Open Access

Plasmid-mediated mcr-1 colistin resistance in Escherichia coli and Klebsiella spp. clinical isolates from the Western Cape region of South Africa

Antimicrobial Resistance & Infection Control20176:78

https://doi.org/10.1186/s13756-017-0234-8

Received: 2 February 2017

Accepted: 25 July 2017

Published: 3 August 2017

Abstract

Background

Colistin is a last resort antibiotic for the treatment of carbapenem-resistant Gram negative infections. Until recently, mechanisms of colistin resistance were limited to chromosomal mutations which confer a high fitness cost and cannot be transferred between organisms. However, a novel plasmid-mediated colistin resistance mechanism, encoded by the mcr-1 gene, has been identified, and has since been detected worldwide. The mcr-1 colistin resistance mechanism is a major threat due to its lack of fitness cost and ability to be transferred between strains and species. Surveillance of colistin resistance mechanisms is critical to monitor the development and spread of resistance.This study aimed to determine the prevalence of the plasmid-mediated colistin resistance gene, mcr-1, in colistin-resistant E. coli and Klebsiella spp. isolates in the Western Cape of South Africa; and whether colistin resistance is spread through clonal expansion or by acquisition of resistance by diverse strains.

Methods

Colistin resistant E. coli and Klebsiella spp. isolates were collected from the NHLS microbiology laboratory at Tygerberg Hospital. Species identification and antibiotic susceptibility testing was done using the API® 20 E system and the Vitek® 2 Advanced Expert System™. PCR was used to detect the plasmid-mediated mcr-1 colistin resistance gene and REP-PCR was used for strain typing of the isolates.

Results

Nineteen colistin resistant isolates, including 12 E. coli, six K. pneumoniae and one K. oxytoca isolate, were detected over 7 months from eight different hospitals in the Western Cape region. The mcr-1 gene was detected in 83% of isolates which were shown to be predominantly unrelated strains.

Conclusions

The plasmid-mediated mcr-1 colistin resistance gene is responsible for the majority of colistin resistance in clinical isolates of E. coli and Klebsiella spp. from the Western Cape of South Africa. Colistin resistance is not clonally disseminated; the mcr-1 gene has been acquired by several unrelated strains of E. coli and K. pneumoniae. Acquisition of mcr-1 by cephalosporin- and carbapenem-resistant Gram negative bacteria may result in untreatable infections and increased mortality. Measures need to be implemented to control the use of colistin in health care facilities and in agriculture to retain its antimicrobial efficacy.

Keywords

Colistin resistance mcr-1 plasmid-mediated resistance E. coli Klebsiella spp South Africa

Background

The global increase in antibiotic resistance is extremely concerning as it compromises patient outcome and increases the financial burden on health-care systems [1, 2]. Amongst Gram-negative bacteria, including the Enterobacteriaceae, the situation is particularly alarming as the available treatment options for multi-resistant organisms are limited, and there is a paucity of new drugs being developed. The use of β-lactam antibiotics to treat Enterobacteriaceae has been severely compromised by the spread of extended-spectrum β-lactamases (ESBLs), which confer resistance to third and fourth generation cephalosporins, resulting in increased carbapenem use. The emergence and spread of carbapenem resistance, primarily mediated by the plasmid-encoded carbapenemases, is therefore of extreme concern [3, 4].

The polymyxins, colistin and polymyxin B, are the “last resort” antibiotics for treatment of infections with carbapenemase producing Enterobacteriaceae and in 2012 colistin was reclassified by the WHO as critically important for human medicine [5]. Colistin is a polycationic molecule which interacts with the bacterial outer membrane by displacing divalent cations from the negatively-charged phosphate groups of the Lipid A of the lipopolysaccharide membrane, resulting in cell lysis. Traditionally, colistin resistance was considered to be due to rare chromosomal mutations in the genes encoding the PmrA/PmrB and PhoP/PhoQ two component signalling systems or the negative regulator MgrB [6]. These mutations result in modifications to the Lipid A molecule, or rarely, the complete loss of Lipid A. These chromosomal mutations confer a fitness cost to the organism and are unlikely to be maintained in the absence of colistin selection; and are not transferable to other organisms. In November 2015, the emergence of a novel plasmid-mediated colistin resistance mechanism was described [7]. This colistin resistance is conferred by the mcr-1 gene which was identified on an IncI2 plasmid, pHNSHP45, isolated from an Escherichia coli isolate from a pig in China. The mcr-1 gene encodes a phosphoethanolamine transferase enzyme which transfers a phosphoethanolamine to Lipid A; conferring resistance to colistin. The plasmid was shown to be transferable by conjugation and transformation, and is stably maintained in E. coli, Pseudomonas aeruginosa and Klebsiella pneumoniae for at least 14 days, in the presence or absence of colistin [7]. Subsequent studies have identified the mcr-1 gene in various Enterobacteriaceae, including E. coli, K. pneumoniae and Salmonella spp., in Asia, Europe, North America and Africa [816].

Plasmid-mediated colistin resistance mechanisms offer no fitness cost and are stably maintained in the absence of colistin selection [7]. These mechanisms can be transferred between bacterial strains and therefore pose a massive risk to the treatment of Gram-negative infections. Distribution of these plasmids amongst carbapenem resistant organisms, especially in the hospital setting, may catalyse a return of the “pre-antibiotic era” for the treatment of infections with Gram-negative bacterial pathogens. This study aimed to determine the prevalence of the plasmid-mediated colistin resistance gene, mcr-1, in colistin-resistant E. coli and Klebsiella spp. isolates in the Western Cape of South Africa; and to determine whether colistin resistance is spread through clonal expansion or by acquisition of resistance by diverse strains. Surveillance of colistin resistance mechanisms present in a population is vital for advising effective treatment of bacterial infections and for monitoring the development and spread of resistance.

Methods

Consecutive colistin resistant E. coli and Klebsiella spp. isolates were collected from routinely collected clinical specimens processed at the National Health Laboratory Service (NHLS) laboratory at Tygerberg Hospital, as part of convenience sampling, between January and August 2016. The NHLS Microbiology laboratory at Tygerberg Academic Hospital receives specimens from Tygerberg Hospital as well as a number of regional and district hospitals. The hospital serves a drainage area of approximately half of Cape Town (predominantly the Northern and Eastern sub-districts), as well as the West Coast, Cape Winelands and Overberg rural districts. The hospital acts as a referral centre for 4 regional hospitals, 17 district hospitals and over 120 primary health care clinics. The population served is approximately 2.6 million, representing just under half the population of the Western Cape. Microbial identification was done using the API® 20 E system (Analytical Profile Index 20 Enterobacteria) (bioMérieux) or the Vitek® 2 Advanced Expert System™ (bioMérieux) and antimicrobial susceptibilities were determined using the Vitek® 2 Advanced Expert System™. All routinely identified colistin-resistant E. coli and Klebsiella spp. isolates were collected for the study. Limited specimen information, including specimen type, date and hospital of collection was identified based on the laboratory specimen number. These isolates were not included in a previous study which identified mcr-1 in South Africa [16]. Colistin minimum inhibitory concentrations (MICs) were determined by gradient diffusion using colistin Etest® strips (bioMérieux). Colistin susceptibility was interpreted using the European Committee on Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing (EUCAST) Clinical Breakpoints (version 6.0) which defines resistance to colistin in Enterobacteriaceae as MIC >2 μg/mL [17].

PCR detection of the mcr-1 gene was done as previously described, using the primers CLR5 F: 5′-CGGT CAGTCCGTTTGTTC-3′ and CLR5 R: 5′-CTTGGTCGGTCTGTAGGG-3′ [7]. An rpoB internal amplification control using RpoB-F 5′-AACCAGTTCCGCGTTGGCCTGG-3′ and RpoB-R 5′-CCTGAACAACACGCTCGGA-3′ was included in the mcr-1 PCR [18]. PCRs were done using the KAPA Taq ReadyMix PCR Kit (Kapa Biosystems) with 0.4 μM of each primer in a 25 μL reaction volume, using an annealing temperature of 60 °C and 35 cycles. Amplicons were separated on a 2% w/v agarose gel and detected using the Alliance 2.7 imaging system (UVITec). Sanger sequencing was done to confirm the mcr-1 amplicons.

Strain typing was done by REP-PCR using primers REP2I: 5′-ICGICTTATCIGGCCTAC-3′ and REP1R: 5′- IIIICGICGICATCIGGC-3′ [19]. E. coli strain ATCC 25922 and K. pneumoniae strain ATCC 700603 were used as controls for strain typing. PCR was done essentially as previously described using an annealing temperature of 40 °C for 1 min and extension for 8 min at 65 °C, for 30 cycles. Digitised REP-PCR gel images were analysed using GelCompar II version 7.5 (Applied Maths). Banding patterns were normalised to the KAPA™ Universal Ladder (Kapa Biosystems) and band intensity was not evaluated. Similarity between the profiles was calculated with the band matching Dice coefficient and dendrograms for each species were produced by the unweighted pair group method with arithmetic averages (UPGMA) and neighbour-joining algorithms. Identical strains were defined as isolates with >97% similarity, closely related isolates with ≥95% similarity; isolates with <95% similarity were defined as unrelated strains, based on the UPGMA dendograms [20].

Results

Twenty-one colistin-resistant isolates were collected over the 7 month period between January and August 2016, based on Vitek® 2 susceptibility testing (n = 14 E. coli, n = 6 K. pneumoniae, n = 1 Klebsiella oxytoca) (Table 1). These isolates were identified from specimens collected from 19 patients from eight hospitals in the Western Cape region; Hospital A (n = 6), Hospital B (n = 3), Hospital C (n = 3), Hospital D (n = 2), Hospital E (n = 2), Hospital F (n = 1), Hospital G (n = 1) and Hospital H (n = 1) (Table 1). The majority of isolates were obtained from urine specimens. Two E. coli (CEC12 and CEC15) and two K. pneumoniae (CK1 and CK7) isolates were each obtained from urine specimens from the same patient taken at least 2 months apart. All of the E. coli isolates, with the exception of CEC10, are susceptible to 3rd and 4th generation cephalosporins, while four of the six K. pneumoniae isolates are resistant to both, one of which is also resistant to carbapenems (CK2).
Table 1

Specimen details, colistin susceptibilities and presence of mcr-1 in colistin resistant isolates

Species

Isolate

Specimen type

Date of collection

Hospital

Vitek MIC (μg/ml)

Etest MIC (μg/ml)

mcr-1 PCR

Additional antibiotic resistance

E. coli

CEC1

Urine

25/01/2016

A

4 (R)

4 (R)

+

SXT,

CEC2

Urine

16/01/2016

F

4 (R)

4 (R)

+

SXT, CIP, CXM(I)

CEC3

Urine

15/01/2016

D

16 (R)

4 (R)

+

none

CEC4

Urine

16/01/2016

E

8 (R)

4 (R)

+

SXT, AMP, CXM(I)

CEC5

Urine

01/02/2016

H

16 (R)c

0.5 (S)

-

AMI(I)

CEC7

Superficial abdominal swab

27/01/2016

D

8 (R)

4 (R)

+

SXT, AMP, AMC(I), CIP, CXM(I), TZP(I)

CEC8

Urine

12/02/2016

A

8 (R)

4 (R)

+

SXT, AMP, CIP

CEC9

Urine

16/02/2016

B

4 (R)

2 (S)

+

SXT, AMP, CIP

CEC10

Urine

16/02/2016

C

4 (R)

2 (S)

+

AMP, AMC(I), CIP, CXM, CTX, CAZ, FEP, AMI(I), TZP(I)

CEC11

Urine

03/03/2016

B

8 (R)

4 (R)

+

SXT, AMP,

CEC12a

Urine

23/05/2016

A

4 (R)

4 (R)

-

SXT, AMP, AMC(I)

CEC13

Urine

10/06/2016

G

4 (R)

4 (R)

+

SXT, AMP, CIP, CXM(I), FOX(I)

CEC14

Urine

27/07/2016

A

4 (R)c

0.5 (S)

-

none

CEC15a

Urine

23/07/2016

A

4 (R)

4 (R)

-

SXT, AMP

K. pneumoniae

CK1b

Urine

20/05/2016

E

4 (R)

2 (S)

+

AMP, AMC, CIP, CXM, CTX, CAZ, FEP, TZP(I)

CK2

Sputum

17/06/2016

A

16 (R)

4 (R)

+

SXT, AMP, AMC, CIP, CXM, FOX, CTX, CAZ, FEP, GEN, AMI, TZP, ETP, IPM, MEM

CK5

Urine

17/07/2016

C

4 (R)

0.5 (S)

+

AMP, CXM

CK6

Urine

26/07/2016

A

16 (R)

Isolate lost during culture

SXT, AMP, AMC, CIP, CXM, FOX, CTX, CAZ, FEP, GEN, AMI(I), TZP

CK7b

Urine

12/08/2016

E

16 (R)

4 (R)

-

SXT, AMP, AMC, CIP, CXM, CTX, CAZ, FEP, GEN, TZP(I)

CK8

Sputum

02/07/2016

C

4 (R)

0.5 (S)

+

AMP, GEN(I), AMI(I)

K. oxytoca

CK3

Superficial skin swab

21/06/2016

B

16 (R)

0.25 (S)

+

AMP

aSuccessive E. coli isolates obtained from the same patient. bSuccessive K. pneumonia isolates obtained from the same patient. cRepeat Vitek susceptibility testing redefined the colistin MIC as 0.5 μg/mL; both these isolates were excluded from further analysis. R resistant, I intermediate, S susceptible, SXT trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole, CIP ciprofloxacin, CXM cefuroxime, AMP ampicillin, AMI amikacin, AMC amoxicillin-clavulanic acid, TZP piperacillin-tazobactam, CTX cefotaxime/ceftriaxone, CAZ ceftazidime, FEP cefepime, GEN gentamicin, ETP ertapenem. IPM imipenem, MEM meropenem

There was good correlation between the Vitek and Etest colistin susceptibility results in the E. coli isolates. For 12 of the 14 E. coli isolates the MICs agreed, or showed a single fold dilution difference (Table 1). The remaining two E. coli isolates (CEC5 and CEC14) were found to be colistin susceptible by Etest (MIC = 0.5 μg/mL). The VITEK susceptibilities were repeated on these isolates; and repeat testing found the colistin MIC of both isolates to be 0.5 μg/mL; these isolates were reclassified as colistin susceptible and excluded from the analysis. One K. pneumoniae isolate, CK6, was lost during subsequent culture and was excluded from further analysis. The correlation between the Vitek and Etest susceptibility results was poor for the Klebsiella spp. isolates; with all but one isolate showing a greater than 1 fold dilution difference between the two testing methods. Therefore, we found 19 colistin resistant isolates (12 E. coli, 6 K. pneumonia, and 1 K. oxytoca).

The mcr-1 gene was detected in 15 out of 18 (83%) confirmed colistin-resistant isolates, including 10/12 E. coli isolates and 5/6 Klebsiella spp. isolates (Table 1). As no mcr-1 positive control strain was available, selected mcr-1 amplicons from both E. coli and Klebsiella spp. isolates were sequenced and shown to share 100% identity with the published mcr-1 gene sequence (Genbank accession number: NG_050417.1) [7]. Four mcr-1 positive Klebsiella isolates were reported to be colistin susceptible by the Etest method. The two mcr-1-negative colistin resistant E. coli isolates (CEC12 and CEC15), were isolated from the same patient.

Strain typing using REP-PCR identified 11 unrelated strain types amongst the E. coli and 4 amongst the Klebsiella spp. isolates (Fig. 1). Two genetically related E. coli isolates (CEC12 and CEC15), with 95% similarity, and two identical K. pneumoniae isolates (CK1 and CK7) were respectively identified from the same patient. Isolate CK1 was mcr-1-positive, while CK7 was mcr-1-negative, even after repeating the PCR. Both isolates were however colistin resistant, although CK7 had a higher colistin MIC (16 μg/mL) than CK1 (4 μg/mL).
Fig. 1

UPGMA dendograms representing the relatedness of a E. coli and b Klebsiella pneumoniae strains. Clustering was consistent between the UPGMA and neighbor-joining dendograms (data not shown)

Discussion

The plasmid-mediated mcr-1 colistin resistance gene was found to be the predominant colistin resistance mechanism amongst E. coli and Klebsiella spp. clinical isolates in the Western Cape of South Africa, present in 83% of colistin resistant isolates. These mcr-1 positive isolates were obtained from seven hospitals across the Western Cape, indicating that this resistance mechanism is widespread in the province. Previously, mcr-1 has been reported in eight colistin resistant E. coli isolates from patients in Johannesburg and Pretoria, and one from Cape Town [16]; however the presence of mcr-1 in clinical Klebsiella isolates has not been previously described in South Africa. This highlights the need for screening for mcr-1 in other Gram negative organisms in addition to E. coli. The presence of the mcr-1 colistin resistance mechanism in K. pneumoniae is particularly concerning in light of the high prevalence of ESBL-production as well as ongoing emergence of carbapenem resistance amongst K. pneumoniae in South Africa [21, 22]. The mcr-1 gene was detected in two K. pneumoniae isolates which are resistant to 3rd and 4th generation cephalosporins, one of which is also resistant to carbapenems, indicating that these highly resistant organisms are already present in our population.

The mcr-1 gene was detected in diverse strains of E. coli and K. pneumoniae from geographically diverse hospitals, indicating that this plasmid-mediated colistin resistance mechanism is not distributed clonally, but mediated by multiple independent acquisitions of mcr-1 containing plasmids. Six of these hospitals are regional or district hospitals, where colistin use is extremely uncommon, and it is probable that these isolates are present in the community, rather than arising as a result of selective pressure in hospitals. This is consistent with previous data from South Africa which showed that the mcr-1 positive E. coli isolates from Johannesburg and Pretoria were unrelated strains, containing mcr-1 on 3 different plasmid types [23]. Plasmid typing has not yet been done on the isolates in this study, therefore it cannot be concluded whether the dispersion of mcr-1 in the Western Cape is due to the spread of a single mcr-1 containing plasmid amongst different strains and species, or whether mcr-1 is present on multiple plasmid types in this community.

The two genetically identical K. pneumoniae isolates, obtained from the same patient, appear to have distinct colistin resistance mechanisms. The first isolate contained the mcr-1 gene, while the second was mcr-1-negative. Further studies are required to explain this finding, which may be due to loss of the mcr-1 plasmid in combination with development of chromosomal colistin resistance mutations, or acquisition of an alternative plasmid-mediated gene such as mcr-2 [24]. New mutations in mcr-1, resulting in increased colistin MICs and loss of one or both primer binding sites, is another speculative explanation. Both of these isolates are resistant to 3rd and 4th generation cephalosporins and the second isolate had also acquired resistance to trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole and gentamicin, which may be linked to acquisition of additional plasmids. The mechanism/s of colistin resistance in the other mcr-1 negative isolates also requires further investigation.

The high prevalence of the mcr-1 colistin-resistance gene in China was attributed to the widespread use of colistin in their veterinary sector [7]. In South Africa, an increased prevalence of colistin resistance was observed in E. coli obtained from chickens in the last quarter of 2015, as part of the MIC surveillance program, and 79% of these colistin resistant E. coli isolates (19/24) were mcr-1 positive [25]. As a result of these findings, as well as the presence of mcr-1 in human isolates in South Africa, and colistin’s position as an antibiotic of last resort for human health, the South African Veterinary Council (SAVC) recently recommended that colistin not be used in feed producing animals unless its use can be justified by a sensitivity test showing that it is the only therapeutic option available [25]. Prudent use of colistin in agriculture is vital to prevent further spread of the mcr-1 gene to other bacteria and to retain its use in humans and animals [25, 26].

In July 2016, EUCAST issued a statement recommending that the Etest not be used for colistin MIC determination, after evaluating its use on a collection of isolates with and without known colistin resistance mechanisms [27]. Results indicated that the Etest underestimates MIC values. Furthermore, In the December 2016 issue of the CLSI AST News Update, the Clinical Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI)/EUCAST Joint Working Group recommended that broth microdilution, without surfactant, be used as the reference method for testing colistin and that disk and agar gradient diffusion methods not be used as they yield unacceptably high error rates [28]. This is consistent with the findings in this study, which found that Etest MICs were typically lower than those of the Vitek, although considerably more so for Klebsiella spp. in which the Etest MICs in 5 of the 6 isolates were at least 2 dilutions lower, even in the presence of the mcr-1 resistance gene.

The isolates included in this study exhibited a range of antibiotic susceptibility profiles. The E. coli isolates were all susceptible to carbapenems, and only one isolate was resistant to cephalosporins and six to the fluoroquinolone ciprofloxacin. However, four of the six K. pneumoniae isolates were resistant to 3rd and 4th fourth generation cephalosporins, one of which was also resistant to carbapenems. Other studies have also detected the mcr-1 resistance gene in isolates which harbour plasmid-mediated ESBL and carbapenemase genes [2932], and notably, mcr-1 was found to be present on the same plasmid as an ESBL gene in an E. coli isolate in France [33]. This highlights the threat of widespread dispersion of this resistance mechanism and its introduction into more resistant strains. New antibiotics are unlikely to solve the antibiotic resistance problem in the near future, and surveillance of colistin resistance and the prudent use of colistin in humans and animals are vital to retain colistin activity.

Conclusions

The plasmid-encoded mcr-1 gene is the predominant colistin resistance mechanism in E. coli and Klebsiella spp. isolates from clinical specimens in the Western Cape of South Africa. The mcr-1 gene was detected in unrelated strains from patients at various hospitals throughout the province, suggesting that the mcr-1 gene has been acquired by multiple strains and is not clonally spread. The presence of mcr-1 in both E. coli and K. pneumoniae isolates is of concern; the presence of mcr-1 in isolates resistant to 3rd and 4th generation cephalosporins and carbapenems is alarming, and highlights the threat of potentially untreatable infections. Increased surveillance of colistin resistance mechanisms to monitor their acquisition and spread is vital, and ongoing efforts to ensure the judicious use of colistin (and indeed all antibiotics) both in agriculture and in health-care facilities are welcomed.

Abbreviations

ESBL: 

Extended-spectrum β-lactamase

EUCAST: 

European Committee on Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing

HREC: 

Health Research Ethics Committee

MIC: 

Minimum inhibitory concentration

NHLS: 

National Health Laboratory Service

SAVC: 

South African Veterinary Council

UPGMA: 

Unweighted pair group method with arithmetic averages

Declarations

Acknowledgements

Not applicable.

Funding

This research was supported by a grant from the NHLS Research Trust.

Availability of data and materials

Not applicable.

Authors’ contributions

MNF, MRBM and AW participated in the design of the study and interpretation of the data. YS carried out the analyses and interpreted the data. All authors contributed to, read and approved the final manuscript.

Ethics approval and consent to participate

Ethical clearance was obtained from the Stellenbosch University Health Research Ethics Committee (HREC # U16/04/005). A waiver of consent was approved for this study.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
Division of Medical Microbiology, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Stellenbosch University
(2)
National Health Laboratory Service, Tygerberg Hospital

References

  1. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Antibiotic resistance threats in the United States, 2013. USA: CDC, 2003. https://www.cdc.gov/drugresistance/threat-report-2013/pdf/ar-threats-2013-508.pdf. Accessed 28 Nov 2016.
  2. World Health Organisation. Antimicrobial Resistance: Global report on surveillance. 2014. Geneva: WHO, 2014. http://www.who.int/drugresistance/documents/surveillancereport/en/. Accessed 28 Nov 2016.
  3. Livermore DM, Woodford N. The beta lactamase threat in Enterobacteriaceae, pseudomonas and Acinetobacter. Trends in Microbiol. 2006;14(9):413–20. doi:10.1016/j.tim.2006.07.008.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  4. Walsh TR. Emerging carbapenemases: a global perspective. Int J Antimicrob Agents. 2010;36(Suppl 3):S8–14. doi:10.1016/S0924-8579(10)70004-2.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. World Health Organisation. Critically important antimicrobials for human medicine, 3rdedn. Geneva: WHO; 2011. http://apps.who.int/iris/bitstream/10665/77376/1/9789241504485_eng.pdf?ua=18&ua=1. Accessed 28 Nov 2016.Google Scholar
  6. Olaitan AO, Morand S, Rolain JM. Mechanisms of polymyxin resistance: acquired and intrinsic resistance in bacteria. Front Microbiol. 2014;5(643):1–18. doi:10.3389/fmicb.2014.00643.Google Scholar
  7. Liu Y-Y, Wang Y, Walsh TR, Yi LX, Zhang R, Spencer J, et al. Emergence of plasmid-mediated colistin resistance mechanism MCR-1 in animals and human beings in China: a microbiological and molecular biological study. Lancet Infect Dis. 2016;16(2):161–8. doi:10.1016/S1473-3099(15)00424-7.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. Webb HE, Granier SA, Marault M, Millemann Y, den Bakker HC, Nightingale KK, et al. Dissemination of the mcr-1 colistin resistance gene. Lancet Infect Dis. 2016;16(2):144–5. doi:10.1016/S1473-3099(15)00538-1.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. Tse H, Yuen KY. Dissemination of the mcr-1 colistin resistance gene. Lancet Infect Dis. 2016;16(2):145–6. doi:10.1016/S1473-3099(15)00532-0.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. Hu Y, Liu F, Lin IY, Gao GF, Zhu B. Dissemination of the mcr-1 colistin resistance gene. Lancet Infect Dis. 2016;16(2):146–7. doi:10.1016/S1473-3099(15)00533-2.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. Olaitan AO, Chabou S, Okdah L, Morand S, Rolain JM. Dissemination of the mcr-1 colistin resistance gene. Lancet Infect Dis. 2016;16(2):147. doi:10.1016/S1473-3099(15)00540-X.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. Arcilla MS, van Hattem JM, Matamoros S, Melles DC, Penders J, de Jong MD, et al. Dissemination of the mcr-1 colistin resistance gene. Lancet Infect Dis. 2016;16(2):147–9. doi:10.1016/S1473-3099(15)00541-1.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. Zurfuh K, Poirel L, Nordmann P, Nüesch-Inderbinen M, Hächler H, Stephan R. Occurrence of plasmid-borne mcr-1 Colistin resistance gene in extended-Spectrum-β-Lactamase-producing Enterobacteriaceae in river water and imported vegetable samples in Switzerland. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2016;60(4):2594–5. doi:10.1128/AAC.00066-16.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  14. Quesada A, Ugarte-Ruiz M, Iglesias MR, Porrero MC, Martínez R, Florez-Cuadrado D, et al. Detection of plasmid-mediated colistin resistance (MCR-1) in Escherichia coli and Salmonella enterica isolated from poultry and swine in Spain. Res Vet Sci. 2016;105:134–5. doi:10.1016/j.rvsc.2016.02.003.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. Elnahriry SS, Khalifa HO, Soliman AM, Ahmed AM, Hussein AM, Shimamoto T, et al. Emergence of plasmid-mediated Colistin resistance gene mcr-1 in a clinical Escherichia coli isolate from Egypt. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2016;60(5):3249–50. doi:10.1128/AAC.00269-16.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  16. Coetzee J, Corcoran C, Prentice E, Moodley M, Mendelson M, Poirel L, et al. Emergence of plasmid-mediated colistin resistance (MCR-1) among Escherichia coli isolated from south African patients. SAMJ. 2016;106(5):35–6. doi:10.7196/SAMJ.2016.v106i5.10710.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. The European Committee on Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing. Breakpoint tables for interpretation of MICs and zone diameters. Version 6.0, 2016. http://www.eucast.org.
  18. Hoffmann H, Roggenkamp A. Population genetics of the nomenspecies Enterobacter Cloacae. Appl Environ Microbiol. 2003;69(9):5306–18.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  19. Versalovic J, Koeuth T, Lupski JR. Distribution of repetitive DNA sequences in eubacteria and application to fingerprinting of bacterial genomes. Nucleic Acids Res. 1991;19(24):6823–31.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  20. Higgins PG, Hujer AM, Hujer KM, Bonomo RA, Seifert H. Interlaboratory reproducibility of DiversiLab rep-PCR typing and clustering of Acinetobacter baumannii isolates. J Med Microbiol. 2012;61(Pt 1):137–41. doi:10.1099/jmm.0.036046-0.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  21. Bamford C, Bonorchis K, Ryan A, Simpson J, Elliott E, Hoffmann R, et al. Antimicrobial susceptibility patterns of selected bacteraemic isolates from south African public sector hospitals, 2010. South Afr J Epidemiol Infect. 2011;26(4):243–50.Google Scholar
  22. Perovic O, Singh-Moodley A, Dusé A, Bamford C, Elliott G, Swe-Han KS, et al. National sentinel site surveillance for antimicrobial resistance in Klebsiella pneumoniae isolates in South Africa, 2010 - 2012. S Afr Med J. 2014;104(8):563–8. doi:10.7196/samj.7617.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. Poirel L, Kieffer N, Brink A, Coetze J, Jayol A, Nordmann P. Genetic features of MCR-1-producing Colistin-resistant Escherichia Coli isolates in South Africa. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2016;60(7):4394–7. doi:10.1128/AAC.00444-16.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  24. Xavier BB, Lammens C, Ruhal R, Kumar-Singh S, Butaye P, Goossens H, et al. Identification of a novel plasmid-mediated colistin-resistance gene, mcr- 2, in Escherichia coli, Belgium, June 2016. Euro Surveill. 2016;21(27). doi:10.2807/1560-7917.ES.2016.21.27.30280.
  25. Gerber D. Colistin resistance in E. coli in broiler operation in South Africa. In V-Tech Report, 11 January 2016. Johannesburg; V-tech Pty (Ltd), 2016.Google Scholar
  26. Gouws J. Colistin use by veterinarians. In the Official Newsletter of the South African Veterinary Council. 2016;86:6.Google Scholar
  27. The European Committee on Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing. Antimicrobial susceptibility testing of colistin - problems detected with several commercially available products. July 2016. http://www.eucast.org/ast_of_bacteria/warnings/#c13111. Accessed 28 Nov 2016.
  28. CLSI Subcommittee on Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing. CLSI AST News Update. Volume 1, Issue 2 December 2016.Google Scholar
  29. Poirel L, Kieffer N, Liassine N, Thanh D, Nordmann P. Plasmid-mediated carbapenem and colistin resistance in a clinical isolate of Escherichia coli. Lancet Infect Dis. 2016;16(3):281. doi:10.1016/S1473-3099(16)00006-2.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  30. Falgenhauer L, Waezsada SE, Yao Y, Imirzalioglu C, Käsbohrer A, Roesler U, et al. Colistin resistance gene mcr-1 in extended-spectrum β-lactamase-producing and carbapenemase-producing gram-negative bacteria in Germany. Lancet Infect Dis. 2016;16(3):282–3. doi:10.1016/S1473-3099(16)00009-8.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  31. Du H, Chen L, Tang YW, Kreiswirth BN. Emergence of the mcr-1 colistin resistance gene in carbapenem-resistant Enterobacteriaeceae. Lancet Infect Dis. 2016;16(3):287–8. doi:10.1016/S1473-3099(16)00056-6.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  32. Yao X, Doi Y, Zeng L, Lv L, Liu JH. Carbapenem-resistant and colistin-resistant Escherichia coli co-producing NDM-9 and MCR-1. Lancet Infect Dis. 2016;16(3):288–9. doi:10.1016/S1473-3099(16)00057-8.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  33. Haenni M, Poirel L, Kieffer N, Châtre P, Saras E, Métayer V, et al. Co-occurrence of extended spectrum β lactamase and MCR-1 encoding genes on plasmids. Lancet Infect Dis. 2016;16(3):281–2. doi:10.1016/S1473-3099(16)00007-4.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright

© The Author(s). 2017

Advertisement