Skip to main content
Download PDF

Whole-genome sequencing to explore nosocomial transmission and virulence in neonatal methicillin-susceptible Staphylococcus aureus bacteremia

Antimicrobial Resistance & Infection Control volume 9, Article number: 39 (2020) Cite this article

Abstract

Background

Neonatal Staphylococcus aureus (S. aureus) bacteremia is an important cause of morbidity and mortality. In this study, we examined whether methicillin-susceptible S. aureus (MSSA) transmission and genetic makeup contribute to the occurrence of neonatal S. aureus bacteremia.

Methods

A retrospective, single-centre study was performed. All patients were included who suffered from S. aureus bacteremia in the neonatal intensive care unit (NICU), Erasmus MC-Sophia, Rotterdam, the Netherlands, between January 2011 and November 2017. Whole-genome sequencing (WGS) was used to characterize the S. aureus isolates, as was also done in comparison to reference genomes. Transmission was considered likely in case of genetically indistinguishable S. aureus isolates.

Results

Excluding coagulase-negative staphylococci (CoNS), S. aureus was the most common cause of neonatal bacteremia. Twelve percent (n = 112) of all 926 positive blood cultures from neonates grew S. aureus. Based on core genome multilocus sequence typing (cgMLST), 12 clusters of genetically indistinguishable MSSA isolates were found, containing 33 isolates in total (2–4 isolates per cluster). In seven of these clusters, at least two of the identified MSSA isolates were collected within a time period of one month. Six virulence genes were present in 98–100% of all MSSA isolates. In comparison to S. aureus reference genomes, toxin genes encoding staphylococcal enterotoxin A (sea) and toxic shock syndrome toxin 1 (tsst-1) were present more often in the genomes of bacteremia isolates.

Conclusion

Transmission of MSSA is a contributing factor to the occurrence of S. aureus bacteremia in neonates. Sea and tsst-1 might play a role in neonatal S. aureus bacteremia.

Introduction

Staphylococcus aureus (S. aureus) is a well-established nosocomial pathogen that causes multiple types of neonatal infections [1, 2]. Invasive S. aureus infections in neonates (e.g. bacteremia) are common in very low birth weight (VLBW) infants, which makes this bacterial species one of the most important pathogens in neonatal intensive care units (NICU) [3,4,5]. A significant risk factor for S. aureus bacteremia in VLBW infants is the presence of intravascular catheters, which are frequently required [6,7,8]. In addition, S. aureus bacteremia can result in severe complications such as endocarditis and osteomyelitis [5, 9, 10]. All-cause mortality among neonates suffering from S. aureus bacteremia varies between 10 and 20% [7, 11]. So there is an urgent need to prevent this infection. To prevent S. aureus bacteremia in neonates, it is important to know the factors contributing to the high frequency and severity of this infection.

Previously, the virulence factors tsst-1 and sea were implicated to play a role in S. aureus bacteremia [12,13,14]. Furthermore, transmission of S. aureus might contribute to the high frequency of bacteremia. Outbreaks of methicillin-resistant S. aureus (MRSA) at the NICU are described and relatively easy to detect [15,16,17,18]. Meanwhile, the detection of methicillin-sensitive S. aureus (MSSA) outbreaks seems to be more difficult, excluding outbreaks in patients who suffer from a skin infection [19,20,21,22]. In this study, whole-genome sequencing (WGS), the typing method with the highest discriminatory power, was used to determine whether MSSA transmission and genetic makeup, contribute to the occurrence of neonatal S. aureus bacteremia.

Methods

Population

The NICU of Erasmus MC-Sophia, Rotterdam, the Netherlands, is a level IV, 27-beds facility. It is divided into four units with six to eight beds each. Per year, about 750 neonates are admitted. Nearly 40% of them are below 32 weeks of gestation and were in majority born in this hospital.

Screening

We included neonates with a presumed infection, of whom blood cultures were obtained between January 2011 and November 2017 that showed to be positive for S. aureus. Clinical data concerning gender, gestational age, birth weight and survival were obtained from patient records.

S. aureus isolates

Blood from neonates was cultured in BACTEC plus PEDS aerobic bottles and incubated in the Bactec FX (BD, Heidelberg, Germany). In case of positive blood cultures, plates were inoculated and, after 16–24 h of incubation at 37 °C, screened for S. aureus based on colony morphology. Identification was performed by means of a latex agglutination test (Slidex Staph Plus, bioMérieux, Marcy-l’Etoile, France) and/or via matrix-assisted laser desorption/ionisation, time-of-flight, mass spectrometry (MALDI-TOF MS system, Bruker). S. aureus isolates were stored at − 20 °C or – 80 °C until use. The VITEK 2 system (bioMérieux) was used for antimicrobial susceptibility testing (AST).

Whole-genome sequencing

Transmission

S. aureus isolates were processed according to the bioMérieux EpiSeqcs V1 programme and sent to LGC Genomics GmbH (Berlin, Germany) for next-generation sequencing (NGS). We used Illumina chemistry, which generated paired end 2 × 150 bp reads. Sequences were assembled using the proprietary built-in assembler from CLC Genomics Workbench v11 software (Qiagen, Hilden, Germany) with default parameters. We analysed them by means of the available S. aureus core genome multilocus sequence typing scheme (cgMLST) [23] in BioNumerics 7.6.3 (bioMérieux, Sint-Martens-Latem, Belgium) which contains 1861 loci. Allele calling was performed using two algorithms, one based on the assembly using a BLAST approach (assembly-based calling) and one based on the trimmed sequencing data using a kmer based approach (assembly-free calling). A consensus of both algorithms was used to assign final allele calls: when both algorithms were in agreement or when an allele call was made by only one of the algorithms, the allele call was considered in the consensus. However, when both algorithms were in disagreement, the allele call was not considered in the consensus. Both allele calling algorithms were executed using default parameters. Conventional MLST types were inferred in silico from the WGS data. To this end, the seven MLST loci were identified using the sequence extraction tool and the MLST plugin from BioNumerics 7.6.3 that is synchronized to the pubMLST.org public repository (accession date: April 5, 2019). For the visualisation of the genetic relatedness between the isolates, we used a minimum spanning tree for the cgMLST data. The MST was generated using default parameters, and no re-sampling was performed. Isolates containing less than 12 allelic differences in the S. aureus core genome were considered genetically indistinguishable [23]. We defined a cluster as more than two genetically indistinguishable isolates and, within a cluster, considered transmission of S. aureus likely. To further validate the results based on the cgMLST approach, as additional method, we evaluated transmission events using a SNP based approach (Additional file 1: Table S1).

Virulence

The presence of virulence genes was assessed, using the sequence extraction tool in BioNumerics 7.6.3. Extraction parameters (percentage coverage and identity) were individualised to accommodate for the different levels of sequence diversity within and between the virulence genes. Anticipating problems upon assembling virulence genes containing repetitive motifs (sdrA, −B and -C, clfA and –B, cna, sasG) using the short read sequence data, only the largest non-repetitive part of these genes was used for quering. In order to obtain data from a general S. aureus population, the prevalence of virulence genes was also assessed by means of the available genomic sequences in the Refseq Genome Database, using the BLAST interface (https://blast.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/Blast.cgi). This database contained 10,288 S. aureus genomes at the time of analysis. Virulence gene-specific search parameters were used as discussed above. Role and function of the S. aureus virulence genes were described in more detail earlier [12, 24]. An overview of analysed virulence genes, their role, search parameters and query sequence are shown in Additional file 2: Table S2.

Results

Patient characteristics

After coagulase-negative staphylococci (CoNS), MSSA was the most frequent causative pathogen of bacteremia in neonates. Several species of CoNS were isolated from neonatal blood, but they were considered to be one group. Twelve percent (n = 112) of 926 positive blood cultures from neonates (one blood culture per episode per patient), taken in the period January 2011 – November 2017, were positive for MSSA. Fifty-nine of the 112 neonates (52.7%) with MSSA bacteremia were male. The median (interquartile range) for gestational age and birth weight were 26 3/7 (25 1/7–30) weeks and 880 (680–1150) grams, respectively. The onset of all episodes of MSSA bacteremia occurred 72 h after birth, at a median postnatal age of 10 (7–19) days. The overall mortality among the included 112 patients was 20.5% while 11 of these 23 neonates died of MSSA septicaemia.

Genetic relatedness

One hundred and four MSSA isolates from the total of 112 neonatal bloodstream isolates (93%) were available and therefore included for WGS (including only the first isolate per patient). Based on WGS, a total of 23 classical MLST types were identified. The most predominant MLST types were ST5 and ST45 (for both n = 16). For 11 MSSA isolates a novel MLST type was found. To assess the genetic relatedness between the 104 isolates based on the more discriminatory cgMLST scheme, we visualised the number of allelic differences of the isolates in Fig. 1. Twelve cgMLST clusters of genetically indistinguishable isolates were observed, containing a total of 33 isolates (2–4 isolates per cluster). In seven of these cgMLST clusters, at least two of the identified MSSA isolates were collected within a time period of one month. In two cgMLST clusters, all MSSA isolates were found within a time period of one year, but the shortest time interval between isolates of two neonates was forty days. In the other three cgMLST clusters, there was a time interval of more than one year between culturing the MSSA bloodstream isolates of two neonates. The SNP approach confirmed our results based on the cgMLST approach (Additional file 1: Table S1).

Fig. 1
figure1

Minimum spanning tree, based on the core genome of 104 S. aureus isolates. Colours indicate the classical MLST sequence types (ST). Twelve cgMLST clusters containing at least two isolates with a maximum of eleven allelic differences are indicated with a grey background

Full size image

S. aureus virulence genes

An overview of virulence genes present in the 104 MSSA isolates is provided in Table 1. Of the immunomodulatory proteins, staphylococcal complement inhibitor (scin) was present in 100% of all bloodstream isolates. Alpha-hemolysin (hla) was present in 99% of the isolates. We also found a 98–100% presence of the MSCRAMMs clumping factors A and B (clfA, clfB), immunodominant surface antigen A (isaA) and iron-responsive surface determinants A and H (isdA, isdH). When compared to a reference population of S. aureus genomes, a few observations stand out. Remarkably, staphylococcal enterotoxin A (sea) and toxic shock syndrome toxin 1 (tsst-1) were, respectively, 2.6 and 3.2 times more prevalent among the 104 neonatal bloodstream isolates, relative to the reference genomes. Likewise, staphylococcal enterotoxin h (seh) was 3.4 times more prevalent although, in absolute numbers, this involved only a few isolates (6/104 versus 173/10288). For the other virulence genes, no such increases were detected (Table 1).

Table 1 Presence of virulence genes in neonatal S. aureus isolates compared to reference genomes
Full size table

Discussion

At our level IV neonatal intensive care unit, as in many centres [3,4,5], S. aureus is a frequent cause of neonatal bacteremia. In our study, we explored the role of MSSA transmission and the possible contribution of virulence genes. By using WGS, 12 different cgMLST clusters of MSSA isolates were found. Seven of these twelve cgMLST clusters included at least two MSSA isolates, cultured from blood of neonates within one month, indicative for transmission. Transmission should therefore be considered as a contributing factor for the frequent occurrence of neonatal S. aureus bacteremia, as was recently described by Rouard et al. [13]. Although it seems reasonable to assume that transmission, irrespective of the source, can only occur through the hands of healthcare workers (HCWs), we did not prove this, since we did not culture the environment, nor the HCWs or parents. Still, general measures such as improvement of the current (daily) cleaning, disinfection procedures as well as hand hygiene, will be likely to help. It was already proven that neonatal hospital-acquired infections could in part be prevented by strict infection control measures [8, 25, 26]. In addition, reinforcement of the implementation of central-line bundles has the potential to reduce the incidence of central line-associated bloodstream infections (CLABSIs); although these bundles are already implemented, compliance can still be improved and additional measures can be explored [27].

Besides transmission, it was determined whether the presence of certain virulence factors is associated with neonatal S. aureus bacteremia. Since it was difficult to define a suitable control population of neonates, we chose to compare neonatal S. aureus bacteremia isolates to all available S. aureus genomes from the Refseq Genome Database (N = 10,288 at the time of analysis). Remarkably, the genes sea and tsst-1 were found a factor 2.6 and 3.2 times more often in the MSSA bloodstream isolates, compared to the reference genomes in the Refseq Genome Database. The overrepresentation of tsst-1 could not be explained by the frequent presence of MLST ST5 and ST45 in our isolates collection, since tsst-1 was not associated with these sequence types. On the other hand, 11 of the 25 isolates carrying sea were found in ST5 isolates. Still, this cannot be the full explanation for finding an association between sea and neonatal MSSA bacteremia. Many studies have been executed on S. aureus toxins and their pathogenic roles, particularly on sea and tsst-1. Previously, it was described that antibody responses to these two specific toxins were higher in patients with S. aureus bacteremia, compared to control patients [12]. In addition, in a recent publication about a NICU MSSA outbreak, tsst-1 and especially sea were found in bloodstream isolates, compared to colonisation isolates [13]. Another review article describes the association of these toxins with bacteremia [14]. Therefore, this may suggest that sea and tsst-1 might play a role in the pathogenesis of S. aureus bacteremia. The other virulence genes were present in virtually all study isolates, but in virtually all reference genomes as well (Table 1).

Our study has its limitations. It was performed retrospectively, in a single centre. We considered less than 12 allelic differences in the S. aureus core genome as indistinguishable, as described by Leopold et al. for MRSA outbreaks [23]. Still, it is a matter of debate which cut-off should be used to define MSSA isolates as indistinguishable. If the cut-off would have been set at 20 alleles [28], this would have led to 10 larger instead of 12 indistinguishable MSSA clusters, which would not have changed the conclusion regarding transmission. Additional studies are needed to define a clear cut-off. Finally, we compared neonatal isolates to a large number of reference genomes, but these originate from several countries, several clinical sites and patients of all ages. It would have been ideal if the reference genomes had originated from colonized but not infected neonates, admitted to the same NICU, in the same time period.

Conclusions

In conclusion, transmission of MSSA seems a contributing factor to the occurrence of S. aureus bacteremia in neonates. The possibility of MSSA transmission in neonatal intensive care should be explored to prevent this invasive and serious infection. The exact role of sea and tsst-1 warrants further investigation.

Availability of data and materials

The data generated and analysed in this study are included in the current article.

References

  1. 1.

    Jeong IS, Jeong JS, Choi EO. Nosocomial infection in a newborn intensive care unit (NICU), South Korea. BMC Infect Dis. 2006;6:103.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. 2.

    Reichert F, Piening B, Geffers C, Gastmeier P, Buhrer C, Schwab F. Pathogen-specific clustering of nosocomial blood stream infections in very preterm infants. Pediatrics. 2016;137.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. 3.

    Ericson JE, Popoola VO, Smith PB, Benjamin DK, Fowler VG, Benjamin DK Jr, Clark RH, Milstone AM. Burden of invasive Staphylococcus aureus infections in hospitalized infants. JAMA Pediatr. 2015;169:1105–11.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. 4.

    Carey AJ, Duchon J, Della-Latta P, Saiman L. The epidemiology of methicillin-susceptible and methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus in a neonatal intensive care unit, 2000-2007. J Perinatol. 2010;30:135–9.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  5. 5.

    Dolapo O, Dhanireddy R, Talati AJ. Trends of Staphylococcus aureus bloodstream infections in a neonatal intensive care unit from 2000-2009. BMC Pediatr. 2014;14:121.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. 6.

    Ekkelenkamp MB, van der Bruggen T, van de Vijver DA, Wolfs TF, Bonten MJ. Bacteremic complications of intravascular catheters colonized with Staphylococcus aureus. Clin Infect Dis. 2008;46:114–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. 7.

    Hakim H, Mylotte JM, Faden H. Morbidity and mortality of staphylococcal bacteremia in children. Am J Infect Control. 2007;35:102–5.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. 8.

    Murdoch F, Danial J, Morris AK, Czarniak E, Bishop JL, Glass E, Imrie LJ. The Scottish enhanced Staphylococcus aureus bacteraemia surveillance programme: the first 18 months of data in children. J Hosp Infect. 2017;97:127–32.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  9. 9.

    Le J, Dam Q, Tran T, Nguyen A, Adler-Shohet FC, Kim S, Schmidt K, Lieberman JM, Bradley JS. Epidemiology and hospital readmission associated with complications of Staphylococcus aureus bacteremia in pediatrics over a 25-year period. Epidemiol Infect. 2017;145:2631–9.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  10. 10.

    Valente AM, Jain R, Scheurer M, Fowler VG Jr, Corey GR, Bengur AR, Sanders S, Li JS. Frequency of infective endocarditis among infants and children with Staphylococcus aureus bacteremia. Pediatrics. 2005;115:e15–9.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. 11.

    Kaufman D, Fairchild KD. Clinical microbiology of bacterial and fungal sepsis in very-low-birth-weight infants. Clin Microbiol Rev 2004;17:638–680, table of contents.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. 12.

    Verkaik NJ, Dauwalder O, Antri K, Boubekri I, de Vogel CP, Badiou C, Bes M, Vandenesch F, Tazir M, Hooijkaas H, Verbrugh HA, van Belkum A, Etienne J, Lina G, Ramdani-Bouguessa N, van Wamel WJ. Immunogenicity of toxins during Staphylococcus aureus infection. Clin Infect Dis. 2010;50:61–8.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  13. 13.

    Rouard C, Bourgeois-Nicolaos N, Rahajamanana L, Romain O, Pouga L, Derouin V, De Luca D, Doucet-Populaire F. Evaluation of an 'all-in-one' seven-day whole-genome sequencing solution in the investigation of a Staphylococcus aureus outbreak in a neonatal intensive care unit. J Hosp Infect. 2019;102:297–303.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  14. 14.

    Xu S, McCormick J. Staphylococcal superantigens in colonization and disease. Front Cell Infect Microbiol. 2012;2:52.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. 15.

    Regev-Yochay G, Rubinstein E, Barzilai A, Carmeli Y, Kuint J, Etienne J, Blech M, Smollen G, Maayan-Metzger A, Leavitt A, Rahav G, Keller N. Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus in neonatal intensive care unit. Emerg Infect Dis. 2005;11:453–6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. 16.

    Reich PJ, Boyle MG, Hogan PG, Johnson AJ, Wallace MA, Elward AM, Warner BB, Burnham CA, Fritz SA. Emergence of community-associated methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus strains in the neonatal intensive care unit: an infection prevention and patient safety challenge. Clin Microbiol Infect. 2016;22:645:e641–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. 17.

    Huang YC, Lien RI, Su LH, Chou YH, Lin TY. Successful control of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus in endemic neonatal intensive care units--a 7-year campaign. PLoS One. 2011;6:e23001.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  18. 18.

    Ramsing BG, Arpi M, Andersen EA, Knabe N, Mogensen D, Buhl D, Westh H, Ostergaard C. First outbreak with MRSA in a Danish neonatal intensive care unit: risk factors and control procedures. PLoS One. 2013;8:e66904.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  19. 19.

    Achermann Y, Seidl K, Kuster SP, Leimer N, Durisch N, Ajdler-Schaffler E, Karrer S, Senn G, Holzmann-Burgel A, Wolfensberger A, Leone A, Arlettaz R, Zinkernagel AS, Sax H. Epidemiology of methicillin-susceptible Staphylococcus aureus in a neonatology Ward. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol. 2015;36:1305–12.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. 20.

    Lin MF, Huang ML, Lai SH. Investigation of a pyoderma outbreak caused by methicillin-susceptible Staphylococcus aureus in a nursery for newborns. J Hosp Infect. 2004;57:38–43.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  21. 21.

    Gomez-Gonzalez C, Alba C, Otero JR, Sanz F, Chaves F. Long persistence of methicillin-susceptible strains of Staphylococcus aureus causing sepsis in a neonatal intensive care unit. J Clin Microbiol. 2007;45:2301–4.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  22. 22.

    Koningstein M, Groen L, Geraats-Peters K, Lutgens S, Rietveld A, Jira P, Kluytmans J, de Greeff SC, Hermans M, Schneeberger PM. The use of typing methods and infection prevention measures to control a bullous impetigo outbreak on a neonatal ward. Antimicrob Resist Infect Control. 2012;1:37.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. 23.

    Leopold SR, Goering RV, Witten A, Harmsen D, Mellmann A. Bacterial whole-genome sequencing revisited: portable, scalable, and standardized analysis for typing and detection of virulence and antibiotic resistance genes. J Clin Microbiol. 2014;52:2365–70.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. 24.

    Verkaik NJ, van Wamel WJ, van Belkum A. Immunotherapeutic approaches against Staphylococcus aureus. Immunotherapy. 2011;3:1063–73.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  25. 25.

    Borghesi A, Stronati M. Strategies for the prevention of hospital-acquired infections in the neonatal intensive care unit. J Hosp Infect. 2008;68:293–300.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  26. 26.

    Trevisanuto D, Arnolda G, Chien TD, Xuan NM, le TA T, Kumara D, Lincetto O, Moccia L. Reducing neonatal infections in south and south central Vietnam: the views of healthcare providers. BMC Pediatr. 2013;13:51.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. 27.

    Ista E, van der Hoven B, Kornelisse RF, van der Starre C, Vos MC, Boersma E, Helder OK. Effectiveness of insertion and maintenance bundles to prevent central-line-associated bloodstream infections in critically ill patients of all ages: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Lancet Infect Dis. 2016;16:724–34.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. 28.

    Goyal M, Javerliat F, Palmieri M, Mirande C, van Wamel W, Tavakol M, Verkaik NJ, van Belkum A. Genomic evolution of Staphylococcus aureus during artificial and natural colonization of the human nose. Front Microbiol. 2019;10:1525.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We thank Marian ten Kate and Heleen van de Spek for their help in collecting the S. aureus isolates. We thank Marius Vogel for his help in data collection. We thank Bruno Lacroix and Deborah Braun (both bioMérieux France) for their help.

Funding

bioMérieux funded this study. bioMérieux designs, develops and sells diagnostic tests in the domain of infectious diseases. The company had no influence on the design and execution of the current study.

Author information

Affiliations

  1. Department of Medical Microbiology and Infectious Diseases, Erasmus MC, University Medical Center Rotterdam, Dr. Molewaterplein 40, 3015, GD, Rotterdam, The Netherlands

    Bibi C. G. C. Slingerland, Margreet C. Vos, Willeke Bras, Wil H. F. Goessens, Corné H. W. Klaassen & Nelianne J. Verkaik

  2. Department of Pediatrics, Division of Neonatology, Erasmus MC, University Medical Center Rotterdam, Rotterdam, The Netherlands

    René F. Kornelisse & Irwin K. M. Reiss

  3. BioMérieux SA, Data Analytics, Clinical Unit, Sint-Martens-Latem, Belgium

    Dieter De Coninck

  4. BioMérieux SA, Clinical Unit, 38390, La Balme-les-Grottes, France

    Alex van Belkum

Authors
  1. Bibi C. G. C. Slingerland
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Margreet C. Vos
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Willeke Bras
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. René F. Kornelisse
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Dieter De Coninck
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Alex van Belkum
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  7. Irwin K. M. Reiss
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  8. Wil H. F. Goessens
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  9. Corné H. W. Klaassen
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  10. Nelianne J. Verkaik
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

BS contributed to the study design, collected, analysed and interpreted the data, and drafted the initial manuscript. NV conceptualised and designed the study, collected, analysed, interpreted and supervised the data collection and critically revised and reviewed the manuscript for intellectual content. MV contributed to the study design, while MV WB collected and interpreted the data, and critically revised and reviewed the manuscript for intellectual content. RK IR contributed to the study design, collected data, and critically revised and reviewed the manuscript for intellectual content. DDC CK contributed to the study design, collected, analysed and interpreted the data, and critically revised and reviewed the manuscript for intellectual content. AVB WG conceptualised and designed the study, interpreted the data and critically revised and reviewed the manuscript for intellectual content. The author(s) read and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Bibi C. G. C. Slingerland.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

Because this was a retrospective observational study in which anonymised patient data were used, collected during routine clinical practice, informed consent was not mandatory according to the Dutch Medical Research Involving Human Subjects Act (WMO). The Institutional Ethics Review Board of the Erasmus MC reviewed the study protocol and provided an exemption from formal ethical assessment (MEC-2015-306), based on the non-interventional design. The study was carried out in accordance with the current ethical guidelines for epidemiological research.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

All other authors declare that there are no competing personal or institutional interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary information

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Slingerland, B.C.G.C., Vos, M.C., Bras, W. et al. Whole-genome sequencing to explore nosocomial transmission and virulence in neonatal methicillin-susceptible Staphylococcus aureus bacteremia. Antimicrob Resist Infect Control 9, 39 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1186/s13756-020-0699-8

Download citation

Keywords

  • Staphylococcus aureus
  • Bacteremia
  • Whole-genome sequencing
  • Neonatal intensive care unit
  • Transmission

Antimicrobial Resistance & Infection Control

ISSN: 2047-2994

Contact us