Skip to main content
Download PDF

High risk of bloodstream infection of carbapenem-resistant enterobacteriaceae carriers in neutropenic children with hematological diseases

Antimicrobial Resistance & Infection Control volume 12, Article number: 66 (2023) Cite this article

Abstract

Background

Neutropenic children with hematological diseases were associated with higher morbidity of carbapenem-resistant enterobacteriaceae (CRE) blood-stream infection (BSI) or colonization. But it was still murky regarding clinical characteristics, antimicrobial susceptibility, and outcomes of CRE-BSI in these patients. We aimed to identify the potential risk factors for subsequent bacteremia and clinical outcome caused by CRE-BSI.

Methods

Between 2008 and 2020, 2,465 consecutive neutropenic children were enrolled. The incidence and characteristics of CRE-BSI were explored in CRE-colonizers versus non-colonizers. Survival analysis was performed and risk factors for CRE-BSI and 30-day mortality were evaluated.

Results

CRE-carriers were identified in 59/2465 (2.39%) neutropenic children and19/59 (32.2%) developed CRE-BSI, while 12/2406 (0.5%) of non-carriers developed CRE-BSI (P < 0.001). The 30-day survival probability was significantly lower in patients with CRE-BSI than in non-BSI (73.9% vs. 94.9%, P = 0.050). Moreover, the 30-day survival probability of patients with CRE-BSI was also poorer in CRE-carriers versus non-carriers (49.7% vs. 91.7%, P = 0.048). Tigecycline and amikacin exhibited satisfactory antimicrobial activity against all isolated strains. Fluoroquinolone sensitivity was lower in E. coli (26.3%) strains versus satisfactory susceptibility of E. cloacae and other CRE-strains (91.2%). CRE-BSI accompanying intestinal mucosal damage were independent risk factors for 30-day survival probability (both P < 0.05), while combined antibiotic therapy and longer duration of neutropenia were more prone to developed CRE-BSI (P < 0.05).

Conclusion

CRE-colonizers were prone to subsequent BSI and CRE-BSI was regarded as an independent predictor predisposing to high mortality in neutropenic children. Moreover, individualized antimicrobial therapy should be adopted due to different features of patients with separate CRE strains.

Introduction

Carbapenem-resistant enterobacteriaceae (CRE) are being increasingly detected and pose a great threat to people’s health worldwide [1]. The absence of effective treatment for CRE infections turns them into life-threatening diseases [2, 3]. In China, the current result indicated that the incidence of CRE infection was about 3.0%, and the resistance rate of all antimicrobial agents had reached 11.0% in 2014 [4]. Several studies have investigated potential risk factors for CRE colonization or infection in adults, which included continual exposure to antibiotics, long-term hospital residence, indwelling medical instruments, or an immunocompromised state [5]. Despite increased attention to CRE all over the world, there is insufficient data available on the topic of CRE in children [6]. Moreover, the scientific quality of the evidence supporting CRE-bloodstream infection (BSI) management remains low. Over the past decade, CRE infections are an emerging problem in children with hematological malignancies and are associated with worse outcomes in healthcare settings [7]. The status of immunodeficiency associated with hematological diseases leads to a prolonged episode of neutropenia and these children are usually exposed to hospital admission, longer antibiotics treatment, more invasive operations and previous chemotherapy. When the effects of the factors above are on the side of disadvantages, the risk of CRE infections may soar, which in turn may further increase treatment-related mortality for children if colonized and/or infected with CRE [8]. The increasing morbidity and mortality of CRE infection in children highlight the importance of early prevention in susceptible populations and effective therapy for those infections caused by these organisms [9]. Therefore, we aim to analyze the incidence and characteristics of CRE-BSI in asymptomatic CRE-colonizers in comparison to non-colonizers in neutropenic pediatrics who suffered acute leukemia (AL) or severe aplastic anemia (SAA). What’s more, the survival analysis was performed and the potential risk factors for subsequent CRE-BSI and 30-day mortality after the onset of bacteremia were identified.

Methods

Study population

We included 2465 children with hematological diseases (AL and SAA) at the Institute of Hematology & Blood Diseases Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences & Peking Union Medical College between Jan 2008 and Dec 2020. All 2465 patients were screened with perirectal swabs on the day of admission to our hospital and once weekly thereafter. The inclusion criteria of patients were: (I) age < 18 years old, (II) individuals or their caregivers who provided written informed consents. In order to reduce the influence of confounding factors in prior admission, we only included patients with newly diagnosed hematological diseases who were first admitted to the hospital. In this study, empirical antimicrobial treatment was adopted for all febrile children immediately after the collection of blood culture samples, and the use of antimicrobials was according to the guidelines of the Infectious Diseases Society of America [10, 11].

The protocol was approved by the Ethics Committee and Institutional Review Board of the Institute of Hematology & Blood Diseases Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences & Peking Union Medical College and the study was conducted in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki.

Data collection and definitions

The baseline characteristics collected included age, sex, CRE strains of infection or colonization, length of neutropenia, length and type of antibiotic therapy, central venous catheter use and length of hospitalization and the concomitant gastrointestinal mucosa damage.

Enterobacterales that test resistant to at least one of the carbapenem antibiotics (ertapenem, meropenem, doripenem, or imipenem) or produce a carbapenemase (an enzyme that can break down carbapenem antibiotics) are called CRE [12]. Neutropenia was defined as the absolute neutrophil count (ANC) lower than 0.5 × 109/L [13].

Recently, developed molecular assays have suggested that when compared with rectal swabs, perirectal swabs have very similar performance characteristics when used in some assays [14,15,16,17]. Allowing for the perirectal region can be considered an acceptable alternative for collecting surveillance cultures for CRE colonizing the gastrointestinal tract, we performed perirectal swabs instead of rectal swabs when the presence of neutropenia in all patients. The perirectal screening was performed for all 2465 patients on the day of admission and once weekly thereafter, and asymptomatic carrier was considered as patients with a positive perirectal swab for CRE at any one time, while who have never had a positive swab for CRE were classified as the non-colonizer. CRE blood culture was performed at the onset of a fever after hospital admission which was obtained from peripheral blood, and the onset of CRE-bacteremia was defined as the blood culture that confirmed infection of CRE [18].

The type of antibiotic therapy was categorized either as monotherapy (one antibiotic) or combined therapy (two or more antibiotics) for all previous infections but was not limited to CRE. Length of antibiotic use ≥ 14 days was defined by at least one antibiotic (cephalosporin, carbapenem or glycopeptides e.g.) used more than 14 days in the past 30 days before diagnosis of CRE-colonization or infection. Length of neutropenia was defined as the duration of ANC < 0.5 × 109/L while hospitalized. According to an updated NCICTC scale (Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events, version 5.0 [CTCAE v5.0]), mucosal damage was measured by anatomic, symptomatic, and functional components. The symptoms of mucosal damage were associated with nausea, vomiting, bloating, diarrhea, intestinal cramping, and abdomen pain. Given that gastrointestinal (GI) bleeding can be classified as a common cause of BSI in neutropenic patients, we also included patients with GI bleeding in this study.

Microbiological methods

CRE surveillance was performed in all 2465 patients when their hospitalization started. Allowing for the perirectal region can be considered an acceptable alternative for collecting surveillance cultures for CRE colonizing the intestinal tract, we performed perirectal swabs instead of rectal swabs when the presence of neutropenia in all patients. All swabs were transported to the central laboratory in liquid Stuart medium. In order to maximize the sensitivity of CRE screening (detection of low-level resistance and low loads of CRE), selection for CRE was conducted by inoculation onto McConkey agar plate after broth enrichment on the basis of the CDC method [19], and phenotypic antimicrobial susceptibility testing of CRE identification for isolates was confirmed using the Vitek-2 automated system (bioMérieux, Marcy-I’Étoile, France). Blood samples were cultured using a bottle and automated blood culture instrument of BD9050 (BD company, USA). Antibiotic resistance was the result interpreted according to CLSI criteria (CLSI2014) [20].

Statistical analysis

To analyze the differences in continuous variables, a non-parametric test (Mann-Whitney U test) was used, and frequencies were analyzed using Fisher’s exact test. A logistic regression model of univariate and multivariate analysis was to evaluate risk factors for asymptomatic CRE carriers who developed BSI. Survival rates were estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method and compared using the log-rank test. In this study, we aim to investigate the effect of CRE colonization on 30-day mortality, and we consider the patients with death occurred by the end of the 30 days after the onset of CRE bacteremia or colonization as a censor. A Cox regression model was to evaluate risk factors for the 30-day survival probability of all patients. All variables with a P < 0.10 in univariate analysis were included in the multivariate analysis in the logistic regression model. A two-sided P-value of < 0.05 was deemed to be statistically significant. Statistical analysis was done using SPSS 22.0 (Chicago, IL, USA) and GraphPad Prism 6.02 software (La Jolla, CA, USA).

Results

Baseline characteristics

We enrolled 2465 neutropenic children in our center, and the median age was 4.5 years (range 1–16) and 1553 patients (63%) were male. CRE colonization was detected in four patients after perirectal swabs on the day of admission. Asymptomatic CRE carriers were identified in 59 of 2465 (2.39%) individuals, including 10 Klebsiella pneumoniae (K. pneumoniae), 14 Enterobacter cloacae (E. cloacae) and 35 Escherichia coli (E. coli). 19 patients of 59 asymptomatic carriers (32.2%) developed a CRE-BSI after colonization diagnosis within a median of 6–28 days (median 19 days) in the same period of hospitalization, and CRE strains in these 19 BSI patients were 3 K. pneumoniae, 13 E. coli and 3 E. cloacae, separately. Meanwhile, 12 patients from 2406 non-carriers (0.5%) were diagnosed with CRE-BSI, including 6 K. pneumoniae, 3 E. coli and 3 E. cloacae (Fig. S1). The median time from admission to the onset of bacteremia in non-colonizers, which was significantly longer than the duration of positive CRE colonization to bacteremia in CRE colonizers [47 (12–71) days vs. 19 (6–28) days, P < 0.001].

Comparison between patients who developed CRE-BSI and non-BSI in asymptomatic CRE carriers

Table 1 showed the results of the comparison between asymptomatic CRE carriers with or without BSI. Of all 59 asymptomatic CRE carriers, patients who developed BSI were more likely to receive carbapenems and glycopeptides when compared with patients without BSI (both P = 0.030), while exposure of cephalosporin was similar between the two groups (P = 0.364) in the previous 30 days before diagnosis of CRE-colonization. What’s more, we found that patients with CRE-BSI had a higher proportion of combined antibiotic therapy (52.6% vs. 22.5%, P = 0.021), prolonged duration of neutropenia (94.7% vs. 55.0%, P = 0.002) and were more frequently admitted to ICU (84.2% vs. 32.5%, P < 0.001). However, the incidence of repeated admission and application of central venous catheter were similar between CRE-colonization patients with BSI and without BSI (P = 0.944 and P = 0.698). Notably, we found that 84.2% of CRE-BSI children suffered from severe mucositis of the digestive tract, thus patients with mucosal damage were significantly susceptible to CRE-BSI (P = 0.004) in asymptomatic carriers.

Table 1 Baseline characteristics of asymptomatic CRE carriers in children with hematologic disease
Full size table

Comparison between CRE asymptomatic carriers and non-carriers who developed BSI

On comparing the demographic data between CRE-carriers and non-carriers who developed BSI, there were obvious differences in the distribution of CRE strains (P = 0.005). The majority of BSI in non-carriers was caused by K. pneumonia (50%), and the proportion of E. coli and E. cloacae were both 25%. Unlike the non-carriers, the most common pathogen of BSI in asymptomatic carriers was E. coli (68.4%), while the proportion of K. pneumonia and E. cloacae were both 15.8%, which was similar to the proportion of CRE-carriers without BSI (55% for E. coli, 17.5% for K. pneumonia and 27.5% for E. cloacae).

No significant gender difference was found between the two groups (P = 0.547). Although insignificantly, the median age of patients in the non-carriers group was younger and with longer periods of neutropenia, which may indicate that non-colonized patients who suffered BSI were more likely with low immunity. Most importantly, only 6 out of 12 (50.0%) BSI patients suffered from mucositis in non-carriers when compared with 16 out of 19 (84.2%) patients in the CRE-colonization group (P < 0.001). (Table 2)

Table 2 Comparison between asymptomatic CRE carriers and non-carriers who developed BSI in neutropenic children
Full size table

Antimicrobial susceptibility of separate isolates

Of the 71 isolated strains from 59 CRE-colonizers and 12 non-colonizers, 38 (53.5%) were E. coli, 16 (22.5%) were K. pneumoniae and 17 (24.0%) were E. cloacae. Figure 1 showed the antimicrobial susceptibility of CRE isolates to six kinds of antibiotics, the antimicrobial properties to aminoglycosides, cephalosporins, tetracyclines (tigecycline), fluoroquinolones, carbapenems, and piperacillin in the K. pneumoniae group were 60.4%, 3.1%, 81.3%, 62.5%, 12.5%, and 6.2%, respectively. Whereas, the efficacies of these six antibiotics on strains in the E. coli group were 58.7%, 5.1%, 65.8%, 26.3%, 18.4% and 5.3%, separately. Nevertheless, E. cloacae were more sensitive to the majority of the antibiotics, especially to aminoglycosides and fluoroquinolone (77.6% and 91.2%). Even those that were extensively resistant to E. coli and K. pneumoniae, such as cephalosporin and piperacillin, 29.4% and 14.7% of E. cloacae were sensitive to them. (Fig. S2)

Fig. 1
figure 1

Distribution of antimicrobial susceptibility of separate carbapenem-resistant isolates

Full size image

Altogether, tigecycline and amikacin exhibited satisfactory antimicrobial activity against all isolated strains. More importantly, fluoroquinolone resistance was found in the majority of E. coli (73.7%) strains when compared with a remarkably reduced number of K. pneumoniae (37.5%), together with E. cloacae (8.8%). Moreover, the resistance rate of piperacillin was similar to that of ertapenem (Table 3).

Table 3 Antimicrobial susceptibility of separate CRE isolates
Full size table

Prognostic analysis of patients in the separated group

All children with febrile neutropenia received empirical antimicrobial therapy immediately after blood culture samples were collected. In order to minimize the emergence of antibiotic resistance, patients received a non-antibiotic therapeutic alternative (watch & wait strategy) after testing for a perirectal CRE colonization which spare them unnecessary use of antibiotics.

Through the survival analysis, Fig. 2A depicted that the 30-day survival probability was significantly lower in 19 children as BSI colonizers than in 40 non-BSI colonizers [49.7% (31.7–67.7%) vs. 94.9% (91.4–98.4%), P = 0.004]. In addition, of 31 patients with BSI, the 30-day survival probability was significantly lower in 19 CRE colonizers in comparison to 12 non-CRE colonizers [49.7% (67.7%-31.7%) vs. 91.7% (83.7-99.7%), P = 0.048] (Fig. 2B). As for prognosis of BSI children with separate CRE strains, the 30-day survival probability of patients infected with E. coli was lower than patients with K. pneumoniae or E. cloacae [50.5% (31.5–69.5%) vs. 87.5% (75.8–99.2%) vs. 83.3% (68.1–98.5), P for trend = 0.324] (Fig. 3).

Fig. 2
figure 2

A. 30-day survival probability of bloodstream infection (BSI) colonizers or non-BSI colonizers. B. 30-day survival probability of patients with CRE colonizers or non-CRE colonizers who developed BSI

Full size image
Fig. 3
figure 3

30-day survival probability of patients with separate carbapenem-resistant isolates who developed CRE-BSI

Full size image

Risk factors for CRE-BSI and 30-day survival probability

We anatomized factors associated with 30-day survival probability after the onset of CRE-BSI (Table 4). In univariate analysis, we found a significantly higher 30-day mortality rate in children with recent admission to ICU, mucosal damage or CRE-BSI, moreover, patients with CRE colonization also took an increased risk of 30-day survival probability (all P < 0.05). In addition, the result of the multivariate cox regression analysis revealed that mucosal damage (P = 0.027), CRE colonization (P = 0.048) and BSI caused by CRE (P = 0.035) were key risk factors for 30-day survival probability.

Table 4 Univariate and multivariate analysis for risk factors for 30-day survival probability in all included patients
Full size table

When it comes to the presence of CRE-BSI, the univariate analysis demonstrated that mucosal damage, combined use of antibiotics, prolonged neutropenia duration and admission to ICU were all major risk factors for CRE-BSI (P < 0.05). Based on multivariate logistic regression analysis, risk factors independently associated with bacteremia in asymptomatic carriers were: mucosal damage (P = 0.034), duration of neutropenia ≥ 7 days (P = 0.007) and combined antibiotic therapy before BSI (P = 0.024) (Table 5).

Table 5 Univariate and multivariate analysis for risk factors for presence of CRE bloodstream infection in all included patients
Full size table

Discussion

To the best of our knowledge, this is the first study represents the attempt to bring about the incidence and risk factors of asymptomatic carriers who developed CRE-BSI in neutropenic children with hematological diseases and compare the features of CRE-colonizers with non-colonizers who developed BSI. More importantly, clinical outcomes associated with CRE-BSI and potential prognostic factors on the 30-day survival probability of these patients were also investigated.

CRE is naturally resistant to most carbapenems and the optimal options for antimicrobial therapy for children suspected of having CRE-BSI are limited [21]. Previous research had explored the risk factors of CRE infected adults, nevertheless, the conditions in CRE infected children differ from those in adults. For instance, the enterobacter species accounted for the majority of CRE isolates in children, which was different from the reports of adult patients in which Klebsiella species was the most common CRE [22]. Additionally, as for the antimicrobial susceptibility of CRE isolates, in contrast to the higher rates of fluoroquinolone resistance described in the adult literature, most CRE isolates from children were susceptible to fluoroquinolone [23]. Thus, CRE strains in children may have different susceptibility to certain antibiotics in comparison to adult patients, which is due in part to the infrequent use of certain antibiotic in children which leads to less selective pressure on gastrointestinal flora and promote the development of resistance to this antibiotic. Thus, these differences showed the difficulty of translating data derived from adults into the clinical practice of children management [24].

An observational study performed by Chiotos et al. evaluated risk factors for CRE colonization or infection in pediatrics [22]. However, they did not perform further analysis in a neutropenic cohort, as neutropenia may be associated with more susceptibility to CRE infection in healthcare settings. Hence, it was relatively incomplete. An Italian retrospective study conducted by Montagnani et al. reported that CRE infection may affect immunosuppressive children with oncologic diseases who underwent chemotherapy [25]. Nevertheless, the methods of management in CRE colonized patients were not unified, thus it may indicate a problem with heterogeneity. Another study about adult data in our hospital, which have the same design and method as ours, reported that the incidence of CRE perirectal colonization was 2.54% among adults with neutropenia and CRE-BSI rate was 17.6% among 74 asymptomatic carriers [26]. Since then, few studies have analyzed the risk factors for CRE-infection among asymptomatic carriers in neutropenic pediatrics and discriminated the features of CRE-colonizers from non-colonizers who developed BSI. Given this, researches focusing on these issues may bring some illumination to the prevention of CRE bacteremia in neutropenic children with hematological disease.

In neutropenic children, an obvious difference was examined in the distribution of infecting CRE strains between carriers and non-carriers who developed CRE-BSI. The latent reason is that gut colonization of CRE potentiated the chance of pathological bacterial translocation due to increased permeability of the intestinal-vascular barrier and gram-negative bacteria, such as E. coli, live there in their billions. Thus, it is plausible that E. coli is the most common cause of BSI in asymptomatic carriers, while K. pneumoniae is related to the higher occurrence of BSI in non-carriers. Given the difference in the prognosis of children infected with separated CRE strains, it is crucial to highlight the challenges in specifying the type of CRE strains and combinations of antibiotics recommended for neutropenic children who suffered E. coli BSI, while E. cloacae infection may deserve de-escalation antibiotics due to better antimicrobial efficacy.

According to our study, the incidence of asymptomatic carriers was similar with adult patients in our hospital. Although with a similar incidence of colonization, subsequent bacteremia was much more common in neutropenic children, on account of weaker protective capability than adults. Moreover, higher treatment intensity in the children with acute leukemia when compared with adults may be also associated with higher prevalence of BSI in children. Thus, perirectal screening may be helpful for starting enough attention promptly in assessable susceptible patients, especially in children suffered from severe mucositis of the gastrointestinal tract. In order to improve the prognosis of CRE-colonizers, certain multimodal strategies may be suggested so as to result in a more broad-based benefit to prevent CRE perirectal colonization, like high fidelity hand hygiene, environmental cleaning and chlorhexidine bathing. Allowing for the mucosal damage was considered an independent risk factor of subsequent CRE-bacteremia and 30-day survival probability, and children with AL who received chemotherapy may lead to severe mucosa damage to the gastrointestinal tract [27]. Treatment of intestinal mucositis should be initiated as early as possible, provided that administration of antibiotics cannot be avoided, it is essential to analyze the gut microbiome changes in case of the long-term and combined usage of these agents.

There still exist limitations in this study. Firstly, although our data about risk factors were statistically significant, the study was limited by the low number of children with CRE-BSI, even if the examined cohort includes both colonized and non-colonized patients. However, this may be regarded as a positive element, suggesting a limited CRE spread in our center. The keys to success in preventing the infection of CRE are early detection through perirectal swab screening, proper hand hygiene, isolation carriers cohort, air quality control through high-efficiency particulate air filtration, as well as active surveillance measures. Secondly, allowing for the retrospective nature of the study, it is possible that there was an incomplete capture of demographic variables or clinical features if these were not documented in the electronic health record. Thus, we cannot exclude the possibility that some variables may be regarded as independent risk factors for CRE-BSI in neutropenic children.

Conclusions

Collectively, CRE-BSI was regarded as an independent predictor predisposing to high morbidity and mortality in neutropenic children. Moreover, individualized antimicrobial therapy should be adopted due to different features of patients with separate CRE strains.

Data availability

The data that support the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.

References

  1. Chotiprasitsakul D, Srichatrapimuk S, Kirdlarp S, Pyden AD, Santanirand P. Epidemiology of carbapenem-resistant Enterobacteriaceae: a 5-year experience at a tertiary care hospital. Infect Drug Resist. 2019;12:461–8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  2. Potter RF, D’Souza AW, Dantas G. The rapid spread of carbapenem-resistant Enterobacteriaceae. Drug Resist Updat. 2016;29:30–46.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  3. Lin MY, Lyles-Banks RD, Lolans K, Hines DW, Spear JB, Petrak R, Trick WE, Weinstein RA, Hayden MK. The importance of long-term acute care hospitals in the regional epidemiology of Klebsiella pneumoniae carbapenemase-producing Enterobacteriaceae. Clin Infect Dis. 2013;57:1246–52.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Hu FP, Guo Y, Zhu DM, Wang F, Jiang XF, Xu YC, Zhang XJ, Zhang CX, Ji P, Xie Y, Kang M, Wang CQ, Wang AM, Xu YH, Shen JL, Sun ZY, Chen ZJ, Ni YX, Sun JY, Chu YZ, Tian SF, Hu ZD, Li J, Yu YS, Lin J, Shan B, Du Y, Han Y, Guo S, Wei LH, Wu L, Zhang H, Kong J, Hu YJ, Ai XM, Zhuo C, Su DH, Yang Q, Jia B, Huang W. Resistance trends among clinical isolates in China reported from CHINET surveillance of bacterial resistance, 2005–2014. Clin Microbiol Infect. 2016;22(Suppl 1):9–14.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Bogan C, Kaye KS, Chopra T, Hayakawa K, Pogue JM, Lephart PR, Bheemreddy S, Lazarovitch T, Zaidenstein R, Perez F, Bonomo RA, Marchaim D. Outcomes of carbapenem-resistant Enterobacteriaceae isolation: matched analysis. Am J Infect Control. 2014;42:612–20.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Castanheira M, Farrell SE, Deshpande LM, Mendes RE, Jones RN. Prevalence of β-lactamase-encoding genes among Enterobacteriaceae bacteremia isolates collected in 26 U.S. hospitals: report from the SENTRY Antimicrobial Surveillance Program (2010). Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2013;57:3012–20.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  7. van Duin D, Doi Y. The global epidemiology of carbapenemase-producing Enterobacteriaceae. Virulence. 2017;8:460–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Satlin MJ, Cohen N, Ma KC, Gedrimaite Z, Soave R, Askin G, Chen L, Kreiswirth BN, Walsh TJ, Seo SK. Bacteremia due to carbapenem-resistant Enterobacteriaceae in neutropenic patients with hematologic malignancies. J Infect. 2016;73:336–45.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  9. Pannaraj PS, Bard JD, Cerini C, Weissman SJ. Pediatric carbapenem-resistant Enterobacteriaceae in Los Angeles, California, a high-prevalence region in the United States. Pediatr Infect Dis J. 2015;34:11–6.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  10. Rolston KV. The infectious Diseases Society of America 2002 guidelines for the use of antimicrobial agents in patients with cancer and neutropenia: salient features and comments. Clin Infect Dis. 2004;39(Suppl 1):44–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Taplitz RA, Kennedy EB, Bow EJ, Crews J, Gleason C, Hawley DK, Langston AA, Nastoupil LJ, Rajotte M, Rolston K, Strasfeld L, Flowers CR. Outpatient Management of Fever and Neutropenia in adults treated for malignancy: American Society of Clinical Oncology and Infectious Diseases Society of America Clinical Practice Guideline Update. J Clin Oncol. 2018;36:1443–53.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Control CfD. CRE Technical Information.

  13. Freifeld AG, Bow EJ, Sepkowitz KA, Boeckh MJ, Ito JI, Mullen CA, Raad II, Rolston KV, Young JA, Wingard JR. Clinical practice guideline for the use of antimicrobial agents in neutropenic patients with cancer: 2010 update by the infectious diseases society of america. Clin Infect Dis. 2011;52:e56–93.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Curry SR, Schlackman JL, Hamilton TM, Henderson TK, Brown NT, Marsh JW, Shutt KA, Brooks MM, Pasculle AW, Muto CA, Harrison LH. Perirectal swab surveillance for Clostridium difficile by use of selective broth preamplification and real-time PCR detection of tcdB. J Clin Microbiol. 2011;49:3788–93.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  15. Stier CJ, Paganini MC, de Souza HH, Costa LM, dos Cruz SGS. Active surveillance cultures: comparison of inguinal and rectal sites for detection of multidrug-resistant bacteria. J Hosp Infect. 2016;92:178–82.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Glisovic S, Eintracht S, Longtin Y, Oughton M, Brukner I. Rectal swab screening assays of public health importance in molecular diagnostics: sample adequacy control. J Infect Public Health. 2018;11:234–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Lautenbach E, Harris AD, Perencevich EN, Nachamkin I, Tolomeo P, Metlay JP. Test characteristics of perirectal and rectal swab compared to stool sample for detection of fluoroquinolone-resistant Escherichia coli in the gastrointestinal tract. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2005;49:798–800.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  18. Zhang Y, Guo LY, Song WQ, Wang Y, Dong F, Liu G. Risk factors for carbapenem-resistant K. pneumoniae bloodstream infection and predictors of mortality in chinese paediatric patients. BMC Infect Dis. 2018;18:248.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  19. CDC. Laboratory protocol for detection of carbapenem-resistant or carbapenamase-producing, Klebsiella spp. and E. coli from rectal swabs.

  20. Bailey AL, Armstrong T, Dwivedi HP, Denys GA, Hindler J, Campeau S, Traczewski M, Humphries R, Burnham CA. Multicenter evaluation of the Etest Gradient Diffusion Method for Ceftolozane-Tazobactam susceptibility testing of Enterobacteriaceae and Pseudomonas aeruginosa. J Clin Microbiol. 2018;56.

  21. Tofas P, Samarkos M, Piperaki ET, Kosmidis C, Triantafyllopoulou ID, Kotsopoulou M, Pantazatou A, Perlorentzou S, Poulli A, Vagia M, Daikos GL. Pseudomonas aeruginosa bacteraemia in patients with hematologic malignancies: risk factors, treatment and outcome. Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis. 2017;88:335–41.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Chiotos K, Tamma PD, Flett KB, Naumann M, Karandikar MV, Bilker WB, Zaoutis T, Han JH. Multicenter Study of the risk factors for colonization or infection with Carbapenem-Resistant Enterobacteriaceae in Children. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2017;61.

  23. Castanheira M, Farrell SE, Krause KM, Jones RN, Sader HS. Contemporary diversity of β-lactamases among Enterobacteriaceae in the nine U.S. census regions and ceftazidime-avibactam activity tested against isolates producing the most prevalent β-lactamase groups. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2014;58:833–8.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  24. Castagnola E, Fontana V, Caviglia I, Caruso S, Faraci M, Fioredda F, Garrè ML, Moroni C, Conte M, Losurdo G, Scuderi F, Bandettini R, Tomà P, Viscoli C, Haupt R. A prospective study on the epidemiology of febrile episodes during chemotherapy-induced neutropenia in children with cancer or after hemopoietic stem cell transplantation. Clin Infect Dis. 2007;45:1296–304.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Montagnani C, Prato M, Scolfaro C, Colombo S, Esposito S, Tagliabue C, Lo VA, Bruzzese E, Loy A, Cursi L, Vuerich M, de Martino M, Galli L. Carbapenem-resistant Enterobacteriaceae Infections in children: an italian Retrospective Multicenter Study. Pediatr Infect Dis J. 2016;35:862–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Xu CH, Su Y, Lyu YX, Tian ZY, Sun FJ, Lin QS, Wang C. [Perianal swabs surveillance cultures of Carbapenem-resistant Enterobacteriaceae(CRE) can be hints for CRE bloodstream infection in patients with hematological diseases]. Zhonghua Xue Ye Xue Za Zhi. 2018;39:1021–5.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Hueso T, Ekpe K, Mayeur C, Gatse A, Joncquel-Chevallier CM, Gricourt G, Rodriguez C, Burdet C, Ulmann G, Neut C, Amini SE, Lepage P, Raynard B, Willekens C, Micol JB, De Botton S, Yakoub-Agha I, Gottrand F, Desseyn JL, Thomas M, Woerther PL, Seguy D. Impact and consequences of intensive chemotherapy on intestinal barrier and microbiota in acute myeloid leukemia: the role of mucosal strengthening. Gut Microbes. 2020;12:1800897.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

None.

Funding

This work was supported by grants from the Ministry of Science and Technology of China (2019YFA0110803 [X.F.Z.]), the National Natural Science Foundation of China (82070201 [Y.G.], 8227014 [X.F.Z.], 81870131 [X.F.Z.]), and the CAMS Innovation Fund for Medical Sciences (CIFMS) (2022-I2M-1-022 [X.F.Z.]).

Author information

Author notes

  1. Li-Peng Liu and Qing-Song Lin contributed equally to this work as the first author.

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Division of Pediatric Blood Diseases Center, State Key Laboratory of Experimental Hematology, National Clinical Research Center for Blood Diseases, Haihe Laboratory of Cell Ecosystem, Institute of Hematology & Blood Diseases Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences & Peking Union Medical College, 288 Nanjing Road, Tianjin, 300020, China

    Li-Peng Liu, Qing-Song Lin, Wen-Yu Yang, Xiao-Juan Chen, Fang Liu, Xia Chen, Yuan-Yuan Ren, Min Ruan, Yu-Mei Chen, Li Zhang, Yao Zou, Ye Guo & Xiao-Fan Zhu

  2. Tianjin Institutes of Health Science, Tianjin, 301600, China

    Li-Peng Liu, Qing-Song Lin, Wen-Yu Yang, Xiao-Juan Chen, Fang Liu, Xia Chen, Yuan-Yuan Ren, Min Ruan, Yu-Mei Chen, Li Zhang, Yao Zou, Ye Guo & Xiao-Fan Zhu

Authors
  1. Li-Peng Liu
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Qing-Song Lin
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Wen-Yu Yang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Xiao-Juan Chen
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Fang Liu
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Xia Chen
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  7. Yuan-Yuan Ren
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  8. Min Ruan
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  9. Yu-Mei Chen
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  10. Li Zhang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  11. Yao Zou
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  12. Ye Guo
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  13. Xiao-Fan Zhu
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

Conception and design: L.P.L, Y.G, X.F.Z. Development of methodology: Q.S.L, X.J.C, W.Y.Y, M.R, X.C. Acquisition of data: Q.S.L, F.L, L.Z, Y.Y.R, Y.Z. Writing, review, and/or revision of the manuscript: L.P.L, X.F.Z, L.Z, Y.M.C, Y.G. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Ye Guo or Xiao-Fan Zhu.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

The protocol was approved by the Ethics Committee and Institutional Review Board of Institute of Hematology & Blood Diseases Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences & Peking Union Medical College and the study was conducted in accordance with Declaration of Helsinki.

Consent for publication

The manuscript is approved by all authors for publication.

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Electronic supplementary material

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary Material 1

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Liu, LP., Lin, QS., Yang, WY. et al. High risk of bloodstream infection of carbapenem-resistant enterobacteriaceae carriers in neutropenic children with hematological diseases. Antimicrob Resist Infect Control 12, 66 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1186/s13756-023-01269-1

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s13756-023-01269-1

Keywords

Antimicrobial Resistance & Infection Control

ISSN: 2047-2994

Contact us