b CDS-CDS alignments; c close-up view of ARG locus2; d close-up view of ARG locus1

Full size image

A comparative analysis of IncH12 plasmids carrying qnrB2 and displaying high levels of similarity with pCM18-216 (Table 6) showed that they all shared a common backbone with a number of sequence re-arrangements and inversions (Additional file 4: Fig. S3). The pEC-IMPQ sequence was the most closely related to pCM18-216 with 99.94% sequence similarity, and carried an IS26-flanked composite transposon containing blaSHV-12 and a class 1 complex integron containing ISCR1 elements and qnrB2, but these components were located distantly on the replicon. Similarly, the plasmid p34977 from Enterobacter hormaechei subsp. steigerwaltii (CP_012170.1) possessed an IS26-blaSHV-12 transposon located 21 kbp away from the class 1 complex integron above described. By contrast, in pCM18-216 ARG locus-2, the IS26-blaSHV-12 transposon was immediately adjacent to the complex class 1 integron (Fig. 3b).

Table 6 IncH12 plasmids carrying qnrB2 selected for comparative analysis
Full size table

Systematic alignments of these plasmids with the CGView Comparison tool confirmed that ARGs-carrrying regions are associated with most of the gene diversity within the subset (Fig. 5). While all plasmids except one carried an ESBL gene (blaSHV-12 or blaOXA1), only 3 plasmids (namely pEC-IMPQ, pIMP4-SEM1 and pMS7884A) also encoded metallo beta lactamases (blaIMP-4 or blaIMP-8) conferring resistance to carbapenems.

Fig. 5
figure 5

Systematic comparative alignments of pCM18-216 and qnrB2-carrying incH12 plasmids from Enterobacteriaceae (see Table 6 for details). Each panel represents a query sequence plasmid (black outer circle) and the seven subject sequences (inner circles) arranged by decreasing order of similarity with the query. Positions of antimicrobial resistance genes in each query sequence are indicated in red

Full size image

Discussion

The veterinary hospital investigated in this study has been using a registered commercial disinfectant containing benzalkonium chloride and biguanide hydrochloride for regular decontamination procedures. This type of product is widely used in animal care premises as it is considered efficacious against common veterinary pathogens as well as being safe for pets and staff. For cleaning and disinfection of sinks, the Standard Operating Procedure (SOP) enforced in the hospital is performed in two steps. First, a detergent or scrubbing agent is used to remove most organic material, followed by a thorough rinsing with water. Then, the disinfectant is applied liberally and allowed to dry, ensuring a minimum 10 min contact time, as per the manufacturer instructions. Hospital staff members are supervised and trained by the Hospital Infection Control Officer (ICO) to ensure compliance with the SOP. The repeated isolation of Enterobacter in the hospital ICU exemplifies the capacity of some micro-organisms to persist in health care premises despite normal disinfection attempts. The plasmid-encoded efflux pump qacE delta1 may have played a role in conferring partial resistance against the quaternary ammonium compound present in the disinfectant. However we cannot rule out that the other factors, such as the presence of grooves or hard-to-reach parts in the sink structure, may have initially interfered with the correct application of the product. Here, the hospital ICO played a crucial role to ensure that proper decontamination protocols were followed, including the manufacturer’s recommendations for dilution, temperature and contact time of the disinfectant. The Enterobacter strain was not detected from swabs collected after a third round of decontamination of the sink, suggesting that the correct measures were eventually applied with success. Benzalkonium chloride is still used in the veterinary hospital. Routine environmental surveillance of the premises has not indicated the presence of intractable infectious agents, when the disinfectant is applied correctly.

Although two biochemical identification kits classified the Enterobacter isolates as E. cloacae, the absence of lactose fermentation was atypical for this species [36], as 93% of E. cloacae strains but only 9% of E. hormaechei strains appear lactose positive on MacConkey plates after 48 h [37]. Within the E. cloacae complex, accurate species identification by MALDI-TOF can be difficult, prompting for DNA sequencing to resolve taxonomic ambiguities [38]. The various genome analysis methods used in our study (Ribosomal Multilocus Sequence Typing, Average Nucleotide Identity and pylogenetic tree construction) identified the sink isolates as E. hormaechei. These results illustrate the current limitations of identification kits and databases for the correct classification of species in the E. cloacae complex.

All chromosomal ARGs were components of multidrug efflux pumps, except for bacA, which confers resistance to bacitracin by target alteration [39], whereas the conjugative plasmid pCM18-216 encoded specific resistance mechanisms against important antimicrobials, such as fluoroquinolones and cephalosporins. Although no ECOFF value is currently available for E. hormaechei against enrofloxacin, the MIC of 1 ug/mL observed with this antimicrobial was well above the ECOFF value of 0.125 ug/mL reported by EUCAST for E. coli, suggesting the presence of an acquired (albeit modest) resistance to the drug, likely due to the qnrB2 gene. However, the E. coli transconjugants carrying pCM18-216 were susceptible to fluoroquinolones. The reason for this is unclear, but the impact of a qnrB2 resistance on therapeutic outcomes in animals infected by E. hormaechei or other nosocomial agents carrying pCM18-216 cannot be dismissed. The pCM18-216 carried the mcr-9.1 gene, encoding a newly described phosphoethanolamine transferase which can confer an inducible resistance to colistin upon exposure to sub-inhibitory concentrations of the drug [40]. The sink isolates appeared susceptible to colistin and polymyxin B based on conventional testing methods. Although preliminary attempts at inducing colistin resistance in CM18-216 and CM18-242–2 by sub-culturing the isolates in presence of the antibiotic in broth or solid media failed to demonstrate a reversible increase in MIC in our hands, this question deserves further scrutiny. In E. coli, the two component system encoded by qseC and qseB is proposed to regulate the expression of polymixin/colistin resistance [41]. These genes are localised next to mcr-9.1 and IS903 in some E. coli and E. hormaechei plasmids [40]. While qseC and qseB were not carried pCM18-216, homologous sequences were found on the isolate chromosome, between nt positions 691981 and 693986. It is unclear whether E. hormaechei CM18-216 can display colistin resistance under certain inducing conditions, which remain to be defined, but as this antimicrobial is a last resort, high importance drug for humans, the presence of an organism carrying mcr-9.1 in a veterinary ICU is concerning.

The co-selection of resistant organisms and propagation of resistance genes in veterinary hospital environments has been explored recently in our group, with a particular focus on the ICU [42]. The phenotypic characterization of metal resistances in the sink isolates was beyond the scope of this study, but it is worth noticing that pCM18-216 carried tellurium resistance gene clusters typically found in IncH12 plasmids [43] and heavy metal resistance genes organized similarly to other plasmids and transposons of Gram negative bacteria [44, 45]. The ESBL production was putatively attributed to the plasmidic gene blaSHV-12; the association of ESBL-encoding and metal resistance genes has been recently reported in E. hormaechei [46]. Topical preparations containing silver and fluoroquinolones are commercially available in Australia for the treatment of ear infections in companion animals, raising questions about the risks associated with the accumulation of heavy metals and antimicrobials residues in veterinary premises. The temperature requirements observed in mating experiments between CM18-216 and E. coli are also found in the conjugative transfer of IncHI plasmids, which occurs only within a 22–28 °C range [34, 47]. This suggests that pCM18-216 can transfer from E. hormaechei to other bacteria and disseminate heavy metal and multidrug resistances, including ESBLs, in the hospital normal environmental conditions.

The isolates also carried several mobile genetic elements. The presence of an additional chromosomal prophage in one of the four isolates indicates that the Enterobacter population colonizing the ICU sink may have acquired or rearranged mobile genetic elements over time. Several transposases and integrases were also found in the plasmid sequence, with important consequences for the physical organisation and potential co-transfer of ARGs. In Australia, ISCR1 have been described in IncL/M plasmids and IS26-associated class 1 integrons carrying qnrB2 [48]. The ISCR1 elements are involved in rolling-circle transposition to form complex class 1 integrons [49]. IS26 mediated genetic re-arrangements are also well documented [50,51,52], particularly for their role in dissemination of antimicrobial resistance genes. The accumulation of antimicrobial resistance genes in genetic loci flanked by IS26 elements was more pronounced in pCM18-216 compared to other plasmids. No other sequence in the Genbank nucleotide database possessed a complete colinearity with the pCM18-216 full ARG locus-2, suggesting that this structure was created by intra-plasmidic sequence relocation. Because of the physical proximity of these ARGs and the presence of two bordering IS903 copies, the ARG locus-2 of pCM18-216 has the potential to facilitate the simultaneous horizontal gene transfer of the ESBL gene blaSHV-12 and the fluoroquinolone resistance gene qnrB2, along with other antimicrobial resistance genes, through a single transposition event. In Australia, blaIMP-4 genes have been associated with IncHI2 plasmids carried by E. hormaechei with various MLST profiles, but only two ST110 isolates [53]. These antimicrobials are considered of very high importance and their use in companion animals is not generally recommended (https://vetantibiotics.fvas.unimelb.edu.au/). Although the isolates CM18-216 and CM18-242 were susceptible to carbapenems and did not carry blaIMP sequences on their plasmids, the presence of the same mobile genetic elements found on blaIMP plasmids and pCM18-216 opens the question whether the organism is able to acquire such resistance. This underlines the importance of early detection of multidrug resistant organisms and decontamination to control the risks of dissemination of resistance within the hospital.

Conclusions

The presence in the veterinary hospital ICU of an ESBL, as well as fluoroquinolone and putative colistin resistance genes within an IS26 transposon in a conjugative plasmid for nearly one month underlines the risk of horizontal dissemination of ARGs into other bacterial species and nosocomial infections with reduced possibilities of treatment. This was concerning, even though the Enterobacter host was not phenotypically resistant to colistin and presented only intermediate MICs levels against ciprofloxacin. Repeated rounds of disinfection of the sink pipes were implemented until the organism could no longer be detected by environmental sampling. Based on these results, routine environmental surveillance programs incorporating the rapid detection of organisms capable of ESBL production and resistance to fluoroquinolones, colistin and carbapenems, should be considered in large veterinary hospitals.

Availability of data and materials

The datasets generated and analysed during the current study have been deposited in the Genbank repository under the following entries: BioProject PRJNA613546; BioSample SAMN14409014: CP05031 (chromosome CM18-216), CP050312 (plasmid pCM18-216); BioSample SAMN14449833: CP050506 (chromosome CM18-242-2), CP050507 (plasmid pCM18-242-2).

Abbreviations

ICU:

Intensive care units

ESBL:

Extended spectrum beta-lactamase

MIC:

Minimum inhibitory concentration

ARG:

Antimicrobial resistance gene

References

  1. Peter S, Bosio M, Gross C, Bezdan D, Gutierrez J, Oberhettinger P, et al. Tracking of antibiotic resistance transfer and rapid plasmid evolution in a hospital setting by Nanopore sequencing. bioRxiv. 2019. https://doi.org/10.1101/639609.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Conlan S, Thomas PJ, Deming C, Park M, Lau AF, Dekker JP, et al. Single-molecule sequencing to track plasmid diversity of hospital-associated carbapenemase-producing Enterobacteriaceae. Sci Transl Med. 2014;6(254):254ra126.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  3. Lerminiaux NA, Cameron ADS. Horizontal transfer of antibiotic resistance genes in clinical environments. Can J Microbiol. 2018;65(1):34–44.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Chapuis A, Amoureux L, Bador J, Gavalas A, Siebor E, Chrétien M-L, et al. Outbreak of extended-spectrum beta-lactamase producing Enterobacter cloacae with high MICs of quaternary ammonium compounds in a hematology ward associated with contaminated sinks. Front Microbiol. 2016;7:1070.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  5. Roux D, Aubier B, Cochard H, Quentin R, van der Mee-Marquet N. Contaminated sinks in intensive care units: an underestimated source of extended-spectrum beta-lactamase-producing Enterobacteriaceae in the patient environment. J Hosp Infect. 2013;85(2):106–11.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Lowe C, Willey B, O’Shaughnessy A, Lee W, Lum M, Pike K, et al. Outbreak of extended-spectrum β-lactamase-producing Klebsiella oxytoca infections associated with contaminated handwashing sinks. Emerg Infect Dis. 2012;18(8):1242–7.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  7. Susy Hota MD, Zahir Hirji M, Karen Stockton M, Camille Lemieux ML, Helen Dedier MLT, Gideon Wolfaardt P, et al. Outbreak of multidrug-resistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa colonization and infection secondary to imperfect intensive care unit room design. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol. 2009;30(1):25.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Brooke JS. Pathogenic bacteria in sink exit drains. J Hosp Infect. 2008;70(2):198–9.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Kotay SM, Donlan RM, Ganim C, Barry K, Christensen BE, Mathers AJ. Droplet-rather than aerosol-mediated dispersion is the primary mechanism of bacterial transmission from contaminated hand-washing sink traps. Appl Environ Microbiol. 2019;85(2):e01997-e2018.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  10. Weingarten RA, Johnson RC, Conlan S, Ramsburg AM, Dekker JP, Lau AF, et al. Genomic analysis of hospital plumbing reveals diverse reservoir of bacterial plasmids conferring carbapenem resistance. mBio. 2018;9(1):e02011-17.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  11. Davin-Regli A, Lavigne J-P, Pagès J-M. Enterobacter spp.: update on taxonomy, clinical aspects, and emerging antimicrobial resistance. Clin Microbiol Rev. 2019;32(4):e00002-19.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  12. Jarlier V, Nicolas MH, Fournier G, Philippon A. Extended broad-spectrum beta-lactamases conferring transferable resistance to newer beta-lactam agents in Enterobacteriaceae: hospital prevalence and susceptibility patterns. Rev Infect Dis. 1988;10(4):867–78.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Bell SM. The CDS disc method of antibiotic sensitivity testing (calibrated dichotomous sensitivity test). Pathology. 1975;7(4 Suppl):Suppl 1-Suppl 48.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Krueger F. Trim Galore https://github.com/FelixKrueger/TrimGalore; 2017. https://github.com/FelixKrueger/TrimGalore.

  15. Wick RR, Judd LM, Gorrie CL, Holt KE. Unicycler: resolving bacterial genome assemblies from short and long sequencing reads. PLoS Comput Biol. 2017;13(6):e1005595.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  16. Jolley KA, Maiden MCJ. BIGSdb: scalable analysis of bacterial genome variation at the population level. BMC Bioinform. 2010;11(1):595.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Seemann T. Prokka: rapid prokaryotic genome annotation. Bioinformatics. 2014;30(14):2068–9.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Aziz RK, Bartels D, Best AA, DeJongh M, Disz T, Edwards RA, et al. The RAST server: rapid annotations using subsystems technology. BMC Genom. 2008;9(1):75.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Rutherford K, Parkhill J, Crook J, Horsnell T, Rice P, Rajandream M-A, et al. Artemis: sequence visualization and annotation. Bioinformatics. 2000;16(10):944–5.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Jia B, Raphenya AR, Alcock B, Waglechner N, Guo P, Tsang KK, et al. CARD 2017: expansion and model-centric curation of the comprehensive antibiotic resistance database. Nucleic Acids Res. 2016;45(D1):D566–73.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  21. Siguier P, Perochon J, Lestrade L, Mahillon J, Chandler M. ISfinder: the reference centre for bacterial insertion sequences. Nucleic Acids Res. 2006;34(suppl_1):D32–6.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Cury J, Jové T, Touchon M, Néron B, Rocha EP. Identification and analysis of integrons and cassette arrays in bacterial genomes. Nucleic Acids Res. 2016;44(10):4539–50.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  23. Bertelli C, Laird MR, Williams KP, Simon Fraser University Research Computing Group, Lau BY, Hoad G, et al. IslandViewer 4: expanded prediction of genomic islands for larger-scale datasets. Nucleic Acids Res. 2017;45(W1):W30–5.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  24. Li X, Xie Y, Liu M, Tai C, Sun J, Deng Z, et al. oriTfinder: a web-based tool for the identification of origin of transfers in DNA sequences of bacterial mobile genetic elements. Nucleic Acids Res. 2018;46(W1):W229–34.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  25. Jolley KA, Bliss CM, Bennett JS, Bratcher HB, Brehony C, Colles FM, et al. Ribosomal multilocus sequence typing: universal characterization of bacteria from domain to strain. Microbiology. 2012;158(Pt 4):1005–15.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  26. Jolley KA, Bray JE, Maiden MCJ. Open-access bacterial population genomics: BIGSdb software, the PubMLST.org website and their applications. Wellcome Open Res. 2018;3:124.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  27. Seemann T. ABRicate, mass screening of contigs for antimicrobial resistance or virulence genes. 2017. https://github.com/tseemann/abricate.

  28. Darling ACE, Mau B, Blattner FR, Perna NT. Mauve: multiple alignment of conserved genomic sequence with rearrangements. Genome Res. 2004;14(7):1394–403.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  29. Galata V, Fehlmann T, Backes C, Keller A. PLSDB: a resource of complete bacterial plasmids. Nucleic Acids Res. 2019;47(D1):D195–202.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Guy L, Roat Kultima J, Andersson SGE. genoPlotR: comparative gene and genome visualization in R. Bioinformatics. 2010;26(18):2334–5.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  31. Grant JR, Arantes AS, Stothard P. Comparing thousands of circular genomes using the CGView Comparison Tool. BMC Genom. 2012;13(1):202.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  32. Kumar S, Stecher G, Li M, Knyaz C, Tamura K. MEGA X: molecular evolutionary genetics analysis across computing platforms. Mol Biol Evol. 2018;35(6):1547–9.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  33. Edgar RC. MUSCLE: a multiple sequence alignment method with reduced time and space complexity. BMC Bioinform. 2004;5(1):113.

    Google Scholar 

  34. Taylor DE, Levine JG. Studies of temperature-sensitive transfer and maintenance of H incompatibility group plasmids. J Gen Microbiol. 1980;116:475–84.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Billman-Jacobe H, Liu Y, Haites R, Weaver T, Robinson L, Marenda M, et al. pSTM6-275, a conjugative IncHI2 plasmid of salmonella enterica that confers antibiotic and heavy-metal resistance under changing physiological conditions. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2018;62(5):e02357-17.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  36. Bergey DH, Holt JG. Bergey’s manual of determinative bacteriology. 9th ed. Baltimore: Williams & Wilkins; 1994.

    Google Scholar 

  37. O’Hara CM, Steigerwalt AG, Hill BC, Farmer JJ, Fanning GR, Brenner DJ. Enterobacter hormaechei, a new species of the family Enterobacteriaceae formerly known as enteric group 75. J Clin Microbiol. 1989;27(9):2046–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  38. Monahan LG, DeMaere MZ, Cummins ML, Djordjevic SP, Roy Chowdhury P, Darling AE. High contiguity genome sequence of a multidrug-resistant hospital isolate of Enterobacter hormaechei. Gut Pathog. 2019;11:3.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  39. McArthur AG, Waglechner N, Nizam F, Yan A, Azad MA, Baylay AJ, et al. The comprehensive antibiotic resistance database. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2013;57(7):3348–57.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  40. Kieffer N, Royer G, Decousser J-W, Bourrel A-S, Palmieri M, OrtizDeLaRosa J-M, et al. mcr-9, an inducible gene encoding an acquired phosphoethanolamine transferase in Escherichia coli, and its origin. Antimicrobial Agents Chemother. 2019;63(9):e00965-19.

    Google Scholar 

  41. Breland EJ, Zhang EW, Bermudez T, Martinez CR, Hadjifrangiskou M. The histidine residue of QseC is required for canonical signaling between QseB and PmrB in uropathogenic Escherichia coli. J Bacteriol. 2017;199(18):e00060-e117.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  42. Kamathewatta KI, Bushell RN, Young ND, Stevenson MA, Billman-Jacobe H, Browning GF, et al. Exploration of antibiotic resistance risks in a veterinary teaching hospital with Oxford Nanopore long read sequencing. PLoS ONE. 2019;14(5):e0217600.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  43. Taylor DE, Rooker M, Keelan M, Ng L-K, Martin I, Perna NT, et al. Genomic variability of O islands encoding tellurite resistance in enterohemorrhagic Escherichia coli O157:H7 isolates. J Bacteriol. 2002;184(17):4690–8.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  44. Osborn AM, Bruce KD, Strike P, Ritchie DA. Distribution, diversity and evolution of the bacterial mercury resistance (mer) operon. FEMS Microbiol Rev. 1997;19(4):239–62.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  45. Boyd E, Barkay T. The mercury resistance operon: from an origin in a geothermal environment to an efficient detoxification machine. Front Microbiol. 2012;3:349.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  46. Andrade LN, Siqueira TES, Martinez R, Darini ALC. Multidrug-resistant CTX-M-(15, 9, 2)-and KPC-2-producing Enterobacter hormaechei and Enterobacter asburiae isolates possessed a set of acquired heavy metal tolerance genes including a chromosomal sil operon (for acquired silver resistance). Front Microbiol. 2018;9:539.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  47. Sherburne CK, Lawley TD, Gilmour MW, Blattner FR, Burland V, Grotbeck E, et al. The complete DNA sequence and analysis of R27, a large IncHI plasmid from Salmonella typhi that is temperature sensitive for transfer. Nucleic Acids Res. 2000;28(10):2177–86.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  48. Roy Chowdhury P, Ingold A, Vanegas N, Martinez E, Merlino J, Merkier AK, et al. Dissemination of multiple drug resistance genes by class 1 integrons in Klebsiella pneumoniae isolates from four countries: a comparative study. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2011;55(7):3140–9.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  49. Toleman MA, Bennett PM, Walsh TR. ISCR elements: novel gene-capturing systems of the 21st century? Microbiol Mol Biol Rev. 2006;70(2):296.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  50. Harmer CJ, Hall RM. IS26-mediated formation of transposons carrying antibiotic resistance genes. J Res. 2016;1(2):e00038-16.

    Google Scholar 

  51. Doublet B, Praud K, Weill F-X, Cloeckaert A. Association of IS26-composite transposons and complex In4-type integrons generates novel multidrug resistance loci in Salmonella genomic island 1. J Antimicrob Chemother. 2008;63(2):282–9.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  52. Sun Y-W, Liu Y-Y, Wu H, Wang L-F, Liu J-H, Yuan L, et al. IS26-flanked composite transposon Tn6539 carrying the tet(M) gene in IncHI2-type conjugative plasmids from Escherichia coli isolated from ducks in China. Front Microbiol. 2019;9:3168.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  53. Roberts LW, Catchpoole E, Jennison AV, Bergh H, Hume A, Heney C, et al. Genomic analysis of carbapenemase-producing Enterobacteriaceae in Queensland reveals widespread transmission of blaIMP-4 on an IncHI2 plasmid. Microbial Genom. 2020;6(1):e000321.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors thank the Infection Control Officer of the U-vet Veterinary Hospital, Ms Robin Searson, and the U-vet staff for their help in collecting the environmental samples.

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Veterinary Biosciences, Faculty of Veterinary and Agricultural Sciences, The University of Melbourne, Werribee, VIC, 3030, Australia

    Kanishka Kamathewatta, Rhys Bushell & Marc Marenda

  2. Asia-Pacific Centre for Animal Health, Department of Veterinary Biosciences, Faculty of Veterinary and Agricultural Sciences, The University of Melbourne, Parkville, VIC, 3052, Australia

    Fannana Rafa, Glenn Browning & Helen Billman-Jacobe

Authors
  1. Kanishka Kamathewatta
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Rhys Bushell
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Fannana Rafa
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Glenn Browning
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Helen Billman-Jacobe
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Marc Marenda
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

Conceptualization, M.M.; methodology, M.M., H.B. and K.K.; validation, M.M., H.B. and G.B.; formal analysis, K.K., H.B. and M.M.; investigation, K.K. FR, MM and R.B.; resources, R.B.; data curation, K.K. and M.M.; writing—original draft preparation, K.K.; writing—review and editing, M.M., H.B. and G.B.; visualization, K.K., and M.M.; supervision, M.M., H.B. and G.B.; All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Marc Marenda.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

Not applicable.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary information

Additional file 1: Table S1

. Sequencing read statistics after quality filtering. Table S2. Details on the genomes used to construct the phylogenetic tree.

Additional file 2: Figure S1

. Chromosomal map of the E. hormaechei isolate CM18-216. From outer to inner circles: 1, nucleotide positions; 2 and 3, CDSs (grey); 4, tRNA (green); 5, predicted genomic islands and prophages (red); 6, pco/sil copper/silver resistance(brown-green), transposases (purple), salmochelin synthesis and uptake (blue); 7, GC% plot; 8, GC skew plot. Inset: detailed map of the pco/sil resistance locus.

Additional file 3: Figure S2

. Mauve alignment of the chromosome sequences of the four Enterobacter strains isolated from the ICU sink over approximately one month. Local blocks of colinearity are labelled with different colors. Predicted coding sequences are indicated underneath each genome. CM18-216 and CM18-242-2 (two top rows) were obtained from hybrid assemblies of Illumina and Nanopore reads; CM18-269-1 and CM18-269-2 (two bottom rows) were assembled from nanopore reads only. Position of a putative phage in CM18-269-2 is indicated by a red box.

Additional file 4: Figure S3

. Alignment of pCM18-216 with IncH12 plasmids carrying qnrB2. Horizontal black lines indicate the lengths of the plasmid sequences. Dark blue horizontal bars on the top (forward strand) and the bottom (reverse strand) of the black lines indicate areas of sequence homology. Vertical bars connecting the horizontal lines show areas of sequence homology.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Kamathewatta, K., Bushell, R., Rafa, F. et al. Colonization of a hand washing sink in a veterinary hospital by an Enterobacter hormaechei strain carrying multiple resistances to high importance antimicrobials. Antimicrob Resist Infect Control 9, 163 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1186/s13756-020-00828-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s13756-020-00828-0

Keywords

Antimicrobial Resistance & Infection Control

ISSN: 2047-2994

Contact us