Skip to main content
Download PDF

Faecal microbiota transplantation reduces amounts of antibiotic resistance genes in patients with multidrug-resistant organisms

Antimicrobial Resistance & Infection Control volume 11, Article number: 20 (2022) Cite this article

Abstract

Background

Multidrug-resistant organisms (MDROs) such as vancomycin-resistant enterococci (VRE) and carbapenemase-producing Enterobacteriaceae (CPE) are associated with prolonged hospitalisation, increased medical costs, and severe infections. Faecal microbiota transplantation (FMT) has emerged as an important strategy for decolonisation. This study aimed to evaluate the genetic response of MDROs to FMT.

Methods

A single-centre prospective study was conducted on patients infected with VRE, CPE, or VRE/CPE who underwent FMT between May 2018 and April 2019. Genetic response was assessed as the change in the expression of the resistance genes VanA, blaKPC, blaNDM, and blaOXA on days 1, 7, 14, and 28 by real-time reverse-transcription polymerase chain reaction.

Results

Twenty-nine patients received FMT, of which 26 (59.3%) were infected with VRE, 5 (11.1%) with CPE, and 8 (29.6%) with VRE/CPE. The mean duration of MDRO carriage before FMT was 71 days. Seventeen patients (63.0%) used antibiotics within a week of FMT. In a culture-dependent method, the expression of VanA and overall genes significantly decreased (p = 0.011 and p = 0.003 respectively). In a culture-independent method, VanA, blaNDM, and overall gene expression significantly decreased over time after FMT (p = 0.047, p = 0.048, p = 0.002, respectively). Similar results were confirmed following comparison between each time point in both the culture-dependent and -independent methods. Regression analysis did not reveal important factors underlying the genetic response after FMT. No adverse events were observed.

Conclusion

FMT in patients infected with MDROs downregulates the expression of resistance genes, especially VanA, and facilitates MDRO decolonisation.

Background

The increase in the rate of antibiotic resistance is one of the most important public health concerns worldwide [1,2,3]. The human gut is a complex microbial ecosystem of symbiotic gastrointestinal (GI) microorganisms [4]. Dysbiosis owing to antibiotics can disrupt the colonisation of non-commensal pathogens and encourage the colonisation of multidrug-resistant microorganisms (MDROs) [4, 5]. The gut microbiome is not only a potential reservoir for MDROs such as vancomycin-resistant enterococci (VRE) and carbapenemase-producing Enterobacteriaceae (CPE) but also a hub of antibiotic resistance genes such as VanA, blaKPC, blaOXA, and blaNDM, collectively known as the gut resistome [4, 6]. The gut resistome provides a suitable environment for the horizontal transfer of antimicrobial resistance genes through conjugation, natural transformation, and transduction [7, 8]. The transfer of antimicrobial resistance genes within commensals can create new antimicrobial-resistant pathogens and pose a challenge for the treatment of patients with severe MDRO infection. Therefore, it is imperative to develop a novel strategy that addresses the resistance environment with various antibiotic resistance genes. One of the ways to deal with the gut resistome comprising clinically important resistance genes is to reconstruct a new environment through faecal microbiota transplantation (FMT).

FMT is a way to restore the human gut microbiome by transferring the microbiota from healthy donors. It is conducted by the administration of refined faeces obtained from screened healthy donors into the colon or the upper small intestine of patients via colonoscopy, enema, or capsules [9, 10]. Its safety and effectiveness against recurrent Clostridium difficile infection (CDI) in the GI tract is well established [11, 12]. A recent study showed that FMT is effective in reducing antibiotic resistance genes in patients with recurrent CDI and modifying the expression of resistance genes [11,12,13]. Numerous studies have shown the effectiveness of FMT in decolonisation of MDROs [10, 14, 15]. FMT is thought to restore the natural microbiota by replacing MDROs with healthy bacteria, leading to the generation of diverse compositions of the human gut microbiome. Although FMT can reduce the expression of resistance genes in patients infected with CDI, its effect on MDROs has not been investigated. In the present study, we investigated whether FMT significantly reduces the expression of antibiotic resistance genes in patients colonized with MDROs.

Materials and methods

Subjects and study design

This was a prospective, single-centre cohort study performed between May 2018 and April 2019 at Severance Hospital in Seoul, South Korea. Patients older than 6 months colonized with CPE, VRE, or CPE and VRE in the GI tract were enrolled in this study. CPE or VRE colonisation was determined by at least one positive result of rectal swab culture a week prior to FMT. Patients carrying MDROs in a location other than the GI tract or who had immunosuppression, food allergy, or high risk associated with study participation were excluded. Patients who used antibiotics were allowed to continue to do so at the time of FMT, and there were no restrictions on the use of antibiotics after FMT. The sample size of this study was determined using the GPower 3.1 Software. Power analysis indicated that a total of 25 participants (number of measurements = 5) were needed for effect size (0.25) when α = 0.05 for a power of 0.8. Therefore, a total of 27 patients were enrolled taking dropout rate into consideration.

The primary endpoint of the study was the complete elimination of antibiotic resistance genes 1 month after FMT. The secondary endpoint included decreased expression of resistance genes. All faecal samples, regardless of MDRO subtype, were tested using real-time reverse-transcription polymerase chain reaction (PCR) for the quantification of antibiotic resistance genes such as VanA, blaKPC, blaOXA, and blaNDM. Genetic response was defined as a decrease in the number of genes.

Faecal microbiota transplantation

Faecal material was obtained from healthy, unrelated donors. All volunteers were screened based on their history and clinical examination for antibiotic use within 3 months, GI symptoms, and any risk of infectious disease. Donors were excluded if they had taken any antibiotics in the past 3 months. Donors were tested for hepatitis (A, B, and C), human immunodeficiency virus, syphilis, bacteria (stool culture), rotavirus/norovirus/adenovirus (stool PCR), C. difficile toxin, parasites and their eggs (rectal exam), and VRE and CPE (stool culture). Stool samples were donated, and 100 g samples were mixed with 200 mL of sterile normal saline and stored as concentrated glycerol stocks at − 70 °C.

FMT was performed using a preparation of the frozen faecal solution via colonoscopy, duodenoscopy, a percutaneous jejunostomy tube, or an gastric capsule. The FMT delivery modality was selected based on the clinicians’ assessment as per the patient’s clinical condition. Patients under colonoscopy took 4 L of bowel preparations 1 day prior to FMT. Only patients who were less likely to aspirate were treated with capsules, which were taken after fasting for 2 h following breakfast for 2 consecutive days. After taking capsules with cranberry juice, patients were advised not to ingest any food and to sit in Fowler’s position for at least 2 h.

Real-time reverse-transcription PCR for detection of antibiotic resistance genes

Faecal samples of subjects were obtained before FMT and 1, 7, 14, and 28 days after FMT and stored at − 80 °C until used for DNA extraction. The efficacy of FMT was assessed by real-time PCR to detect expression of antibiotic resistance genes encoding VanA and carbapenemase. The DNA was extracted from faecal samples using the FastDNA® SPIN Kit for Soli (MP Biomedicals, Solon, OH, USA), which is well-suited for use with faecal samples, as per the manufacturer’ s instructions. Based on the available literature data, PCR was performed using the primers VanAF 5ʹ-ATCAACCATGTTGATGTAGC-3ʹ for VanA, KPC-rtF 5ʹ-CAGCTCATTCAAGGGCTTTC-3ʹ for blaKPC, Oxa-rtF 5ʹ-AGGCACGTATGAGCAAGATG-3ʹ for blaOXA, and Ndm-rtF 5ʹ-GATTGCGACTTATGCCAATG-3ʹ for blaNDM. PCR was performed using 2 × SYBR Green Master Mix (Applied Biosystems) on a 7300 Real-Time PCR system (Applied Biosystems). Amplifications were carried out under the following conditions: 95 °C for 30 s; 40 cycles of 95 °C for 30 s, 60 °C for 34 s, and 95 °C for 15 s, 60 °C for 60 s, and 95 °C for 15 s. Amplification was verified by running the products on a 1% agarose gel. Standard curves were generated using the reference quantities of the cloned resistance genes.

The analysis was performed in two ways. One was culture-dependent PCR, which detects resistance genes based on the resistance the strains demonstrate in cultures. The other is culture-independent PCR, which quantifies resistance genes in polymicrobial samples regardless of their phenotypes. In the first case, for example, VanA gene quantified using PCR confirmed the presence of VRE. In the latter case, all resistance genes such as VanA, blaKPC, blaOXA, and blaNDM were quantified regardless of the MDRO type.

Data collection

Clinical and laboratory data at each follow-up point were collected as follows: age, sex, body mass index, type of MDRO carriage, duration of carriage before FMT, whether antibiotic treatment was used either before or after FMT, laboratory findings such as white blood cells, haemoglobin, platelets, blood urine nitrogen, creatinine, aspartate transaminase, alanine transaminase, total cholesterol, low-density lipoprotein, albumin, fasting glucose, and C-reactive protein. All DNA values were log10 transformed before analysis.

Statistical analysis

All variables are presented as mean ± standard deviation, unless otherwise indicated. Comparisons were performed using Mann–Whitney U test, χ2 analysis, or Fisher’s exact test, as appropriate. A linear mixed model was used to confirm significant decrease in gene expression after FMT. The number of genes at each point was compared using the Wilcoxon signed-rank test. Statistical significance was set at p < 0.05. All statistical analyses were conducted using the Statistical Package for the Social Sciences version 25.0 (IBM Corporation, Armonk, NY, USA).

Results

Patient characteristics

A total of 27 patients who tested positive for MDRO were prospectively enrolled and underwent FMT. The gut colonising MDROs included VRE and CPE. The most common enterococci were Enterococcus faecium (n = 26), and most of the Enterobacteriaceae were Klebsiella pneumoniae (n = 11).

The clinical characteristics of the patients are summarised in Table 1. The median age of the participants was 51.23 years (interquartile range [IQR] = 27.24), and 16 patients were male (59.3%). Fifteen patients (55.5%) were tested positive for VRE, 1 (3.7%) was tested positive for CPE, and 11 (40.7%) for VRE and CPE. Antibiotic resistance genes included VanA (n = 26), blaKPC (n = 11), and blaOXA (n = 1). The duration of MDRO colonisation before FMT was 71 days. Sixteen patients (59.3%) were treated with antibiotics before FMT, and 17 patients (62.9%) were treated with antibiotics after FMT.

Table 1 Baseline characteristics of study participants (n = 27)
Full size table

Genetic responses

Microbiological follow-up data were available for all patients with FMT at 1, 7, 14, and 28 days. Real-time reverse-transcription PCR was performed to detect antibiotic resistance genes in all stool samples. In addition to the previously identified resistance genes, a test was also conducted on the remaining resistance genes using the culture-independent method.

The expression of VanA significantly decreased from 9.28 log10 to 6.82 log10 copies/mL on day 28 of FMT (p = 0.011), and that of blaKPC decreased from 7.41 log10 to 5.14 log10 copies/mL, but no significant difference was observed (p = 0.126). The expression of all genes, including VanA, and blaKPC, was significantly downregulated from 8.57 log10 to 6.34 log10 copies/mL over time after FMT (p = 0.003) (Table 2). We measured the expression levels of all antibiotic resistance genes in each sample and found that the expression levels of VanA and blaNDM decreased from 9.41 log10 to 7.56 log10 and 5.86 log10 to 2.80 log10 copies/mL, respectively (p = 0.047 and p = 0.048). However, no significant decrease was observed in the expression levels of blaKPC and blaOXA, as evident from a decrease from 8.00 log10 to 6.13 log10 and 2.06 log10 to 1.72 log10 copies/mL, respectively (p = 0.063 and p = 0.774). The levels of all genes, including VanA, blaKPC, blaOXA, and blaNDM, significantly decreased over time from 9.64 log10 to 6.04 log10 copies/mL (p = 0.002) (Table 3).

Table 2 Quantification of resistance gene expression after FMT in a culture-dependent method
Full size table
Table 3 Quantification of resistance gene expression after FMT in a culture-independent method
Full size table

We analysed the decrease in the expression of genes at each time point. VanA gene expression level significantly decreased between pretreatment and day 1, pretreatment and day 7, pretreatment and day 14, and pretreatment and day 28 (p = 0.021, 0.017, 0.004, < 0.001, respectively). No significant reduction in the expression of blaKPC was observed between these time points (p = 0.33, 0.099, 0.502, 0.547, respectively). The levels of all genes, including VanA and blaKPC, significantly decreased between pretreatment and day 7, pretreatment and day 14, and pretreatment and day 28 but not between pretreatment and day 1. (p = 0.049, 0.003, < 0.001, 0.06, respectively) (Fig. 1). Similar results were obtained when we tested expression of all antibiotic resistance genes in each sample. VanA gene expression significantly decreased at all time points (p = 0.008, 0.022, 0.003, < 0.001), but no statistically significant decrease was observed in blaKP, blaOXA, and blaNDM gene expression levels. The number of genes expressed, including VanA, blaKPc, blaOXA, and blaNDM, significantly decreased between pretreatment and day 7, pretreatment and day 14, and pretreatment and day 28 but not between pretreatment and day 1. (p = 0.015, 0.008, < 0.001, 0.164, respectively) (Fig. 2).

Fig. 1
figure 1

Genetic response after FMT in culture-dependent method. A Changes in amount of VanA gene. B Changes in amount of blaKPC gene. C Changes in amount of all resistance genes including VanA, blaKPc, blaOXA, and blaNDM

Full size image
Fig. 2
figure 2

Genetic response after FMT in culture-independent method. A Changes in amount of VanA gene. B Changes in amount of blaKPC gene. C Changes in amount of blaNDM gene. D Changes in amount of all resistance genes including VanA, blaKPc, blaOXA, and blaNDM

Full size image

Factors associated with genetic responses

The results of univariate regression analyses to test the downregulation in the expression of antibiotic resistance genes are shown in Table 4. MDRO carriage (CPE: hazard ratio [HR] = 0.417, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 0.46–1.188, p = 0.0.102; combined VRE and CPE: HR = 0.63, 95% CI = 0.182–2.179, p = 0.465), antibiotic resistance gene type (blaKPc: HR = 0.620, 95% CI = 0.078–4.947, p = 0.652; blaOXA HR = 0.831, 95% CI = 0.09–6.959, p = 0.864), duration of MDRO carriage before FMT (HR = 0.99, 95% CI = 0.994–1.004, p = 0.670), antibiotics used before FMT within 1 week (HR = 0.609, 95% CI = 0.249–1.489, p = 0.277), and antibiotics used after FMT (HR = 1.312, 95% CI = 0.472–3.651, p = 0.603) were not related to the decrease in gene expression. We did not find a significant independent predictor associated with decrease in antibiotic resistance gene expression after FMT.

Table 4 Significant predictors associated with genetic response after FMT
Full size table

Discussion

FMT is an emerging therapeutic strategy against MDRO decolonisation. The effectiveness of FMT in treating recurrent C. difficile infection is relatively well-established, with a resolution rate of up to 90% [11, 16, 17]. In patients colonized with MDROs, the spontaneous resolution or clearance rate is 9%–50% and may need a long time [18,19,20]. Multiple groups have studied the decolonisation of MDRO after FMT, which had an efficacy of approximately 50–87.5% [14, 15, 21]. FMT restores the gut microbial diversity, interacts with commensal bacteria, and increases resistance to colonisation [22,23,24]. In our previous study, we observed significant effects of FMT on the decolonisation of MDROs and induction of microbiota richness and biodiversity [15].

The human gut serves as an ideal reservoir of antibiotic resistance genes. Under antibiotic pressure, MDROs predominantly grow in the GI tract and express and disseminate their resistance genes via horizontal gene transfer through conjugation, transformation, or transduction [6,7,8, 25]. This phenomenon occurs easily because the lower GI tract exhibits a high cell density and cell-to-cell contact, high biodiversity with over 500 species, and biofilm-protective cells [7, 8]. A study on gram-negative clinical cultures showed increased susceptibility of post-FMT faecal samples to nitrofurantoin, trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole, and aminoglycoside [12]. The expression and diversity of antibiotic resistance genes were higher in patients with recurrent CDI than in controls and significantly decreased following FMT-mediated improvement in the disease status [11]. These results provide evidence that the decrease in the expression of antibiotic resistance genes may be associated with a clinical response.

In the present study, we assessed the effect of FMT on antibiotic resistance gene clearance in patients colonized with MDROs. The patients were colonised with heterogeneous strains such as VRE, CPE, or CPE/VRE. First, we detected the expression of resistance genes from faecal cultures by PCR based on the sequences of known genes. After FMT, the expression of VanA significantly decreased; although the expression of blaKPc also decreased, the difference was not significant, and blaOXA and blaNDM gene expression was difficult to statistically analyse owing to the small sample size. It decreased in terms of the overall study period and decreased in terms of each section. This observation is consistent with the fact that FMT more quickly and easily affects the decolonisation of VRE [15]. These results suggest that FMT is an effective way to reduce antibiotic resistance gene expression in patients colonized with MDROs.

Although we performed culture-dependent PCR to detect the expression of antibiotic resistance genes, there are still many uncultured isolates constituting the gut microbiota; thus, the traditional techniques may not completely analyse the antibiotic resistome [4, 6, 25]. To overcome this problem, we detected and quantified the levels of total community antimicrobial resistance genes. In culture-independent PCR, we quantified resistance gene expression in polymicrobial samples, regardless of their phenotypes. In VRE stool samples, blaKPc, blaOXA, and blaNDM genes were detected in addition to VanA gene; similar results were recorded for all other samples. We compared the effects after FMT and found that VanA and blaNDM gene expression levels significantly decreased; blaKPc gene expression level also decreased, but the difference was not significant. The expression of blaOXA gene was not downregulated. These results were similar to those of the culture-dependent method. Thus, these findings suggest that the gut resistome in patients colonized with MDROs is affected by FMT.

The exposure of the human microbiota to antibiotics may selectively increase the abundance of resistant organisms owing to their growth advantage and rapid proliferation [6]. This exacerbates the dissemination of resistance genes by horizontal gene transfer in the presence of a basal gene level, leading to a vicious cycle and an increase in the number of resistant organisms [6, 26, 27]. Among patients with recurrent CDI, the number of antibiotic resistance genes significantly reduced only in those who had a clinical response after FMT. This effect was attributed to the changes in the microbial composition of the gut microbiome [11]. In our study, VanA, blaKPc, blaOXA, and blaNDM gene expression decreased after FMT, but no significant decrease in blaKPc or blaOXA gene expression was observed. This is because several species (e.g., Barnesiella spp.) in the microbiota directly inhibit MDROs, especially VRE [28, 29]. In this respect, it is important to evaluate not only the clinical response but also the genetic response to understand the effect of FMT.

Our study has several limitations. First, the sample size was small. In addition, we did not compare the control group with patients colonized with MDROs but who were not treated with FMT. We also did not determine the clinical impact of resistance gene clearance after FMT. Further studies are warranted to determine the relationship between antibiotic resistance gene clearance and clinical outcomes.

Conclusion

This study shows that FMT has many beneficial effects not only through MDRO decolonisation and restoration of composition but also through the reduction in the number and expression of antibiotic resistance genes in the gut microbiome. FMT is especially effective in VanA and blaNDM gene clearance in the gut resistome in patients colonized with MDROs.

Availability of data and materials

The datasets used and/or analysed during the study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.

Abbreviations

MDROs:

Multidrug-resistant organisms

VRE:

Vancomycin-resistant enterococci

CPE:

Carbapenemase-producing Enterobacteriaceae

FMT:

Faecal microbiota transplantation

GI:

Gastrointestinal

CDI:

Clostridium difficile Infection

References

  1. Pitout JDD, Laupland KB. Extended-spectrum β-lactamase-producing Enterobacteriaceae: an emerging public-health concern. Lancet Infect Dis. 2008;8(3):159–66.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Rice LB. Federal funding for the study of antimicrobial resistance in nosocomial pathogens: no ESKAPE. J Infect Dis. 2008;197(8):1079–81.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Fauci AS, Morens DM. The perpetual challenge of infectious diseases. N Engl J Med. 2012;366(5):454–61.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Khoruts A, Sadowsky MJ. Understanding the mechanisms of faecal microbiota transplantation. Nat Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2016;13(9):508–16.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Feehan A, Garcia-Diaz J. Bacterial, gut microbiome-modifying therapies to defend against multidrug resistant organisms. Microorganisms. 2020;8(2):166.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Sommer MOA, Dantas G. Antibiotics and the resistant microbiome. Curr Opin Microbiol. 2011;14(5):556–63.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Huddleston JR. Horizontal gene transfer in the human gastrointestinal tract: potential spread of antibiotic resistance genes. Infect Drug Resist. 2014;7:167–76.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. McInnes RS, McCallum GE, Lamberte LE, van Schaik W. Horizontal transfer of antibiotic resistance genes in the human gut microbiome. Curr Opin Microbiol. 2020;53:35–43.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Manges AR, Steiner TS, Wright AJ. Fecal microbiota transplantation for the intestinal decolonization of extensively antimicrobial-resistant opportunistic pathogens: a review. Infect Dis (Lond). 2016;48(8):587–92.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Santiago M, Eysenbach L, Allegretti J, Aroniadis O, Brandt LJ, Fischer M, et al. Microbiome predictors of dysbiosis and VRE decolonization in patients with recurrent C. difficile infections in a multi-center retrospective study. AIMS Microbiol. 2019;5(1):1–18.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Millan B, Park H, Hotte N, Mathieu O, Burguiere P, Tompkins TA, et al. Fecal microbial transplants reduce antibiotic-resistant genes in patients with recurrent Clostridium difficile infection. Clin Infect Dis. 2016;62(12):1479–86.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Steed DB, Wang T, Raheja D, Waldman AD, Babiker A, Dhere T, et al. Gram-negative taxa and antimicrobial susceptibility after fecal microbiota transplantation for recurrent Clostridioides difficile infection. mSphere. 2020. https://doi.org/10.1128/mSphere.00853-20.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  13. Leung V, Vincent C, Edens TJ, Miller M, Manges AR. Antimicrobial resistance gene acquisition and depletion following fecal microbiota transplantation for recurrent Clostridium difficile infection. Clin Infect Dis. 2018;66(3):456–7.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Bilinski J, Grzesiowski P, Sorensen N, Madry K, Muszynski J, Robak K, et al. Fecal microbiota transplantation in patients with blood disorders inhibits gut colonization with antibiotic-resistant bacteria: results of a prospective, single-center study. Clin Infect Dis. 2017;65(3):364–70.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Seong H, Lee SK, Cheon JH, Yong DE, Koh H, Kang YK, et al. Fecal microbiota transplantation for multidrug-resistant organism: efficacy and response prediction. J Infect. 2020. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jinf.2020.09.003.4834.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  16. Rossen NG, MacDonald JK, de Vries EM, D’Haens GR, de Vos WM, Zoetendal EG, et al. Fecal microbiota transplantation as novel therapy in gastroenterology: a systematic review. World J Gastroenterol. 2015;21(17):5359–71.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Quraishi MN, Widlak M, Bhala N, Moore D, Price M, Sharma N, et al. Systematic review with meta-analysis: the efficacy of faecal microbiota transplantation for the treatment of recurrent and refractory Clostridium difficile infection. Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 2017;46(5):479–93.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  18. O’Fallon E, Gautam S, D’Agata EM. Colonization with multidrug-resistant gram-negative bacteria: prolonged duration and frequent cocolonization. Clin Infect Dis. 2009;48(10):1375–81.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Haverkate MR, Weiner S, Lolans K, Moore NM, Weinstein RA, Bonten MJM, et al. Duration of colonization with Klebsiella pneumoniae Carbapenemase-producing bacteria at long-term acute care hospitals in Chicago, Illinois. Open Forum Infect Dis. 2016. https://doi.org/10.1093/ofid/ofw178.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  20. Bar-Yoseph H, Hussein K, Braun E, Paul M. Natural history and decolonization strategies for ESBL/carbapenem-resistant Enterobacteriaceae carriage: systematic review and meta-analysis. J Antimicrob Chemother. 2016;71(10):2729–39.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Dinh A, Fessi H, Duran C, Batista R, Michelon H, Bouchand F, et al. Clearance of carbapenem-resistant Enterobacteriaceae vs vancomycin-resistant enterococci carriage after faecal microbiota transplant: a prospective comparative study. J Hosp Infect. 2018;99(4):481–6.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Kamada N, Chen GY, Inohara N, Núñez G. Control of pathogens and pathobionts by the gut microbiota. Nat Immunol. 2013;14(7):685–90.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Laffin M, Millan B, Madsen KL. Fecal microbial transplantation as a therapeutic option in patients colonized with antibiotic resistant organisms. Gut Microbes. 2017;8(3):221–4.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Hourigan SK, Chen LA, Grigoryan Z, Laroche G, Weidner M, Sears CL, et al. Microbiome changes associated with sustained eradication of Clostridium difficile after single faecal microbiota transplantation in children with and without inflammatory bowel disease. Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 2015;42(6):741–52.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Jernberg C, Löfmark S, Edlund C, Jansson JK. Long-term impacts of antibiotic exposure on the human intestinal microbiota. Microbiology (Reading). 2010;156(Pt 11):3216–23.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Kent AG, Vill AC, Shi Q, Satlin MJ, Brito IL. Widespread transfer of mobile antibiotic resistance genes within individual gut microbiomes revealed through bacterial Hi-C. Nat Commun. 2020;11(1):4379.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Allen HK, Donato J, Wang HH, Cloud-Hansen KA, Davies J, Handelsman J. Call of the wild: antibiotic resistance genes in natural environments. Nat Rev Microbiol. 2010;8(4):251–9.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Biliński J, Grzesiowski P, Muszyński J, Wróblewska M, Mądry K, Robak K, et al. Fecal microbiota transplantation inhibits multidrug-resistant gut pathogens: preliminary report performed in an immunocompromised host. Arch Immunol Ther Exp. 2016;64(3):255–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Ubeda C, Bucci V, Caballero S, Djukovic A, Toussaint NC, Equinda M, et al. Intestinal microbiota containing Barnesiella species cures vancomycin-resistant Enterococcus faecium colonization. Infect Immun. 2013;81(3):965–73.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

I would like to express my great appreciation to Ji Won Kim for her technical support regarding the implementation of the study.

Funding

This work was supported by the Severance Hospital Research fund for Clinical excellence (SHRC), the Research Program funded by the Korea Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (2019-ER540-00), research grants for discovering major clinical and epidemiological indicators for people with HIV (Korea HIV/AIDS Cohort Study, 2019-ER5101-00), and a grant from the Ministry of Health & Welfare, Republic of Korea (Grant Number HI14C1324).

Author information

Affiliations

  1. Division of Infectious Disease, Department of Internal Medicine, Gangnam Severance Hospital, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, South Korea

    JongHoon Hyun

  2. Division of Gastroenterology, Department of Internal Medicine, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, South Korea

    Sang Kil Lee & Jae Hee Cheon

  3. Division of Laboratory Medicine and Research Institute of Bacterial Resistance, Department of Internal Medicine, Severance Hospital, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, South Korea

    Dong Eun Yong

  4. Division of Gastroenterology, Hepatology, and Nutrition, Department of Pediatrics, Severance Children’s Hospital, Severance Pediatric Liver Disease Research Group, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, South Korea

    Hong Koh

  5. Division of Gastroenterology, Hepatology, and Nutrition, Department of Pediatrics, Yonsei University Wonju College of Medicine, Wonju, South Korea

    Yun Koo Kang

  6. Division of Infectious Diseases, Department of Internal Medicine, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Yonsei University Health System, 50-1, Yonsei-ro, Seodaemun-gu, Seoul, 03722, South Korea

    Moo Hyun Kim, Yujin Sohn, Yunsuk Cho, Yae Jee Baek, Jung Ho Kim, Jin Young Ahn, Su Jin Jeong, Joon Sup Yeom & Jun Yong Choi

Authors
  1. JongHoon Hyun
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Sang Kil Lee
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Jae Hee Cheon
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Dong Eun Yong
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Hong Koh
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Yun Koo Kang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  7. Moo Hyun Kim
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  8. Yujin Sohn
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  9. Yunsuk Cho
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  10. Yae Jee Baek
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  11. Jung Ho Kim
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  12. Jin Young Ahn
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  13. Su Jin Jeong
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  14. Joon Sup Yeom
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  15. Jun Yong Choi
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

JHH analysed and interpreted the study data, drafted and revised the manuscript. SKL and JHC performed duodenoscopy and colonoscopy for faecal microbiota transplantation. All authors contributed to the literature research and writing and revision of the manuscript. JYC conceived the study, analysed and interpreted the study data and drafted and revised the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jun Yong Choi.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

This study was approved by the Institutional Review Board of Severance Hospital (2016-1079-019). The study was conducted in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki and International Good Clinical Practices. All participants provided written informed consent.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Hyun, J., Lee, S.K., Cheon, J.H. et al. Faecal microbiota transplantation reduces amounts of antibiotic resistance genes in patients with multidrug-resistant organisms. Antimicrob Resist Infect Control 11, 20 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1186/s13756-022-01064-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s13756-022-01064-4

Keywords

  • Faecal microbiota transplantation
  • Multidrug-resistant organism
  • Vancomycin-resistant enterococci
  • Carbapenemase-producing Enterobacteriaceae
  • Microbiome

Antimicrobial Resistance & Infection Control

ISSN: 2047-2994

Contact us