Skip to main content
Download PDF

Characterization of florfenicol resistance genes in the coagulase-negative Staphylococcus (CoNS) isolates and genomic features of a multidrug-resistant Staphylococcus lentus strain H29

Antimicrobial Resistance & Infection Control volume 10, Article number: 9 (2021) Cite this article

Abstract

Background

With the wide use of florfenicol to prevent and treat the bacterial infection of domestic animals, the emergence of the florfenicol resistance bacteria is increasingly serious. It is very important to elucidate the molecular mechanism of the bacteria’s resistance to florfenicol.

Methods

The minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) levels were determined by the agar dilution method, and polymerase chain reaction was conducted to analyze the distribution of florfenicol resistance genes in 39 CoNS strains isolated from poultry and livestock animals and seafood. The whole genome sequence of one multidrug resistant strain, Staphylococcus lentus H29, was characterized, and comparative genomics analysis of the resistance gene-related sequences was also performed.

Results

As a result, the isolates from the animals showed a higher resistance rate (23/28, 82.1%) and much higher MIC levels to florfenicol than those from seafood. Twenty-seven animal isolates carried 37 florfenicol resistance genes (including 26 fexA, 6 cfr and 5 fexB genes) with one carrying a cfr gene, 16 each harboring a fexA gene, 5 with both a fexA gene and a fexB gene and the other 5 with both a fexA gene and a cfr gene. On the other hand, all 11 isolates from seafood were sensitive to florfenicol, and only 3 carried a fexA gene each. The whole genome sequence of S. lentus H29 was composed of a chromosome and two plasmids (pH29-46, pH29-26) and harbored 11 resistance genes, including 6 genes [cfr, fexA, ant(6)-Ia, aacA-aphD, mecA and mph(C)] encoded on the chromosome, 4 genes [cfr, fexA, aacA-aphD and tcaA] on pH29-46 and 1 gene (fosD) on pH29-26. We found that the S. lentus H29 genome carried two identical copies of the gene arrays of radC-tnpABC-hp-fexA (5671 bp) and IS256-cfr (2690 bp), of which one copy of the two gene arrays was encoded on plasmid pH29-46, while the other was encoded on the chromosome.

Conclusions

The current study revealed the wide distribution of florfenicol resistance genes (cfr, fexA and fexB) in animal bacteria, and to the best of our knowledge, this is the first report that one S. lentus strain carried two identical copies of florfenicol resistance-related gene arrays.

Background

Coagulase-negative Staphylococcus (CoNS) are opportunistic pathogens that are found not only in animals and humans but also widely in the environment, including dust, soil, water and air. CoNS are also considered a repository of resistance genes, highlighting their threat to public health [1]. CoNS infection can lead to arthritis, cow mastitis, and even systemic infections [2]. Florfenicol is an antimicrobial widely used in veterinary medicine that acts by binding to the 50S ribosomal subunit, leading to inhibition of protein synthesis [3]. Because of its broad antibacterial activity and few adverse effects, florfenicol has been licensed exclusively for use in veterinary medicine to treat infections caused by, for example, Pasteurella multocida, Staphylococcus sp. and Streptococcus sp. in companion animals, farm animals and fish [4]. However, the increasing use of the antibiotics for the treatment and prevention of infectious diseases in animals has contributed to the emergence and widespread of florfenicol resistance genes among bacteria of different species or genera [5]. Reports of multidrug-resistant CoNS are also increasing, and this increased resistance of CoNS to antibiotics also limits the choice of drugs to treat infections [6]. To date, a variety of florfenicol resistance mechanisms have been characterized, including efflux pumps (floR, fexA/fexB and pexA/pexB) [7,8,9,10,11], rRNA methyltransferase (cfr) [12], chloramphenicol hydrolase (estDL136) [13], chloramphenicol acyltransferases (catA or catC) [14] and ribosomal protection proteins (optrA and poxtA) [15, 16]. In CoNS, only cfr, optrA, poxtA and fexA/fexB have been identified. The gene cfr was initially found on the 17.1-kb plasmid pSCFS1 from an S. sciuri isolate and was shown to encode an rRNA methylase mediating resistance to phenicol by methylation of the 23S rRNA. In contrast, the gene fexA, which encodes an efflux protein within the major facilitator superfamily (MFS), was first identified on the 34-kb plasmid pSCFS2 [17] from S. lentus and was shown to be part of the Tn554-like transposon Tn558 [18]. fexB, also a phenicol exporter gene, was first identified on the pEFM-1 (35 kb in size) of E. faecium and pEH-1 (25.3 kb in size) of E. hirae, both strains with swine origins [19]. The genes optrA and poxtA encode ribosomal protection proteins of the ABC-F family. The gene optrA was first identified in E. faecalis and E. faecium and later found in various other gram-positive bacteria [20, 21], while poxtA was recently identified on the MRSA (methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus) chromosome [22].

S. lentus is a coagulase-negative staphylococcus that belongs to the Staphylococcus sciuri group (S. sciuri, S. lentus, and S. vitulinus) [23]. S. lentus was traditionally considered to be an animal pathogen and has been isolated from a wide range of pets, farm animals, wild animals, and retail meats [24]. S. lentus has also been identified as the causative organism in several serious human infections, including sinusitis, endocarditis, peritonitis, septic shock, urinary tract infection, and wound infections, and its clinical significance is apparently increasing [25,26,27]. In this work, in addition to detecting the florfenicol resistance levels and resistance genes of 39 Staphylococcus isolates from poultry and seafood, we also investigated the molecular mechanism of florfenicol resistance of a S. lentus strain with high level florfenicol resistance isolated from a hen. Through whole genome sequencing, we found, for the first time, two copies of the genes cfr and fexA colocalized on a plasmid as well as the chromosome of a bacterium.

Materials and methods

Bacteria and antimicrobial susceptibility testing

28 CoNS strains were isolated from fresh fecal samples of domestic animals (ducks, cows, chickens and pigs) collected from several farms in Sichuan, Zhejiang, Shanxi, Shandong and Henan provinces, China, in 2016. 11 CoNS strains were isolated from fresh seafood (including fishes and prawns) intestinal contents from fishfarms in Wenzhou, Zhejiang, China, in 2018. The isolates were identified by Gram’s staining and serum coagulase testing in strict accordance with experimental procedures [28] and verified by homology comparisons of the 16S rRNA genes. Antimicrobial susceptibility was evaluated by the agar dilution method following the guidelines recommended by the Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI, 2017: M100, https://clsi.org/standards/). The MIC of linezolid was determined by the agar dilution method according to the European Committee on Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing (EUCAST, http://www.eucast.org). S. aureus ATCC29213 was used as a control strain.

Clonal relationship analysis of the strains resistant to florfenicol

The clonal relatedness of the 23 florfenicol-resistant strains (florfenicol MIC ≥ 32 µg/mL) was examined by the pulsed-field gel electrophoresis (PFGE) analysis. Salmonella enterica serovar Braenderup H9812 genome was used as a size standard. The bacterial genomic DNA was digested with 40 U of SmaI (Takara, Dalian, China). The gel was then electrophoresed in a CHEF-Mapper system (Bio-Rad, USA) and the Bio-Rad Quantity One software (Bio-Rad, USA) was used to analyze the PFGE result. A minimum spanning tree was constructed using a categorical coefficient with the unweighted pair group method with arithmetic mean (UPGMA) clustering.

Detection of florfenicol resistance genes

The florfenicol resistance genes (fexA, fexB, cfr, optrA, pexA and floR) were detected by PCR with the primers previously reported (Table 1). Genomic DNA was extracted from each of the 39 isolates using the AxyPrep Bacterial Genomic DNA Miniprep kit (Axygen Scientific, Union City, CA, USA) and used as the template for PCR amplification. Positive amplification products were verified by sequencing with an ABI 3730 automated sequencer (Shanghai Sunny Biotechnology Co., Ltd., Shanghai, China), and the sequencing results were compared with BLAST against the corresponding resistance gene sequences in NCBI nucleotide database (https://blast.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/blast.cgi).

Table 1 Primer sequences and PCR product sizes of the florfenicol resistance genes
Full size table

Sequencing and annotation of the S. lentus H29 genome

The genomic DNA of S. lentus H29 was extracted as mentioned above and sequenced with Illumina HiSeq 2500 and Pacific Bioscience sequencers at Annoroad Gene Technology Co., Ltd. (Beijing, China). The Pacific Bioscience sequencing reads of approximately 10–20 kb in length were assembled by SOAPdenovo v2.04, Celera Assembler 8.0 [29]. Two FASTQ sequence files corresponding to the reads derived from HiSeq 2500 sequencing were used to control assembly quality and to correct possible misidentified bases. Glimmer3.02 software with default parameters was used to predict potential open reading frames (ORFs). ORF annotation was determined by performing BLASTX comparisons with the NCBI nonredundant protein database. Comparisons of nucleotide sequences and amino acid sequences were performed by BLASTN and BLASTP, respectively [30]. BLASTp was applied to compare amino acid sequences with those in the Antibiotic Resistance Genes Database (ARDB, https://card.mcmaster.ca/). The map of the plasmid with GC content and GC skew was drawn with the online CGView Server (http://stothard.afns.ualberta.ca/cgview_server/) and local GView 1.7 with a visual interface [31]. The plasmid sequences used in this study were downloaded from the NCBI database (http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov). The rRNA gene sequences were annotated by the online tool RNAmmer (http://www.cbs.dtu.dk/services/RNAmmer/) [32], and the tRNA sequences were annotated by the online tool tRNAscan-SE 2.0 (http://lowelab.ucsc.edu/tRNAscan-SE/) [33]. Promoter sites were predicted by using Soft Berry BPROM software (http://linux1.softberry.com/berry.phtmltopic=bprom&group=programs&subgroup=gfindb).

Comparative genomics analysis

Sequences containing resistance genes were obtained from the NCBI nucleotide database by the BLASTN program using the resistance gene sequences of S. lentus H29 as the query. The resulting sequences were filtered, and only sequences containing complete resistance genes were retained. CD-HIT was used to cluster the retained sequences using the genome sequence of S. lentus H29 as the reference with an identity of ≥ 90%. The sequence sharing the greatest similarity to the other sequences in each cluster was chosen as the candidate for ortholog analysis. Orthologous groups of the genes from the candidate sequences were identified using BLASTP [30]. Sequence retrieval, statistical analysis and other bioinformatics tools used in this study were applied with Perl and Bioperl scripts (http://www.perl.org/).

Results

Bacterial strains and antimicrobial susceptibility testing

A total of 39 CoNS strains including 9 species were analyzed in this work (Additional file 1: Table S1). Among them, 28 strains were isolated from animal feces and 11 strains were isolated from the seafood intestinal contents. The strains included S. epidermidis (4), S. lentus (2), S. equorum (6), S. saprophyticus (7), S. sciuri (4), S. haemolyticus (3), S. gallinarum (2), S. cohnii (3), S. warneri (4) and 4 unclassified ones. The results of the antimicrobial susceptibility testing of the strains to 21 antimicrobial agents showed that the strains isolated from the animals generally showed wider resistance spectra and higher MIC levels than those isolated from seafood. More than 60% (17/28) of the animal strains showed resistance to 6 antibiotics, including chloramphenicol (85.8%, 24/28), florfenicol (82.1%, 23/28), clindamycin (75.0%, 21/28), tetracycline (67.9%, 19/28), streptomycin (64.3%, 18/28) and erythromycin (60.7%, 17/28), while the seafood bacteria were only resistant to erythromycin (63.6%, 7/11) (Table 2, Additional file 2: Table S2). Meanwhile, more than 90% of the animal isolates were sensitive to eight other antibiotics, especially amikacin, trimethopim and tigecycline with all the strains sensitive to them. However, the seafood isolates only showed certain resistance rates to erythromycin (63.6%, 7/11) and clindamycin (36.4%, 4/11), and most strains were totally sensitive to some antibiotics, such as linezolid, cefoxitin, vancomycin and norfloxacin (Table 2).

Table 2 Characterization of the sensitivity of 39 CoNS isolates to 21 antibiotics
Full size table

Identification of florfenicol resistance genes in the CoNS isolates

In this work, of all 6 florfenicol resistance-related genes (fexA, cfr, optrA, floR, fexB and pexA), only 3 (fexA, cfr and fexB) were identified in the 39 Staphylococcus strains. A total of 37 genes, including 26 fexA, 6 cfr and 5 fexB genes, were identified in 27 strains, with one (S. cohnii H19) and 16 strains each carrying a cfr and a fexA genes, respectively, 5 strains carrying both a fexA and a cfr genes, and other 5 isolates harboring both a fexA and a fexB genes, while the remaining twelve strains were free of the resistance gene. Strains from animals presented a much higher positive rate and carried much more resistance genes, with 82.1% (23/28) of the strains carrying 91.9% (34/37) of the resistance genes, while in the seafood bacteria, only three strains (3/11, 27.3%) carried one fexA gene each (3/37, 8.1%). All 23 florfenicol-resistant isolates (florfenicol MIC level ≥ 32 µg/mL) were isolated from animals, and they all carried two (fexA and fexB) or one (fexA) florfenicol resistance gene. Among the 16 florfenicol-sensitive isolates (MIC ≤ 1 µg/mL), 12 were free of the florfenicol resistance gene, and 3 (HXM5, HXM10 and HXM13 all isolated from seafood) carried a fexA gene and one strain from poultry with a cfr gene. Among the 5 isolates that carried both fexA and cfr, two strains (S. sciuri FC11 and S. haemolyticus FC24) showed an MIC value of 8 μg/mL to linezolid, which was interpreted as an intermediate for linezolid, while the other three strains showed MIC values of ≤ 0.25 μg/mL for linezolid.

Clonal relatedness of the florfenicol-resistant CoNS isolates

Clonal relationship analysis for 23 florfenicol-resistant strains (MIC ≥ 32 µg/mL) revealed that no clonal relatedness was identified among them, including the strains of the same species (Fig. 1). The highest similarity of 63% was observed between two strains of different species, S. equorum (H37) and S. haemolyticus (FP36), which were isolated from different hosts (hen and pig, respectively).

Fig. 1
figure 1

PFGE patterns of 23 florfenicol-resistant CoNS isolates

Full size image

General features of the S. lentus H29 genome

To analyze the molecular characteristics of the florfenicol-resistant CoNS strains, S. lentus H29, co-carrying fexA and cfr with a wide resistance spectrum and high MIC values to the antibiotics tested, was chosen for whole genome sequencing (WGS) analysis. The general features of the H29 genome are shown in Table 3. The complete genome of S. lentus H29 consists of one chromosome and two plasmids (pH29-46 and pH29-26). The chromosome with a G + C content of 31.9% was 2,802,282 bp in length encoding 2683 ORFs. pH29-46 was 46,167 bp in length and encoded 46 ORFs, and pH29-26 was 26,210 bp in length encoding 26 ORFs. The whole genome of S. lentus H29 encoded 11 resistance genes, of which 6 [cfr, fexA, ant(6)-Ia, aacA-aphD, mecA and mph(C)] were encoded on the chromosome, 4 [cfr, fexA, aacA-aphD and ΔtcaA] on pH29-46 and 1 (fosD) on pH29-26. The resistance phenotypes coincided with the resistance genotypes (Table 4). In addition to showing resistance to florfenicol (MIC of 256 μg/mL) and chloramphenicol (MIC of 256 μg/mL), S. lentus H29 was also resistant to erythromycin (> 64 μg/mL) and macrolide antibiotics.

Table 3 General characteristics of the S. lentus H29 genome
Full size table
Table 4 Antimicrobial resistance determinants in S.lentus H29
Full size table

Comparative genomics analysis of the resistance plasmids and the fexA- and cfr-related sequences in the S. lentus H29 genome

Three plasmids, pSX01 (NZ_KP890694.1) of Staphylococcus xylosus 378, pSR01 (NZ_CP019564.1) of S-taphylococcus aureus strain SR434 and pLRSA417 (KJ922127.1) of Staphylococcus aureus 417, sharing the highest nucleotide sequence similarities (coverage > 70%, identities ≥ 97%) with pH29-46 were retrieved from the NCBI nucleotide database. According to the structure and function of the genes encoded on the plasmid, pH29-46 could be divided into two regions (Regions A and B, Fig. 2). Region A was about 26 kb in size encoding the backbone genes, mainly including a replication gene repA, a segregation gene parM, 16 T4SS genes and several hypothetical protein genes, and it displayed 98–100% identity to the corresponding regions of the plasmids pSR01 and pLRSA417. Region B, about 20 kb in length, harbored five resistance genes, which could be divided into two segments. One segment (about 7.5 kb in length) included the tnpABC and fexA genes, which were not present in the three plasmids from the database. The other segment was a 12.5 kb sequence encoding the resistance genes of cfr, aacA-aphD and tcaA, and three copies of IS256 showing 99% identity and 80% coverage to the sequence on pSR01 and pLRSA417.

Fig. 2
figure 2

Genetic map of pH29-46 and its comparison with other plasmids of the highest nucleotide sequence similarities. From the outside to the inside: circle 1, pH29-46 region A in purple and region B in green; circle 2, pSX01 (the plasmid of S. xylosus strain 378 isolated from pig, NZ_KP890694.1); circle 3, pSR01 (the plasmid of S. aureus strain SR434 isolated from human, NZ_CP019564.1); circle 3, pLRSA417 (S. aureus strain 417 isolated from human, KJ922127.1); circle 4, pH29-46 with genes encoded on the two strands. The red arrows indicate drug-resistant genes, blue arrows indicate transfer genes and the gray arrows indicate the genes encoding hypothetical proteins

Full size image

It turned out that the S. lentus H29 genome carried two identical copies of the gene arrays of radC-tnpABC-hp-fexA (5671 bp) and IS256-cfr (2690 bp), of which one copy was encoded on plasmid pH29-46, while the other was encoded on the chromosome (Fig. 3). To the best of our knowledge, this is the first case that the combination of the mobile genetic element related cfr (IS256-cfr) and fexA (tnpABC-hp-fexA) was identified in both the plasmid (pH29-46) and the chromosome of an isolate S. lentus H29, respectively, even though this combination has been identified in several other plasmids such as pSS-01 of S. cohnii (JQ041372.1) and either IS256-cfr or tnpABC-hp-fexA has been identified encoded in plasmids or chromosomes in other Staphylococcus strains of different source (Fig. 3).

Fig. 3
figure 3

Genetic environments of the fexA and cfr genes encoded in plasmids or S. LQQ24chromosomes. The sequences and their origins are: S. lentus S. LQQ24 chr (the chromosome of S. lentus S. LQQ24 isolated from chicken in China, KF029594.1), S. sciuri wo227 chr (the chromosome of S. sciuri wo227 isolated from swine, KX982170.1), S. lentus H29 chr (the chromosome of H29 isolated from hen of this work, CP059679), S. lentus H29 pH29-46 (the plasmid of pH29-46 isolated from a hen of this work, CP059680), S. cohnii pSS-01 (the plasmid of S. cohnii SS-01 isolated from swine, JQ041372.1), S.aureus BA01611 chr (the chromosome of S.aureus BA01611 isolated from bovine, CP019945.1), S.aureus QD-CD9 chr (the chromosome of S.aureus QD-CD9 isolated from in swine, CP031838.1). Antimicrobial resistance genes are in red, transposase or integrase genes are in blue and other genes are in gray. Gray-shaded areas represent regions with > 95% nucleotide sequence identities. The arrows indicate the positions and orientations of the genes

Full size image

Discussion

In this work, of the 39 CoNS strains from 9 species analyzed, the S. saprophyticus strains, with the most isolates (17.95%, 7/39), were isolated from both the animals and seafood, which was in accordance with the statistics reported [34]. S. epidermis that has been reported to be most commonly isolated from humans [35], was present in the animals as well as seafood. It was found that the isolates from the animals demonstrated wider resistance spectra and higher MIC levels than those isolated from seafood. Although most antibiotic resistance rates of the animal CoNS isolates were similar to those previously reported, the resistance rates for clarithromycin (39.3%, 11/28) and fusidic acid (36.7%, 10/28) were higher than those in recent publications [36], which may indicate the abused use of the drugs in local livestock husbandry.

Of the 39 isolates, 69.2% (27/39) carried one or two florfenicol resistance-related genes, with 26 carrying a fexA gene, 6 carrying a cfr gene and 5 with a fexB gene, respectively. Many studies have reported that fexA is one of the most common florfenicol resistance gene in household animals in rural China [6, 11, 37]. In this study, the fexA gene occupied 70.3% (26/37) of the florfenicol resistance genes. The isolates from animals carried much more resistance genes (91.9%, 34/37) than those from the seafood (3/11, 27.3%), and all 23 florfenicol-resistant isolates were from the animals. It was interesting to find that of the 5 isolates each with both fexA and cfr, two strains presented an intermediate resistance for linezolid (with MIC levels of 8 μg/mL), much higher than those of the other three (with the MIC values of ≤ 0.25 μg/mL). According to previous reports, linezolid resistance was related with ATP-binding cassette transporter gene optrA and it has been identified in bacteria of the animal origin [38, 39]. However, in this work, the optrA gene has not been identified in these strains. This may indicate that other mechanisms rather than optrA conferring the low-level linezolid resistance might exist in the two isolates.

At present, except for S. lentus H29 of this work, no complete genome sequence of S. lentus is available in the NCBI nucleotide database. The whole genome of S. lentus H29 encoded 11 resistance genes, including two copies of the mobile genetic elements (MGEs) related florfenicol resistance genes cfr (IS256-cfr) and fexA (radC-tnpABC-hp-fexA) with one copy of them encoded in the chromosome and the other in the plasmid. This is the first case of one strain carrying two identical copies of cfr and fexA related MGEs, even though these MGEs could be found encoded in either the chromosome or the plasmid of the different bacterial species [40, 41]. It indicated that the MGEs carried florfenicol resistance genes could be horizontally transferred between strains of different species, causing the spread of drug resistance. On the other hand, these MGE-related florfenicol resistance genes identified in bacteria of different origins (such as those isolated from animals and humans) may demonstrate the threat of the use of antibiotics in animals to human health.

Conclusions

In this work, the animal CoNS isolates showed wider resistance spectra and higher resistance levels to multiple antibiotics than those of seafood-derived isolates. The main molecular mechanism that makes the CoNS isolates resistant to florfenicol is the fexA, fexB and cfr genes. Sequncing analysis of the S. lentus H29 genome showed that the fexA and cfr genes were related with the mobile genetic elements and located on both the plasmid and the chromosome which indicated that they may transmit between different bacterial species and cause widespread of florfenicol resistance.

Availability of data and materials

All data generated or analyzed during this study are included in this published article and its supplementary information files. The data related to the paper are deposited in the NCBI GenBank. The accession numbers for the chromosome, pH29-46 and pH29-26 are CP059679, CP059680and CP059681, respectively.

Abbreviations

CoNS:

Coagulase-negative Staphylococcus

BLAST:

The basic local alignment search tool

MIC:

Minimum inhibitory concentration

PFGE:

Pulsed-field gel electrophoresis

PCR:

Polymerase chain reaction

UPGMA:

Unweighted pair-group method with arithmetic means

References

  1. Osman K, Alvarez-Ordonez A, Ruiz L, Badr J, ElHofy F, Al-Maary KS, Moussa IMI, Hessain AM, Orabi A, Saad A, et al. Antimicrobial resistance and virulence characterization of Staphylococcus aureus and coagulase-negative staphylococci from imported beef meat. Ann Clin Microbiol Antimicrob. 2017;16(1):35.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Argemi X, Hansmann Y, Prola K, Prévost G. Coagulase-negative Staphylococci Pathogenomics. Int J Mol Sci. 2019;20(5):1215.

    Article  CAS  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  3. Li P, Zhu T, Zhou D, Lu W, Liu H, Sun Z, Ying J, Lu J, Lin X, Li K, et al. Analysis of resistance to florfenicol and the related mechanism of dissemination in different animal-derived bacteria. Front Cell Infect Microbiol. 2020;10:369.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  4. Schwarz S, Fessler AT, Loncaric I, Wu C, Kadlec K, Wang Y, Shen J. Antimicrobial resistance among staphylococci of animal origin. Microbiol Spectr. 2018;6(4):10.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Yang XX, Tian TT, Qiao W, Tian Z, Yang M, Zhang Y, Li JY. Prevalence and characterization of oxazolidinone and phenicol cross-resistance gene optrA in enterococci obtained from anaerobic digestion systems treating swine manure. Environm Pollut (Barking, Essex: 1987). 2020;267:115540.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Schoenfelder SMK, Dong Y, Feßler AT, Schwarz S, Schoen C, Köck R, Ziebuhr W. Antibiotic resistance profiles of coagulase-negative staphylococci in livestock environments. Vet Microbiol. 2017;200:79–87.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Lang KS, Anderson JM, Schwarz S, Williamson L, Handelsman J, Singer RS. Novel florfenicol and chloramphenicol resistance gene discovered in Alaskan soil by using functional metagenomics. Appl Environ Microbiol. 2010;76(15):5321–6.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  8. Kehrenberg C, Schwarz S. Distribution of florfenicol resistance genes fexA and cfr among chloramphenicol-resistant Staphylococcus isolates. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2006;50(4):1156–63.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  9. Zhu T, Liu S, Ying Y, Xu L, Liu Y, Jin J, Ying J, Lu J, Lin X, Li K, et al. Genomic and functional characterization of fecal sample strains of Proteus cibarius carrying two floR antibiotic resistance genes and a multiresistance plasmid-encoded cfr gene. Comp Immunol Microbiol Infect Dis. 2020;69:101427.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Freitas AR, Tedim AP, Duarte B, Elghaieb H, Abbassi MS, Hassen A, Read A, Alves V, Novais C, Peixe L. Linezolid-resistant (Tn6246::fexB-poxtA) Enterococcus faecium strains colonizing humans and bovines on different continents: similarity without epidemiological link. J Antimicrob Chemother. 2020;75(9):2416–23.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Zhao Q, Wang Y, Wang S, Wang Z, Du XD, Jiang H, Xia X, Shen Z, Ding S, Wu C, et al. Prevalence and abundance of florfenicol and linezolid resistance genes in soils adjacent to swine feedlots. Sci Rep. 2016;6:32192.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  12. Shore AC, Lazaris A, Kinnevey PM, Brennan OM, Brennan GI, O’Connell B, Fessler AT, Schwarz S, Coleman DC. First report of cfr-carrying plasmids in the pandemic sequence type 22 methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus Staphylococcal Cassette chromosome mec type iv clone. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2016;60(5):3007–15.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  13. Tao W, Lee MH, Wu J, Kim NH, Kim JC, Chung E, Hwang EC, Lee SW. Inactivation of chloramphenicol and florfenicol by a novel chloramphenicol hydrolase. Appl Environ Microbiol. 2012;78(17):6295–301.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  14. Tao W, Lee MH, Yoon MY, Kim JC, Malhotra S, Wu J, Hwang EC, Lee SW. Characterization of two metagenome-derived esterases that reactivate chloramphenicol by counteracting chloramphenicol acetyltransferase. J Microbiol Biotechnol. 2011;21(12):1203–10.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Elghaieb H, Freitas AR, Abbassi MS, Novais C, Zouari M, Hassen A, Peixe L. Dispersal of linezolid-resistant enterococci carrying poxtA or optrA in retail meat and food-producing animals from Tunisia. J Antimicrob Chemother. 2019;74(10):2865–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Antonelli A, D’Andrea MM, Brenciani A, Galeotti CL, Morroni G, Pollini S, Varaldo PE, Rossolini GM. Characterization of poxtA, a novel phenicol-oxazolidinone-tetracycline resistance gene from an MRSA of clinical origin. J Antimicrob Chemother. 2018;73(7):1763–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Kehrenberg C, Schwarz S. Florfenicol-chloramphenicol exporter gene fexA is part of the novel transposon Tn558. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2005;49(2):813–5.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  18. Shang Y, Li D, Shan X, Schwarz S, Zhang SM, Chen YX, Ouyang W, Du XD. Analysis of two pheromone-responsive conjugative multiresistance plasmids carrying the novel mobile optrA locus from Enterococcus faecalis. Infect Drug Resist. 2019;12:2355–62.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  19. Liu H, Wang Y, Wu C, Schwarz S, Shen Z, Jeon B, Ding S, Zhang Q, Shen J. A novel phenicol exporter gene, fexB, found in enterococci of animal origin. J Antimicrob Chemother. 2012;67(2):322–5.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Ye H, Li Y, Li Z, Gao R, Zhang H, Wen R, Gao GF, Hu Q, Feng Y. Diversified mcr-1-harbouring plasmid reservoirs confer resistance to colistin in human gut microbiota. mBio. 2016;7(2):e00177.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  21. Liu Y-Y, Wang Y, Walsh TR, Yi L-X, Zhang R, Spencer J, Doi Y, Tian G, Dong B, Huang X, et al. Emergence of plasmid-mediated colistin resistance mechanism MCR-1 in animals and human beings in China: a microbiological and molecular biological study. Lancet Infect Dis. 2016;16:161–8.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. D’Andrea MM, Antonelli A, Brenciani A, Di Pilato V, Morroni G, Pollini S, Fioriti S, Giovanetti E, Rossolini GM. Characterization of Tn6349, a novel mosaic transposon carrying poxtA, cfr and other resistance determinants, inserted in the chromosome of an ST5-MRSA-II strain of clinical origin. J Antimicrob Chemother. 2019;74(10):2870–5.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Stepanovic S, Dakic I, Morrison D, Hauschild T, Jezek P, Petrás P, Martel A, Vukovic D, Shittu A, Devriese LA. Identification and characterization of clinical isolates of members of the Staphylococcus sciuri group. J Clin Microbiol. 2005;43(2):956–8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  24. Mazal C, Sieger B. Staphylococcus lentus: the troublemaker. Int J Infecti Dis. 2010;14:e397.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Hay CY, Sherris DA. Staphylococcus lentus sinusitis: a new sinonasal pathogen. Ear Nose Throat J. 2020;99(6):N62–3.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Ortega-Peña S, Franco-Cendejas R, Salazar-Sáenz B, Rodríguez-Martínez S, Cancino-Díaz ME, Cancino-Díaz JC. Prevalence and virulence factors of coagulase negative Staphylococcus causative of prosthetic joint infections in an orthopedic hospital of Mexico. Cirugia y cirujanos. 2019;87(4):428–35.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Rivera M, Dominguez MD, Mendiola NR, Roso GR, Quereda C. Staphylococcus lentus peritonitis: a case report. Peritoneal Dial Int J Int Soc Peritoneal Dial. 2014;34(4):469–70.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Jarløv JO. Phenotypic characteristics of coagulase-negative staphylococci: typing and antibiotic susceptibility. APMIS Suppl. 1999;91:1–42.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Koren S, Walenz BP, Berlin K, Miller JR, Bergman NH, Phillippy AM. Canu: scalable and accurate long-read assembly via adaptive k-mer weighting and repeat separation. Genome Res. 2017;27(5):722–36. https://doi.org/10.1101/gr.215087.116.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  30. Altschul SF, Gish W, Miller W, Myers EW, Lipman DJ. Basic local alignment search tool. J Mol Biol. 1990;215(3):403–10.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Petkau A, Stuart-Edwards M, Stothard P, Van Domselaar G. Interactive microbial genome visualization with GView. Bioinformatics (Oxford, England). 2010;26(24):3125–6.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  32. Lagesen K, Hallin P, Rodland EA, Staerfeldt HH, Rognes T, Ussery DW. RNAmmer: consistent and rapid annotation of ribosomal RNA genes. Nucleic Acids Res. 2007;35(9):3100–8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  33. Lowe TM, Chan PP. tRNAscan-SE On-line: integrating search and context for analysis of transfer RNA genes. Nucleic Acids Res. 2016;44(W1):W54-57.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  34. de Sousa VS, da-Silva APS, Sorenson L, Paschoal RP, Rabello RF, Campana EH, Pinheiro MS, Dos Santos LOF, Martins N, Botelho ACN, et al. Staphylococcus saprophyticus recovered from humans, food, and recreational waters in Rio de Janeiro, Brazil. Int J Microbiol. 2017;2017:4287547.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  35. Banaszkiewicz S, Calland JK, Mourkas E, Sheppard SK, Pascoe B, Bania J. Genetic diversity of composite enterotoxigenic Staphylococcus epidermidis pathogenicity Islands. Genome Biol Evol. 2019;11(12):3498–509.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  36. Cui J, Liang Z, Mo Z, Zhang J. The species distribution, antimicrobial resistance and risk factors for poor outcome of coagulase-negative staphylococci bacteraemia in China. Antimicrob Resist Infect Control. 2019;8:65.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  37. Sun C, Zhang P, Ji X, Fan R, Chen B, Wang Y, Schwarz S, Wu C. Presence and molecular characteristics of oxazolidinone resistance in staphylococci from household animals in rural China. J Antimicrob Chemother. 2018;73(5):1194–200.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Wang Y, Li X, Fu Y, Chen Y, Wang Y, Ye D, Wang C, Hu X, Zhou L, Du J, et al. Association of florfenicol residues with the abundance of oxazolidinone resistance genes in livestock manures. J Hazard Mater. 2020;399:123059.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. Wu Y, Fan R, Wang Y, Lei L, Feßler AT, Wang Z, Wu C, Schwarz S, Wang Y. Analysis of combined resistance to oxazolidinones and phenicols among bacteria from dogs fed with raw meat/vegetables and the respective food items. Sci Rep. 2019;9(1):15500.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  40. Wang Y, Zhang W, Wang J, Wu C, Shen Z, Fu X, Yan Y, Zhang Q, Schwarz S, Shen J. Distribution of the multidrug resistance gene cfr in Staphylococcus species isolates from swine farms in China. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2012;56(3):1485–90.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  41. Song Y, Lv Y, Cui L, Li Y, Ke Q, Zhao Y. cfr-mediated linezolid-resistant clinical isolates of methicillin-resistant coagulase-negative staphylococci from China. J Glob Antimicrob Resist. 2017;8:1–5.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors would like to acknowledge all study participants and individual who contributed for the study.

Funding

This work was funded by grants from the Natural Science Foundation of Zhejiang Province (LY14C060005 and LQ17H190001), the National Natural Science Foundation of China (81973382, 31500109 and 81960381) and the Science & Technology Project of Inner Mongolia Autonomous Region, China (201800125).

Author information

Author notes

  1. Chongyang Wu and Xueya Zhang have contributed equally to this work.

Authors and Affiliations

  1. School of Laboratory Medicine and Life Science/Institute of Biomedical Informatics, Wenzhou Medical University, Chashan University Town, Wenzhou, 325035, Zhejiang, China

    Chongyang Wu, Xueya Zhang, Qiaoling Li, Hailong Lin, Danying Zhou, Wei Lu, Zhewei Sun, Xi Lin, Kewei Li, Qiyu Bao & Junwan Lu

  2. The Second Affiliated Hospital and Yuying Children’s Hospital, Wenzhou Medical University, Wenzhou, 325027, Zhejiang, China

    Chongyang Wu, Xueya Zhang, Jialei Liang, Qiaoling Li, Hailong Lin, Chaoqin Lin, Hongmao Liu & Hailin Zhang

  3. Institute of Translational Medicine, Baotou Central Hospital, Baotou, 014040, China

    Teng Xu

  4. Department of Laboratory Medicine, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, 610041, Sichuan, China

    Chongyang Wu

Authors
  1. Chongyang Wu
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Xueya Zhang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Jialei Liang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Qiaoling Li
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Hailong Lin
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Chaoqin Lin
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  7. Hongmao Liu
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  8. Danying Zhou
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  9. Wei Lu
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  10. Zhewei Sun
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  11. Xi Lin
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  12. Hailin Zhang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  13. Kewei Li
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  14. Teng Xu
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  15. Qiyu Bao
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  16. Junwan Lu
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

CW, XZ, JL, QL, HL, CL, WL, XL and HZ collected the strains and performed the experiments. JL, HL, DZ, ZS, KL and TX analyzed the experimental results. JL, ZS, TX and JL performed the bioinformatics analysis. CW, XZ and QB co-led the writing of the manuscript. TX, QB and JL designed the work. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Teng Xu, Qiyu Bao or Junwan Lu.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

Not applicable.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

The authors declare that there are no conflicts of interest in this work.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary Information

Additional file 1: Table S1.

Resistance phenotype and florfenicol resistance genes of the CoNS isolates.

Additional file 1: Table S2.

Antibiotics resistance profile of all 39 CoNS isolates.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Wu, C., Zhang, X., Liang, J. et al. Characterization of florfenicol resistance genes in the coagulase-negative Staphylococcus (CoNS) isolates and genomic features of a multidrug-resistant Staphylococcus lentus strain H29. Antimicrob Resist Infect Control 10, 9 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1186/s13756-020-00869-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s13756-020-00869-5

Keywords

Antimicrobial Resistance & Infection Control

ISSN: 2047-2994

Contact us